Chessville - by chessplayers, for chessplayers!
 

The Best of Chess Informant:
Vladimir Kramnik (CD)

Reviewed by Prof. Nagesh Havanur

Chess Informant, 2007 ISSN 1451-9399


Vladimir Kramnik (b.1975-) is a player with a striking original talent and he would go down in history as the nemesis of Kasparov whom he beat in the World championship match without conceding a single loss.

In terms of style he is the heir of former world champions, Petrosian and Karpov.  He is a virtuoso of positional play and endgame technique. He does not seek kingside attack and combinative play like Kasparov and Shirov, but exerts tactical control once he has the upper hand in the position.  His Achilles’ heel is his handling of irrational positions.  Sometimes he loses his bearings in those positions.

This CD offers a comprehensive view of Kramnik’s career so far. The distribution of material here follows the standard Informant format:

CLOSE-UP
   Foreword
   Bio & Facts
   Tournaments

GAMES
   843 published games, 391 annotated by Kramnik
   White/Black repertoire trees
   Stats

CREATIVITY
   Best games
      5 golden games
      100 best games
      Chess Informant Jury
   Most important theoretical novelties
      Novelties
      Chess Informant Jury
      Theoretical surveys (C42, D85, E04)

PLAY LIKE KRAMNIK
   Combinations
   Excellent moves
   Attack
   Storming initiative
   Defense
   Endings
   Rare Blunders & Misconceptions

In 4 different formats (Chess Informant Expert, PGN, ChessBase and Chess Assistant)

The section Close-up offers biographical data and tournament crosstables.  Kramnik won the World Junior Championship in 1991.  He became a GM in 1992 when he was seventeen- years-old.  He had the best individual result, 8.5 points out of 9 rounds in the Manila Olympiad.  He became a world championship candidate in 1994 only to be beaten by Gelfand ( 4½-3½).  He received a further setback when he lost to Shirov (3½5½).

Unfortunately, no sponsors could be found for Kasparov –Shirov match.  So it was an irony of fate that Kramnik became the world championship challenger to Kasparov in 2000.

He beat Garry with the score of 8½-6½ (2 wins, 12 draws and no loss!).  The rest is history.

Since his debut in the international arena Kramnik has won a number of elite competitions including Linares, Wijk-aan –Zee and Melody Amber tournaments.

In the main section there are 843 published games (1988-2006) of which 391 are annotated by Kramnik.  Here a comparison with the other two Informant CDs on Kasparov and Anand is inevitable.  Kasparov invariably offers very detailed annotations.  He has few peers in sheer depth of analysis.  Anand focuses only on the critical points of the game, and from this point of view his annotations are lucid and illuminating.  Kramnik, however, is not always forthcoming in his annotations, especially, in the opening phase of the game.

The next section Creativity has a selection of games including 6 golden games, 100 Best games and games selected by the Informant Jury.  They are supplemented by an analysis of opening novelties and the games in which they were produced.

The last section Play like Kramnik includes positions with standard themes like attack, defence and endings.

This CD is worth viewing, especially, on account of the Anand-Kramnik World Championship Match this month (October 2008).

The following game from the CD is a miniature in which Kramnik outwits Ivanchuk:
 

Vladimir Kramnik – Vassily Ivanchuk
Dortmund 1997

Queen’s Gambit Declined (D45)
(Notes based on Kramnik’s annotations in the Informant CD)

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4

Ever ready for an English Opening, a Kramnik favourite.

2...c6

But Ivanchuk is not interested.

The opening transposes to Queen's Gambit Declined in stead.

3.Nc3 d5 4.d4 e6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 b6 7.Bd3 Bb7 8.0–0 Be7 9.b3 Rc8 10.Bb2 c5








Not 10...dxc4? 11.bxc4 c5 12.d5 !

10...0–0 may be better as after 11.Rad1 White may have only a slight plus.

11.cxd5! cxd4?

Black hopes to exploit the pin on c-file.  But the ensuing tactics prove him wrong.

If 11...Nxd5 12.Nxd5 cxd4 13.Qe2 Bxd5 14.Nxd4 0–0 15.Ba6±

So 11...exd5 was mandatory even if White has some pressure after 12.Bf5.

12.dxe6 dxc3 13.exd7+ Nxd7








Not 13...Qxd7? 14.Bf5+-

14.Bxc3 Bb4

If 14...Bf6? 15.Bxf6 Qxf6 16.Qe2 and White is a pawn up with a superior position.

15.Bc4 Bxf3








Black has to seek complications.

Other alternatives allow White to consolidate his position.

15...Bxc3? 16.Qxc3 0–0 (16...b5? 17.Qxg7) 17.Qd4±

16.gxf3

Not 16.Bxb4? Qg5 17.g3 b5.

16...Bxc3 17.Qxc3 Qg5+

The pin with 17...b5? does not work on account of 18.Qxg7.

18.Kh1 b5

Doesn't White lose a piece?








19.Qa5!

No. This cross pin destroys Black's hopes.

19...Rxc4 20.bxc4 Qh5 21.Rg1 Qxf3+ 22.Rg2+- is hopeless for Black.

1–0
 

The next game shows Kramnik emerging victorious from a lost position.

Viswanathan Anand – Vladimir  Kramnik
Mainz (m/3-rapid) 2001

Ruy Lopez Berlin Defence (C67)

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6








The same Berlin wall that frustrated Kasparov's efforts to win with White in the World Championship Match 2000.

4.0–0 Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.Bxc6 dxc6 7.dxe5 Nf5 8.Qxd8+ Kxd8 9.Nc3 h6








In later games Kramnik saved a tempo with 9...Bd7 10.b3 Kc8=

10.h3 Bd7 11.b3 Kc8 12.Bb2 b6 13.Rad1 Ne7 14.Rd2!N








Kasparov played 14.Ne2 against Kramnik in the first game of the aforesaid match.

14...c5 15.Rfd1 Be6 16.Ne2 g5?!








This move allowing the invasion of the White rook on the 8th rank is the decisive error.

16...Nc6 is necessary to complete development.-NSH

17.h4 g4 18.Nh2 h5 19.Rd8+ Kb7 20.Rxa8 Kxa8 21.Rd8+ Kb7 22.Nf4 Ng6 23.g3








He should first play 23.Nxe6!fxe6 24.Re8 Be7 25.Rxh8 Nxh8 26.g3 (with the idea of f3) and White is better according to the Informant Editors.

But this move is not bad.-NSH

23...c4!

Setting a cunning trap in a lost position.

Probably Anand was expecting 23...Nxf4? 24.gxf4 threatening f5 and e6.

He is in for a surprise.

24.bxc4?

And Anand falls for it!

The same exchange suggested on the previous move is still possible here.

24.Nxe6! fxe6 25.bxc4 and Black is in serious trouble according to NiC Magazine reporting the event. -NSH

24...Nxf4 25.gxf4 g3 26.Nf1 gxf2+ 27.Kh2








27.Kg2 Rg8+ 28.Kf3 also loses for White.

27...Bxc4 and White resigned.

Our Silicon friend suggests how the game could have continued:

28.Rd1 Rg8 29.Ng3 Bh6 30.Bc1 Rxg3 31.Kxg3 f1Q 32.Rxf1 Bxf1 33.Kf3 Bc4 34.a3 Kc6–+

Or 28.Bd4.Bxf1 29.Bxf2 Rg8 30.Bg3 Bc4 31.a4 Be6 32.Be1 a5 33.Bd2 Bf5 34.c4 Be4 and Black should win.-NSH

0–1
 

From the Publisher’s site: http://www.sahovski.com/pgn/article60_ws.htm

Highly Recommended
 

Index of all Reviews


Chess Books
& Equipment

 


 



The
Chessville
Chess Store

 

Advertisement


The
Chessville
Weekly

Newsletter

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each


From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.

Copyright 2002-2008 Chessville.com unless otherwise noted.