|
 |
The Story of
a Chess Player
by Jaan Ehlvest
Reviewed
by
Prof. Nagesh Havanur
Arbiter Publishing, Inc., 2004
softcover, 228 pages
ISBN 0-9763891-0-X
Algebraic Notation
|
[Editor: For another point of view, read
Rick Kennedy's review.]
This is the autobiography of Jaan Ehlvest (1962-), a leading
grandmaster from Estonia who has now settled in the USA. Ehlvest has
had a chequered tournament career. He won the European Junior
Championship in 1983 and the championship of Estonia in 1986. He
became a world championship candidate in 1988 losing only to Yusupov.
In his distinguished career Ehlvest has beaten a number of GMs like Anand,
Kramnik, Ivanchuk, Shirov and Rajdabov.
This brings me to the contents of the book. The
interview method whereby the author plays the role of a chess journalist,
asks himself questions and provides his own answers, was first seen in the
celebrated autobiography of Tal (Life and Games of Tal by Mikhail Tal, RHM
Press 1976). Tal fans were so mesmerized by the colourful narrative
that they failed to notice a number of omissions in the book. Indeed,
Tal was far from candid about his problems with authorities and his troubled
married life. In spite of Tal’s success with this method I do not
think it would work in an autobiography.
Few authors would ask themselves deep and searching questions that would
reveal their heart and soul to one and all. Jaan Ehlvest is not silent
on his follies and foibles like Tal.
Indeed, this is an honest self-portrait with warts and all.
Jaan is a clinical psychologist by training. His
scientific temperament lends itself to some deep analysis of the chess mind.
But the factual trivia of questions and answers only slows down the pace of
narration. So what we have here is rather a dry account of an
otherwise eventful life.
History buffs, however, would find it interesting. The
rest of the world knows precious little about Estonia. Jaan’s account
of Estonia’s domination by her powerful neighbours Russia and Germany makes
fascinating reading. One also begins to understand and appreciate the
nationalist aspirations of this proud land.
Jaan has quite a few revelations to make on chess life in
the Soviet era. A case in point is the following account of the
Kasparov-Karpov rivalry:
In 1988 I played in the Soviet Union Super-championship in
Moscow…..The chief arbiter was Botvinnik himself, and a big clash between Karpov and Kasparov took place. My tournament had ups and downs, most
importantly, I drew with the Ks. In the last round, I played with
Karpov. Kasparov was very interested in the result of this game.
My second-Veingold and I were invited to Kasparov’s hotel suite. My
hosts made it clear that if I managed to make a draw, I would receive a
guaranteed place on the USSR Olympic Team. In any case, I didn’t think
of losing on purpose against Karpov as White. The next day, my game
lasted a little more than 40 moves, and the draw was agreed.
(Both Kasparov and Karpov tied for the first place. There was to be a
tie-breaker match. Unfortunately, it was called off. The whole
story appears in the book, Garry Kasparov:
On My Great Predecessors
Part 2. Of course, Kasparov is silent on his own back door
machinations before the last round.-NSH)
Jaan also offers some wry observations on the way the system
worked in the Soviet era:
Chess was actually the first professional sport in the Soviet Union-although
not openly so. The Committee of Sport paid your travelling expense and
later charged only a 30% “ tax” from any prize money you received. The
rest could later be exchanged for “ golden roubles” which you could use in
special shops selling western goods, without waiting in line. These
privileges were granted to chess players for political reasons - the
government wanted to prove that Soviets were like the cleverest people on
the earth because of communism. In reality the privileges were a
Pavlov mechanism - you get your prize, and your praise for the Party starts
flowing from your mouth.
Unfortunately, this critical attitude is
largely absent when he speaks of the present FIDE establishment. The
following bit of panegyric on Kirsan says it all: Later I learned a
lot about him and still admire his patience and diplomacy in dealing with
arrogant chess players.
Surely, Jaan cannot be so naïve as to give a clean chit to a
controversial figure like Kirsan and it stretches one’s credulity to believe
that chess players can be arrogant, but not Kirsan.
To sum up, the autobiography, like the curate’s egg, is good in parts. But
the games are pure gold.
There are 48 games in this book, of which 41 are deeply annotated. By and
large, the annotations are an ideal blend of explanatory prose and critical
variations.
The following game was played in dramatic circumstances:
In Novgorod I faced the new star Vladimir Kramnik in the last round…. The
situation before the last round was very tense. I had only a plus score and
was not vying for first place; but Kramnik still had a chance. Before the game Ivanchuk advised me to try a new move order
in the Queen’s Gambit Accepted…. He had actually tricked me with this
move order a few months back in Riga and I unexpectedly lost with the White
pieces.
Vladimir Kramnik - Jaan Ehlvest
Novgorod 1995
Queen's Gambit Accepted (D23)
1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 e6!?
This move order avoids the unpleasant Furman line 4.e3
a65.Bxc4a6 6.Qe2.
3.c4 dxc4 4.Qa4+ !?
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
After 4.e3 a6 5.Bxc4 c5 because after 6.Qe2 Black has 6...b5
and White does not have time to take on c5 as in the normal Furman,1.d4 d5
2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 c5 6.Qe2 a6 7.dxc5 and so on.
Realizing this, Kramnik takes the game to an unknown path.
4...Nd7 5.e4 Nf6 6.Nc3 a6 7.Bxc4 Rb8
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
Black loses a tempo, but White needs to retreat the queen as
well. If immediately, 7...b5? 8.Bxb5
8.Qc2 b5 9.Bd3 Bb7 10.Bf4 Rc8 11.Rd1
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
11.0–0 c5 12.d5 c4 13.Be2 exd5 14.Rad1 Nc5= is harmless for
Black.
The current preference is for 11.d5 Nh5, and here Gelfand
suggests (11...exd5 12.0–0–0‚) 12.Bg5 Be7 13.dxe6 fxe6 with interesting
complications.
[A detailed analysis of this line may be found in the recent
book The Queen’s Gambit Accepted (Third Revised Edition) by Sakaev
and Semkov, Chess Stars,2008-NSH]
11...c5 12.d5 c4 13.dxe6 cxd3 14.exf7+?
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
After 14.exd7+ Qxd7 15.Rxd3 Qg4! White must fight for
equality and does not have any winning chances.
14...Kxf7 15.Rxd3 Qe8 16.0–0
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
White has two pawns for the bishop and the Black king is
exposed; but the main issue is that the Black pieces co-ordinate very well,
and without the light-coloured bishop White cannot create any serious
threats.
16…Nc5! 17.Re3 Kg8 18.Rfe1?
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
Ehlvest does not comment on this move. The rook does
not belong here. It should have moved to d1 in due course of time.
The immediate 18.b4!? Ne6 creating threats of Qb3 and Rd1 deserved
attention.-NSH
18...h6 19.e5 Nh5 20.Bg3 Ne6! 21.Qf5 Qf7 22.Qg4 Nxg3
23.hxg3 h5 24.Qh4 Bc5 25.Rd3 g5! 26.Qh1
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
An ignominious retreat. 26.Nxg5?? Qxf2+ 27.Kh2 Qxg2# -NSH
26...g4 27.Ne4 Bxe4
27...gxf3? 28.Nf6+ would give White a few counter-chances. -
NSH
28.Rxe4 Qf5 29.Qh4 Rh6
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
A cruel move, not even allowing White to play Qf6.
30.Nd2
and White resigned. It's mate in two.
0–1
More on the author:
Born in Estonia, International Grandmaster Jaan Ehlvest became an
International Master in chess by winning the European Junior Championship in
1983. After tying for the second place in the Zagreb Interzonal in
1987, he became a Grandmaster.
In the first series of the World Cup tournaments, Ehlvest
came fourth after World Champions Anatoly Karpov and Garry Kasparov, and
grandmaster Valery Salov. In 1989, he won the Reggio Emilia
super-tournament ahead of grandmasters Vassily Ivanchuk and Karpov. In
the last World Championship in Delhi he finished on the top-16.
Ehlvest’s highest international rating was 2660, and he has been one of the
top-5 players in the world. In 2003, he won the World Open
Championship.
Ehlvest has been once elected as Zonal President of FIDE,
the World Chess Federation. He is currently an active participant in FIDE’s “Chess in Schools” and various training committees. He is
currently managing Ehlvest Chess Gates, an organization for teaching chess
to children.
|

The
Chessville
Chess Store
Advertisement

Advertisement

The
Chessville
Weekly
Newsletter

Subscribe
Today -
It's Free!!
The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives

Advertise
with
Chessville!!
Advertise to
thousands
of
chess
fans
for
as little
as $25.
Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each
From the
Chessville
Chess Store



From the
Chessville
Chess Store
|