|
Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints

Advertise
with
Chessville!!
Advertise to
thousands
of
chess
fans
for
as little
as $25.
Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.

From the
Chessville
Chess Store



From the
Chessville
Chess Store
|
Justice Triumphs
Vladimir
Kramnik's victory in the reunification championship will be welcomed by 99%
of chess fans. The vast majority have been outraged by the false
allegations of cheating with a computer during restroom breaks, hurled
against Kramnik during the contest by the Bulgarian delegates. Fans
have also been horrified by the blatantly biased stance of FIDE, the world
chess federation. Disgracefully, the organising body, led by its
spaceship traveling president, Kirsan Ilumzhinov, who doubles as president
of Kalmykia itself, bent over backwards to support their own champion,
Bulgarian grandmaster Vesselin Topalov. This included unilateral
alteration of match regulations during the contest, and appointing to the
appeals committee the representative of a federation, Azerbaijan, which had
openly come out in support of Topalov!
Before
the match , most commentators had dismissed the eccentric Kalmykian
president as a basket case. I, uniquely amongst chess commentators,
had perceived a glimmer of hope that his billions might still be put to good
use in the promotion of chess, and articulated that view. However, the
pessimists were right and FIDE proved yet again that it is not fit to stage
anything as important as a trip to the zoo, let alone the world chess
championship.
Let me digress
with a brief history lesson. during the mid 1980's and early 1990's , FIDE
under its corrupt then president Florencio Campomanes, continuously broke
its own rules to obstruct the path of the young genius Garry Kasparov.
Indeed, Campomanes was later to be indicted by the anti corruption court the
SANDIGANBAYAN in his home country of the Philippines.
When
Britain's Nigel Short qualified to challenge Kasparov for his title in 1993,
FIDE's disregard for its own rules became so blatant that the duo broke away
from the world body's jurisdiction to arrange their own match for supremacy
in chess. Since then the world championship has been split, with
Kasparov recognised as champion by the world at large, but with FIDE
promoting its own anemic version of the title, at one time held
incongruously by a player ranked number 40 in the world.
In 2000 in London
Kasparov lost to Kramnik, and the genuine succession of champions, extending
back to Steinitz in 1886, passed to the young Russian, then 25 years old.
Kramnik defended his title against Peter Leko of Hungary four years later in
Switzerland, but in 2005, Kasparov, still ranked number one, retired from
chess to boldly go into the bear-pit of Russian politics. His rewards
so far have been a couple of physical assaults (he has been hit over the
head with a chessboard by a political opponent) and very few votes. Be
that as it may, Kasparov's withdrawal from the chess arena made it possible
after 13 years of schism to stage a meaningful contest for the unified title
between Kramnik and FIDE's own champion, Vesselin Topalov of Bulgaria.
The venue, Elista, the capital of Kirsan Ilumzhinov's Kalmykia and the
epicentre of the empire of the FIDE president himself.
Kramnik
could hardly have imagined the weight of official force which would be
mustered against him when he agreed to play under FIDE's jurisdiction.
When he moved into an unexpected lead, as if by pre-arranged plan, Topalov
sprang into action with a whole series of allegations, all of them patently
groundless, which, however, were ratified by the stacked appeal committee
appointed by Kirsan. Kramnik forfeited game five under protest but was
never given this stolen point back. Many grandmasters supported him
openly or advised him to walk away from this farce. Pro-Kramnik
comments poured in from Karpov, Korchnoi, Spassky, Short and reigning
British champion, Jonathan Rowson, while prominent tournament organisers
called for a future sanctions against Topalov. Even the Bulgarian
prime minister, in a vain appeal for fair play, urged Topalov to reconsider
his decision to take the fifth game by forfeit. Chess websites around
the world were swamped with record levels of encouragement for Kramnik and
if cosmic karma alone could have secured victory, then Kramniks success was
assured.
In spite of the
tsunami of sentiment in his favour, Kramnik collapsed in games 8 and 9,
having suffered the further strain of unprecedentedly having to defend with
black three times in a row. Fortunately Kramnik emerged from his selva
obscura, won game 10 and then clinched the title in the playoff.
FIDE now expects
Kramnik to enter their world championship tournament in Mexico next year.
After his experience in Elista, I doubt Kramnik will want anything more to
do with this revolting crew and will prefer instead to go for a match which
upholds the ancient traditions of the chess championship, perhaps against
Anand or even our own Michael Adams.
What is Kramnik's
position amongst the pantheon of champions after this success? He has
survived three title matches and en route defeated the highest ranked player
in the history of the game. He will be champion for at least 8 years.
In my opinion he is now in the same league as Botvinnik, Petrosian,
Capablanca and Karpov, having already surpassed the achievements as champion
of Euwe, Smyslov, Tal, Fischer and Spassky. If he fulfills his
potential he may even go on to rival Alekhine, Steinitz, Lasker and Kasparov
himself, the most outstandingly successful of the great champions.
World
champion Vladimir Kramnik fought back to take game 10 of the match in Elista
and then led by three decisive games to two in games played. However
Kramnik's forfeit from game five had still not been rescinded by FIDE the
world chess federation, and Kramnik announced his intention of suing FIDE
after the match in the court of international sports arbitration in
Lausanne. FIDE has already lost one case there to the former women's
world champion, Susan Polgar. Fortunately this necessity for a
lawsuit, though justly deserved by FIDE and it's corrupt officials, has
receded, since Kramnik went on to win the play-off. Here are my notes
to Kramnik's best win of the mail match:
Kramnik - Topalov
Reunification WCh Elista, Game 10
Catalan Opening

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2
Be7 6.Bg2 0-0 7.0-0 c6 8.Bf4 Nbd7 9.Qc2 a5
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
9...b6 10.Rd1 Ba6 11.b3 transposes to a line of the
Queen's Indian Defence which Kramnik likes as White.
10.Rd1 Nh5 11.Bc1
Avoiding the exchange
of his bishop for Black's knight as occurred with colours reversed in
the previous game.
11...b5 12.cxd5
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
The alternative is the blockading advance 12.c5 but
Kramnik has - to his credit - something considerably more energetic in
mind.
12...cxd5 13.e4
The only logical continuation after the exchange on
d5.
13...dxe4 14.Qxe4 Rb8
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
After 14...Ra6 15.Qe2 the queen forks the h5-knight
and the b5-pawn.
15.Qe2 Nhf6
Black's main trump consists of the control of d5.
16.Bf4 Rb6 17.Ne5 Nd5
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
Black needs just one more move to consolidate with
...N7f6 in order to get a perfectly viable position.
Kramnik acts at once with a seemingly anti-positional trade -
surrendering his Catalan bishop - to thwart this plan.
18.Bxd5 exd5 19.Nc3
Now White must win a pawn but it would appear that
Black obtains plenty of counterplay for his nominal material deficit.
19...Nf6 20.Nxb5 Ba6 21.a4 Ne4 22.Rdc1 Qe8 23.Rc7
Bd8 24.Ra7
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
24...f6?
A blunder - necessary is 24...Bxb5 25.axb5 Qxb5
26.Qxb5 Rxb5 27.Ra2 when White would retain a small but permanent
plus, but this move loses outright.
25.Nd7
25.Qg4 might be even stronger for White.
25...Rf7 26.Nxb6 Rxa7 27.Nxd5
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
White has won a second pawn.
27...Rd7 28.Ndc3 Rxd4 29.Re1
After 29.f3 Black simply loses the knight, e.g.
29...Nd6 30.Qxe8+ Nxe8 31.Nxd4
29...f5 30.Qc2 Rb4 31.Nd5 Rxb5
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
Desperation.
32.axb5 Qxb5 33.Nc7 Qc4 34.Qd1. Bxc7 35.Qd7 h6
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
White was threatening mate.
36.Qxc7 Qb4 37.Qb8+ Qxb8 38.Bxb8. Nd2 39.Ra1 g5
40.f4 Nb3 41.Ra3 Bc4 42.Bc7 g4 43.Bxa5 1-0, Black resigns.
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
Kramnik's most convincing win so far in this match.
-
Ray Keene
Keene On Chess Index
|

The
Convekta Store
Check out our
low prices
on all of Convekta's famous chess education and database management
software.
|
Invest in
your chess future! |
|
|
search tips
The
Chessville
Chess Store
Chess

|
A Chess Book a Mortal can enjoy?
Like Learning a Face-Stomping Opening
over Beer and Onion Rings!

|
"...perfect opening
for non-masters
...many brutal muggings"
- IM Silman |
(Reviews,
Excerpts and
Comments Here.)
|

Reference
Center
The Chessville
Weekly
The Best Free
Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -
It's Free!!
The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives
Discussion
Forum
Chess Links
Chess Rules
Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store
|