|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Chessville
Advertise to Single insert:
|
The first thing any chess teacher must do, when meeting a new student, is to discover how much he already knows. Maybe you will ask him to demonstrate the basic mates with queen and with rook. After that, you may set up the pieces and play a few moves with him, to see if he knows to develop his pieces and castle. That will tell you a little, if the student is only a bit better than beginner. But what if he is a more advanced player? How can one determine, in an hour or so, exactly how much chess knowledge he has and where his deficiencies lie? One way to answer this question came as early as 1980, when Danny Kopec and Dr. Ivan Bratko developed a 24 position test for use in evaluating computer chess programs. The test, called the Bratko-Kopec (or BK) test, remained a standard tool for chess program developers for a number of years. The positions test for a number of common tactical and positional ideas.
One of the first things we learned at the camp was that the tests were too hard for some of the weaker young players. Even a player of 1500 rating could be expected to score only about 5 correct on the BK test. So for the second year of the camp, Hal Terrie devised a new test, specifically designed for those of beginner level up to about 1500 rating. In the years since then, four additional tests of varying levels have been constructed, with the goal of testing a wide range of middlegame and endgame concepts. In 1997, the first six tests and some research results were collected into a book, Test, Evaluate and Improve Your Chess, a Knowledge-Based Approach. In 2003, the USCF published a new edition, containing revised and improved test solutions, a new seventh test and updated research from the years 1997-2002. Here now are some samples from these tests. In this article, we will show you some positions from the earliest tests and from the two designed specifically for novice and intermediate players. In a subsequent article, we may look at the other tests, two of which focus on endgame concepts. The BK and New Positions tests feature tactical ideas of
varying difficulty. The student get two minutes to look at each
position and list up to four moves in descending order of preference.
Here are some samples: BK #15: Fischer - Mecking
[CV: After reviewing the position, scroll down for the commentary.]
BK #19: Euwe - Keres
[CV: After reviewing the position, scroll down for the commentary.]
Here is one that tests a positional idea: BK #3:
Bogoljubow - Spielmann
[CV: After reviewing the position, scroll down for the commentary.]
Positions like these first three were much too difficult for
novice players, so the Novice test looks for knowledge of a variety of
simpler concepts. The test has eight positions each in the opening,
middlegame and ending, at a variety of difficultly levels appropriate for
less experienced players. Once again, the student gets two minutes to
look at each position but this time writes down only one move choice.
Novtest #6: Simplify When Ahead
[CV: After reviewing the position, scroll down for the commentary.]
Novtest #13: Only One Recapture
[CV: After reviewing the position, scroll down for the commentary.]
Novtest #9: Seventh Rank
[CV: After reviewing the position, scroll down for the commentary.]
Novtest #22: Rook Behind Passed Pawn
| ||||