Chessville - by chessplayers, for chessplayers!
 

První mezinárodní šachový
turnaj v Praze 1908

Prague 1908 International Tournament (in Czech)

by Jan Kalendovský and Zdeněk Závodný

Reviewed by Prof. Nagesh Havanur

BRNO 2008 © SNZZ

hardcover, 422 pages

http://smzsnzz.wz.cz/praha/praha1.html
zzavodny@upcmail.cz

This book is a labour of love by two Czech historians, Jan Kalendovský and Zdeněk Závodný.  Thanks to their efforts, a classic tournament has been resurrected in all its glory, a century after the event.

1908 was a great year for chess in Europe.  The great Lasker-Tarrasch World Championship Match was preceded by two international tournaments, Vienna 1908 and Prague 1908.  Both were held in honour of the sixtieth anniversary of Franz Joseph’s elevation as monarch to the Empire of Austria-Hungary.

Lasker and Tarrasch, with their minds occupied with their world championship match, did not participate in these events.  But other players did.  Only Bernstein and Nimzovitsch were absent.  The Vienna tournament featured the young stars, Rubinstein, Marshall, Spielmann and Tartakower.  But they were overtaken by Schlechter, Maroczy and Duras who shared the first prize.

The Prague Jubilee Congress was a mirror image of the Vienna event, with almost the same prize winners participating.  Besides honoring the Emperor, the tournament was held along with an international trade & commerce exhibition.  This was a massive affair with 19 rounds and it took more than a month to complete the event.

The result was once again a success for Schlechter and Duras, who shared the first prize with 13˝ out of 19 points.  Schlechter’s score was well-deserved and he played a number of classic games.  The same could not be said of Duras.  He won two games without having to move a piece.  The first opponent Dus-Chotimirsky forfeited his game as he was stopped at the Russian border for lack of proper credentials.  The second opponent Kvícala withdrew upon learning the death of his parents.

Maroczy who had shared honours with Schlechter and Duras in Vienna could now come only 6th.

The third place was taken by Vidmar, and thereby hangs a tale.  Reaching a simplified position against him in the second round, the German master Leonhardt offered a draw.  Unfortunately, this was not allowed according to tournament rules which forbade draws under 30 moves.  Apparently surprised, poor Vidmar made quite a few hasty moves and lost from a level position –thus dropping a precious half point and ultimately, a share of the first prize with Schlechter and Duras.

But subsequently this 30- move rule was violated with impunity by payers like Maroczy and Marshall who drew their games as they pleased.  Only the hapless Vidmar paid the price for the folly of this rule.

Rubinstein was fourth, succumbing to attack in the games with Maroczy and Janowsky.  He had his share of luck when his opponent Kvícala overlooked a spectacular win.  Curiously enough, the missed opportunity was not noticed for years.  It is to the credit of the authors of this book that they discovered it first.  Rubinstein did play a number of masterpieces including wins against Alapin, Salwe and Vidmar.  While competitive success eluded him, these games must have brought him some satisfaction.

The tournament saw a clash of styles, with tacticians like Marshall, Spielmann, Janowsky and Mieses grappling with strategists like Schlechter, Rubinstein, Maroczy and Vidmar.

This brings me to the contents of the book.  There is a wealth of historical material here, culled from a number of books, newspapers and magazines.  Not only does one learn about the preparation and organization of the tournament, but also gets to know about the selfless work and dedication of the men who made this tournament possible.  The detailed bibliography, appendices and indices bear testimony to the vast research undertaken for this work.

The book is rich in incident and anecdote, and there are detailed stories and reports for every round.  There are 223 games, 10 problems and 2 studies in commemoration of the event.  For annotations to the games, the authors have tapped every possible source from the contemporary period to the present.  The distinguished commentators from the past include Tarrasch, Tartakower and Kmoch.  The commentators from the present include Donaldson & Minev, Razuvaev and Dvorestsky.  The authors have consulted a number of recent opening monographs like Keilhack’s work on Tarrasch Defence and Bronznik’s Colle-Koltanowski System, not to mention the ECO.

The book has an elegant and sturdy design and it is illustrated by a number of images.  It comes as a pleasant surprise to see a very young Rubinstein and the ever dashing Janowsky among the players.

Now for the games:

The following position arose in the game Schlechter- Bardeleben in the fourth round.

As Warren Goldman, Schlechter’s biographer put it, the Berlin master with the van Dyke beard and aristocratic tastes could be dangerous to any player.  In fact it was Bardeleben who ruined Duras’s chance for a solo victory by beating him in the seventh round.  But here he is on the receiving end:








50.h4!! gxh4 51.Rg7+ Kh6 52.Rf5!








The point. The rook occupies the 5th rank vacated by the pawn sacrifice 50.h4.

52…Ng3 53.Rh5+ Nxh5 54.g5 #








An artistic finish.

Alas, Schlechter himself became a victim of Marshall inspired by none other than the ghost of Steinitz after the game was adjourned in the sixteenth round.  Here is the incredible story in Marshall’s own words:

“As I lay awake at night I saw a white shape resembling Steinitz standing near the curtains.  I was scared.  Then I heard a voice like the voice of Steinitz telling me to make a certain move in my game the next day.  Then the spectre vanished.  Frightened though I was, I jumped out of bed, lit a candle, took out my pocket chessboard and studied the move suggested by the ghost.  After deep analysis I found that the move would infallibly win me the game.  Needless to add that I played it next morning and won.  I owe Steinitz much but this is perhaps my greatest debt.”








33.Qc8 c5! 34.Qa8

Schlechter senses danger.

If White accepts the bait with 34.Qxc7? cxd4 35.cxd4 Ne6 36.Qc8+ Kf7 37.Qd7+ Be7 and the threat of ...Nf4 + will be decisive.

34...Bxe3 35.Bxe3 cxd4 36.cxd4 c5!








37.dxc5

Or 37.Qxa7? Ne6 38.Kf2 Nxd4 39.Qxc5 Qf3+ 40.Kg1 Ne2#

37...Qc4+ 38.Kf3 d4 39.Bf4 Qxc5 40.Ke4 Kh7 41.Qd5 Qc3!








Not 41...Qxd5+? 42.Kxd5 and the e-pawn becomes a force to reckon with.

42.e6

42.Qxd4? Qxd4+ 43.Kxd4 Ne6+ 44.Ke4 Nxf4 45.Kxf4 Kg6–+ leads to a won king and pawn ending.

42...Qe1+ 43.Kd3

43.Kf5? Qb1+–+

43...Qf1+ 44.Ke4 Qe2+ 45.Kf5 Qh5+ 46.Ke4 Qe2+ 47.Kf5 Qd3+! 48.Kg4 Qg6+ 49.Kf3 Nxe6 50.Bc1 Qd3+ 51.Kf2 Qc2+

0–1

In the eighth round Rubinstein, playing the black pieces, was beaten by Janowsky in hussar style.  The swashbuckling cavalier won with a combination that earned him the second brilliancy prize.  (The first prize was given to Duras-Süchting, a rather one-sided game.)








42.d5! Rf7

If 42...Rg7 43.Bxf6 Qxf6 44.Rxf6 Rxg4+ 45.Kf2+- !

43.Rxf6! Rxf6 44.Qe6! Qxe6 45.dxe6 Kg7 46.e7! Kf7 47.Bxf6 1–0

The game Rubinstein-Kvicala  in the tenth round was a comedy of errors.








23.Rb1?!

Chasing a mirage.

Better is 23.Qc1! Qd6 24.Qc3 b5 25.a3 Rb8 26.Bc6 Rc8 27.Rc1±

23...b5! 24.Qc5 Bh3!








Courageous play.

25.Qe3?!

Rubinstein errs on the side of caution and he is wrong!  He could have taken the b-pawn without risk. 25.Qxb5! Qf3 26.d6 Qf6 27.Bg2 Bxg2 28.Kxg2 with a slightly superior position.

25...Rd7 26.Bc6 Re7








Black has survived the crisis and launched a counterattack.

27.Qc5??

27.Qd3! is essential, even if it loses the exchange as seen later in the game.  27...Bf5 28.Qf3 Qe5 29.Rd1 Qe1+ 30.Rxe1 Rxe1+ 31.Kg2 Be4 32.Qxe4 Rxe4 33.Bxb5 Rd4 34.Bc6 Kf8=

27...Qe5??

Missing a brilliant win with 27...Qf3! 28.d6 Re4! 29.Bxe4 Qxe4 30.f3 Qxb1+ 31.Kf2 Qf1+ 32.Ke3 Qg1+–+

28.Qe3?? Qf6??

Our silicon friend suggests 28...Qf5! 29.Qc1 Re2 30.f4 Rc2 31.Qe1 Re2!–+

29.Qc5??

29.Qd3! draws  as shown in the note on 27th move.

29...Qe5?? 30.Qe3?? Qf6??








As on 28th move, the combination with 30...Qf5! wins.

31.Qd3

This move is given a '?' in the book.  But White has nothing better.  So the variation given on the 27th move plays itself.

31...Bf5 32.Qf3 Qe5 33.Rd1 Qe1+ 34.Rxe1 Rxe1+ 35.Kg2 Be4 36.Qxe4 Rxe4 37.Bxb5 Rd4 38.Bc6 Kf8

And the game was drawn later in spite of White's futile attempts to promote the a-pawn.

˝–˝ (...60 moves)
 

Rubinstein played better in other games.  The following miniature is a game of theoretical importance.

Mieses - Rubinstein [C21]

1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.c3








The Danish Gambit.

3...d5 4.e5?

This is an error.  4.exd5 is necessary.

4...dxc3 5.Nf3?








After this move White does not have enough compensation for the pawn.

5.Nxc3 is imperative.

5...cxb2 6.Bxb2 Nh6! 7.Nc3 Be6 8.Bd3 Be7 9.Qc2 Nc6! 10.a3








An admission of weakness.  White cannot afford the invasion of the Black knight on b4.

10...Qd7 11.Bc1 Nf5 12.Qa4 0–0 13.Qf4 f6!








Threatening to open the f-file and expose the White queen to attack.

14.g4?

White throws himself on the sword.

14...fxe5 15.Nxe5 Nxe5 16.Qxe5 Bf6!








White will lose a piece after the withdrawal of the queen.

0–1

Let not the language of the book intimidate you.  Of course it would be wonderful if you know Czech and savor the stories and the round by round reports in the book.  Even if you don’t, you can just sit back and enjoy the games.  Language is not a barrier to enjoy the poetry of 64 squares.

Highly Recommended.
 

 

Index of all Reviews


Chess Books
& Equipment