|
Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints
Already
Play the
Colle System?Learn to Play it Better! |
The Moment of Zuke:
Critical Positions and
Pivotal Decisions for
Colle System Players |
|

by David Rudel
author of Zuke 'Em
|
|
7 modules written just for
Colle System Players. Over 150 practice problems accompany
lessons written in Rudel's crystal-clear, inimitable style |
|
Thematic Lessons
on game-changing
decisions Colle Players
frequently face
Two Free
Excerpts
Available
|
|

Advertise
with
Chessville!!
Advertise to
thousands
of
chess
fans
for
as little
as $25.
Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.

From the
Chessville
Chess Store



From the
Chessville
Chess Store
|
|
Alekhine's Parrot
TheParrot
Says…Welcome
to the archive of the weekly leader of chess events around the world. Chessville
welcomes your Feedback to TheParrot on this week’s news by
writing to
TheParrot@Chessville.com where selected letters will be
featured.
|
.jpg) |
6-28-2008

Oregon Over
The 10 player round robin event was held in June
2008 at the Portland Chess
Club in Portland, Oregon. Radu Roua (USCF 2209 FIDE 2240) won the
event 7-2 to repeat his victory of 2007. Landon Brownell (2249, 2277)
and Nick Raptis (2305, 2259) tied for 2nd-3rd with 6.5-2.5,
Full crosstable. News
courtesy Rusty Miller

Chess Media – Texas Tech announce
a Million for che$$
Last year,
Texas Tech University generously agreed to host the Susan Polgar
National Invitational for Girls, the most prestigious all-girls event
in the United States, for the next 10 years and award a four-year
academic scholarship for the winner each year to attend TTU.
That is nearly an $800,000 sponsorship package.
A new
announcement June 23rd brings the total sponsorship for the Susan
Polgar National Invitational for Girls for the next 10 years to
over $1 million! Special thanks to Provost Dr.
Marcy, Vice-Provost Dr. Jim Brink, Peggy Flores, and everyone else who
made this possible!
Good enough?
Not for everyone!
The same generous sponsorship offer was made for the Denker Tournament
of HS Champions and the USCF, but USCF President Bill Goichberg and
his supporters rejected the sponsorship offer by Texas Tech
University.

Last week a misunderstanding arose at Chessville between this
columnist and the publisher. In the side-bar game a chess
diagram illustrated the current position – in fact, readers may have
been puzzled why the only diagrammed position for the entire game was
the position on the board before the first move! |
|
|
What to Play? Getting off to a bad start with Bg5 on the
Torre.
This side-bar features an on-going
exploration of the history of opening developments. I
found a terrible first outing for the earliest Torre Attack, or
the Trompowsky as it was to become better known in England.
Anyone know of an earlier game than this
correspondence miniature?
[Event "corr."]
[Site "England"]
[Date "1855"]
[Round ""]
[White "Doherty A J"]
[Black "Ashby M"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Eco "A45"]
1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 c5 3.Bxf6 gxf6 4.d5 Qb6 5.Qc1 d6 6.e3 Nd7 7.Na3
a6 8.Ne2 Qa5+ 9.c3 b5 10.e4 Ne5 11.Qd1 f5 12.exf5 b4 13.Nb1
Bxf514.Ng3 Bxb1 0-1
On the other hand, here is a high-level
game featuring 2. Bg5 against a Dutch set-up:
[Event "Herceg Novi blitz"]
[Site "Herceg Novi"]
[White "Petrosian, Tigran V"]
[Black "Bronstein, David I"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A80"]
[EventDate "1970.04.08"]
[EventType "tourn (blitz)"]
[EventRounds "22"]
1. d4 f5 2. Bg5 c6 3. Nd2 d5 4. e3 Qb6 5. Rb1 Nf6 6. Ngf3 Nbd7
7. c4 e6 8. a3 Be7 9. Be2 O-O 10. O-O a5 11. Qc2 a4 12. cxd5
cxd5 13. Rbc1 Bd6 14.Nb1 Ne4 15.Bf4 Bxf4 16. exf4 Nb8 17. Nc3
Bd7 18. Rfd1 Rc8 19. Ne5 Qd6 20. Qd3 Nc6 21. f3 Nf6 22. Rc2 Na5
23. Qe3 Nb3 24. g4 Be8 25. g5 Nh5 26. Bd3 Rab8 27. Ne2 b5 28.
Rxc8 Rxc8 29. Bb1 b4 30. axb4 Qxb4 31. Nd3 Qd6 32. Ne5 g6 33.
Ba2 Qb6 34. Nc3 1-0 |
|
| |
|
|
Always innovative, we at
Chessville believe this may be a first...
David
Bronstein was famous for taking a long time to make his own first
move, maybe 5 or even 15 minutes, even with the White pieces. When he
was asked why he ‘tranced’ at move 1, Bronstein quipped, “it’s a very
complicated position.” [See for yourself!] |
 |
| |
|

Chess
Media
Problem’s, Problems!
Another item from last week was
about Nabokov, problemist. A
fascinating article by Chessville’s Robert T. Tuohey, which should
engage all you literate people out there, and also all you chess problemists.
If you missed it, well worth a look. What particularly struck me is
that it is unclear from the following extract if Nabokov is talking about
composing chess or literary problems – or even if he is differentiating one
from the other?
But whatever I can
say about this matter of problem composing, I do not seem to convey
sufficiently the ecstatic core of the process and its points of connection
with various other, more overt and fruitful, operations of the creative
mind, from the charting of dangerous seas to the writing of one of those
incredible novels where the author, in a fit of lucid madness, has set
himself certain unique rules that he observes, certain nightmare obstacles
that he surmounts, with the zest of a deity building a live world from the
most unlikely ingredients—rocks and carbon, and blind throbbings.
Chess
Media
Parrot addresses USCF Board over Women’s Championship
Dear USCF Board, and interested parties,
I wish to raise official questions about the recently concluded US Women's
Champion final, on an on the record basis.
It is the general opinion of the super-site
Chessbase that what we recently witnessed was that Americans degraded and
demeaned the game of chess by their conduct during the Women's
championship final.
|
Even tournament directors in Europe do not
recognize the final as other than a deviant form of chess, nor think
blitz any sensible means of resolving tie-breaks for the serious game.
On behalf of Chessville, now very prominent on the
US chess scene, in fact in terms of reader numbers, #1, I propose the
USCF board the following questions which I will also publish, and
continue to do so until it is understood:
1) Does any person on the board //disagree// that
the means of resolving of the championship was degrading to chess and
its players?
2) Who was responsible for choosing this way of
resolving the championship?
3) Do the rules of Armageddon matches allow a
player to move on the opponent's time?
4) While I understand that the TD is bound by the
rules and no doubt has acted properly from that basis, did both
players sufficiently understand the changed nature of the Armageddon
rules to what went before?
I see from one player's reaction that this is not
likely so, because of suggestions of open cheating, and thereby, what
efforts were expended to inform the players of the actual rules under
which they played some form of chess?
I will publish these questions next weekend as an
open letter to the board. I will continue to keep the issue open until
each item is both answered by people with authority to do so, and will
receive any answer made to me by any party here as being in the public
domain, and intended as permission to publish same.
THE sort of
ANSWERS received…
Three individuals responded at generous
essay-length: Frank K. Berry, Tom Braunlich, Don Shultz, with in total
about 4,500 words.
Rather than repeat that correspondence in its
entirety in this column, I understand that two of the questions above
were answered, both to do with rules.
What are the RULES?
Question
3 asked – what do the rules say about if you can move on opponent’s
time – and to paraphrase response: “yes”.
|
|
|
What to Play?
No Plan & Bad Plan
Bg5,
slightly delayed
Kavalek - Browne
US Champ 1986
1 d4 Nf6
2 c3 g6 ['the bishop bites on granite', but where else to
put it?]
3 Bg5 Bg7
4 Nd2 d5 [otherwise on d6, e4 sooner or later]
5 Ngf3 0-0
6 e3 b6
7 b4 [the first non-standard move in the set-up, but
indicated says Soltis to restrain the c pawn: eg 7 ...c5 8 bc!
bc 9 Qa4 "after which White controls key Q-side diagonals"]
7... Bb7 [another, for now, 'bad
bishop']
8 Be2 Nbd7
9 0-0 Ne4? [a strong GM goes wrong before move 12. Black
cannot quite figure out how to get free by either c5 or e5 pawn
advances.
10 Nxe4! dxe4
11 Nd2 h6
12 Bh4
[player's assessment??: the usual result of
playing through an opening is to ask yourself at somewhere
between move 10 to 15, which side would you rather have? I think
the challenge in this game is, if you think its equal, what plan
to use as black?] Want a diagram?

12. ... g5? [black goes wrong again
but wait for the Marshall anecdote] |
|
Did the players know the RULES?
Other items of
substance came from the pen of Mr. Berry, who wrote about question 4:
“Krush said if she had realized this at the time she would have
protested, and argued that due to this mad scramble the result was
not a sporting one, and that a verdict of co-champions makes sense.”
And a fair paraphrase of that is ‘no’.
Certainly Irina Krush did not know them – The Parrot made a follow-up
question to those who answered, asking if the rules were actually
published somewhere, or how we now the players received or understood
them? There was no direct response to this question.
The Parrot pointed out that previous rules
actually stated that the rules themselves should be published in the
playing area, citing Maxwell’s book ‘Blitz Theory’, and which rules
were varied from that?
At time of press it is also unclear if whatever
rules in place were Fide-based, or merely what the respondents said
was common practice in blitz – so I can’t report any clear
answer despite all those words.
Did both players actually
proceed by the RULES?
Mr. Berry responded: “Even so, is it true that
Anna was not playing fair? As Anna and many others who watched
the video have pointed out, Irina also made a questionable move or two
during the time scramble when she knocked over a piece and didn’t set
it back up before punching her clock as the rules require.”
A fair reading of that response which included
the word “also” seems to indicate that neither player proceeded by the
rules. |
|
|
13 Bg3 f5
["a bad plan," said Frank, "is better than
no plan at all." Soltis comments that black needs to activate
his heavy pieces, Queen and rooks. Here the apparent pressure is
achieving a double-edged situation, and Whites 'hidden
resources' says Soltis, come into view]
14 f3! f4?
[question mark by Soltis - though I suppose
it follows-on to with the previous plan with 12 ... f5? I
suppose there may still be wiggle room for black here, if he at
least delays the push]
15 Bf2 exf3
16 Bxf3 Bxf3
17 Nxf3 fxe3
18 Bxe3 e5
[and black escapes the opening having
resolved all his problems, right?]
19 Qb3+! Kh8
20 Qe6! Qc8
[choosing that over Re8 since the resulting
pressure on his King and weak pawns would 'crump' him]
21 Rae1 Re8
22 Qg6! e4
23 Nxg5! hxg5
24 Rf7 and /tilt!/ Black resigned
I
think Andy Soltis suggested above the means to improve on as
drastic a defeat as Walter ever suffered in a US Championship -
the question remains, how to do that, and to when was black's
plan clearly flawed? Which side did the reader pick at
move 12? |
|
And so to the RULES themselves, clear as
day, or as mud?
Mr. Berry continued to say:-
“More importantly, what Anna did on these moves appears to be typical and
not actually “illegal” despite what some players commonly believe.
Mike Atkins, an experienced blitz director who helped write the new USCF
blitz rules, says, “If Player A has moved and is reaching for the clock, in
blitz it is perfectly acceptable to be making your move in response.
As long as you allow the opponent to punch the clock first… This is not
illegal.”
Does that mean you can or
cannot move on opponent’s time? Obviously if you allow the opponent to
punch the clock first… First? Before touching your
pieces? Although you can be ‘making your move in response’ which means
exactly what? preparing to move a piece, or actually completing a move
with a piece?
Certainly someone, even of
Krush’s experience, did not seem to understand what was
‘perfectly acceptable’ in blitz, which might been just coffee house chess,
were also the rules for deciding a national championship.
As to question 1 above – Helluva Rules
No answer to that one from the board, and I
think we can safely conclude that whether it was degrading or demeaning,
remains an open question. It would be fair to say that non-board
members responded rather than answered the question – but the responses who
in terms of denial that anyone should have said degrading or demeaning.
The politest public remark I can find is
“It’s a helluva way to pick a champion,”
said John Fedorowicz.
I suggest USCF change the name of US
championship rules to just that: Helluva Rules.
Who
is going to Beat Polgar? Polgar?
Simul
record attempt
The current world record is by
GM Susan Polgar for 326 Simultaneous Games Played with a 96 percent win rate
in Palm Beach, Florida on Aug. 1, 2005. Her opponents ranged from
4-year-old Hannah Boshell, who lasted one more round than her older sister,
Hunter, to 95-year-old Jona Lerman, who’s been playing the game for more
than eight decades.
Honorable
Gossip this week has it that there may be a new attempt at the record –
perhaps by Susan Polgar herself.
Warning!
Don’t try this at home – I may have misheard the total distance Susan Polgar
walked around that circle, but I thought I heard 12 miles.
Nakamura
wins the Mainz960
John
Henderson has been kind to send us these reports: Second seed GM
Hikaru Nakamura (Smallville) of the USA reasserted his authority as one of
the top dogs on ICC on Sunday by winning the Mainz
Chess Classic online Chess960 title. After winning the first qualifier,
Nakamura beat with ease Cassano (3-0), VerdeNotte (2.5-0.5) and Yarosavich
(3-0) en route to the six-game final.
And in a more closely contested
final, Nakamura beat the young Russian top seed Dmitry Andreikin, 4-2, to
claim the $1090 (700 Euro) first prize, invitation to the FiNet and Ordix opens,
hotel room and breakfast at the Hilton
Mainz Hotel by the banks of the Rhine, just 1 block from the picturesque
Old Town.
All of last week, qualifiers were held here on
ICC for the coveted spots in the 16-player KO Mainz
Chess Classic online
Chess960 finals. The full list of finalists and results can be found at our
dedicated Mainz
Chess960 page.
The
Sparkassen Chess-Meeting takes place in Dortmund 28th June - 6th July
2008. Participants: Kramnik Vladimir RUS 2788, Mamedyarov Shakhriyar AZE
2752, Leko Peter HUN 2741, Ivanchuk Vassily UKR 2740, Van Wely Loek NED
2676, Nepomniachtchi Ian RUS 2634, Naiditsch Arkadij GER 2623, Gustafsson
Jan GER 2603. Official site:
www.sparkassen-chess-meeting.de
6-21-2008
Yerevan Chess
Giants ~ Karen Asrian
Memorial
Took place June 8th and 15th 2008. After
the death of Armenian GM Karen Asrian, the event was renamed to the Karen
Asrian Memorial. Time control 25' + 10' inc.
Round 12 standings
1 Leko - 7.5
2 Aronian - 7.0
3 Sargissian - 6.5
4-5 Morozevich, Bu Xiangzhi - 6.0
6-7 Adams, Gelfand - 5.5
8 Akopian - 4.0
Official website:
http://www.chessgiants.am/

Very Big Attempt at Chess World Record in NJ
After
corresponding with a principal organizer this week, and then extensively
with the entire organizing committee, Chessville has agreed to be a primary
news outlet for an astounding attempt at a Guinness Book of Records event,
in Chess!
Prevention First is a nonprofit agency
dedicated to strengthening the foundations of children and families by
empowering them to successfully handle difficult, everyday life situations
and extraordinary challenges such as violence and substance abuse, and has
been in existence for over 40years.
I
was a pleasure to speak to you yesterday. As I mentioned, I am chairing
Prevention First's Chessfest in Asbury Park for '08. wrote John
Szeliga, who as well as being a Verizon employee is also on the board of a
national foundation for children:
Last years attendance by GM Maurice Ashley certainly was a big step forward
and encouraged this years attempt:
I am chairing Chessfest 2008 in Asbury Park, NJ (through the nonprofit
Prevention First - I am a board member.) We are attempting to set a
Guinness Book of World Records record. We will need to have 13,000+
participants on Sept 27.
Stay tuned for news of this major initiative in chess in the USA directly
relating chess to social benefits for children.
|

Chess Media
‘Nother New Chess Novel
Susan Polgar wrote: The
Fire will be another fantastic book by a friend of mine who is the
best-selling author Katherine Neville. I spoke to Katherine about what
it is like to be a female in chess and some other similar issues. Here
is some info about this book (published October 16th, Ed.):
Katherine
Neville’s groundbreaking novel, The Eight, dazzled audiences more than
twenty years ago and set the literary stage for the epic thriller. A
quest for a mystical chess service that once belonged to Charlemagne,
it spans two centuries and three continents, and intertwines historic
and modern plots, archaeological treasure hunts, esoteric riddles, and
puzzles encrypted with clues from the ancient past. Now the
electrifying global adventure continues, in Neville’s long anticipated
sequel: THE FIRE

2003,
Colorado: Alexandra Solarin is summoned home to her family’s ancestral
Rocky Mountain hideaway for her mother’s birthday. Thirty years ago,
her parents, Cat Velis and Alexander Solarin, believed that they had
scattered the pieces of the Montglane Service around the world,
burying with them the secrets of the power that comes with possessing
it. But Alexandra arrives to find that her mother is missing and that
a series of strategically placed clues, followed swiftly by the
unexpected arrival of a mysterious assortment of houseguests,
indicates that something sinister is afoot.
When she inadvertently discovers from her aunt, the chess
grandmaster Lily Rad, that the most powerful piece of Charlemagne’s
service has suddenly resurfaced and the Game has begun again,
Alexandra is swept into a journey that takes her from Colorado to the
Russian wilderness and at last into the heart of her own hometown:
Washington D.C.
1822, Albania: Thirty years after the French Revolution, when the
chess service was unearthed, all of Europe hovers on the brink of the
War of Greek Independence. Ali Pasha, the most powerful ruler in the
Ottoman Empire, has angered the sultan and is about to be attacked by
Turkish forces. Now he sends the only person he can rely upon–his
young daughter, Haidee–on a dangerous mission to smuggle a valuable
relic out of Albania, through the mountains and over the sea, to the
hands of the one man who might be able to save it.
Haidee’s journey from Albania to Morocco to Rome to Greece, and
into the very heart of the Game, will result in revelations about the
powerful chess set and its history that will lead at last to the spot
where the service was first created more than one thousand years
before: Baghdad.
Blending exquisite prose and captivating history with nonstop
suspense, Neville again weaves an unforgettable story of peril,
action, and intrigue.
http://www.katherineneville.com/
Chess
Media
Alekhine on
BBC Radio
Reader Bob Holmstrom has pointed out a
better
recording of Alekhine’s BBC radio interview.
The
offer still stands – if you can identify the interviewer tell us who
you think it is, then we will amaze BBC who want to know.

US Junior Championship
[photo, below, right: Final photo from the US Junior.
From left to right: organizer FM Tom Brownscombe, US Junior Champion
Tyler Hughes, US Junior co-Champ Gregory Young, 3rd place Daniel Yeager, 4th
place Edward Lu and Karpov School President Marck Cobb.
|
|
|
A few weeks ago the noted
Petersburg GM remarked about ‘the Kasparov menace.’ Here
he is annotating his own game.
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
1.d4 d5
2.Nf3 Nf6 3.c4 c6 4.Nc3 dxc4 5.a4 Bf5 It seems a
pleasant surprise, this variation I play both White and Black.
Many lines I looked by myself, at different time analyzed it
together with such theorists as Elmar Magerramov, Alexander
Khalifman, Vladimir Kramnik, prepared this variation for
utilization on the World Championships...
6.e3
Lately I mostly play so, but in that situation I should
admit this move as a psychological mistake. 6.Ne5 leads to a
more forced (thus simpler to play) game. The more so the
knowledge of this variation I have deeper than of the variation
with 6.e3
6...e6
7.Bxc4 Bb4 8.0–0 Nbd7 9.Nh4 White is going to exchange
Black's light colored Bishop. Another variety of the
variation is 9.Qe2 Further White proceeds e3-e4, capture space,
but Black has a firm position without weaknesses. Earlier
Vasily Smyslov played this variation as black perfectly, now
Evgeny Bareev.
9...Bg6
The other well-known in theory line is 9...0–0 10.Nxf5 exf5
11.Qc2 g6 12.f3 White strives to prepare the advance e3-e4,
Black tries to prevent it.
10.h3
A move has been introduced in practice several years ago by
Kasparov. It's dangerous to exchange on g6 at once since the
opening of h-file, thus White expects Black's castling. More
reliably 10.g3 in order to avoid the 'suspension' h4-Knight,
which Black uses by the next move.
10...Bh5!
A risky continuation which turned out to be psychologically
correct.
11.Qb3??
Certainly I knew that it is necessary to play 11.g4! Bg6
12.f4! whereupon begins a real slaughter. Besides such
play suits to position requirements. Sitting up for about
forty minutes I never could make up one's mind to a courageous
assault of Black's position. One moment I already thought
to exchange bishops by way of 11.Be2 whereupon even Kasparov
hardly would manage to find resources for a serious fight.
The position emasculates by itself quickly and a draw becomes
inevitable. However I considered that it is simply
improperly to play so (I think the same now despite of a dismal
result of the game). One moment I simply twitched not
estimating the position and not counting the lines (strictly
speaking there is nothing to calculate), have made a terrible
Queen move and after it White stands worse.
11...a5
Here I engrossed in thoughts for a long time again. It is
true now it was to think about. White with the last move
deprived himself an opportunity both to finish normally the
development and to set in motion his central pawns.
12.g4
In such interpretation this move is already not an attacking
but a defensive one. Probably nevertheless preferred was
12.Na2 whereupon Black has a pleasant choice between positional
12...Nd5 and attacking 12...Bd6.
12...Bg6
Black has only a perpetual check after 12...Nxg4 13.hxg4
Qxh4 14.gxh5
13.Ng2 0–0
Well also is 13...c5 , after for example: 14.Nf4 cxd4
15.exd4 0–0 Black has an advantage at the expense of a weakened
white king.
14.Nf4 e5
15.dxe5? White should not change the d4-pawn which
took away important squares from black knights. Better is
15.Nxg6 hxg6 16.Na2 (or 16.Rd1 exd4 17.exd4 Nb6 18.Bf1
whereupon Black has only minimum advantage.) |
|
| |
| Despite a low-level turn out for this year’s event which
USCF scheduled for final’s week in chess – quality and drama of the chess
seemed very good according to
Michael Aigner’s report, and also the
official site. 2008 US Junior Closed
Final Standings
Tyler Hughes champion on tie-breaks |
 |
|
| |
|
1. Hughes, Tyler B............... CO 2267
xx DW WD WD L- 5.5
2. Young, Gregory................ CA 2213
DL xx WD WD W- 5.5
3. Yeager, Daniel A.............. PA 2363
LD LD xx WD W- 4.5
4. Lu, Edward J.................. VA 2213
LD LD LD xx W- 3.5
5. Sawyer, Bradley J............. TX 2170
W- L- L- L- xx 2.0
Chess
Media: CL GONZO?
After last week’s editorial here, Ex-editor of Chess Life Larry
Parr writes about chess writing, to applaud Chessville’s efforts at
‘tending the flame.’ The Parrot replies with Chessville’s
philosophy:
Dear Parrot: even in these
rancorous times, you are considering benefits for everyone -- for the
USCF, for the writers, for Chess Life readers, even as you take
Chessville from height to height. Yours, Larry Parr.
CLIMB EVERY MOUNTAIN?
In between them heights, Larry, are valleys. In fact, some
old Scots bloke with hams like oak-trees was pointing out a pretty
winter ridge-line to me, a young Parrot, who was about to lead up a
scarp about as steep as a stairs, but a stairs with no steps on it
covered with ice, the top about 2,000 vertical feet above where we
were standing
[Technically, the ice was good for climbing, crusty surface you
could wang your ice-axe through, and with good grip for crampons, and
no cornices above to tunnel through or fall on your head. The
challenge is that most body weight hangs on the toes, and you didn't
want to cramp on the way up otherwise you simply freeze to death from
exposure far above tree-line, with no help possible.]
But he said, nay laddie, its nae geeten oop thair! Its geeten
oop thair and back agin! - and continued to cackle, vastly amused -
how ye going to cummon doon? he asked, carry 2,500 feet of rope?
A good point, I thought.
Anyway, he more seriously suggested two exit strategies from the
top and made me estimate time and other aspects of a return, also
appreciating that the easy route down would take too long, the sun
being down at 3:15 and walking 4 miles in the dark by compass is a
desperate measure in a whited-out unknown landscape.

[caption, an easy summer climb 4,000 feet above
tree-line with the venerable naturalist Ian Campbell – Parrot in red
shirt.] |
|
|
15...Nxe5 16.Be2 Nfd7! Black
knight immediately goes on an apparent excellent station on
c5, at the same time frees the way on h4 for the Queen.
17.Nxg6 Nxg6! [Not very well is
17...Nc5?! 18.Qc2 Nxg6 19.Na2!; Not so strong is also 17...hxg6
in view of 18.Ne4! taking away c5-square from the black knight.]
18.Rd1 In case of 18.Ne4 Qh4
19.Kg2 Qe7 20.Ng3 Nh4+ 21.Kh2 Rad8 Black has a strong
initiative.
18...Nc5 Kasparov decides to
pass the game into the endgame. I think not less strong was
18...Qe7
19.Rxd8 Bad was 19.Qc2 Qh4
20.Kg2 Rae8 , soon Black will provide f7-f5 or transfer the
knight from c5 to g5 with a mate attack.
19...Nxb3 20.Rxa8 Rxa8 21.Rb1 Rd8 22.Bd1
Doesn't help 22.Ne4 Ne5 23.Kf1 Kf8 24.f4 Nd3 25.Bxd3 Rxd3
26.Ke2 Rd8, and White's pieces are paralyzed.
22...Nxc1 23.Rxc1 Ne5 24.Bb3? My
last fault in this game. An active play didn't go off
24.Ne4 Nd3 25.Rb1 Nxb2 26.Bb3 Ba3 (Weaker was 26...Nd3
27.Ng5 Ne5 28.f4 Bc5 29.fxe5 Bxe3+ 30.Kg2 Bxg5 31.Bc4 , and
White has a counter-play.) 27.Ng5 Rf8 Black keeps an
extra-pawn gradually dislodging white pieces from their active
positions. ; Yet there were chances on a draw if White would
play 24.Bc2! A) It is insufficient 24...Nc4 25.Rd1 Rb8
26.Rb1 followed by 27.Ne4 and 28.Bb3(It is interesting
also 26.Rd7!? Nxb2 27.Ne4 b5 28.Bb3) ; B)
24...Bxc3 25.bxc3 Rd2 (Otherwise White activates the rook
25...Nc4 (or 25...Kf8 26.Rb1) 26.Rb1 Na3 27.Rb2!)
26.Rd1 The turned out to be bishop-knight endgame is a difficult
one for White but it is not very simply to win it. Black's plan
are: to place kingside's pawns on dark squares, to transfer the
knight on c5, to bring the King closer to center and further to
organize a passed a-pawn playing b7-b5. But even this is still
not a win, in the offing was a long viscous play.
24...Rd2 25.Rc2 Bxc3 26.bxc3 Nf3+ 27.Kf1
Kf8! I have not seen this simple move in time trouble.
White couldn't even exchange the rooks.
28.Rc1 Ng5 White couldn't
defense numerous weaknesses, further it is simple.
29.Rc2 Black easily wins also
after 29.Ke1 Rb2 30.Bc2 Nxh3 31.f4 g5
29...Ne4 30.Ke1 Rxc2 31.Bxc2 Nxc3 32.Kd2
Nd5 33.Bb3 Ke7 34.Kd3 Kd6 35.Kd4 f6 36.h4 h6 37.h5 Nc7 38.f4
Ne6+ 39.Kc4 Nc5 40.Bc2 Nxa4 What can I say in
conclusion? One should play chess more actively: 'Fortune
leads the one who strives and drags the one who fears...'
Russian Proverb. Result: 0–1
This is an extract from the player’s own account as sponsored
by Chessville – in the “Lesson’s
Learned” series. |
|
LIFE & LETTERS
And there is analogy to USCF's recent lurches into the void
– I see no sensible rehearsals of what to do on getting into trouble in
exposed situations. No viable exit plans - and only grim determination
to brute force issues through, at the expense of engaging situations beyond
any control, and with potential lethal effects.
Certainly it is the main view at Chessville that we wish to
preserve and protect the game, and I think many players do the same - that's
why they read us. On the contrary, those who boost USCF seem far more
content to boost the organization, which is to say, the fortunes of those
who run that organization - and to continue my analogy above - have now
pushed themselves as high as they can go in difficult conditions, but are
faced with either an unrehearsed and very difficult descent, or to take the
long easy route out - but risking survival itself in getting off the hill
before the sun sets, forever!
That is some level of unwarranted risk, and willy-nilly
people undertake the risk on their own behalf which is their own business,
but what business do they have with what is entrusted to them as our
National resources in chess?
That, my dear Larry, if I may subscribe the general
editorial opinion of my Chessville colleagues, is a very pertinent question
and our constant context.
Chess
Media: Chessville Wants …
To thank those good individuals who responded to our appeal
for infra-structural help. There are a couple more jobs going, plus we
are always looking for innovative columnists – one short-fall of our current
offerings is a bit of chess history…

AEROSVIT-2008
The 3rd International Chess Tournament
'AEROSVIT-2008' takes place 7th-20th June 2008 in Foros, Crimea, Ukraine.
Round 5 standings
were
1 Carlsen - 4.5
2-3 Karjakin, Volokitin - 3.0
4-8 Shirov, Ivanchuk, Eljanov, Svidler, Nisipeanu - 2.5
9-10 Alekseev, Jakovenko - 2.0
11-12 Onischuk, Van Wely - 1.5
One other interesting point so far is
White v Black Scores. White has scored 14 wins, Black has 3 wins and there
are 13 draws.
Could Carlsen handle the lead? Well, here
are the Round 9 standings
1 Carlsen - 7.0
2 Eljanov - 5.5
3-4 Ivanchuk, Karjakin - 5.0
5-7 Alekseev, Svidler, Jakovenko - 4.5
8-9 Nisipeanu, Volokitin - 4.0
10-11 Shirov, Van Wely - 3.5
12 Onischuk - 3.0
Carlsen has an extraordinary performance
rating of 2895, but is not in this round of the World Championship cycle –
lets hope he stays around long enough for the next one, whenever that may
be.
The scene was set for the last rounds;
Susan Polgar commented on the GM play:
In
spite of the nice leading edge when first place was almost guaranteed,
Magnus Carlsen played for a win against Ukrainian Andrei Volokitin who owes
him for a catastrophic 0-4 score in their earlier encounters. The long and
tense battle finished in a draw after 80 moves, and after Eljanov drew with
Karjakin, the first place at the 2008 Aerosvit Foros was secured for Carlsen.
Vassily Ivanchuk once again "shocked" his opponent with an early Qf6, and
this time it paid off as he forced Loek Van Wely to resignation practically
right after the opening.
Final standings:
1. Carlsen, Magnus g NOR 2765 8
2. Ivanchuk, Vassily g UKR 2740 7
3-4. Karjakin, Sergey g UKR 2732 6
3-4. Eljanov, Pavel g UKR 2687 6
5-7. Volokitin, Andrei g UKR 2684 5½
5-7. Jakovenko, Dmitry g RUS 2711 5½
5-7. Shirov, Alexei g ESP 2740 5½
8-10. Alekseev, Evgeny g RUS 2711 5
8-10. Svidler, Peter g RUS 2746 5
8-10. Nisipeanu, Liviu-Dieter g ROU 2684 5
11. Van Wely, Loek g NED 2677 4
12. Onischuk, Alexander g USA 2664 3½
Official site:
www.ukrchess.org.ua/aerosvit2008
6-14-2008
In Memoriam
Grandmaster,
Armenian chess champion Asrian dies at 28
2008-06-09 18:32:34
YEREVAN, Armenia (AP) - Karen Asrian, an Armenian chess
grandmaster who was the ex -Soviet nation's reigning champion and won the
2006 Chess Olympiad, died Monday after suddenly losing consciousness, the
Armenian Chess Federation said.
Asrian was ranked 92nd by the World Chess Federation, or
FIDE. Apparently feeling ill, Asrian pulled his car into a court yard
in the Armenian capital, Yerevan, early Monday and lost consciousness, the
Armenian Chess Federation said. An ambulance crew pronounced him dead
at the scene, possibly of a heart attack, it said.
A moment of silence was held in his memory before the
opening of a speed-chess tournament in Yerevan on Monday after his death was
announced by Armenian player Smbat Lputian.
The Yerevan Chess Giants is taking place between June 8th
and 15th 2008. After the death of Armenian GM Karen Asrian, the event
was renamed to the Karen Asrian Memorial. Time control 25' + 10' inc.
Standings after 10 rounds:
1. Leko, Peter g HUN 2741 6½
2. Aronian, Levon g ARM 2763 6
3. Sargissian, Gabriel g ARM 2643 5½
4-5. Bu Xiangzhi g CHN 2708 5
4-5. Gelfand, Boris g ISR 2723 5
6. Morozevich, Alexander g RUS 2774 4½
7. Adams, Michael g ENG 2729 4
8. Akopian, Vladimir g ARM 2673 3½
Official website:
http://www.chessgiants.am/
Big Report on Chess News USA and Canada
2008
Inter-Service Chess Championship, June 9-13
This year’s edition of chess rivalry between the armed
services is already showing hints of historical proportions. For the
first time ever in the history of military chess, a lone Air Force tigress
laid waste to a field of mesmerized men by defeating the top boards of both
the Army and Navy teams.
Paired
against LCDR Choate (USCF 2050), Elena Dulger (USCF 1828) humbled the Navy’s
top player in the first round. She then vanquished 1LT Macaspac (USCF 1986)
in the second round, this year’s Army champion and top seed. After two
rounds, the leaders with perfect scores are: Bucholtz (Air Force), Carrelli
(Marines), Dulger (Air Force), and Baniel (Army).
The winner of the team competition is determined by adding
scores of the top four scorers for each team, and the team with the highest
score earns the bragging rights as champion. Besides the team event, the top
finisher of each team will take the first four team spots. The remaining two
spots will go to the other top placers regardless of service.
In this scheme, any team can possibly (and only) take three
spots in the US Armed Forces Chess Team. The upside to this arrangement is
that each service will at least be represented. In addition, it also
effectively removes the possibility for one service to exclusively comprise
the team.
The downside is evident as it is possible for players to
earn a berth on the US Armed Forces Team by simply becoming the top scorers
of their respective services. These players may not necessarily be in the
top ten on the wall chart. When this happens, the US Armed Forces Team
essentially is not fielding its strongest team based on results.
The format of the tournament is 7-round Swiss but no player
will be paired against his teammate. The six-player team will represent the
US Armed Forces in this year’s edition of the NATO Chess Championship to be
held in Brussels, Belgium. The dates are yet to be announced.
2008 INTER SERVICE CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP PLAYER LIST
AIR FORCE Rank Rating
1. Keough, Robert W TSGT 2073 [captioned below]
2. Bucholtz, Robert A TSGT 2013
3. Dulger, Elena V AC1 1828 [captioned top]
4. Pagtama, Lawrence B MSGT 1903
5. Ranario, Dan P MSGT 2024
6. Echaure, Samuel COL 2009
ARMY
1. Macaspac, Arthur M 1 LT 2086
2. Drake, Christopher A SGT 1964
3. Pitts, Chris L CPT 1915
4. Baniel, Jhonel B SPC 1932
5. West, Darryl L SGT 1730
6. King, Christopher S PFC 1381
NAVY
1. Choate, Paul L LCDR 2050
2. Nichols, Ryan G ATCS 1605
3. Pihl, Eric LCDR 1440
4. Smith, Victor E LCDR 1687
5. Recinos, Johnny Jeff MM2 1627
6. Dixon, Joseph K YN2 1592
MARINES
1. Adkins, James MSGT 1946
3. Carrelli, Donald Cpl 1704
BANIEL IS CHAMPION, DULGER MADE HISTORY!
Reports Chessville’s own correspondent, Andres D. Hortillosa
www.USMilitaryChess.org
Army Specialist Baniel succeeded in demolishing the Air
Force surgeon Dr. (Colonel) Echaure in the last round to secure top honors
finishing with 5.5 points. A weeklong stellar performance earned him a
hallowed place in the tradition-rich annals of military chess. His
name is forever etched in the record books alongside world famous players
like IM Emory Tate.
The sensation of the tournament, Elena Dulger of the Air
Force finished in clear second. The young airwoman’s impressive
performance commences a new beginning in military chess. For the first
time ever, a woman player makes the roster of the US Armed Forces Chess Team
for the NATO Chess Championship in Brussels, Belgium.
The noted IM Elizabeth Phatz represented Germany last year.
Other members of the team for the prestigious NATO event
are: Tech Sgt. Robert A. Bucholtz (Air Force), Lt. Commander Paul L. Choate
(Navy), and Corporal Carrelli (Marines). The last spot is being
determined this very moment by a playoff match between MSgt. Dan P. Ranario
(Air Force) and Captain Christopher Pitts (Army).
The unique rules for determining the composition of the team
call for a playoff match between the 5th and 6th finishers if not all
services have a player in the top four. The Marine qualifier finished
17th but because each service must be represented by its top scorer
regardless of final standing, he makes the team.
This scheme puts players who finish in 4th, 5th and 6th
places, respectively, in a playoff scenario. If the team is chosen by
the order of their respective standings, the members would be in this order:
Baniel (Army), Dulger (Air Force), Bucholtz (Air Force), Ranario (Air
Force), Pitts (Army) and Choate (Navy). In this configuration, two are
Army, three are Air Force and just one Navy will comprise the team.
The Marines will not be represented but the team yields the strongest field.
Decisive results in the last round changed the ranking order
dramatically. Pitts (Army) defeated Keough, the top seed for the Air
Force. Macaspac (Army) who normally makes the team lost to Ranario
(Air Force). Both Pitts and Ranario, with their decisive games in the
last round, earned them a playoff and the winner the last spot on the team.
The Air Force bested the Army for the team championship by
one point, Air Force totaled 26.5 points and the Army totaled 25.5 points.
Had West won his struggle against Adkins, the team event for this year would
have been tied between the two perennial rivals at 26.5 points each.
The Navy finished in the distant third with 11.5 points. The Marines
with just two players finished with 6.5 points.
Top 5:
1 Jhonel B Baniel 1932 5.5
2 Elena V Dulger 1828 5
3 Robert A Bucholtz 2013 5
4 Dan P Ranario 2024 5
5 Chris L Pitts 1915 5
Team Final Standings
AIR FORCE 26.5
ARMY 25.5
NAVY 11.5
MARINES 6.5
Chess news from Susan Polgar
Stars
out over Vegas - results
Many top tanked players didn’t take part in the US
Championship this year, so there is a chance to see Nakamura and Kamsky at
the Las Vegas Chess Festival June 5 to 8, 2008 at the Riviera Hotel.
Players of note include:
Top finishers at the National Open:
1-6 GM Kamsky, Gata NY 2782 5.0
1-6 GM Fressinet, Laurent FRA 2706 5.0
1-6 GM Petrosian, Tigran L ARM 2666 5.0
1-6 GM Kolev, Atanas BGR 2620 5.0
1-6 IM Finegold, Ben MI 2594 5.0
1-6 GM Friedel, Josh NH 2504 5.0
7-9 GM Erenburg, Sergey ISR 2613 4.5
7-9 GM Khachiyan, Melikset CA 2566 4.5
7-9 IM Robson, Ray FL 2433 4.5
SP World Open for Boys and Girls:
Girls under 8 Co-Champions: Annie Wang, Nicole Zlotchevsky,
Alisha Chawla, Queena Deng 4-1
Boys under 8 Champion: Winston Zen 5-0
Girls under 11 Champion: Leanne Hwa 5-0
Boys under 11 Champion:Tommy Polgar 5-0
Girls under 14 Champion: Sayaka Foley 5-0 (TTU $36,000 scholarship - Out of
state tuition)
Boys under 14 Champion: Matthew Martinez 5-0
Girls under 19 Champion: Rebecca Lelko 4.5-.5 (TTU $36,000 scholarship - Out
of state tuition)
Boys under 19 Champion: Randel Eng 5-0 (TTU $36,000 scholarship - Out of
state tuition)
Official website:
http://www.lvchessfestival.com/
Chess
Media – Chess Life optional
USCF announced last week that the flagship print chess
magazine Chess Life will become an optional purchase with USCF membership.
USCF will also terminate its scholastic magazine Chess Life 4 Kids. The plan
is the mind-child of President Goichberg and is receiving severe criticisms
in the chess community.
Chess
Media – More Trouble from ChessCafe
One upshot of these draconian measures is that the principal
of Chesscafe who retails USCF’s book and equipment business has made several
complaints including the mention of lawyers – Hanon Russell is himself a
lawyer and is probably not kidding around. He seems to have taken
great offense at President Goichberg’s actions, not only cutting back the
magazine but also by using other retailers without any due process, or
notification to himself; behavior he says which hurts his business prospects
representing USCF.
Interactions between Russell and board-member Bauer are in
danger of becoming more than a little uncivil, and the confrontational tone
can surely only end in tears. Here is Bauer’s comment to Russell:
You
and I have had this discussion about what actually happened at the US
Amateur Team East, and you know for a fact it is true. You are an
attorney - put up or shut up.
Since these acrimonious interchanges are with USCF’s
dedicated trading agent, it would surprise me to hear about any mediation
services taking place before law-suits are engaged in earnest, and the
inevitable ending in divorce.
Chess
Media: Chess in Education
USCF Chess in Education workshop to be held in Dallas,
August 7, 2008. Contact: Alexey Root
alexey.root@gmail.com The United States Chess Federation (USCF) Chess in
Education workshop is open for registration. USCF workshop: co-organizers
Dr. Alexey Root and Dr. Tim Redman, sponsors USCF, U.S. Chess Trust, The
University of Texas at Brownsville (UTB), Texas Tech University (TTU), and
The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD)
Thursday, August 7, 2008:
1:00-1:30 USCF Chess in Education committee business meeting (John Buky and
Joseph Eberhard, co-chairs).
1:30-2:00
Dr. Alexey Root, [captioned] author of Science, Math, Checkmate: 32 Chess
Activities for Inquiry and Problem Solving, presents a classroom activity.
Looking to combine
educational goals with chess? Dr. Root presents an activity from her most
recent book that teaches the geometry of the board along with the particular
way in which knights move, all wrapped up in a fun story. Come hear, and
participate in, “Coco Can’t Wait.”
2:00-3:00 Keynote Speaker
Russell Harwood, Chess Program Director UTB/TSC, presents, The Chess Boom in
Brownsville, Texas, and Tips for Duplicating it Where You Live.
Scholastic chess is booming
in Brownsville, Texas, and the surrounding communities. Of the 50
schools in the Brownsville Independent School District, at least 35 have
active chess programs. Six different Brownsville ISD schools have won
national chess championships, led by Dr. Americo Paredes Elementary’s seven
national titles. Two elementary school students have tied for
individual national championships, and many others have finished in the top
five. The chess success of our local schools got the attention of Dr.
Juliet Garcia, President of The University of Texas at Brownsville/Texas
Southmost College, who formed a chess program at UTB/TSC so that area
students would have the opportunity to earn scholarships and compete in
chess at the university level. The Brownsville Independent School
District has gotten onboard, and now allocates about $400,000 per year to
their chess program. Chess has become a source of pride to BISD, UTB/TSC,
and our community, and is now part of our identity. How did all of
this come about? How can these results be duplicated elsewhere?
Are there other successful models in our area? How does the future
look? These questions and more will be addressed during this
informative presentation.
3:30-4:00 Jerry Nash,
Scholastic and FIDE Director for USCF, presents Strategies to Introduce
Chess as an Educational Tool: Coordinating the Five Communities.
Scholastic chess has seen a
dramatic increase within the last twenty years. In 1988, the United
States Chess Federation’s youth and scholastic members totaled approximately
7000. By 2002, the two age groups combined for over 53,000 members.
The state of chess in education may be characterized by its status as two
types of programs: after-school and curriculum instruction. By far the
majority of scholastic chess programs fall within the after-school category.
The coordination of four communities – educational, civic, business, and
political communities – along with the chess community is critical for the
development of opportunities to demonstrate the value of chess for
instruction.
4:00-4:30 Rosalyn B. Katz,
author of The New Jersey Chess Bill; Chess in the Classroom; Start Playing
Chess; and, Play Better Chess, presents Make it Legal – Chess Legislation
and Application.
New Jersey’s Chess Bill was passed in 1993. Fifteen years later,
we examine such questions as: What good did it do? How and why was it
done? How did we overcome obstacles and constraints? Is similar
activity a viable option for your state? How can we go even further?
Those interested in expanding chess in their own states in a legalistic and
practical way, will find an organized approach to success. Booklets
about the process will be provided for those in attendance by the NJ State
Chess Federation. Roz will offer individual consultation, at no
additional charge, from August 6th through August 11th for promoters
developing action plans for their own states.
4:30-5:00
Dr. Tim Redman, [2nd caption] editor of Chess and Education:
Selected Essays from the Koltanowski Conference, presents Chess and Syntax:
Some practical applications for teachers.
In his talk for the Chess
in the Schools and Communities Conference (CISCCON)
, Professor Redman spoke on “Chess and Syntax: An Hypothesis.” In that
paper, he noted that among the counterintuitive results coming from valid
research in chess and education was the effect that chess had on increasing
reading scores among young chess players. He offered as an hypothesis
explaining this result that chess possesses a kind of syntax, and that
learning this para-syntactic system indirectly but noticeably helps
students. In this paper, Dr. Redman furthers his work on that
question. Agreeing with his colleague Dr. Alexey Root that we must
modify chess instruction to meet educational goals, he will explain some
lesson plans that teach chess through emphasizing instruction that explains
it in syntactic and rhetorical terms relevant to language arts instruction.
Address for participant
registration:
For USCF workshop, send
advance fees (made out to U.S. Chess Trust Chess in Education fund) to:Dr.
Alexey Root, 500 Sunrise Cove, Denton, TX 76209, 940-484-2265,
alexey.root@gmail.com
And
now, the Armageddon Game Explanation
Anna Zatonskih tells Tom Braunlich what happened from her
perspective at the termination of the US Championship:
TB: What is your
response about the controversy stirred up by Irina in her Open Letter
published on Chess Life Online a week after the tournament which protested
the playoffs?
AZ: Close to the end of the game Irina knocked her rook over and never put
it back. The USCF rules say: “If, during the course of a move, a
player inadvertently knocks over one or more pieces, that player must not
press the clock until the position has been reestablished.”
I
remember my very fast thoughts at this point: If I will press ‘pause’ and
claim win or extra-time based on illegal actions… I will lose on time!
The “Pause” button is a very small one on the front of the clock. So I
only had 2 seconds and I didn’t have a time to do it! I know Irina
didn’t do it on purpose but I had to move my rook as fast as I could.
I didn’t see any other choice for me.
Irina pointed out (in her Open Letter) that I started couple of my moves
before she pressed her clock. I’ve always liked to watch on YouTube
how strong chess players play blitz. I was amazed how they can make
good decisions in just a fraction of a second. During those games
players with a 2600-2800 ratings and even world champions occasionally moved
before their opponents pressed the clock. This is a common thing in
blitz games.
Here is the full interview:
http://main.uschess.org/content/view/8500/463/
Chess
Media: Want a Chess Toolbar?
I tried it and it works, get your own courtesy the
innovative Chess Ratings Service, CXR at
www.cxrchess.com.
I selected on of many options to add to the tool-bar
including a direct Wikipedia button in case I ever want to find anything at
Chessville. [In-house joke]. The truth is Chessville is perhaps
the most quoted source at Wiki, and there is so much stuff on this site –
its hard to find, no?
Chess
Media: Want a Survey on Chess Talent?
Chessville
has agreed to publish significant results from a chess study by Dr. Robert
Howard of the University of New South Wales, a psychologist working in
education. The Parrot wrote back and forth with him this week:
“I got
interested in the natural talent idea from work on the Flynn effect, the
continuing rise in IQ scores. I have thought that the proliferation
of prodigies in recent years might have something to do with the Flynn
effect, but…”
But it seems the study is somewhat controversial with those
who claim its all ‘just practice’. Soon we can make our own assessment.
Chess
Media: Carlsen soon to be #1?
According to the LIVE ratings, Carlsen is #2 with a rating
of 2792.
1 Anand 2798,1 -4,902
2
Carlsen 2792,2 +27,2
3 Kramnik 2788,0 0
4 Morozevich 2787,9 +13,9
5 Ivanchuk 2778,2 +38,2
6 Topalov 2777,0 +10
7 Radjabov 2744,1 -6,9
8 Mamedyarov 2742,1 -9,9
9 Leko 2741,0 0
10 Shirov 2738,9 -1,1
http://chess.liverating.org/
 AEROSVIT-2008
The 3rd International Chess Tournament 'AEROSVIT-2008' takes
place 7th-20th June 2008 in Foros, Crimea, Ukraine.
The usual very strong cast of participants is present:
Carlsen Magnus g NOR 2765, Svidler Peter g RUS 2746, Ivanchuk Vassily g UKR
2740, Shirov Alexei g ESP 2740, Karjakin Sergey g UKR 2732, Jakovenko Dmitry
g RUS 2711, Alekseev Evgeny g RUS 2711, Eljanov Pavel g UKR 2687, Volokitin
Andrei g UKR 2684, Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter g ROU 2684, Van Wely Loek g NED
2676, Onischuk Alexander g USA 2664. Average rating 2711.7
Elsewhere there is a note about Carlsen now being #2 in the
world, but look at this lead against high quality competition!
Round
5 standings
1 Carlsen - 4.5
2-3 Karjakin, Volokitin - 3.0
4-8 Shirov, Ivanchuk, Eljanov, Svidler, Nisipeanu - 2.5
9-10 Alekseev, Jakovenko - 2.0
11-12 Onischuk, Van Wely - 1.5
One other interesting point so far is White v Black Scores.
White has scored 14 wins, Black has 3 wins and there are 13 draws.
Official site:
www.ukrchess.org.ua/aerosvit2008
Bosna-2008
tournament - results
The annual tournament took place 22nd May - 2nd June in
Saraevo. Format: double round robin.
Final
standings
1 Morozevich - 7.5 [captioned]
2 Dominguez - 6.0
3 Movsesian - 5.0
4 Timofeev - 4.5
5 Predojevic - 4.0
6 Sokolov - 3.0
Official site:
www.skbosna.ba
6-7-2008
Chess News USA
and Canada

North American Chess Association
The
US G30 and G60 championship
events will take place June 28-29, 2008. For full information on the events,
click here.
|

Stars out
over Vegas
Many top tanked
players didn’t take part in the US Championship this year, so there is a
chance to see Nakamura and Kamsky at the Las Vegas Chess Festival June 5
to 8, 2008 at the Riviera Hotel. Players of note include:
1 2782 GM 2726
Gata Kamsky
2 2747 GM 2686 Hikaru Nakamura
3 2706 GM 2656 Laurent Fressinet
4 2666 GM 2616 Tigran L Petrosian
5 2666 GM 2601 Varuzhan Akobian
6 2620 GM 2568 Atanas Kolev
7 2613 GM 2568 Sergey Erenburg
8 2594 IM 2539 Ben Finegold
9 2594 GM 2513 Dmitry Gurevich
10 2584 GM 2518 Alex Yermolinsky
The Susan Polgar
Foundation and the Las Vegas International Chess Festival present an
additional range of activities; the Susan Polgar World Open Chess
Championship for Girls and Boys.
The Susan Polgar
World Open Chess Championship for Girls June 7-8
The Susan Polgar World Open Chess Championship for Boys June 7-8
Scholarships to Texas Tech will be awarded based in part on performance in
these events.
The Susan Polgar International Chess Camp (for all ages) June 5
The Susan Polgar World Open Chess Puzzle Solving Contest for Girls and
Boys June 6
Free lecture by Susan Polgar for all players, as well as accompanying
parents and coaches June 6. A Tandem Simul by Susan Polgar against up to
70 players June 6
The Susan Polgar World Open Blitz Chess Championship for Girls and Boys
June 7
NEW! Parents and Coaches Tournament June 7-8
Breakfast with Susan June 7
Five-time U.S.
Champion and syndicated columnist GM Larry Evans will be on hand to
analyze player games. IM John Donaldson will give a series of free
lectures on how to improve your game. You can also fill your time with
Rule Book Tactics by NTD Tim Just, Bughouse Techniques, and more.
There will be
live broadcast of games from the National Open, and possibly other events
here and on the MonRoi web site.
|



 |

First result
already in: Final Standings of US Game 10 Championship – perhaps the
result is no surprise, captioned is Nakamura looking over Gata’s shoulder,
and the game board displays a Taimanov Sicilian.
1 GM HIKARU
NAKAMURA 6.0
2-8 GM LAURENT FRESSINET 5.0
2-8 GM TIGRAN L PETROSIAN 5.0
2-8 GM SERGEY ERENBURG 5.0
2-8 GM ZVIAD IZORIA 5.0
2-8 GM ATANAS IVANOV KOLEV 5.0
2-8 GM MARK C PARAGUA 5.0
2-8 GM NIKOLA MITKOV 5.0
From a field of
99 players. Official
website. Chess news from Susan Polgar.

Here is One of Many
‘Chess-Monkey’ Letters
Dear Parrot,
I idolize both
Anna and Irina. I viewed them as co-champions when I heard the results.
For me, Blitz is nonsense, and it didn't prove anything except that the
organizers ought to re-think this approach. All of these women are terrific
and I hope they will all play head-on against the men next time.
I agree with
Irina that using blitz games to decide an important championship event is,
indeed, degrading. It is not fair to the contestants, and it is not
fair to the fans. The clock-punching monkeys analogue is a good description
of this circus stunt. Many would argue that Blitz is not even chess; the
outcome could be decided better by a match of Hopscotch. I truly hope that
players can come together and agree not to participate in any such monkey
business.
Robyn Fielding
Sheepshead Bay, NY 11235

Video revelations …
After
inviting many people to review the now infamous Armageddon game to resolve
the Women’s title – here is a response from one reviewer, followed by a
reply by the Parrot on what is known and unknown.
Regardless of whether or not any claim could be made at this late
date, it is well that people are made aware of just who the cheaters are.
The video I watched (albeit in herky-jerky motion) revealed that one of
these two contestants systematically cheated; such cheating ought to be
"rewarded" by forfeit of the game in order to prevent the disease from
spreading...
I think the penultimate move actually shows both players with hands on the
clock at the same time - this means that Irina was about to punch the clock
button after her move, but Anna had already moved and was pushing the button
at the same time - as you note, the video framing makes it difficult to see
if punching the button was before, after or simultaneous with Irina.
The video quality is also insufficient to read the clock data.
According to Irina Krush her last glance at the clock showed something like
6 seconds for herself and 2 seconds for Anna Zatonskih.
Unless Anna actually moved on Irina's time it is not credible from the video
footage to think that it was Irina who timed-out.
What do you think?: here again is
the URL.
I know Tom B, the TD, and am on good terms with him, and also understand
that he has made an initial response to this issue, stating that he will
present further rulings – and of course he can only act from the rules.
As far as I can see, there are several things wrong here - in fact by both
players - an initial early offence is that Irina had not righted a rook
before hitting the clock, but then there is 'hovering' over clock and board
by both players, mostly Anna - and this at minimum obstructs the other
players view of the board, and perhaps even opportunity to move your pieces
or hit the clock without encountering the hand of the other player [again
see for yourself, especially surrounding the situation when a piece is
eliminated by Irina, and seems to fall over on Anna's side of the board
- finally there is moving on opponents time, which obviously happened, and I
must presume is permissible under Armageddon rules.
It both Fide and Blitz rules are varied, and it is allowable to move on
opponent's time, then that aspect of things is eliminated. Otherwise
the rules state that releasing the piece constitutes 'a move' [in the
sense that no other move may be made instead] they also say that a player
should have opportunity to punch their clock. [I cited rule numbers
previously, both for Official Blitz and Fide rulings.]
In terms of 'when a game is over' at least the Fide rule says that it an
offense is registered, then the result of game is still open.
Unfortunately it does not say registered by whom - eg, if the TD sees an
offence or cheating - is that sufficient reason to declare an inquiry?
What, according to Armageddon rules is the role of the TD here?
I suppose, as the video makes clear, a delay in making a complaint may also
be justified - reviewing the video may only be possible after it is
published, and perhaps the player had an intervening travel day as well?
Much seems to depend on these technical factors:
# if you can move on the other person's time?
# what constitutes a reasonable objection time in this specific
circumstance?
# the role of the TD to intercede?
I don't know
answers to any of those questions yet. Until they are answered then
very reasonable doubts exist about the fairness of the result. If
there is determined to be no error, then let us never resolve any
championship like this again!

Chess Media:
Down Memory Lane
Here is a completely
self-indulgent piece of nostalgia from my old county team
[somewhat after I left it, and also missing its previous international star
player P. H. Clarke – replaced here on the top board by a ‘goodish’ young
player who continued his chess career to attain a top-ten world ranking
[currently #13 in world] and play in a World Championship Final.
Played at Plymouth, Devon on 15th March 1985:
|
CORNWALL A |
10½ - 5½ |
DEVON A |
|
1 |
M. Adams
|
208
|
1 - 0
|
G. W.
Wheeler |
194
|
|
2 |
J. F. S.
Menadue |
189
|
0 - 1
|
J. F.
Wheeler |
183
|
|
3 |
D. A. J.
Saqui |
192
|
½ - ½
|
B. W. R.
Hewson |
183
|
|
4 |
H. G.
Coleman |
178
|
1 - 0
|
J. M.
Hutchings |
176
|
|
5 |
R. J.
Grime |
169
|
1 - 0
|
C. M.
Hawthorne |
181
|
|
6 |
S. J.
Piper |
167
|
1 - 0
|
T. J.
Buckley |
177
|
|
7 |
J. J.
Nicholas |
169
|
0 - 1
|
R. M.
Gadd |
172
|
|
8 |
D. Bly
|
145
|
0 - 1
|
R. H.
Lingham |
172
|
|
9 |
E. A.
Horn |
151
|
1 - 0
|
S. A.
Wilks |
156
|
|
10 |
A.
Barkhuysen |
148
|
1 - 0
|
B. J.
Penaligon |
149
|
|
11 |
M. S.
Piper |
142
|
½ - ½
|
R. M.
Bruce |
169
|
|
12 |
Default
|
|
0 - 1
|
Default
|
|
|
13 |
C. Peters
|
142
|
1 - 0
|
A.
Osborne |
152
|
|
14 |
A. D.
Meakes |
132
|
1 - 0
|
R. C.
Luffman |
152
|
|
15 |
D.
Burleigh |
142
|
½ - ½
|
K. J.
Bloodworth |
152
|
|
16 |
P. Bowden
|
120
|
1 - 0
|
Mrs R. M.
Bruce |
141
|
Even
defaulting one game, the Cornish team score a massive result against the
much more populated neighboring county, Devon. The emerging young
power-house first appeared in English county chess in the 1981/82 season.
Here he is on board 15.
|
1 |
P. H.
Clarke |
208
|
½ - ½
|
S. Brown
|
205
|
|
15 |
M. Adams
|
127
|
½ - ½
|
C.
Archer-Lock |
161
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am
not sure of the current ‘conversion’ rate of English grades to American
ones, but Clarke was considered to be a very strong master, perhaps IM
level, and represented England in many Olympiads. A result 12 November
1983 played at Exeter woke everyone up to the young player’s potential.
Board 4 M. Adams 1 - 0 M. L. Newbury. This was a significant result
since Mr. Newbury was rated about 185, and Mickey Adams was still 11 years
of age!
The
top result showed something of the strength of the county’s chess teams at
that time since Cornwall’s population is now about 500,000 whereas Devon’s
is 1,000,000.

And
[Laugh] I couldn’t resist this photograph, 1981/82 of the top club in
Cornwall, Camborne – Redruth, there is a bearded Parrot in the back row! To
his right is Ian George who wants to know if anyone can identify the lady
and girl in the front row?
Chess
Media: Drugs in the [Chinese] Rugs? Tastes Like Squirrel
I see that as well as the Olympics proper, the International Mind Games
World Thing is also to be held in Beijing and that it includes chess, which
will be drug tested by WADA, even though no one can actually think of a
single reason to drug-test for chess. Even Fide can’t say why – and
USCF ‘urges’ Fide not to do it. But Fide does.
|
 |
As well as drugs, last night’s dinner should also be tested!
After all, maybe deep-friend squirrel would give one player an unfair
advantage over the any opponent? While this is a joke, testing
chess-players for drugs is equally absurd. |
|
What Chinese people actually understand of the world of “Engrish Food
Notation” is maybe as best unquestioned as what Fide does.
The last picture is perhaps intended to attract chess nerds? |
 |

Have a rice day.

Want a Chess Toolbar?
A press announcement from Chess Express
Ratings proclaims:- CHESS TOOLBAR
Chess Express
Ratings, Inc. (“CXR”) is making available a free CHESS TOOLBAR for use with
the Internet Explorer or Fire Fox browser. We believe that this is the only
chess-oriented toolbar available anywhere. Features include:
-
connects to a chat room just for chess talk
-
includes chess news ticker
-
useful chess links (more to be added)
-
RSS Feed with chess news and puzzles
-
includes world news ticker
-
picks up radio stations around the globe
-
your local weather
-
includes Google Search
-
lots more cool stuff
-
no spyware!
CXR membership is NOT required to
obtain the free toolbar. The download can be obtained by clicking “free
chess toolbar” from the CXR home page.
Chess
Media: Chessville in the movies !!
Last
weekend Chessville gave its permission to allow its home-page to appear in a
forthcoming movie – as well as Convekta from Moscow, to allow their chess
playing engine to appear in…'THE MESSENGER' COMES TO NYC THIS SPRING. THE
MESSENGER is a moving story that follows the lives of those who are most
personally affected by wars- the soldiers who fight in them, and the
families who lose those they love to them.
Derek Montgomery (BEN FOSTER),
Sergeant First Class, having just come back from serving in the war in Iraq,
is battling his own post-war injuries, and his own emotional battles, as
well- the love he left behind when he went off to fight has created a new
life and a new love without him.
But little does Derek know that the
biggest challenges he will face are yet to come with his new assignment to
'Casualty Notification' duty- a new role means he must be the man that gives
the news that no family wants to hear- that their loved one is not returning
home from war.
And
even more difficult for Derek is the order that he must do the work
alongside Captain Tony Stone (WOODY HARRELSON)- his superior with whom he
immediately clashes. Tony has been around the block, is more experienced,
and has an opinion on how Derek should do everything - inside and outside
military life.
And the fine line between the two
begins to blur as soon as Derek meets Olivia (SAMANTHA MORTON) when he
arrives at her house to notify her that she has lost her husband in the war.
What begins as an instant interest turns into a deeper fascination, and
eventually, an unexpected longing… and complication.
As our main characters look to
connect with each other and themselves after the profound experience of
serving for their country, THE MESSENGER explores the bittersweet-ness of
memory, loss, unlikely love, and the time it takes to heal.
This
is the story of hope, redemption, and life after war- of the life that comes
after death.
THE MESSENGER features
Oscar-nominated actor WOODY HARRELSON ('The People Vs. Larry Flynt',
'Indecent Proposal', 'Cheers') as Tony, BEN FOSTER as Derek ('3:10 to Yuma',
'X-Men: The Last Stand'), and SAMANTHA MORTON as Olivia ('In America',
'Minority Report').
This beautiful script is written by
OREN MOVERMAN, (writer of 'I'm Not There' and 'Married Life'), who also
makes his directorial debut.
Executive Producer is MARK GORDON
(Saving Private Ryan, The Patriot, Speed) who is producing along with Reason
Pictures.
Filming starts May 20th in New York
City.

AEROSVIT-2008
The 3rd
International Chess Tournament 'AEROSVIT-2008' takes place 7th-20th June
2008 in Foros, Crimea, Ukraine.
The usual very
strong cast of participants is present: Carlsen Magnus g NOR 2765, Svidler
Peter g RUS 2746, Ivanchuk Vassily g UKR 2740, Shirov Alexei g ESP 2740,
Karjakin Sergey g UKR 2732, Jakovenko Dmitry g RUS 2711, Alekseev Evgeny g
RUS 2711, Eljanov Pavel g UKR 2687, Volokitin Andrei g UKR 2684, Nisipeanu
Liviu-Dieter g ROU 2684, Van Wely Loek g NED 2676, Onischuk Alexander g USA
2664. Average rating 2711.7
Time control: 90
minutes for the first 40 moves then 30 minutes to the end of the game with
addition of 30 sec. after each move starting from the first move.
International arbiter Oleg Tovchyga (Ukraine). The Shahcom Company provides
live coverage of games in the playing hall and via internet on the official
site and our site utilizing electronic boards "Shahcom".
GM Mikhail
Golubev will annotate games live. The first playing day is 8th June.
Official site.
|
Result:
The 4th PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP
...took
place in Odessa, Ukraine 30th May - 2nd June2008.
Final standings:
1 Tregubov
- 9.0 [captioned]
2 Drozdovskij - 9.0
3 Gelfand - 9.0
4 Ponomariov - 9.0
5 Karpov - 8.5
6 Korchnoi - 4.0
7 Beim - 4.0
8 Golubev - 3.5
Official
site: worldcup.pivdenny.com |

 |
Now
Playing…
The traditional
Bosna-2008 tournament takes place 22nd May - 2nd June in Saraevo. Format:
double round robin.
Round 6
standings:
1 Morozevich - 5.0
2 Dominguez - 3.5
3-5 Sokolov, Timofeev, Movsesian - 2.5
6 Predojevic - 2.0
Official site:
www.skbosna.ba
 Nakamura
joins 2700 Club!
This is from the
website: http://chess.liverating.org/
A number of
players including Hikaru Nakamura, Dominguez, Milov, Gashimov, Wang Yue,
Movsesian, and Eljanov broke the 2700 barrier!
1 Anand 2798,1 -4,9
2 Kramnik 2788,0 0
3 Morozevich 2786,5 +12,5
4 Ivanchuk 2780,5 +40,5
5 Topalov 2777,0 +10
6 Carlsen 2775,4 +10,4
7 Radjabov 2744,1 -6,9
8 Mamedyarov 2742,1 -9,9
9 Shirov 2741,4 +1,4
10 Leko 2741,0 0
11 Svidler 2738,0 -8
12 Aronian 2737,1 -25,9
13 Adams 2734,5 +5,5
14 Grischuk 2728,2 +12,2
15 Karjakin 2727,3 -4,7
16 Movsesian 2727,0 +32
17 Kamsky 2720,1 -5,9
18 Gelfand 2719,8 -3,2
19 Ponomariov 2717,6 -1,4
20 Eljanov 2715,8 +28,8
21 Gashimov 2712,4 +33,4
22 Polgar 2710,6 +1,6
23 Jakovenko 2709,4 -1,6
24 Wang Yue 2707,7 +18,7
25 Alekseev 2707,6 -3,4
26 Dominguez 2707,5 +12,5
27 Ni 2705,9 +1,9
28 Bu 2704,6 -3,4
29 Nakamura 2703,6 +17,6
30 Milov 2703,5 +13,5
Chess news from
Susan Polgar
5-31-2008
Chess News USA
and Canada

Mil-Chess
Now that Chessville has its own reporter
on Military Chess, it will be interesting to note the report on the
forthcoming tournament:
For the first time, there will be a woman
competing as one of the six players from the Air Force in the upcoming
Interservice Chess Championships which will feature the top 6 military
players from the Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine Corps in Tucson AZ (June
8-14) at Davis Monthan Air Force Base.
Her name is Elena V. Dulger, from Hill
AFB. This is the first time ever a woman has qualified from ANY service.
During the qualifying rounds she achieved a 2000+ performance rating.
Source: Kris
D'Alessandro, US Army CFSC.
|

Visuals reveal more information than simple rating numbers
Data Source: the recently concluded
Frank K. berry US Championship reveals some interesting statistics for
all players. The following graphic information is courtesy of CXR
chess, and is a wealth of visual information [3 examples follow], even
fuller statistics can be obtained
here and
here.
The first graphic illustrates
performance by Irina Krush, the second by Anna Zatonskih. What an
amazing difference becomes apparent in the relative black and white
scores; relatively equal for Irina, and extraordinarily strong for Ana
with the black bits. The URL’s above show not only these datum, but
also the only published wall-charts of white and black performance
against respective opponents. |



|
As an additional comparison I chose the third graphic
profiling performance of Batchimeg Tuvshintugs, who quite evidently vastly
favors White pieces over Black.
 Don’t
degrade us…
A fascinating and
important letter from Irina Krush, published as an open letter about her
play-off experience in the US Championships – here are significant extracts
from it with only minor cuts – material well justified publishing at length
in this column since it almost certainly too long for print publications
such as Chess Life:
Open Letter by Irina Krush
May 30, 2008
We then proceeded to the
final Armageddon game, that was to be played without increment. As the
defending champion, I was told by the organizers that I had to choose how
the time would be divided, and Anna would choose the color she wanted to
play. I decided that White would be given 6 minutes, Black 4:30.
Anna chose to be Black with draw odds.
The relevant part of the
game is not that I had the initiative throughout, and maintained a winning
position until the end. The relevant part is, of course, the clock,
since I was deemed to have "lost" the title of US Women's Champion due to my
time running out while Anna had 1 second left.
So, about the clock.
Tom Braunlich, one of the organizers of the event, wrote in his report "At
one point Anna had 2 seconds left compared to about 20 for Irina."
This is a plainly incorrect appraisal of the time situation. Then Tom,
in an attempt to explain how my 20 seconds ran out before Anna’s 2, wrote
that "Anna’s draw odds were a big advantage here – she could blitz out moves
hardly thinking (just moving the piece nearest to the clock), while Irina
actually had to do something with her moves since she had to win."
Unfortunately, this statement also has no basis in reality. Despite
having a winning position, I didn't need to "do something with my moves"-
all I needed to do was move quickly and the person with much less time would
flag first. And, in fact, that's what I did. I moved instantly,
as can be seen very clearly in the video you've posted of that game. I
moved instantly, all the while having a significant time advantage until I
got to 0 seconds while Anna had 1. How could this have happened?
First of all, let’s establish what the true
clock situation was. Tom was certainly off in his estimate, but the
essence of what he said was absolutely true: I had a large lead in time,
let's say 8 seconds to 3 at one point, or as Anna herself says in her
interview, “I realized that I had two seconds. I was so shocked that I
am going to lose right now. She has six (seconds). I played
Rb8-e8 because it was so close to clock.” So let's take 6 seconds to
2. Watching the video, seeing me move instantly, how could 6 seconds
lose against 2?
|
And that's the crux of the matter.
My opponent, seeing herself on the verge of losing on time, began playing
moves before I had completed mine. She made her moves before I hit my
clock, and as soon as I pressed the clock, it was punched back at me.
That is how my lead in time was chipped away at, and this process began
during the advance of Anna’s c-pawn, quite a few moves before the game
ended.
Obviously, making moves before your
opponent completes theirs is illegal. Were it legal, White, having the
“disadvantage” of the first move, would always lose on time to Black if the
adversaries were to settle into the rhythm of Black using White’s time to
move their pieces. |
|
Editor’s Note
Modern e-boards can
be set to avoid the situation Irina Krush describes; that of
pressing the clock before a move has been played, by ensuring a
move is recorded before allowing the clock to be punched.
Both the Shahcom
and DGT companies produce boards that can be configured this
way.
Indeed Shahcom have a clock [Kasparov’s design] which even
prevents the opponent from holding down the clock button so the
other person can’t press their own. |
|
The sad thing is,
no one stepped in as this was happening. No arbiter, no organizer,
did anything to ensure that fair play was being observed in the final
moments of the game. It was a free-for-all, where the person with
the worse blitz habits “won.”
People have pointed out
that I should have registered my protest during the game, or immediately
after. Unfortunately, while I was certainly in disbelief as I watched
my opponent complete 3 moves with her last remaining second and saw myself
lose on time despite starting out with a large time lead, during the game
and immediately after, I had no clear grasp of how she had accomplished
this. It happened too quickly for me to understand, but that doesn’t
mean that it didn’t happen, and that it should be ignored.
An injustice that wasn’t
brought to light at the moment it occurred is no less of an injustice.
Moreover, in our particular situation, it is not an injustice that is
difficult to redress. As no one in our tournament was in any way
affected by our playoff, no games need to be replayed, no scores adjusted,
no ratings recalculated- all that needs to be changed is the way the ending
of this story is told.
It has been announced that
Anna, by virtue of conserving 1 second on her clock, is the 2008 U.S.
Women’s Champion.
I fervently dispute Anna's
claim to the sole possession of this title. I do not believe that a
Champion emerges through one second they have managed to keep on their clock
through illegal means.
In my view, a winner of a
tournament is someone who at some point, perhaps in some minuscule and
barely perceptible way, lifts themselves above their competitors. I
would be interested to hear any view that holds that Anna, through legal
techniques, did anything to earn the title of Champion over me.
|
I’d also like
to address my reaction at the end of this game, when I knocked a piece off
to the side of the board before walking out of the room. This may seem
like poor behavior to some, but I believe that my reaction was nothing
compared to the aggression leveled at me by my opponent during the end of
this game. |
|
Knocking off a piece and
storming away had no power or intention to take away anything my opponent
had been working for during this tournament. When my opponent moved
on my time, however innocuous that may appear to be, I believe that she
was committing one of the worst transgressions possible: depriving me,
through unfair means, of the just rewards of my labor. That is where
the aggression lies in this situation, and not in my expression of
frustration and anger over being wronged.
I want this point to be
clear: my reaction at the end of the final game had nothing to do with
“losing” and everything to do with the way it happened and my perception of
something unfair having occurred.
I had hoped to resolve
this matter in a friendly way, without being forced to voice my indignation
in public. Four days ago, I wrote a letter to Anna explaining my
position, urging her to study the video of our final game, and if she agreed
with my conclusions about what happened, to write a few sentences for
uschess.org where she’d communicate her non-objection to sharing the title
with me. In any case, I told her, I looked forward to hearing what she
had to say. Unfortunately, I have not heard back from her, and since
there is no guarantee that I ever will, I decided to go ahead and make my
views known to the chess community.
What do I hope to
accomplish through this letter? First and foremost, I want the truth
to finally be relayed to the American chess public. As I’ve mentioned,
the final tournament report that was offered to you was misleading, and I
have yet to see a retraction of its false assertions. Secondly, I
believe that to continue into the future, unthinkingly parroting that Anna
Zatonskih is the 2008 U.S. Women’s Champion with no regard for how she “won”
this title, is a travesty of truth and justice. I believe I have at
least as much right to this title as she does, and I would like this right
to be acknowledged. To this end, I am asking for responses to this
letter from Frank Berry and Bill Goichberg, the President of the USCF.
This event was held under their auspices, and I would like to know what they
think of the results, given the evidence of what transpired.
To conclude, I will state
that sharing the title would be an acceptable outcome for me, but I would
certainly welcome any initiative to decide the title in over-the-board
games, with real time controls that don’t degrade the participants into
clock punching monkeys.
Sincerely,
Irina Krush

Chess
Media: Big new Chess Movie
The upcoming feature film MATE
is psychological thriller of mystery and suspense in the vein of MEMENTO and
THE USUAL SUSPECTS.
About MATE :
In a world of corruption and
deceit, two former world chess champions cross paths and are unsuspectingly
drawn into a deadly game of mystery and suspense. Michael Foster and
Kyle Kessler are long time archrivals in the highly competitive game of
sixty-four squares. Each has staked his claim to be the best
grandmaster of his time. Each has arguably been deemed the greatest
chess champion to ever play the game.
Yet, beneath the surface of
tactics and strategies, there is a truth that engulfs them beyond their
calculated geniuses; a truth that suddenly turns their world upside down; a
truth that unfolds and forces them on the run from a group of killers who
have coerced them into a dangerous game of intrigue.
In the world of sixty-four
squares, where lies intersect the truth, nothing is what it seems. Inside
the mind of a chess king, reality is merely an illusion.
|
I have signed
on as a co-producer and I will also have a featured appearance in the film.
The press release for the full cast will be released very soon. I was a
chess consultant for the off-Broadway show " Fit to Kill " back in 2005. It
was a blast! I am very excited about this project and I am looking forward
to being a part of this movie. This article written by Susan Polgar

Chess Media: Fide Issue No News Farce
I forget
exactly how many deadlines have now been over-run in respect of fixing up a
match for the world title qualification between Kamsky and Topalov. Latest
news is that Kamsky's manager announced that Lviv, Ukraine is offering
750.000 USD for the match. Danailov says 'We are ready to play in Lviv'.
But… Fide has announced:-
“As of today,
May 29, there is no money from Lviv in the bank account. The several days
extension, given by FIDE to Mr. Chernenko, has expired last week. As stated
in the official rules, if no other bid makes it by April 11, the match will
take place in Bulgaria.”
Enter the
Shirov Camp, who state:- 2. Mr. Gata Kamsky has declared that he does not
wish to play in Bulgaria. According to the match regulations he should be
replaced by me in this case.
So… someone
had the bright idea of asking the Fide President what’s going on, and
received this reply:
KI: I give my
personal guarantees. The prize-winning fund will be such what has been
specified in the application of the manager of the grandmaster Gata Kamski
Alexander Chernenko: 935 000 dollars. The players will receive together 750
000. Besides I shall declare tomorrow the world championship among women. It
will take place in Nalchik from August, 28th till September, 18th. The
prize-winning fund will be 630 000 dollars.

Ernie beats Fisher, wins Championship
[again]
A few years ago Ernie Johnson
achieved a very creditable draw against a GM. Here is one of his games from
the recently concluded Vassar-Chadwick Club Championships, which he went on
to win, again, against a slightly weaker field than last year.
(3) Fisher, Craig (1800) -
Johnson, Ernest (2009) [A02]
Dutchess County Championship (2), 10.03.2008
1.f4 e5 2.fxe5 d6 3.exd6 Bxd6 4.Nf3 g5 5.d4 g4 6.Ng5 f5 7.e4 Be7 8.Nh3 fxe4
9.Nf2 Nf6 10.Nc3 Bf5 11.Be3 Qd7 12.g3 Nc6 13.a3 0-0-0 14.Bb5 Nd5 15.Nxd5
Qxd5 16.c4 Qd6 17.Bxc6 Qxc6 18.Rc1 h5 19.b4 h4 20.b5 Qg6 21.d5 hxg3 22.hxg3
Rxh1+ 23.Nxh1 Bg5 24.Qd4 Bxe3 25.Qxe3 Qb6 26.Ke2 Rh8 27.Qf4 Bd7 28.a4 Qd4
29.Rd1 Qxc4+ 30.Ke3 Qc3+ 31.Ke2 Qf3+ 32.Qxf3 exf3+ 33.Ke3 Re8+ 34.Kf4 Re2
35.Rf1 Ra2 36.Nf2 Rxa4+ 37.Ke5 Ra2 38.Rh1 Rxf2 39.Rh8+ Be8 40.Rxe8+ Kd7
41.Rf8 Rc2 42.Rf7+ Kd8 43.Ke6 Re2+ 44.Kf5 0-1
Playing the From Gambit is
unusual, so I sent Ernie back a game of my own played by correspondence
about 6 months ago. White deviates at move 5 from Ernie’s game, but it you
haven’t faced Black’s play, its worth playing though both variants to assess
the worth and impact of each line.
Source.
1. f4 e5 2. fxe5 d6 3. exd6 Bxd6 4. Nf3 g5 5. g3 g4
6. Nh4 Ne7 7. d4 Ng6 8. Nxg6 hxg6 9. Qd3 Nc6 10.c3 Bf5 11.e4 Qe7 12.Bg2
O-O-O 13.Be3 Bd7 14.Kd1 f6 15.Nd2 Na5 16.b4 Ba4 17.Kc1 Nc6 18.Rb1 a6 19.Re1
Rxh2 20.Re2 Bxg3 21.Nf1 Ne5 22.Qd2 Rxg2 23.Rxg2 Be1 24.Qe2 Bb5 25.Qc2 Bxf1
26.Rg1 Bd3 27.Qd1 Bxb1 28.Kxb1 Bxc3 29.Qc2 Qxb4 30.Kc1 Bb2 31.Qxb2 Nd3 0-1 |
|
The Kasparov Menace
Here is a fascinating extract from a letter
of one player’s
experience.
Sakaev,K (2657) - Kasparov,G
(2830)
EU Club Cup tt Rethymnon (4), 01.10.2003
The game with
Kasparov is always an event for any chess player, especially
when you meet with him for the first time. I felt a huge
emotion before the start the more so the game has been played
for the team and I sensed an immense responsibility.
Perhaps at that moment it would be better for me to play with
Black. I would be more calm. If I lost nothing terrible,
nevertheless black color, Kasparov... But if I managed to
hold out I would feel myself as a hero. In contemporary
chess on a top level white color is a big odds, so I perfectly
understood that I am not at all obliged to lose and my team
certainly has been intended to gain at last half a point on my
board. All night I spent in a preparation (time by time I
tried to go to bed but all the same failed to sleep), even the
most perspective and firm positions seemed to me as risky ones.
On the one hand I would like very much to play an interesting
game, nevertheless I play with Kasparov not every day, on the
other hand it would be better to play more reliably since I felt
a big responsibility before the team. Running a few steps
forward I should say that turned out to be neither. The
game I have played unfortunately became the worst in quality
from my side for many years since I began to play in adult
chess. Really an energy which is radiated by Kasparov
during the game along with a natural emotion disturbs to play
very much. For the first time in my life I have spent more
than one hour for first twelve moves (from which I made only two
my own, both very bad moves). I don't understand what I
thought about...I remember well as on the next day I watch a
similar picture in the game Kasparov-Grischuk. Alexander
set stock-still, couldn't make a move and only when he hadn't
time for emotion (it remained twenty minutes for about 25 moves
in a difficult position) and he has been forced to take quick
decisions, Grischuk began offer the resistance. Already
after the game Boris Gelfand approached to me and said that it's
an usual occurrence almost with everybody. He, for
example, only after about ten games managed to cultivate an
immunity against Kasparov's magic beginning to play in an usual
force. Legendary Victor Korchnoi, the member of my team,
expressed similarly saying that formerly he also radiated energy
which depressed and prevented to play in full force of many
tried and tested avenues.
~
In
a subsequent
interview I asked Mark Taimanov about this ‘menace factor’
and he replied, O Yes! Kasparov has it, Korchnoi has it,
Fischer has it, and most of all, in his opinion, Mikhail Tal had
it.
Perhaps I can
repeat the game itself here in a subsequent column, together
with Sakaev’s own comments. |
|

Chess Media: Chessville too?
I am currently sworn to secrecy for a week, but seems like
Chessville will also be in the movies! I know this message is a tease, but
this is my way of saying nothing about something which seems quite real.
Don’t shoot the messenger!

The
4th PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP will take place in Odessa, Ukraine 30th May -
2nd June2008. The prize fund is USD 35,000. As usual, some of the world's
most famous chess players will compete in this rapid chess tournament. So
this year Anatoly Karpov (Russia), Viktor Korchnoi (Switzerland), Ruslan
Ponomariov (Ukraine) and Boris Gelfand (Israel) will take part. The number
of contestants is reduced from 10 to 8, and the time control will be
shortened (10 minutes on the game with an increment of 5 seconds for move),
but in exchange, the grandmasters will play not one but two games against
each other. The rest participants are Pavel Tregubov (Russia), Valery Beim
(Austria) 2523, Yuri Drozdovskij (Ukraine) 2581, Mikhail Golubev (Ukraine)
2474. The winners of the three previous tournaments were: 2005 GM Ruslan
Ponomariov (Ukraine), 2006 GM Joel Lautier (France), 2007 GM Vassily
Ivanchuk (Ukraine). The main organiser of the tournament is Bank Pivdenny (en.bank.com.ua),
which is the largest bank in the southern part of Ukraine. Pivdenny also
organised the 2007 and 2008 ACP World Rapid Chess Cups, which were won by
Peter Leko (Hungary) and Teimour Radjabov (Azerbaijan), respectively.
The Shahcom Company will provide live
coverage of games in the playing hall and via internet on the official site
and our site utilizing electronic boards "Shahcom" You are able to watch the
games of "3rd PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP" from our Archive section.
Five rounds were played in the first day
of Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup.
1-2. Drozdovskij, Yuri g UKR 2581 4
1-2. Ponomariov, Ruslan g UKR 2719 4
3. Gelfand, Boris g ISR 2723 3½
4. Tregubov, Pavel V g RUS 2629 3
5-7. Karpov, Anatoly g RUS 2655 1½
5-7. Beim, Valery g AUT 2523 1½
5-7. Korchnoi, Viktor g SUI 2598 1½
Official site:
worldcup.pivdenny.com

Now Playing…
The traditional Bosna-2008 tournament
takes place 22nd May - 2nd June in Saraevo. Format: double round robin.
Morozevich
Alexander RUS 2774, Movsesian Sergei SVK 2695, Dominguez Perez Leinier 2695
CUB, Sokolov Ivan 2690 NED, Timofeev Artyom 2664 RUS, Predojevic Borki 2651
BIH.
Round 3 standings
1 Morozevich - 2.5
2 Dominguez - 2.0
3-4 Sokolov, Timofeev - 1.5
5 Movsesian - 1.0
6 Predojevic - 0.5
Illustrated is the playing arena, with
large electronic display boards in the background.
GM Susan Polgar had this to say about his
Friday May 29th performance: When he is on, he is virtually
unstoppable. At this pace, Morozevich is approaching 2800! After 6 games, he
has 4 wins and 2 draws against opponents around 2680 average for a
performance in the mid 2900!
GM Morozevich (2774) - GM Sokolov (2690) [C45]
29.05.2008 - Sarajevo - Round 6
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4
4.Nxd4 Bb4+ 5.c3 Bc5 6.Nxc6 bxc6 7.Bd3 Ne7 8.0–0 0–0 9.Bg5 f6 10.Bh4 d6
11.Nd2 Ng6 12.Bg3 f5 13.exf5 Bxf5 14.Bxf5 Rxf5 15.a4 a6 16.Qb3+ Kh8 17.Qb7
Rb8 18.Qxa6 Rxb2 19.Ne4 h5 20.h4 Rb6 21.Qc4 Qg8 22.Qe2 Rb8 23.Ng5 Nf8
24.Qxh5+ Nh7 25.Rae1 Bb6 26.Re7 Rbf8 27.Kh2 R5f6 28.a5 White wins 1–0
Official site:
www.skbosna.ba
5-24-2008
Chess News USA
and Canada

Sooner or later the First part of the
Parrot will have to be renamed, “Chess News of The Americas.”
This week the Parrot made some delightful connections with chess organizers
in the Caribbean, and Chessville intends to report the chess scene there
more frequently. A big and innovative tournament is taking place in Jamaica
this summer – and there is also an annual youth chess event in Barbados –
both deserving greater publicity, which Chessville is pleased to supply.
Of course, it would be good to have a regular reporter from Mexico too…
SPICE
CUP GOING TO BE HUGE
Official announcements now confirm the quality the event – which last time I
heard any news was a category 15, with average ratings 2600+ USCF. This
update now exceeds 2600 FIDE.
As of this moment, the 2008 SPICE Cup (which will take place at Texas Tech
University in Lubbock, Texas from September 19-28, 2008) is a FIDE Category
15 event with an average rating of 2603 FIDE and 2675 USCF.
We will announce the next group of players shortly. We did not anticipate
the amount of grandmasters requesting for invitations. With only three spots
remaining, there are nearly 20 requests by GMs with ratings from 2570 to
2700. One of our goals is to be able to add a group B by next year.
Here are the confirmed players so far:
USA - GM Onischuk, Alexander 2728 USCF / 2663 FIDE
USA - GM Akobian, Varuzhan 2666 USCF / 2612 FIDE
USA - GM Kaidanov, Gregory 2697 USCF / 2611 FIDE
USA - GM Becerra, Julio 2644 USCF / 2601 FIDE
GER - GM Kritz, Leonid 2667 USCF / 2600 FIDE
POL - GM Miton, Kamil 2703 USCF / 2581 FIDE
USA - GM Perelshteyn, Eugene 2623 USCF / 2549 FIDE
Average USCF rating so far: 2675
Average FIDE rating so far: 2603
Source: Susan Polgar

Frank
K Berry US Chess Championship
Anyway –
like Ivanchuk’s recent performance, it is unsual to rip off 5 wins against
your peers, but Anna [captioned] just went 6! Here is her nice win
with black in a French.
Abrahamyan, T (2239) - Zatonskih, A (2458) [C02]
Frank K Berry ch-USA w Tulsa USA (5), 17.05.2008
1.e4
e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3 Bd7 6.Be2 Rc8 7.a3 c4 8.0-0 Na5 9.Nbd2 Bc6
10.g3 Qd7 11.Nh4 Ba4 12.Qe1 Ne7 13.f4 h5 14.h3 Kd8 15.g4 hxg4 16.hxg4 Kc7
17.Qg3 Kb8 18.Ndf3 Ka8 19.Be3 Bc2 20.Rac1 Bh7 21.Ng5 Bg8 22.f5 exf5 23.gxf5
f6 24.e6 Qe8 25.Nh3 Bh7 26.Bg4 Rd8 27.Nf4 g5 28.fxg6 Bxg6 29.Rce1 Be4
30.Nfg2 Bg7 31.Bf3 Bxf3 32.Rxf3 Rg8 33.Bf4 Nac6 34.Bc7 Rc8 35.Bd6 Qh5 36.Qf2
Rh8 37.Rg3 Qh7 38.Qf4 Bh6 39.Qf3 Bg5 40.Rh3 Rcg8 41.Kh2 Bxh4
0-1
With
one round to go these were the leader standings:
Men's
leaders:
1
Shulman, Yury GM 2664 USA 6.5
2-3 Kudrin, Sergey GM 2610 USA 5.5
2-3 Onischuk, Alexander GM 2728 USA 5.5
4-6 Friedel, Josh IM 2511 USA 5.0
4-6 Perelshteyn, Eugene GM 2615 USA 5.0
4-6 Akobian, Varuzhan GM 2666 USA 5.0
Women's
leaders:
[captioned is Irina Krush in her new red glasses]
1
Krush, Irina IM 2515 USA 7.0
2 Zatonskih, Anna IM 2490 USA 6.5
3 Abrahamyan, Tatev WFM 2280 USA 6.0
4 Rohonyan, Katerine WGM 2318 USA 5.5
Endgame: Final Results
In
the men’s, GM Yury Shulman handily won the 2008 Frank K. Berry U.S.
Championship with a score of 7 from 9 games and an undefeated 7-2 score, a
half-point ahead of GM Alexander Onischuk.
The
drama in the women’s competition was
that Irina Krush drew her last round game which went 100 moves, but Anna
Zatonskih
won her game, giving both players 7.5 points to share first place. Then the
women’s title was resolved the same day. It is interesting to read the
following comments by GM Susan Polgar who was also awarding the ‘best
fighting game’ award sponsored by goddess chess:
“The whole thing ended more than 9 hours after the last round started and
many horrendous blunders were committed. I believe it is partly due to the
fatigue factor. Two most common questions are:
1. Should rapid / blitz chess be used
to decide the national title in regular time control chess?
2. Should the 5-game playoff be held
right after the last round or should it be held the morning after?”
There
is a video of the action here:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fNQjXHjRkNQ
Nothing at all against Anna who won the title, but personally I thought
winning this way was disgusting; was no test of skill between the two
players, especially after Irina had already played so long that day. I
think the viewer will attest for themselves that Irina’s attitude in the
video clip is not just about losing, but perhaps something to do with having
to play high speed ‘smack the clock’ skittles after already performing to
what must be a level of exhaustion.
http://monroi.com/the-2008-fkb-us-chess-championship-results.html
|
Chess
Media:
True Chess Stories
In the age of chess and other
elective programs in school systems being shut down, despite No Child Left
Behind programs, despite stories like the following one – a story which
deserves repeating in full – chess seems very large in young people’s lives.
What follows is entirely uplifting and of good promise for the future.
Citywide Chess Championships at the
Johns Hopkins University. (photo credit: Lloyd Fox)
Sam Macer was the kind of kid who,
to put it kindly, didn't care to conform.
"I don't know how many middle
schools he's been kicked out of," said Belinda Chance, the art teacher and
chess coach at West Baltimore's Dickey Hill Elementary/Middle School, to
which Sam, surly and argumentative, was admitted last year. "He was
very angry. He yelled at teachers. He's yelled at me before."
When Sam, now 13, asked to join
Chance's chess club, she almost didn't let him in. But she
reconsidered.
"I thought, 'Maybe this will be the
thing that will help,'" Chance said yesterday at the Citywide Chess
Championships at the Johns Hopkins University, where Sam, his hands dancing
across the checkered board, subjected one of his opponents to a 1 1/2-minute
drubbing.
In Sam's case, chess made all the
difference.
"It calmed me down," he said during
a break between matches. "It got better when I really started to know
how to play. I look at chess as life: There's different ways you can
move in life. Chess helps me decide, when a situation comes up, the
move I want to make."
Yesterday, Sam shrugged off his
losses in two other matches, a sign that, as even he acknowledged, he is
maturing as both a player and a young man.
At the
tournament, some 235 elementary and middle-school students - all from
Baltimore public schools - battled for chess supremacy in Johns Hopkins
University's Glass Pavilion, a space that went from a fitful silence during
matches to an eruption of noise at the end of each round.
"It gives them
a chance to work on their giftedness," said Bettie J. Williams, an
instructional support teacher at Rosemont Elementary/Middle School, which
entered five students - three of them first-graders - in the tournament for
the first time.
|
|
What to
Play?
Bad Dog! Capa wrongs the Colle.
After last week’s demonstration of allowing
White his ‘model development’, there was a cautionary note in
Karlsbad 1929, Colle v Capablanca:
1. d4 Nf6
2. Nf3 b6
3. e3?! Bb7
4. Nbd2 e6
5. Bd3 c5
6. 0-0 Nc6!
7. c3 Be7

[and once
again White achieves the ‘set-up’, but…]
8. e4 cxd4!
Colle sees a
little too late that his model development cannot be played by
rote. If he continues 9. cxd4 black replies Nb4! 10. Bb1 Ba6
then Rc8 [worse is 10. Be2? Nxe4.]
9. Nxd4 0-0
10. Qe2 Ne5!
11. Bc2 Qc8!
Which black
followed with 12. … Ba6. White’s plan has failed to keep black
pieces off c5 and e5 by maintaining a d4 pawn, and the
fascinating consequence of this game was that the Colle started
to disappear from grandmaster play.
Therefore,
against the black set-up White must be prepared to play the
Stonewall set-up with f4, or evolve into the Torre Formation,
with the White Queen-bishop outside the pawn chain sitting on
g5.
Notes for this
column taken from White Opening System Combining Stonewall
Attack, Colle System, Torre Attack. Andrew Soltis, Chess
Digest 1992. |
|
For
many of the students, it was also the first time they had set foot on the
university's Homewood campus, a grand and unsullied place far removed from
the battered neighborhoods some of them call home.
"They were
really amazed at how beautiful it was here," said David Utara, a
fourth-grade teacher and the chess coach at Mary E. Rodman Elementary
School. "They're learning that if you work really hard you can come to a
place like this. They normally don't see much of the city - they rarely get
off their block."
Bearing in
mind that students this young sometimes need to be reminded about pesky
things like decorum, the tournament's master of ceremonies, Steve Alpern,
who directs the city schools' chess program, urged them before the first
35-minute round to display good sportsmanship, shake hands with opponents,
and behave civilly in both victory and defeat. (Alpern said later that his
position is being eliminated under a proposed restructuring of the school
system's finances.)
Just before
play began, Alpern said, "I want everybody to take a real big breath." The
cavernous room hushed and, after a moment, the only sound heard was the soft
clicking of chess pieces knocking each other off.
Bernard
Thomas, a 10-year-old player from Pimlico Elementary/Middle School whose
opponent unassailably protected his knight, was an early victim. "He beat
me," Bernard said in a whisper, apparently a bit stunned at the speed of his
fall.
His
12-year-old sister, Desire Thomas, did better. She finished off her
adversary with a series of moves that prevented his king's escape from the
back rank with deft positioning of two rooks.
"She's
phenomenal," said Desire's coach, Lee Rutledge, who normally teaches
sixth-grade English at Pimlico. The middle school team, he said, won the
Maryland girls' championship this year and last with Desire's help, and last
year she was the individual winner in that tournament's novice division.
"The kids who
play chess get a lot of their identity from being good at something that's
hard," Rutledge said. "It gives them a lot of confidence with other things
they take on in the classroom."
Reporting
Source: Nick Madigan of the Baltimore Sun

Chess
Media:
True Chess Stories
Former World Chess Champion and
Kremlin critic Garry Kasparov has been attacked by a radio-controlled
phallic object during a meeting of opposition activists. Pro-Kremlin
demonstrators decided to interrupt Kasparov’s address, designed to unite
opposition political forces, by launching a rotor-assisted plastic phallus
towards Mr. Kasparov.
The
unconventional chopper managed to stay up for at least 20 seconds before
stunned security guards swiped it out of the air. The prank was staged by "a
couple of pro-Kremlin Young Russia activists" reports the Moscow Times. Mr.
Kasparov was unharmed and laughed off the incident remarking that it was
"below the belt", while also stating it was about the level one could expect
from his opposition
|
 |
Chess Media:
Goodbye Chess Life? |
|
|
Pending a full report from Chessville on
SPICE, next week, an official release has just announced:
“Texas Tech SPICE just received a cash donation of $320,000
for chess scholarships from an anonymous donor. Additional
funding from the same donor was provided to build a chess park
right outside of the Student Union building on campus.”
SPICE focuses on 3 very important areas:
Chess Education, Chess Research, and Chess Outreach.
~
The benefits of chess seem to be progressively apparent to
mainstream media in the C21st. We might all applaud SPICE for
taking the lead in evolving the subject. |
|
A majority
of USCF board members are voting to terminate USCF’s magazine Chess Life
as part of the subscription. This distinctly odd decision is led by board
members Goichberg, Bauer and Hough, with the intent to make purchase of
the magazine voluntary.
Since Chess Life is perhaps not the most valued chess publication in the
United States, and each month for example, contains less chess than this
column contains every two weeks – never-mind all Chessville’s columnists. In
terms of quality of reporting Chessville is certainly not put in the shade
by the anodyne 6 week old news vehicle which is Chess Life.
What on earth will Chess Life be like if
circulation is reduced even more, and’ as it has been put, ‘market force’s
are allowed to work? I would say they already are! Chessville seems to have
twice as many monthly readers as USCF has adult members.
Chess
Media: Goodbye Democracy?
Yet another report from the Chess Journalists of America [the CJA] mentions
the matter of peculiarities in its election system, specifically that of the
distribution of blank ballots, and otherwise even CJA members on USCF’s
board never receiving any ballots. While editorially we have not yet
received information from all sides of the issue in order to re-present it
to you the chess public, [pending] I personally have read enough to resist
signing up with the CJA for another 5 years.
Mtel
– Result
Final Scores and Crosstable
|
Rank |
Name |
IRtg |
FED |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Pts |
|
1 |
Ivanchuk Vassily |
2740 |
UKR |
* * |
1 ½ |
1 ½ |
1 1 |
1 ½ |
1 ½ |
8,0 |
|
2 |
Topalov Veselin |
2767 |
BUL |
0 ½ |
* * |
½ ½ |
1 1 |
1 0 |
1 1 |
6,5 |
|
3 |
Radjabov Teimour |
2751 |
AZE |
0 ½ |
½ ½ |
* * |
½ ½ |
½ 1 |
½ 1 |
5,5 |
|
4 |
Cheparinov Ivan |
2695 |
BUL |
0 0 |
0 0 |
½ ½ |
* * |
1 1 |
½ ½ |
4,0 |
|
5 |
Bu Xiangzhi |
2708 |
CHN |
0 ½ |
0 1 |
½ 0 |
0 0 |
* * |
½ ½ |
3,0 |
|
6 |
Aronian Levon |
2763 |
ARM |
0 ½ |
0 0 |
½ 0 |
½ ½ |
½ ½ |
* * |
3,0 |
Official site:
www.mtelmasters.com
Coming
up: The Armenian Chess Federation ( www.armchess.am ) just announced a
major rapid chess tournament with $262,000 prize funds. This event will take
place from June 8 to 15, 2008 in Yerevan, Armenia.
Here is the list of players:
1. Morozevich Alexander Russia 2774
2. Aronian Levon Armenia 2763
3. Leko Peter Hungary 2741
4. Adams Michael England 2729
5. Gelfand Boris Israel 2723
6. Bu Xiangzhi China 2708
7. Akopian Vladimir Armenia 2673
8. Sargissian Gabriel Armenia 2643
Chess news from Susan Polgar
Capablanca
Chess Tournament - Result
Havana, May 7 (Prensa Latina) The
drawing of lots by elite chess players will focus the opening ceremony of
the 43rd Capablanca Memorial International Chess Tournament, scheduled for
Wednesday evening at the Neptuno-Triton hotel resort in Havana.
With a 3-way tie for first going into
the last round. GM Dominguez was the only one among the 3 to score a
decisive victory to win clear first.
Final round results:
Dominguez Perez, Lenier - Arencibia
Rodriguez, Walter 1-0
Wojtaszek, Radoslaw - Bruzon Batista, Lazaro 1-0
Khenkin, Igor - Nogueiras Santiago, Jesus ½-½
Amonatov, Farrukh - Hernandez Carmenates, Holden ½-½
Tiviakov, Sergei - Quezada Perez, Yuniesky ½-½
Final standings:
1. Dominguez Perez, Lenier g CUB 2695
6
2. Amonatov, Farrukh g TJK 2649 5½
3. Khenkin, Igor g GER 2609 5½
4. Hernandez Carmenates, Holden g CUB 2568 5
5. Tiviakov, Sergei g NED 2635 4½
6. Wojtaszek, Radoslaw g POL 2625 4½
7. Nogueiras Santiago, Jesus g CUB 2559 4
8. Quezada Perez, Yuniesky g CUB 2567 3½
9. Arencibia Rodriguez, Walter g CUB 2534 3½
10. Bruzon Batista, Lazaro g CUB 2608 3
Official website:
www.inder.cu/capablanca
World
Championship Series
Kamsky versus… well, on Tuesday this week there was still no sign of the
promised money, and no one, let alone Fide, was making any announcements. On
Thursday which is 7 days past the latest deadline, there were still no
announcements, confirmations, from anyone at all!
Somewhere out there $935,000 was supposed to have been transferred. Wouldn’t
you think professional chess players deserve professional business
management?
But that’s
enough from me otherwise I will begin to sound like Topalov’s manager, Mr.
Danilov – who could be said to be more than a tad skeptical of Fide’s (in)activities.
5-17-2008
Chess News USA
and Canada

US Championship
Leaders after 4 rounds:
1 Kudrin, Sergey GM 2610 USA 3.5
2-5 Becerra, Julio GM 2637 USA 3.0
2-5 Shulman, Yury GM 2664 USA 3.0
2-5 Kaidanov, Gregory GM 2697 USA 3.0
2-5 Onischuk, Alexander GM 2728 USA 3.0
Women's leaders:
1-2 Zatonskih, Anna IM 2490 USA 4.0
1-2 Krush, Irina IM 2515 USA 4.0
3 Abrahamyan, Tatev WFM 2280 USA 3.0
4 Rohonyan, Katerine WGM 2318 USA 2.5
Official website
Another
Polgar Game
I was going to write a sidebar this week on the Colle, Torre and Stonewall
opening systems, then saw this recent illustrative game against the
Stonewall.
2008 Elementary Nationals, Pittsburgh
White: Holecek, Zachary
Black: Polgar, Tom
1.d4 d5 2.e3 Nf6
3.Bd3 g6 4.Nd2 Bg7 5.f4 O-O 6.Ngf3 Nbd7 7.O-O c5 8.c3 b6 9.b3 Bb7 10.Qc2 Rc8
11.Bb2 Qc7 12.Ne5 Nxe5 13.fxe5 Nd7 14.Rac1 Qc6 15.Nf3 f6 16.exf6 exf6 17.Nd2
f5 18.Nf3 c4 19.bxc4 dxc4 20.Be2 Rfe8
Okay! Black
has clearly seized the initiative.
The game ended 0-1
at move 46. Now, this was a well-contested game by both sides, and
hardly illustrates all the possibilities of the Stonewall, but certainly
shows how to compete with it. In subsequent columns I think it is best
to proceed with the more modest Colle, which observes all opening principles
of developing each piece with only one move, and to keep Tarrasch happy,
develop all the pieces too! It risks little while negotiating the
opening and retains mid-game prospects. Tough luck with this one Mr.
Holecek, many players would be puzzled to say specifically where you went
wrong.
Tom’s mum plays
the Colle-Zukertort, and I suppose is familiar with its family of openings,
and her family with what to do against it. And if world champions can
do it…
|
Tightened
circumstances?
First captioned is the improved space
allowance at the US Championship.
Apparently Alex Onischuk mentioned the cramped
condition to the TD and the
TD, Frank Berry’s first
reaction to Onischuk’s ‘threat’ was to ask him if he needed a ride to
the airport!
So, some of the women
were shuffled off to another room, where they felt isolated from the
tournament … so back they came to be in the same place as the other
players, [second caption].
The scenario reminds me
of a recent Moscow tournament where the women had less space than the
men, and the subject of the size of their handbags came up. I
guess that’s chess in 2008. |

 |
One good thing to report is that a Chessville columnist on behalf of
www.goddess.chess has created a prize
for best fighting chess in the competition, for the second year running.
The prize was boosted this year by an anonymous contribution ~ thank you, to
whoever that was <grin> and I further understand that this year’s prize will
be judged by Grandmaster Susan Polgar.
True
Stories from Real Chess Fans and their Parents
This is an
actually story that happened to me in Pittsburgh during the National
Elementary Championship. The tournament was held at the David L.
Lawrence Convention Center. I could not book a room at the closest
hotel to the playing site. So I had to stay at a nearby hotel along
with many other chess parents.
Tommy and I
usually walk about 8 - 10 minutes each way to go to and from the hotel and
the Convention Center. We decided to take the taxi from the Convention
Center back to our hotel on night because Tommy was not feeling well and I
wanted him to get extra rest. When we got on the cab, our driver Nick
recognized who I am. He is a chess player and loves the game. He
asked if I am in Pittsburgh to do a speaking engagement or simul. I
told him that I was only there as a Chess Mom. He also asked how my
sisters are doing.
|
When we reached
our hotel, he did not charge me for the cab fare which I was of course more
than happy to pay. It was very nice of him. On top of that,
Tommy forgot his score book inside the cab. When Nick found it, he
drove back to the hotel at midnight to drop it off for Tommy. I think
that this was a very nice gesture by him and I would like to thank him for
it. So Nick, if you happen to read this, thank you and good luck with
your chess!
Susan Polgar
Chess News
WORLDWIDE:
World
Championship
Kamsky v. Topalov? Well…
4 extensions by FIDE, 4 nothings
as result. This thing is looking more like an election in Uganda.
Why has FIDE over-run 4 of its
own deadlines in settling a match? After over-running yet another
deadline on May 15, things cleared up on the sixteenth with the announcement
that the money was in, and the match was on:
Proposed prize fund : USD
750,000.00
The FIDE Contribution : USD 150,000.00
Expenses of FIDE : USD 35,000.00
Organiser's name : VAT ZTO
Prodexport and Rondo Holdings S.A. Organiser’s address : 03150
Ukraine, Kiev, Kovpaka str. 17, app. 131
But…
as of May 17th none of the above
is verified by the banking institutions handling the money.
|
|
What to
Play?
I have been ‘mentoring’ another player for some 300 games of
correspondence chess, and he still cannot strike on a system he
likes. Its easier for him to be black because he thinks
[falsely] that that is simpler, since you only need respond.
As White, I suggest, consider this ‘bland’ opening which
nevertheless completes all opening principles.
The Colle is not a dog!

Model Development of the white pieces. Andy Soltis says
‘White’s pieces coordinate beautifully. He controls all
the central squares except d5. He can expand e3-e4-e5.
The K-Rook can come to e1, the Q to c2, and the only remaining
question is where to put the Q-Bishop and Q-Rook.”
It is worth looking at an illustrative game to discover if
White can un-spring his position and where his prospects lay.
Too often ‘quiet’ development in the opening is judged by
players to have little worth – but a look at the diagram reveals
no White weaknesses therefore is White ready to “un-spring” and
command the middle game? |
|

Mtel – And just when you think it’s a fluke…
The tournament took off
and immediately went vertical with Ivanchuk nonchalantly scoring 4-0
in the first 4 rounds.
Round 5 he had black
against an even higher rated super-GM , and surely…
GM
Aronian (2763) - GM Ivanchuk (2740)
[D12] Mtel - Round 5, 12.05.2008
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3
Nf6 4.e3 Bf5 5.Nc3 e6 6.Nh4 Bg6 7.Nxg6 hxg6 8.a3 Nbd7 9.g3 Be7 10.b3
e5 11.cxd5 Nxd5 12.Nxd5 Qa5+ 13.Nc3 Qxc3+ 14.Bd2 Qb2 15.d5 cxd5 16.Bb5
a6 17.Bxd7+ Kxd7 18.0–0 e4 19.Bc3 Qxc3 20.Qxd5+ Ke8 21.Rac1 Qd3
22.Qxb7 Rd8 23.Rfd1 Qxd1+ 24.Rxd1 Rxd1+ 25.Kg2 a5 26.g4 Kf8 27.Qxe4 g5
28.Qf5 Bd8 29.Qc5+ Kg8 30.Qe5 g6 31.b4 axb4 32.axb4 Kh7 33.b5 Rf8
34.Qc5 Kg8 35.b6 Rb1 36.f4 Rb2+ 37.Kg3 gxf4+ 38.exf4 Bxb6 39.Qc3 Rb1
40.f5 Rg1+ 41.Kh3 Re8 42.Qf6 Bf2 43.Qg7+ Kxg7 44.f6+ Kf8 Black wins
0–1
Five rounds and 5 wins,
but a draw in round 6 temporaily stalled Ivanchuk. In round 7 he had
to face Topalov:
GM
Ivanchuk (2740) - GM Topalov (2767)
[D43] 15.05.2008 / Mtel Round 7
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bg5
h6 6.Bxf6 Qxf6 7.e3 Nd7 8.Rc1 Bd6 9.Bd3 0–0 10.0–0 Qe7 11.Qc2 a6 12.c5
Bc7 13.e4 dxe4 14.Nxe4 Rd8 15.Rfe1 Nf8 16.Qc3 f6 17.Bb1 Kh8 18.a3 Bd7
19.Nfd2 f5 20.Ng3 Qf6 21.Nf3 Be8 22.Ba2 b6 23.Rc2 bxc5 24.Qxc5 Rab8
25.Rd2 a5 26.Qc3 Rd6 27.Rde2 Bb6 28.Re5 Bf7 29.Bb1 Qd8 30.Ba2 Rb7
31.Ne2 Ng6 32.Re3 a4 33.Qc2 Rc7 34.Qxa4 c5 35.dxc5 Rxc5 36.Rc3 Ne5
37.Ned4 Ng4 38.h3 Nxf2 39.Kxf2 Ra5 40.Qc2 Rxd4 41.Kf1 Qd7 42.Rc8+ Kh7
43.Qc6 Qd6 44.Qxd6 Rxd6 45.Rf8 Ra7 46.Ne5 Rd2 47.Re2 Rd1+ 48.Re1 Rd2
49.Re2 Draw agreed ½–½
One
player has been performing way below his capability, and had to face
the dynamo energy of Ivanchuk. Its hard to accuse anyone of this
calibre of weaknesses, but Bu has recently been struggling with
endgames, very fortunate for Ivanchuk in this instance. This is what
happened:
 |
|
The chosen game was played in Ghent by Colle vs Delvaux in 1929.
1. d4 Nf6
2. Nf3 e6
3. e3 d5
4. Bd3
c5
[why not?]

5.c3 Nc6
6. Nbd2 Be7
7. 0-0 c4?
8. Bc2!

[maintaining the Bishop on the ‘mating
diagonal’ says Soltis. Black has plenty of time to launch his
Queen side pawns, right?]
8. … b5
9. e4! dxe4 [allowing e5 would seal off Black’s King from
all aid!]
10. Nxe4 0-0
11. Qe2 Bb7
12. Nfg5 [its starting to look a lot like Christmas!]

12. …h6?
[One more side-bar complete the story.] |
|
GM Bu Xiangzhi (2708) - GM Ivanchuk
(2740)
[A05]
16.05.2008 - Mtel round 8
1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 b6 3.g3 c5 4.Bg2 Bb7 5.0–0 e6 6.Nc3 Be7 7.d4 cxd4 8.Qxd4 d6
9.Rd1 a6 10.b3 Nbd7 11.e4 Qc8 12.Bb2 0–0 13.Qe3 Re8 14.Rac1 Qc7 15.h3 Rac8
16.Nh2 Qb8 17.Ng4 Ba8 18.Nxf6+ Bxf6 19.Na4 Be7 20.e5 Bxg2 21.exd6 Bxd6
22.Kxg2 Nc5 23.Nc3 Be5 24.b4 Nb7 25.Qxb6 Rxc4 26.Na4 Rxc1 27.Rxc1 Bxb2
28.Nxb2 Qa8 29.Qc6 Nd6 30.Qxa8 Rxa8 31.Rc6 Nf5 32.Rc7 h5 33.Nd3 h4 34.g4 Nd4
35.a4 f6 36.Nc5 e5 37.a5 Ne2 38.Ne6 Nf4+ 39.Nxf4 exf4 40.Rc6 Kf7 41.g5 Kg6
42.gxf6 gxf6 43.Kf3 Kg5 44.Rc5+ f5 45.Rc6 Rb8 46.Rb6 Ra8 47.Ke2 Re8+ 48.Kd3
Re4 49.Kc3 Re2 50.Rxa6 Rxf2 51.Rd6 f3 52.Rd1 Kf4 53.Kb3 Re2 54.a6 Re3+
55.Kc4 f2 56.Rf1 Kg3 57.b5 Ra3 58.Kb4 Ra2 59.Kb3 Ra5 60.Kb4 Ra2 61.Kb3 Ra5
Game drawn ½–½
Round 7 standings
1 Ivanchuk - 6.0
2 Topalov - 5.0
3-4 Radjabov, Cheparinov - 3.5
5 Aronian - 2.0
6 Bu Xiangzhi - 1.0
This week’s drama is that Ivanchuk has slowed down, permitting draws after 5
straight wins, but Topalov took over the charge to become a very clear
challenger in second place. I remember two years ago in Mexico Toppy was at
the bottom of the chart, then switching to Linares, Spain, simply
slaughtered everyone, to come out on top.
Official site

Coming up: The 3rd International Chess Tournament 'AEROSVIT-2008'
will take place 7th-20th June 2008 in Foros, Crimea, Ukraine. Participants:
Carlsen Magnus g NOR 2765, Svidler Peter g RUS 2746, Ivanchuk Vassily g UKR
2740, Shirov Alexei g ESP 2740, Karjakin Sergey g UKR 2732, Jakovenko Dmitry
g RUS 2711, Alekseev Evgeny g RUS 2711, Eljanov Pavel g UKR 2687, Volokitin
Andrei g UKR 2684, Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter g ROU 2684, Van Wely Loek g NED
2676, Onischuk Alexander g USA 2664. Average rating 2711.7 Time control: 90
minutes for the first 40 moves then 30 minutes to the end of the game with
addition of 30 sec. after each move starting from the first move. The rest
day - Saturday, June 14th. International arbiter Oleg Tovchyga (Ukraine).
|
The Shahcom Company will provide live coverage of games in the playing hall
and via internet on the official site and our site utilizing electronic
boards "Shahcom". GM Mikhail Golubev will annotate games live. Shahcom
site: www.ruschess.com. Official
site:
www.ukrchess.org.ua/aerosvit2008.
Also
coming up
Capablanca Chess Tournament
Havana, May 7 (Prensa Latina) The
drawing of lots by elite chess players will focus the opening ceremony of
the 43rd Capablanca Memorial International Chess Tournament, scheduled for
Wednesday evening at the Neptuno-Triton hotel resort in Havana.
Standings with 1 round 1 go:
1. Dominguez Perez, Lenier g CUB 2695 5
2. Khenkin, Igor g GER 2609 5
3. Amonatov, Farrukh g TJK 2649 5
4. Hernandez Carmenates, Holden g CUB 2568 4½
5. Tiviakov, Sergei g NED 2635 4
6. Wojtaszek, Radoslaw g POL 2625 3½
7. Arencibia Rodriguez, Walter g CUB 2534 3½
8. Nogueiras Santiago, Jesus g CUB 2559 3½
9. Bruzon Batista, Lazaro g CUB 2608 3
10. Quezada Perez, Yuniesky g CUB 2567 3
Official website:
www.inder.cu/capablanca

Dear Parrot:
ENCI Limburg Open chess tournament
which is held this weekend in Maastricht (NL). With almost 400
players the ENCI Limburg Open is one of the biggest chess
tournaments in Europe. With more than 25 titleholders
the ENCI Limburg Open is a very attractive tournament which should
definitely be covered on your website. For questions you can contact the
organisation by e-mail.
Luther, the Russian GM Vladimir Epishin, and the Austrian women grandmaster
Eva Moser.

|
|
What to
Play? continued...
Black avoided at move 11 with Bb7 the
White’s exchange on Nxf6, then Qe4 threatening mate, and also
attacking the unsupported Q-Knight. But loses the thread here –
12. … g6 was essential]
13. Nxf6+ Bxf6
14. Qe4 g6
15. Nxe6 fxe6
16. Qxg6+ Bg7
17. Qh7+ Kf7

18. Bg6+ [stopping the flight of the
King]
18. … Kf6
19. Bh5 Ne7
20. Bxh6 Rg8

21. h4! [threatening Bg5 mate]
21. … Bxh6
22. Qf7 mate.
Colle also played Alekhine in 1929 at Carlsbad. He had
some interesting ideas about how to treat this new White system
which are worth a look – and which challenge White to change his
‘model development’! |
|

A
Press Release from GM Mikhail Golubev states
Karpov to face Korchnoi at the 4th
Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup
The 4th Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup will take place in Odessa, Ukraine from 30
May - 2 June 2008. Eight grandmasters will play two rapid games each against
other.
The participants are:
Boris Gelfand (2723, Israel)
Ruslan Ponomariov (2719, Ukraine)
Anatoly Karpov (2655, Russia)
Pavel Tregubov (2629, Russia)
Viktor Korchnoi (2598, Switzerland)
Yuri Drozdovskij (2581, Ukraine)
Valery Beim (2523, Austria)
Mikhail Golubev (2474, Ukraine)
The games between the veterans Karpov and Korchnoi will be of special
interest. In 1978 they played the first of their world championship matches
in Baguio, Philippines.
The winners of the three previous Pivdenny Bank Chess Cups were:
2005 - Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine)
2006 - Joel Lautier (France)
2007 - Vassily Ivanchuk (Ukraine)
The official site will be at:
http://worldcup.pivdenny.com
The main organiser of the tournament is Bank Pivdenny (http://en.bank.com.ua),
which is the largest bank in the southern part of Ukraine. Pivdenny also
organised the 2007 and 2008 ACP World Rapid Chess Cups, which were won by
Peter Leko (Hungary) and Teimour Radjabov (Azerbaijan), respectively.
Source: Press Center of the 4th Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup.
5-10-2008
Chess News USA
and Canada

And …
the Caribbean
“Dear Parrot”
We, the Eight Rivers Chess Club located in Ocho Rios, Jamaica W.I. are
trying to develop the game of chess on the Island and we would appreciate
your support. We are planning an open chess tournament in Jamaica next
August 2nd & 3rd. I was wondering if you or any of your club members
would
be
interested in coming here to participate. It is to be a Rated
tournament over 6 rounds and 2 days. The strength of player we are
expecting is good club level. We are expecting between 75 and 100
persons to participate from all over the Island of Jamaica. The
Jamaican Chess Federation will be officiating.
We are also planning an amateur Tournament to run simultaneously. We
are intending to give cash and other prizes to the winners, but no details
are available on that yet! The venue is located at Rooms On The Beach,
a good hotel in Ocho Rios on the North Coast of the Island. I know it
is early, but I want to make as many chess players as possible aware, so
that they can plan their visit.
If you are interested please call me at 1 876 974 7825 or 1 876 877 9288;
I'll give you more
details then. If you don't get me speak to Syd Abbass at
1-876-880-2925, or send me an email. If you need any info regarding
hotels etc, we'll try to help. I hope to hear from you. Kamran
Abbas

US Championship; Participants Announced:
1 GM Alexander SHABALOV 2697 Current Champion
2 GM Alexander ONISCHUK 2728 Rating (2008 SPICE Cup)
3 GM Gregory KAIDANOV 2697 Rating (2008 SPICE Cup)
4 GM Varuzhan Akobian 2666 Rating (2008 SPICE Cup)
5 GM Yury Shulman 2664 Rating (2007 SPICE Cup Invitee)
6 GM Julio Becerra 2637 Rating (2007 SPICE Cup)
7 GM Boris GULKO 2623 U.S. Open Champion (2007 SPICE Cup)
8 GM Alexander Ivanov 2622 Rating
9 GM Eugene Perelshteyn 2615 Rating (2007 and 2008 SPICE Cup)
10 GM Sergey Kudrin 2610 Rating
11 IM Benjamin Finegold 2609 Rating (2007 SPICE Cup Invitee)
12 GM Dmitry Gurevich 2594 Rating
13 GM Alex YERMOLINSKY 2587 Qualifier
14 GM John FEDOROWICZ 2531 Qualifier
15 GM Jesse KRAAI 2569 Qualifier
16 IM Dean IPPOLITO 2499 Qualifier
17 IM David PRUESS 2497 Qualifier
18 FM Daniel LUDWIG 2429 Qualifier
19 NM Sam SHANKLAND 2296 Qualifier
20 IM Josh FRIEDEL 2511 Wild Card
21 FM Michael LANGER 2322 Wild Card
22 Sergey GALANT 2176 Wild Card
23 IM Larry Kaufman 2383 Senior Open Champion
24 IM David Vigorito 2439 WCL Tnmt of Champions winner
US Women's Championship:
1 IM Irina KRUSH 2515 Current Champion (2007 SPICE Cup)
2 IM Anna ZATONSKIH 2490 Rating (2007 SPICE Cup Invitee)
3 WGM Katerine ROHONYAN 2318 Rating
4 WIM Batchimeg TUVSHINTUGS 2289 Rating
5 WFM Tatev ABRAHAMYAN 2280 Rating
6 WIM Tsagaan BATTSETSEG 2251 Rating
7 WFM Iryna ZENYUK 2205 Qualifier
8 WIM Esther Epstein 2194 Rating
9 WFM Chouchanik AIRAPETIAN 2143 Wild Card
10 Courtney JAMISON 2064 Wild Card
Information
courtesy Tom Braunlich for CLO.

Innovative Chess
Indexed Announced
A press release for Chess
Express Ratings (www.cxrchess.com), Forest Hills, NY, May 7th,
also known as “CXR”, announced May 7th the creation of the
"Tournament Significance Index” (TSI). Up until now, when we heard
of someone’s tournament victory, we had no way to compare the significance
of the achievement with that of a rival’s success someplace else.
Except for the very well known events, we may not even have a correct idea
of the strength of either the event or its winner. Chess Express
Ratings, best known for bringing literally dozens of performance metrics to
the sport of Chess, has developed a mathematical formula which - without
bias - calculates a “Section Significance Index” (SSI) for each section of a
tournament. The formula takes into account time control, number of
rounds, effective number of players participating, and the game-weighted
average rating of the contestants.
The minimum requirements for a section to qualify for an SSI are:
~ at least 4 players
~ minimum average rating of 400
~ at least 3 rounds
Instead of
reporting more of this service, I though, “wait a minute! I’m a chess
reporter, I’ll call them up and ask some questions!” And that is how it came
about that the Parrot interviewed Russ Mollot, which you can read near the
bottom of this column.

US Senior Open – RESULT
Stop-press: Susan Polgar reports;
“Going into the final round, IM Kaufman and Foygel were both 4-0. IM
Bradford and GM Gurevich were both 3.5 points. IM Kaufman defeated
Foygel to win clear first.” I see from the above that Kaufman gains
automatic entry into the US championship for this win.

Coming up later this Year – Strongest ever US Tournament.
September 19th to 28th sees a [so far] Category
15 tournament on US soil in the 10 player SPICE CUP. Seven of the 10
invitees have already signed up, and I understand average Elo is
currently 2600. Chessville’s senior editor Kelly Atkins recently
visited the SPICE campus at Lubbock and will make an extended report
on its current and future activities.

Mtel gets going, early results:
Round 1
Aronian 0-1 Topalov
[caption]
Cheparinov 1-0 Bu
Radjabov 0-1 Ivanchuk

Note the
dark glass with media and spectators behind it. This anti-disturbance
device is now common at high level Euro-tournaments.
Round 2:
Veselin Topalov - Vassily Ivanchuk
This was the 5,507 point match up, result 0-1
Levon Aronian - Ivan Cheparinov
5,458
points between them, result draw |
|
What to
Play? …continued
The critical 8. Rb1 in the Grunfeld
Exchange, with 12. Qb3
Here is the tabiya position from last week:

White’s two main options at move11 are
11.d5 or 11. Qd3. Author Yelena Dembo says other options 11.Bd3
and 11. e5 seem insufficient tries by White. We continue with
the most aggressive move, the pawn sac variation Black fears
initiated by 11.d5.
11. d5 Bxc3 and now Qb3 or Bc4
12. Qb3 [Dangerous, but sufficiently promising?]
12. …Bg7
13. Bf4 Qc8!
14. Rfe1 Ba6
15. e5 Bxe2
16. Rxe2 e6

17 d6
Nd7 [Black is better,
Avrukh] Let us look at the other White choice at 11. Bc4 |
|
|
 |
Bu Xiangzhi - Teimour Radjabov
And with 5, 459 points here, result draw
An interesting early statistic is that White has scored 1 Win, and
Black 3 wins. Ivanchuk [cartoon] is the early leader.
Official site:
www.mtelmasters.com. |
Chess News
WORLDWIDE:

Coming Up
The 4th PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP will take place in Odessa, Ukraine
from 30 May - 2 June 2008. The prize fund is USD 35,000. As usual, some of
the world's most famous chess players will compete in this rapid chess
tournament. So far, Anatoly Karpov (Russia), Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine) and
Boris Gelfand (Israel) have all confirmed their participation. This year,
the number of contestants will be reduced from 10 to 8, and the time control
will be somewhat shortened, but in exchange, the grandmasters will play not
one but two games against each other. The winners of the three previous
tournaments were: 2005 GM Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine), 2006 GM Joel Lautier
(France), 2007 GM Vassily Ivanchuk (Ukraine).

Also coming up
Capablanca Chess Tournament
Havana, May 7 (Prensa Latina) The drawing of lots by elite
chess players will focus the opening ceremony of the 43rd Capablanca
Memorial International Chess Tournament, scheduled for Wednesday evening at
the Neptuno-Triton hotel resort in Havana. [caption]
According to a report from the Cuban News Agency -AIN-, the
order of the matches for the nine sessions of the competition will be
defined after each of the ten Grand Masters (GM) randomly pick numbers that
may mark their fate.
The elite group will be granted the 15th category of the
International Chess Federation (FIDE) for having an average ELO of 2,602
points. Heading the group is Cuba’s Leinier Dominguez (2,695), who is in the
26th position in world ranking.
Before
leaving Caracas, Eduardo Iturrizaga [caption], first Grand Master of
Venezuela, said he aspires to dominate at the José Raúl Capablanca In
Memoriam, although he still has to obtain the 2,600 ELO, threshold to enter
elite events.
Another favorite is Holland’s Sergei Tiviakov (2,634), 84th
in the world, and holder of the European title. He is one of the four
foreign players among the group of elite competitors. The others are Farruk
Amonatov (2,625), from Tajikistan, Poland’s Radoslaw Wojtaszek (2,625) and
German Igor Khenki (2,608).
Also
among the top players is Cuban Lazaro Bruzon [caption] (2,608).
With ELOs below 2,600 are locals Holden Hernandez (2,568),
national champion Yuniesky Quesada (2,567), Jesus Nogueiras (2,559) and
Walter Arencibia (2,534). GM Neuris Delgado (2,530), and International
Master (IM) Fidel Corrales (2,502), who is waiting for FIDE's confirmation
to be named GM, will take part in the event.
Source:
www.plenglish.com

Dear Parrot:
ENCI Limburg Open chess tournament which is held this
weekend in Maastricht (NL). With almost 400 players the
ENCI Limburg Open is one of the biggest chess tournaments in Europe.
With more than 25 titleholders the ENCI Limburg Open is a
very attractive tournament which should definitely be covered on your
website. For questions you can contact the organisation by mail at
info@limburgopen.nl.
|
The Press release
states: This weekend, the 2nd ENCI Limburg
Open takes place in Maastricht. More than 25 titled players are
among the nearly 400 participants. Favourites in the fight for
the main price are the eightfold Greek Champion and number 1 of the
Greek ranking list, GM Vassilios Kotronias (2611), and the number 1 of
the Swedish ranking list, GM Emanuel Berg (2601).
Moreover, GM Dimitri Reinderman, who ended up second in the last Dutch
Championships, seems to have remarkable chances. The Netherlands
are furthermore represented in the battle for the main price by the
well-known grandmaster Friso Nijboer. The crowd of 9
grandmasters is completed by the Belgian GM Alexandre Dgebuadze
(Belgian Champion 2007), the English GM Gawain Jones, the German GM
Thomas Luther, the Russian GM Vladimir Epishin, and the Austrian women
grandmaster Eva Moser.
Underdogs in the fight
for the main prize are IMs like Sergy Klimov, Puchen Wang, Emory Tate
and the young Dutch IMs Robin Swinkels and Chiel van Oosterom.
The current Limburg Champion IM Martin Dambacher (2470) and Maurice
Peek (rating 2405 and 2 IM-norms) are dangerous underdogs. They
are also the two favourites to win the title Limburg Champion 2008.

Big Deal in Baku -RESULTS
How sad for Grischuk who
led the whole way… but
Round 10 standings:
1 Grischuk - 6.5
2-3 Gashimov, Wang Yue - 6.0
4-6 Mamedyarov, Carlsen, Adams - 5.5
7-9 Bacrot, Kamsky, Radjabov - 5.0
10-12 Svidler, Karjakin, Cheparinov - 4.5
13 Inarkiev - 3.5
14 Navara - 3.0
But Svidler and Carlsen
both scored a whole point in the last two rounds, 12 and 13, promoting
Carlsen into equal first with Gashimov and the exciting Chinese player
Wang Yue; and these players share first the prize of 72,500 Euros. |
|
The critical 8. Rb1 in the Grunfeld
Exchange, with 12. Bc4

11. d5 Bxc3 and now Qb3 or Bc4
12. Bc4 Bg7! [Prudent! disallowing any tempo-gaining
moves by the white Queen.]
13. Qd3 [or 13. Qe2 Qc8! 14 Bg5 f6! – you will have to
buy the book to review all options, and Play the Grunfeld is
well illustrated.]
13. … Qc8
14. Bg5 Re8
15. e5

Worth another
diagram since White has a big center for his pawn, but no
obvious way to break through. Black players intending to
try out the Grunfeld should feel good about this position, but
should also look at a host of sideline variations. The
good news for Black is that the variations illustrated seem to
be White’s strongest options. The game might continue:
15…Ba6 16.Rbd1 Bxc4 17.Qxc4 Qa6 18.Qh4 Qb7 19.Bh6! [now black
must defend well] 19…Nd7 20.e6 fxe6 21.Ng5! Nf8! 22.dxe6 Bxh6
23.Qxh6 Red8 [Black retained his pawn, and staled the White
attack in Haba-Banas, Austrian League 1997.] |
|
Final
standings:
1-3 Gashimov, Wang Yue, Carlsen - 8.0
4-5 Mamedyarov, Grischuk - 7.5
6-7 Adams, Svidler - 6.5
8-10 Radjabov, Kamsky, Karjakin - 6.0
11-12 Cheparinov, Navara - 5.5
13-14 Bacrot, Inarkiev - 5.0
Radjabov and Cheparinov immediately flew to Sofia, for the 2008 Mtel Masters
on Thursday.
The Parrot notes
that of the top 3 players Gashimov scored 3 times, all with White. Wang Yue
twice with White and once with Black, and Carlsen twice with White and twice
with Black. Interestingly, at the bottom of the chart Inarkiev scored twice.
5-3-2008
Wait
a minute! Before we get started with around-the-world reporting, I
want to know why India is showing up as a massive source of readership at
Chessville? There are 2 possibilities; (a) the first being India has
more spammers hitting our site than any other country whatever, and (b)
that the subcontinent has discovered Chessville, and likes it.
What I would like
to ask is that if you are a (b) type person, our editorial group at
Chessville wants to talk with you about your own column, your own reporting
on chess in the sub-continent. Interested? Write to this
Parrot!
Chess News USA
and Canada
|
More
Chess on TV with ABC
Paul Azzuro
(President of
http://www.chessondvd.com/) and Eileen (Avanti Visual
Communications) are setting up the equipment at ABC TV studio for
chess DVD filming. |
 |
|
 |
So what does it look like? Susan Polgar reports:-
“This is the first ever DVD from the ChessonDVD.com series which is
being shot using the latest High Definition Widescreen technology.
This 2-volume DVD series will cover the French Defense, the first
opening I learned when I started playing chess. I actually used this
opening exclusively until when I reached around the master level. I
still use the French as one of my weapons today.” |
Its…
Editor Atkins!
Susan Polgar’s Blog reported earlier
this week:
"This is Mr. Kelly Atkins, one of the editors and forum host at
chessville.com. He will be visiting SPICE and Texas Tech today to do an
exclusive behind the scene college chess report. Many people hear about the
incredible success of SPICE in a very short period of time. But how do we do
it? After this visit, Kelly will report the behind the scene secret of
success of SPICE and its plans in the future."

Look for Kelly’s special report on
SPICE: [caption
Jerry Perez, Dr. Hal Karlsson (one of the discoverers of water on Mars), GM
Susan Polgar, Kelly Atkins.] Photographer unknown.

US Senior Open – RESULT
Stop-press: Susan Polgar reports;
“Going into the final round, IM Kaufman and Foygel were both 4-0. IM
Bradford and GM Gurevich were both 3.5 points. IM Kaufman defeated Foygel to
win clear first and earn a spot in the Frank K. Berry US Championship in
Oklahoma.”
White:
Kaufman, Lawrence 2383
Black: Foygel, Igor 2501
1.d4 d6 2.e4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.Be3 a6 5.f4 b5 6.Bd3 Nd7 7.e5 Bb7 8.Nf3 c5 9.Be4
Qb8 10.dxc5 Bxe4 11.Nxe4 Qb7 12.Nc3 dxc5 13.Qd5 Qxd5 14.Nxd5 Rc8 15.O-O-O f6
16.Rhe1 fxe5 17.fxe5 Nxe5 18.Nxe5 Bxe5 19.Bh6 Nxh6 20.Rxe5 Ng8 21.Rde1 Kf7
22.Nxe7 Rc7 23.Nd5 Rd7 24.Nf4 Nf6 25.Rxc5 Rhd8 26.Nd3 Kg7 27.Rc6 a5 28.Nc5
1-0

More Chess on TV, this time, Toppy

Its in Bulgarian, but that’s OK, chess humor must
be international, and this one bank commercial featuring GM Topalov is
short and its funny. [Click
here].

Even Brits do it.
But can we?
In fact, I have been writing for 3 months with
the moving force of this project in England, to distribute free chess
sets to schools, who has managed the complex logistics of moiving tons
of chess sets around the country, and who now thinks we should do it
in the USA too. But, he says, we should use our own plastics
company here. The English company who sponsored this initiative,
he told me, got 10 years of advertising from their annual marketing
budget by doing so. Here is a report from an English Newspaper
which cites local politicians – of national politicians I think there
are now a dozen members of parliament strongly enthusiastic of the
program:-
SCHOOLS across Warwickshire
are to be given new chess sets to try to get more youngsters
interested in the game.
The Chess for Schools initiative is being backed by the government and
the English Chess Federation and will involve the distribution of
250,000 chess sets nationwide. |
|
What to Play?
An on-going
exploration into critical opening positions or ‘tabiya’.
She*
says ‘Critical’… so
lets take a look at the Exchange Variation and that 8. Rb1 in
the Grünfeld.
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 g6
3. Nc3 d5
4. cxd5 Nxd5
5. e4 Nxc3
6. bxc3 Bg7
7. Nf3 c5
Fix that position in your mind as the basic tabiya, and now
comes “one of the most critical tests in the entire Grünfeld.”

8. Rb1 0-0
9. Be2
And
here is the big question… who wants to be Black?
White has a
strong center, a lead in development, the possibility of
creating a powerful central passed pawn, the lack of good
squares available to Black’s minor pieces, and the exposed
Queen. Ready to resign yet?
The answer
is Yelena Dembo*, from whose book “Play the Grünfeld”, I
quote, and also Petr Svidler, Garry Kasparov, Bobby Fischer,
Zoltan Ribli, Andras Adorjan, Peter Leko…
Encouraged? Let’s keep looking at this, the most critical
variation. |
|
Cllr
John Burton, cabinet member for schools, said: "We are delighted to be
involved in this scheme which will bring enjoyment and many educational
advantages to pupils across Warwickshire.
Under the scheme, each school in the county is entitled to 10 chess sets -
made by a plastics firm from raw material donated by chemical companies. As
part of the initiative, the council's extended services team is to launch
chess as one of its children's university modules.
The
junior university scheme runs modules including story telling, break-dancing
and Mandarin. After distributing the chess sets, extended services is
aiming to organise sessions with accredited chess coaches to help young
people learn and improve at the game.

But Brits Split:
Following the April Council meeting
on Saturday the following Directors have tendered their resignation
effect 31 May 2008: Martin Regan (Chief Executive), Peter Sowray
(International), Claire Summerscale (Junior Chess & Education; Women's
Chess) and Mike Truran (Non-Executive Director).
Martin Regan had this to say about the issue:
However, in order for English Chess
to achieve that of which it is capable, more fundamental changes are
needed. This is what the board was elected to deliver.
We were under no illusion about the hurdles that would need to be
overcome, nor were we even sure that the Federation itself would wish
to embark on major change.
However, it was clear from the first that in order to progress this
agenda two fundamental conditions were required: A unified board and a
Council wishing to hear the debate with an open mind.
I regret to say that neither condition could be met, despite my best
efforts.

Chess News WORLDWIDE
The IX European
Individual Chess Championships take place in Plovdiv,
Bulgaria 20th April - 4th May.
It was
a bit of an effort to determine what actually happened from the offical
web site, but the Parrot thinks that Tiviakov won the men’s, and
Lahno the women’s. |
|
9.…b6!
A move developed by the aptly named David
Avrukh, and adopted by Petr Svidler, David Navara and Pavel
Eljanov
10. 0-0 Bb7
Take another snapshot of the position:

The author notes one worthwhile
alternative in 10. …Qc7!? As an attempt to avoid the pawn sac line
11. d5, but we skip that analysis here to look at White’s two main
options at move11:
11.d5 or 11. Qd3.
The idea of ‘What to Play’? is not to just
remember move orders from the openings, but to try to understand
the potentials of the position by looking at key points in it. If
you want to play the Grunfeld, or understand what to play against
it, each tabiya illustrates critical strategic or tactical points
in the game that are essential to understand.
Next week we can continue this investigation
with the most aggressive move, the pawn sac variation Black fears
initiated by 11.d5. |
|
After 10
minutes at the site I decided I couldn’t tell who was who from the
pictures, so do not provide any, or any other information that is for
sure, rather than a guess. Maybe you can do better, see the
Official site.
A Russian site reports leader scores:
Men:
1 Tiviakov - 8.5
2-10 Volkov, Tregubov, Movsesian, L'Ami, Vachier-Lagrave, Grachev, Baklan,
Kryvoruchko, Nyback - 8.0
11-34 Sutovsky, Laznicka, Pavasovic, Efimenko, Papaioannou, Khalifman, Najer,
Mamedov, Akopian, Areshcenko, Fressinet, Smirin, Lululesku, Bologan,
Khismatullin, Galkin, Gustafsson, Sargissian, Andreikin, Hracek, Roiz, Vajda,
Markovski, Gurevich - 7.0
Women - Final leading standings:
1 Lahno - 8.5
2-7 Ushenina, Zhukova, Cmilyte, Mkrtchian, Skripchenko, Dembo - 8.0
8-16 Cramling, Pogonina, Muzychuk, Stefanova, Dzagnidze, Danielian,
Lomineishvili, Demina, Socko - 7.5
17 Houska, Paehtz, Hoang Thanh Trang, Repkova, Rajlich, Zimina, Romanko,
Atalik, Turova, Khukhashvili, Molchanova, Cosma - 7.0

Big
Deal in Baku
When Sicilians go bad…
GM Adams
(2729) - GM Svidler (2746) [B92]
30.04.2008
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6
5.Nc3 a6 6.Be2 e5 7.Nb3 Be7 8.0–0 0–0 9.Be3 Be6 10.Qd2 Nbd7 11.a4 Qc7
12.Rfd1 Rac8 13.a5 Rfe8 14.h3 h6 15.Qe1 Qb8 16.Bf3 Rc4 17.Nd2 Rc6 18.Nf1
Rec8 19.Bd2 b6 20.Ne3 bxa5 21.Ncd5 Bxd5 22.exd5 Rc5 23.Bxa5 e4 24.Be2 Qxb2
25.Bxa6 Rb8 26.c3 Rxa5 27.Rxa5 Qb6 28.Rda1 Nc5 29.Bf1 Qd8 30.Rb5 Rc8 31.Ra7
Nfd7 32.Nf5 Bf8 33.Qe3 Qf6 34.Ng3 Qe5 35.Nxe4 Nxe4 36.Rxd7 Rxc3 37.Qe2 Qd4
38.Rd8 Rc1 39.Kh2 White wins 1–0
GM
Radjabov (2751) - GM Kamsky (2726) [B41]
30.04.2008 (Baku Grand Prix - Round 9)
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6
5.c4 Nf6 6.Nc3 Qc7 7.a3 b6 8.Be3 Bb7 9.f3 d6 10.Rc1 Nbd7 11.Be2 Be7 12.0–0
0–0 13.b4 Rac8 14.Nb3 Qb8 15.Kh1 Rfe8 16.Na4 Bd8 17.Bg1 h5 18.Bf2 Bc7 19.Nd4
Ne5 20.c5 dxc5 21.bxc5 b5 22.c6 Nxc6 23.Nxc6 Bxc6 24.Rxc6 bxa4 25.Bg1 Be5
26.Qxa4 Rxc6 27.Qxc6 Rc8 28.Qxa6 Rc2 29.Bd3 Rd2 30.Rc1 Qb2 31.Qc8+ Kh7
32.Rc2 Rxc2 33.Qxc2 Qxa3 34.f4 Bxf4 35.e5+ g6 36.exf6 Qd6 37.Qc5 Qxc5
38.Bxc5 Be5 39.Be7 h4 40.Bc4 g5 41.Bxe6 Kg6 42.Bc8 Bxf6 43.Bxf6 Kxf6 44.g4
hxg3 White wins 1–0
Round 10 standings:
1 Grischuk - 6.5
2-3 Gashimov, Wang Yue - 6.0
4-6 Mamedyarov, Carlsen, Adams - 5.5
7-9 Bacrot, Kamsky, Radjabov - 5.0
10-12 Svidler, Karjakin, Cheparinov - 4.5
13 Inarkiev - 3.5
14 Navara - 3.0
I have been trying
to access the official site baku2008.fide.com all week, and you can too!
But it didn’t work for me.
4-26-2008
Chess News USA
and Canada

This Week:
Big Focus on
Chess USA
|
Master
Nip on TV
Eight
minutes of chess video via U-tube featuring young Master Nip aged 10,
playing a 10 board simul – one of his opponents was the current armed
forces champ from West Point – which was not enough to earn him a point!
Nicholas gave up one draw
and won the other nine games.
See for yourself. |
 |
Samford
Fellowship Awards, Krush and Bhat
International
master (IM) Irina Krush is the reigning U.S. Women's Champion, with a
USCF rating of 2515 and a FIDE rating of 2479. Irina has represented
the U.S. in numerous international competitions since the age of seven,
receiving medals in both World Youth and World Junior Championships.
She became a master at age twelve, and an International Master at age
sixteen. She has been an integral part of the U.S. Women's Olympiad
Team since the age of fourteen, helping the U.S. win a historic silver medal
at the 2004 Olympiad in Mallorca, Spain.
At just fourteen,
she won her first U.S. Women's title with the convincing score of 8.5/9.
At seventeen, she tied for first place with GM Igor Novikov in the NYC
Mayor's Cup and earned her first grandmaster norm. Irina is also
active in the chess community as a writer, photographer, teacher, and
manager of the U.S. Chess League team, the New York Knights.
Vinay
Bhat learned how to play chess when he was six-and-a-half years old.
At the age of ten-and-a-half he set the then-current record for becoming the
youngest national master, breaking Bobby Fischer's record by two years.
That record was since broken by Hikaru Nakamura, and most recently, by
Nicholas Nip. Vinay also played extensively internationally,
representing the US in nine different World Youth competitions with top five
finishes on five different occasions.Vinay completed his IM title in 2000.
From 2002 through
2006, he attended the University of California at Berkeley, graduating with
degrees in Statistics and Political Economy, and then went on to work at
Cornerstone Research in Menlo Park, California. While working he has
gotten back to playing chess and won his third and final GM norm in July
2007. Later that year, FIDE granted him the GM title conditional on
his FIDE rating crossing 2500.
|
North
Carolina is one of the few states that holds an annual invitational
for its top players. Each year, six active players are invited to
square off in a weekend round robin. The highest-rated players in
the state, who have been playing in local weekend tournaments, make up
the field. This year’s event is April 26-27 at UNC Charlotte.
“In order to groom the next generation of masters and experts,
we need to keep our current crop of masters active in the state,”
...said Randy Wheeless, president of the North Carolina
Chess Association. “This event serves as a ‘thanks’ to those
players who are competing every weekend in local Saturday Swiss events
and our top tournaments. They make the chess environment in North
Carolina much stronger.”
This year’s field includes: FM Andrey Chumachenko
(defending champ), NM Maurice Dana, NM Neal Harris, NM Craig Jones, NM
Chris Mabe and FM Ron Simpson.
Official Site.
Pictures are from an article on scholastic chess
Of Kings and Kids in the Charlotte magazine. |

 |
10th
North American FIDE Invitational - Chicago
April 19 - April
25, 2008. All games held at the Touch Move Chess Center at 5639 N. Ashland
Ave Chicago, IL 60660. The score with 3 rounds to go:
1st - 2nd
(5.0/6.0)
WFM Melekhina [captioned] (WIM norm scored! Will she get
a GM norm too?)
IM Young
3rd place (4.0/6.0)
FM
Pasalic
4th (3.5/6.0)
IM Amanov
5th - 6th (3.0/6.0)
FM Stamnov
FM Shankar
7th (2.0/6.0)
FM Chow
8th - 10th (1.5/6.0)
WFM Yuan
FM Monokroussos
IM Vishnuvardhan
IM Norm - 6.5/9;
WGM Norm - 6/9; WIM norm - 4/9
For events
specifics including round times visit -
http://www.nachess.org/fide
MASSACHUSETTS
WINS STATE CHAMPION OF CHAMPIONS TITLE
IM David Vigorito claims
online U.S. Championship Qualifying Spot
World Chess
Live - April 20, 2008 - The United States Chess Federation and World
Chess Live are pleased to announce that, after a close competition, IM David
Vigorito, representing Massachusetts, has won the fourth U.S. State Champion
of Champions event and will now go forward to the
2008 Frank K. Berry U.S. Chess Championship, 13-21 May, in Tulsa,
Oklahoma.
Fifty state
champions from Alaska through California to Hawaii, and from Maine through
to New York and Florida battled their way through the Eastern and Western
Conferences held on WCL (the new
sister-site of the Internet Chess Club), with the top four contesting the
Finals.
The four who
battled their way through the Blitz Conference qualifiers to the Finals
Weekend were: Western Conference: IM Vinay Bhat (Northern California) and IM
Enrico Sevillano (Southern California). Eastern Conference: IM David
Vigorito (Massachusetts) and IM-elect Ray Robson (Florida).
In
the semifinals, both Vigoreto and Sevillano scored convincing 2-0 wins,
respectively, against Robson and Bhat to set-up the final match-up of
Southern California versus Massachusetts. And in that final, it was
David Vigorito, 36, from Andover, MA, who snatched the final U.S. Chess
Championship qualifying spot by taking the title 1.5-0.5.
“It’s [the U.S.
State Champion of Champions event] tough and demanding, yet at the same time
innovative by being played online,” commented David Vigorito after winning
the title. “It was nice to be able to go to Tulsa having won through
-- and doubly so by representing my home-state of Massachusetts.”
This unique event
demonstrates that online chess and over-the-board chess can indeed be a
perfect mix – even for one of the world’s most famous national
championships. First, each player in the tournament had to prove
themselves OTB by winning (or scoring highly in) their relevant state
championship to be invited, then they had to play online on WCL (both in an
all-play-all Blitz for the conference qualifiers, and then the G\60 knockout
finals, with independent proctors officiating at each venue to ensure
fairness throughout), with the winner going forward to the U.S. Chess
Championship.
Caption: Winner IM
David Vigorito
For further
information:
John Henderson, Director of Marketing & Chess Content
Tel: 847-347-9593. Email:
jbhthescots@chessclub.com
The
5th Annual All-Girls Nationals, presented by the Dallas Chess Club and
the Kasparov Chess Foundation (KCF) kicks off Friday April 25 with a
simultaneous by Irina Krush. The main event begins on Saturday, April
26 with four rounds, and two more on Sunday. Some notable
pre-registered players include 2008 U.S. Women's Championship wild card
Courtney Jamison, World Youth silver-medalist Sarah Chiang and members of
the many-time National Championship team I.S. 318 Darrian Robinson and
Angelica Berrios, pictured to the left. Other high-ranked entries
include Anna Matlin, Medina Parilla, Sylvia Yang and Linda Diaz.
At stake in the
Under 18 section is a Scholarship to the University of Texas at Dallas,
valued at over $65,000 for an out-of-state student. KCF President Michael
Khodarkovsky is happy that this year the tournament will include: "195
registered players and the strongest ever field of competitors so far."
The
Susan Polgar Foundation and the Las Vegas International Chess Festival
proudly present the
Third Annual Susan Polgar World Open Championship for Girls (This is
an OFFICIAL qualifier for the SP National Invitational for Girls) and
Second Annual Susan
Polgar World Chess Challenge for Boys.
Sections: Under 8,
11, 15, 19
June 6-8, 2008 - Las Vegas
G/45 - 5 Round Swiss
Over $100,000 in
scholarships and cool chess prizes are available. Details:
http://www.vegaschessfestival.com/polgar/
New
Chess Blog
GM
Boris Alterman has put up a new instructive chess blog:
“Nowadays I rarely play
professional chess. Most of my time is dedicated to giving chess lectures,
Simultaneous exhibitions, private lessons and training sessions.”
See
http://chesslessons.wordpress.com:80/.

Good Interview Spotted:
Lilja
Gretarsdottir - President of the Iceland Chess Federation spoke with
journalists on her chess playing career and also the state of chess in
Iceland.
“I
cherish it personally more than competitively, in fact, and I enjoy the
beauty in chess when others play well. Somehow for me it is also a personal
connection to my grandmother, whom I adored. She was a person of an
incredible independence and free spirit, both on the chessboard and in life.
She always played the King’s Gambit and always went for the win no matter
what. I loved her dearly and she gave me chess. I never had a trainer or
anything like that, but I had my grandmother as an inspiration. (In spite of
this fact Lilja has been eleven-time Icelandic women champion! D.B.)’
Read the whole
thing
here.
Chess News
WORLDWIDE:
The
IX European Individual Chess Championships take place in Plovdiv,
Bulgaria 20th April - 4th May.
Top men
participants: Movsesian Sergei 2695 SVK, Vallejo Pons Francisco 2684
ESP, Volokitin Andrei 2684 UKR, Almasi Zoltan 2674 HUN, Nikolic Predrag 2674
BIH, Akopian Vladimir 2673 ARM, Fedorchuk Sergey 2671 UKR, Motylev Alexander
2666 RUS, Bologan Viorel 2665 MDA, Georgiev Kiril 2665 BUL, Timofeev Artyom
2664 RUS, Efimenko Zahar 2660 UKR, Roiz Michael 2659 ISR, Tomashevsky Evgeny
2658 RUS, Fressinet Laurent 2656 FRA, Predojevic Borki 2651 BIH, Areshchenko
Alexander 2650 UKR, Moiseenko Alexander 2650 UKR, Ivanisevic Ivan 2649 SRB,
Sakaev Konstantin 2649 RUS
Round
4 leading standings
1-3 Grigoriants, Pantsulaia, Sutovsky - 4.0
4-14 Volkov, Stevic, Kovacevic, Tiviakov, Pavasovic, Efimenko, Mamedov,
Werle, Movsesian, Kurnosov, Kriviruchko - 3.5
Top women
participants: GM Cramling Pia 2539 SWE, GM Stefanova Antoaneta 2538 BUL,
IM Socko Monika 2505 POL, IM Muzychuk Anna 2486 SLO, GM Lahno Kateryna 2479
UKR, IM Danielian Elina 2479 ARM, GM Hoang Thanh Trang 2477 HUN, IM Ushenina
Anna 2474 UKR, WGM Pogonina Natalija 2470 RUS, IM Cmilyte Viktorija 2466 LTU,
IM Javakhishvili Lela 2466 GEO, GM Peng Zhaoqin 2455 NED, IM Arakhamia-Grant
Ketevan 2452 SCO, WGM Zhukova Natalia 2450 UKR, IM Paehtz Elisabeth 2449
GER. IM Dzagnidze Nana 2443 GEO, IM Skripchenko Almira 2443 FRA, IM Ovod
Evgenija 2437 RUS.
Round
4 leading standings
1 Kovalevskaya - 4.0
2-8 Cmilyte, Kazimova, Stefanova, Peptan, Muzychuk A., Lahno, Dzagnidze -
3.5
Official site:
http://www.eicc2008.com
Big
Deal in Baku
Standings after 3
rounds:
1 Grischuk 2716
RUS 2.5
2-6 Carlsen 2765 NOR 2
Radjabov 2751 AZE 2
Karjakin 2732 UKR 2
Kamsky 2726 USA 2
Gashimov 2679 AZE 2
7-9 Adams 2729 ENG 1.5
Bacrot 2705 FRA 1.5
Yue 2689 CHN 1.5
10-13 Mamedyarov 2752 AZE 1
Svidler 2746 RUS 1
Inarkiev 2684 RUS 1
Navara 2672 CZE 1
14 Cheparinov 2695 BUL 0
| Insider talk before the match was if Magnus Carlsen
could handle the pressure of being the #1 rated player. I
personally thought so – but that is one very strong field of players!
That is what I wrote last week, but round 4 results went like this: |
 |
Round 4
results:
Kamsky Gata 2726 1/2 Grischuk Alexander 2716
Adams Michael 2729 1-0 Navara David 2672
Bacrot Etienne 2705 1/2 Karjakin Sergey 2732
Yue Wang 2689 1-0 Cheparinov Ivan 2695
Svidler Peter 2746 1/2 Radjabov Teimour 2751
Inarkiev Ernesto 2684 - Gashimov Vugar 2679
Mamedyarov Shakhriyar 2752 1-0 Carlsen Magnus 2765
GM Mamedyarov (2752) - GM
Carlsen (2765) [E17]
24.04.2008 - Round 4
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4
e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 [Regular Parrot readers will recognize
features of the English Defence and the Accelerated Queen’s Indian featured
earlier this year. A game Bilek-Schussler, Helsink 1978 went 1.c4 b6,
2. d4 Bb7, 3. Nf3 e6, 4.g3 Bxf3 – in other high level games this year Black
has chosen Ba6].
5.Bg2 Be7 6.0–0 0–0 7.Re1 Na6 8.Ne5 Bxg2 9.Kxg2 c6 10.e4 Qc7 11.Nc3 Qb7
12.Nd3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.cxd5 cxd5 15.h4 Nb4 16.Bg5 Nxd3 17.Qxd3 Bb4 18.Rec1
a6 19.Ne2 Rfc8 20.h5 h6 21.a3 Bf8 22.Bd2 Rxc1 23.Rxc1 Rc8 24.Rf1 b5 25.f4
Qc6 26.Rc1 Qb7 27.Rf1 Qc6 28.Qf3 Qb6 29.f5 exf5 30.Bc3 a5 31.Bxa5 [Carlsen
overlooked this shot] Qxa5 32.Qxf5 Qd2 33.Qxf7+ Kh8 34.Rf2 Rd8 35.Qxd5
Qa5 36.Nf4 Qa8 37.Ng6+ 1–0
Why Resign?
See the ‘Final Word’ at the bottom of the Page.
 Olympiad
Feed, Dresden:
Polgar defeats
GM Uhlmann in demonstration games a couple of times at castle, before 1,200
guests.
Susan Polgar in
her role of Ambassador of the Chess presented to the Chess Olympiad at
Dresden, 2008, where 75 nations are registered to take part. [The following
is from the German Press…]
The celebrated
Hungarian-American chess genius Susan Polgar celebrated her birthday on
April 19th, 2008 at the Dresden Residence Castle. The former chess world
champion was, on her great day, the star visitor of this year’s Press Gala.
The glamorous meeting of journalists, politicians and business
representatives this year will be themed “Rochade in black and white” – on
the occasion of the Chess Olympiad Dresden 2008 from 12 to 25 November.
Along with Susan
Polgar, the grand masters Wolfgang Uhlmann and Lothar Schmid, Winfried
Lehmann, president of the Organizing Committee, Chairman Dr. Dirk Jordan,
director Jörn Verleger as well as the 26-year-old artist and ambassador of
the Chess Olympiad Dresden 2008, Vaile, followed the invitation of the host
and celebrated together with over 1,200 ball guests until early morning.
During the blitz
match with commentary upon for visitors by Dr. Dirk Jordan, Susan Polgar
twice defeated her ambassador colleague, the Dresden chess legend Wolfgang
Uhlmann, in an uphill struggle. He took it calmly. For him, this weekend’s
sportive highlight is the finale of the 2nd German Chess League. The male
players of the USV TU Dresden are right before their ascension into the 1st
league.
www.dresden2008.de or
www.dresden2008.com
Karpov,
Ponomariov and Gelfand to play in Odessa
by GM Mikhail Golubev
The 4th
PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP will take place in Odessa, Ukraine from 30 May -
2 June 2008. The prize fund is USD 35,000. As usual, some of the
world's most famous chess players will compete in this rapid chess
tournament. So far, Anatoly Karpov (Russia), Ruslan Ponomariov
(Ukraine) and Boris Gelfand (Israel) have all confirmed their participation.
This year, the
number of contestants will be reduced from 10 to 8, and the time control
will be somewhat shortened, but in exchange, the grandmasters will play not
one but two games against each other.
The winners of the
three previous tournaments were:
2005 GM Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine)
2006 GM Joel Lautier (France)
2007 GM Vassily Ivanchuk (Ukraine)
The main organiser
of the tournament is Bank Pivdenny (en.bank.com.ua), which is the largest
bank in the southern part of Ukraine. Pivdenny also organised the 2007 and
2008 ACP World Rapid Chess Cups, which were won by Peter Leko (Hungary) and
Teimour Radjabov (Azerbaijan), respectively.
The 4th Pivdenny
Bank Chess Cup will be covered at the Pivdenny chess site,
worldcup.pivdenny.com.
4-19-2008
|
Fantasy
Chess Island
in Rare Chess Pictures vol. 3 is not Mont St Michel in
France, and nobody guessed it from last week’s distance shot.
Here are closer views at low tide, and also at high
tide. I have been trying to convince a certain someone that the site is
worth review just in case they ever make a [slightly gothic?] chess
movie.
Historical references are as early as 400bc, where,
as an important trading port for the export of
tin and copper to Europe. It is thought likely to be the island of
Ictis, referred to in classical literature.
In fact, I have volunteered my services to be a
native-speaking guide for whenever the Island is inhabited by either a
group of Grandmasters, or Tom Hanks & crew.
If
anything good happens I’ll send you all a postcard
J |

 |

10th North
American FIDE Invitational - Chicago
April 19 - April 25, 2008. All games held at the Touch Move Chess Center at
5639 N. Ashland Ave Chicago, IL 60660.
Participants include:
|
IM Mesgen Amanov
IM Angelo Young
IM Arjun Vishnuvardhan
FM Mehmed Pasalic
FM Dennis Monokroussos |
FM Gauri Shankar
FM Aleksander Stamnov
FM Albert Chow
WFM Alisa Melekhina
WFM Yuanling Yuan |
IM Norm -
6.5/9; WGM Norm - 6/9; WIM norm - 4/9. For event specifics including
round times visit -
http://www.nachess.org/fide.
 So
Wins, Other Cheated at Dubai
Even so, let us
not concentrate on yet another chess cheater on his cell-phone when the
14-year old youngest Philippine GM scores a great tournament championship
victory in Dubai. Now rated 2540, but with a massive 2700 level performance
rating, the young player scored 7 points to clinch the win and also $4500.
Good show! Mr. So.
Susan
Polgar is in Dresden for the Olympiad, and Chessville understands that she,
and her husband will forward Chessville regular news on the Olympiad, as
well as photography of the event.
Not everything in the April Fool’s joke
was false! In fact other parts of the Fool’s Day are also true – and
the Parrot also wants to point out that the origin of the joke was from
Susan herself.
Susan wrote, “The festivities in Dresden this weekend will be amazing.
There will be tons of mainstream media, celebrities, important business
people, politicians, etc. I was told
that there will only be two representatives from the chess community,
grandmaster Wolfgang Uhlmann and myself. I just gave a long interview
to the biggest newspaper in Dresden. They will be doing a 4-page chess
special every single day during the Olympiad.
All the announcement will be officially made by this
weekend. I will keep you posted.”
Ural win Russian Team
Championship – Result
It must feel good
to have a team like this, and they certainly performed:
Board 1: Radjabov, Board 2: Shirov, Board 3: Kamsky, Board 4: Grischuk,
Board 5: Malakhov, Board 6: Akopian
|
1. Ural
(Yekaterinburg) 16 (36½)
2. Economist-1 (Saratov) 13 (33½)
3. Finek (St Petersburg) 13 (32½)
4. TPS (Saransk) 12 (33½)
5. Spasio-Swiss (Moscow) 12 (32)
6. Shatar (Buryatia) 12 (31½)
7. '64' (Moscow) 11 (30)
8. SHSM (Moscow) 8 (29½)
9. Tomsk-400 (Tomsk) 8 (27)
10. Politekhnik (N. Tagil) 7 (27), etc.
Chess
News WORLDWIDE
Grand
Master Anatoly Karpov
to Play at Cuban Mass Match
Havana, April 15 (acn) Russian chess Grand Master and former world champion
Anatoly Karpov will take part in a gigantic 4,000 chess board simultaneous
match on April 21 at the University of Computer and Informatics Sciences
(UCI) in Havana.

Karpov was
welcomed upon his arrival Monday by Osvaldo Vento, an official from the
Cuban Sports, Physical Education and Recreation Institute (INDER). Vento
greeted the chess great on behalf of Jose Ramon Fernandez, president of the
Cuban Olympic Committee and Christian Jimenez, who heads INDER.
Besides
participating in the large gathering of chess enthusiasts at the UCI, Karpov
will visit the International School of Sports and Physical Education and a
local rehabilitation center for Ukrainian children affected by the Chernobyl
nuclear disaster.
The Russian
chess grand master will also visit the pantheon containing the remains of
mythical Cuban chess master Jose Raul Capablanca, world champion from 1921
to 1927, who Karpov considers a great inspiration.
Source.
|
|
What to Play?
Several week’s ago I was showing off my ignorance of
the King’s Gambit, and as a corrective action researched a few lines,
Kieseritzky’s and Fischer’s particularly – thus armored with 45 minutes
study I thought I’d try it in a correspondence game… but the game went
like this…
1.e4 e5
2. f4 exf4
3. Nf3 Be7
4. Bc4
Ah! I know Be2 is the Cunningham, but that was originally a
gambit line combined with a subsequent g3, and I don't think it was very
good, so played this Bc4 thing which I also don't know the name thereof.
4... Bh4 +
The question being, is that a good move, because now Black's king-N has
trouble developing itself.
5. Kf1 c6

The guy I
am playing is 2465 so requires respect, and I think that is an innovation
– and I asked in a newsgroup if anyone had seen it before? I
had been expecting d6. A reply stated there are some 15 year-old
games in a database, but the line lacks a name.
Is there
one? |
|
|
Big
Deal in Baku
The Chess Grand Prix will take place from April 20 to May
6 in Baku, Azerbaijan.
Here are the list of the players (by April 2008 rating
order) in the Baku Grand Prix:
Magnus Carlsen (NOR 2765)
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (AZE 2752)
Teimour Radjabov (AZE 2751)
Peter Svidler (RUS 2746)
Sergey Karjakin (UKR 2732)
Michael Adams (ENG 2729)
Gata Kamsky (USA 2726)
Alexander Grischuk (RUS 2716)
Etienne Bacrot (FRA 2705)
Ivan Cheparinov (BUL 2695)
Wang Yue (CHN 2689)
Ernesto Inarkiev (RUS 2684)
Vugar Gashimov (AZE 2679)
David Navara (CZE 2672)
Insider talk is if Magnus Carlsen can handle the pressure
of being #1. I personally think so – but that is one very strong field of
players!
|
What’s this?!

PAPP Béla Memorial / Rapid
Adorján: Reversed Chess World
premier!
Prize Found: 200.000,- HUF / Ft -
2008. április 19-20. (½ 10 és 10 óra)
4+3 round / forduló, 2x30’ + lépésenként 20”/moves
Hungarian Chess Federation / Magyar
Sakkszövetség (1055 Budapest, Falk Miksa u. 10.)
Prizes / Díjazás:
75-50-30-20-15-10 thousand HUF
(over 60 players) Entry 3000,- HUF (WGMs and GMs free)
Reversed Chess
(Fordisakk) naturally is played according to
traditional chess. The only
difference is that the two camps changing places in the beginning
position. BLACK is to start standing in the
place of White, in return White that is playing in the place of BLACK
replies. This mutation creates odd and comical
pictures but not l’art pour l’art!
It is an experiment.
They say it is better to play with White.
If it is really so could only be because of the
right (and duty) of the first move. However
almost all the associations connected with BLACK are negative.
I have collected just hundreds of such
combination.
In short: the aim of the test
tournament is to learn whether moving first or playing White in the whole
game gives an advantage?
Naturally you cannot draw a firm
conclusion of just one tournament. But I, the
’innovator’ am sure that there’ll be interesting games and I’m eager to
see the statistics of this tournament….
A. Adorjan, E-mail:
aa_ok@interware.hu |
4-12-2008

First of All: Reply-to-Parrot Mail
Dear Louis, Fantasy Chess Island in Rare Chess
Pictures vol 3 is not Mont St Michel in France, though you
are not too far adrift! You are right that Errol Flynn is playing
Olivia DeHavilland who co-starred with him in "They Died With Their Boots
On", which you date to 1940 or 1941. |
 |

This Could Be
The Last Time
Last week we
reported the immanent demise of a board member – and his issue seems to
now have become public news, and concerns legal liabilities of the USCF
Forum, and disagreement about the need for insurance.
I note in
passing that other board members Susan Polgar and Paul Truong have refused
to have anything to do with the forum for over a year, and suggested
shutting it down.
A visit to
that forum records:
Who is
online
“Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest.” Which would
be moi. The most visited item was “Notices of Disciplinary actions” which
recorded a whopping 8,666 views [!] and another titled Complaints
Department had recorded 1,616 views.
Any thread
identifying chess itself as a topic was in the hundreds of view, and many
of those seemed abandoned, with no 2008 entries at all.
In his offer
to resign letter, Mr. Joel Channing opined with 2 rather significant
comments: |
|
Small Problem with
World Championship

On 25th of June 2007 on the
presidential board meeting in Tallinn, FIDE decided that the semi final
match of the world championship cycle (2008-2009) between Gata Kamsky
and Veselin Topalov will take place in the second half of 2008 in
Bulgaria. The same decision was confirmed at the 78th FIDE congress
in Antalya in November 2007. The Bulgarian Chess Federation
expressed it's readiness to provide the necessary prize fund of 150 000
USD and to cover all additional taxes and expenses around it's
organization. The contract for the match had to be signed in
Singapore. But that did not happen.
Instead of following the
decisions taken at the 78th congress, the FIDE President Kirsan Ilymzhinov
has extended the bidding period until April 23rd. |
|
"If our actions or inactions were ever found by a jury to be the
cause of significant damage to the image and career of a high
profile personality, a jury award could easily be well into the
millions."
"This would mean that the financial health of the Federation
itself, as well as those of the directors, could be at risk."
While the USCF Forum is a contentious new element in the life of the
Federation, it occupies massive amounts of board and staff time, and
money to sustain it, it also seems to have detracted from a
little problem to do with income, that is to say, about 200
thousand dollars adrift, and according to my calculations the
impending financial crisis will hit home [that is, the homes of
USCF's employees] at about Christmas time. |
$200,000
adrift being about 7 salaried positions. Though this is not the
most dire prediction, which for next year is at the $300,000 level from a
gross income of about $3.1 million.
This week voting on the future of the Forum went:
To cancel the internet insurance: Yes 4 (Bauer,
Berry, Goichberg, Hough). The motion passes.
To shut down the USCF Issues Forum: Yes 2 (Polgar,
Truong). The motion fails.
If a very slimmed down organization survives and
retains the same name, then at least ratings services will continue as a
core service to the chess public – though after a few more
‘little problems’ including last year’s resignation of a
sitting board member for cheating with his own rating, plus the report in
NY Times Chess Blog last week, by a player who wrote in to USCF for a
masters title and a ratings floor, and was awarded them with no questions
asked, no signature required… even though the sense of the letter was that
the player achieved his results pre-1990, and USCF have ‘lost’ all rating
data before that time…
Of course, if you can qualify as a master, that is
some level of credibility in order to earn money by becoming a chess
teacher…
But quality control systems seem
entirely absent from ratings, and even after the demise of board member
Tanner for rigging his own, the Parrot has not been able to understand
from USCF officials if anything at all has happened in terms of the
competency of the ratings department’s management of, what is after all,
America’s official ratings service, and have received ‘replies’ rather
than substantive answers.
A minimum
response needs to state how no quality control measure was in place even
for a Master title, and secondly, how many such instances are there? And
of course, what has been done about what is known to be a problem.
With
Dylan, I rather think ‘somebody better investigate soon’.
|
When Ratings were Gradings
Parrot Questioned on Ratings then and now:
Has the FIDE rating system veered away from the original Elo theory as
much as the USCF rating system has? If the answer to this is no by a
substantial margin then there is a valid point in making this distinction.
Who knows the history of these subjects?
Answer: 'Ratings' is actually a new term. The
older one is 'grading', and as early as 1880 people have been devising
reports and schema to determine relative strength among chess players.
[see, G. M. Brumfitt].
No ratings emerged to any general public until the
end of WWII. But the Correspondance Chess League of America successfully
introduced a system of their own devising in the 1930's.
OTB Ratings became more popular in England due to the
work of J. Gilchrist and [to be Sir] R. W. B. Clarke. The first 'grading'
list appeared March 1954 as result of their work.
In the 1950's USCF also implemented a [non-Elo]
grading system - but this was problematic and was superceded by another
devised by its own mathematical committee. At about the same time the
Germans used yet another system, INGO.
The main differences between the contenders of these
three systems was perhaps between the US systems and the English one. The
US system related current results to all previous ones, whereas the
English related current results to more recent results.
Until about 1970 there was nothing else to report -
and then Don Shultz's introduction of Elo gained world wide attention, [to
chess and also to horse racing!] especially among the increasing number of
international players - and was some means for FIDE to also determine
strength by an objective means as measured player-to-player, and from
country to country. |

US Championship 2008
Confirmed Roster -
Women:
1 IM Irina KRUSH 2515 Current Champion
2 IM Anna ZATONSKIH 2490 Rating
3 WGM Rusudan GOLETIANI 2384 Rating
4 WGM Katerine ROHONYAN 2318 Rating
5 WIM Batchimeg TUVSHINTUGS 2289 Rating
6 WFM Tatev ABRAHAMYAN 2280 Rating
7 WIM Tsagaan BATTSETSEG 2251 Rating
8 WFM Iryna ZENYUK 2205 Qualifier
9 WFM Chouchanik AIRAPETIAN 2143 Wild Card
10 Courtney JAMISON 2064 Wild Card
Confirmed Roster for the 2008 US Championship:
1 GM Alexander SHABALOV 2697 Current Champion
2 GM Alexander ONISCHUK 2728 Rating
3 GM Gregory KAIDANOV 2697 Rating
4 GM Jaan EHLVEST 2687 Rating
5 GM Varuzhan AKOBIAN 2666 Rating
6 GM Yury SHULMAN 2664 Rating
7 GM Boris GULKO 2623 U.S. Open Champion
8 GM Julio BECERRA 2637 Rating
9 GM Alexander IVANOV 2622 Rating
10 GM Eugene PERELSHTEYN 2615 Rating
11 GM Sergey KUDRIN 2610 Rating
12 IM Benjamin FINEGOLD 2607 Rating
13 GM Alex YERMOLINSKY 2587 Qualifier
14 GM John FEDOROWICZ 2531 Qualifier
15 GM Jesse KRAAI 2569 Qualifier
16 IM Dean IPPOLITO 2499 Qualifier
17 IM David PRUESS 2497 Qualifier
18 FM Daniel LUDWIG 2429 Qualifier
19 NM Sam SHANKLAND 2296 Qualifier
20 IM Josh FRIEDEL 2511 Wild Card
21 FM Michael LANGER 2322 Wild Card
22 Sergey GALANT 2176 Wild Card
Source: Tom Braunlich

The New England Masters 2008 will take place at the Blackstone Chess
Academy, 26 Main Street, Pawtucket (near Providence), Rhode Island, USA,
from August 11-15, 2008. As usual, the event will be a 9 round FIDE rated
Swiss with norm opportunities available to the participants.
Already confirmed to take part are GM Leonid Kritz (Germany), GM Timur
Gareez (Uzbekistan), GM Sergey Erenburg (Israel), GM Eugene Perelshteyn
(USA), GM Keith Arkell (ENG) and now two-time winner of Dos Hermanas, Jorge
Sammour-Hasbun (PLE).
Free entries and reduced rate accommodation are offered to Grandmasters,
non-USA International Masters and players rated FIDE 2500 or higher. To help
attract foreign players to the event, which helps with norms, all entry fees
are discounted by $100 for anyone participating who is not listed as USA.
Entry will be limited to players rated FIDE 2100 or higher although we are
allowing 4 special participants rated under the minimum limit the chance to
participate. Also, due to the size of the location, entry is limited to the
first 50 confirmed entries received.
The event will also be part of the Blackstone Chess Festival that will also
encompass the Blackstone Open on the weekend after the New England Masters,
August 16-17, 2008.
For complete
details and entry information please visit the
tournament website.
Chess
News Worldwide
 
Magistral Ruy López
One round to go and Mickey
Adams is 1 point clear of the field.
Round 6 results:
1 Julio GRANDA (2609) ½ ½ Gabriel
SARGISSIAN (2643)
2 Michael ADAMS (2729) 1 0 Fabiano CARUANA (2620)
3 Humpy KONERU (2603) 1 0 Manuel Perez CANDELARIO (2537)
4 Hou YIFAN (2549) 0 1 Zhang PENGXIANG (2640)
|
No. |
|
Nombre |
Rtg |
FED |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Pts. |
Rk. |
|
1 |
GM |
Michael
ADAMS |
2729 |
ENG |
* |
1 |
1 |
½ |
1 |
1 |
|
½ |
5,0 |
1 |
|
2 |
GM |
Koneru
HUMPY |
2603 |
IND |
0 |
* |
½ |
½ |
1 |
|
½ |
1 |
3,5 |
6 |
|
3 |
WGM |
Hou YIFAN |
2549 |
CHN |
0 |
½ |
* |
0 |
|
0 |
½ |
|
2,0 |
7 |
|
4 |
GM |
Zhang
PENGXIANG |
2640 |
CHN |
½ |
½ |
1 |
* |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
4,0 |
3 |
|
5 |
IM |
Manuel
P.CANDELARIO |
2537 |
ESP |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
* |
0 |
½ |
½ |
1,0 |
8 |
|
6 |
GM |
Fabiano
CARUANA |
2620 |
ITA |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
* |
0 |
½ |
2,5 |
4 |
|
7 |
GM |
Gabriel
SARGISSIAN |
2643 |
ARM |
|
½ |
½ |
1 |
½ |
1 |
* |
½ |
4,0 |
2 |
|
8 |
GM |
Julio
GRANDA |
2609 |
PER |
½ |
0 |
0 |
|
½ |
½ |
½ |
* |
2,0 |
5 |
|
The official site features some stunningly beautiful chess paintings
in honor of the origins of the tournament.
Ruy López y su época : JUAN DE LUCENA: UNO DE LOS
ANTECESORES DE RUY LOPEZ
Ruy López y su época : MADRID,
1575: EL PRIMER TORNEO INTERNACIONAL DE AJEDREZ por Loli Iglesias
website |
 |

The
Dutch Championship is taking place 2nd - 13th April. The participants
are: Sergei Tiviakov GM 2634, Daniel Stellwagen GM 2621, Erwin L'Ami GM
2600, Jan Smeets GM 2578, Sipke Ernst GM 2559, Friso Nijboer GM 2558,
Dimitri Reinderman GM 2526, Ruud Janssen IM 2504, Yge Visser GM 2477,
Jan-Willem De Jong IM 2474, Manuel Bosboom IM 2471, Daan Brandenburg IM
2435.
Nijboer was the early leader, but with 3 rounds to go young stars GMs Daniël
Stellwagen (2621) and Jan Smeets (2578) are tied for first at the 2008 Dutch
Championship with the score of 5.5 points in 8 games.
GMs Erwin L'Ami (2600), Spike Ernst (2559) and Dimitri Reinderman (2526) are
half a point behind with 5 points.
This is a category 12 event with average rating of 2536. [Cool logo is from
a sponsor.]
Official site.
Check
out Chessville's Forum:
This week we have “correspondance anyone?” Here’s a pull quote:
“I've finally gotten it down to 14 current games, so I'm not so
overwhelmed anymore. Never got to play Yelena. Rob tried to put me on the
team, but it was full, so he started a second CV team and I've been playing
on it (I think you're on both of them). Yelena was slaughtering everybody in
sight, wasn't she? I played one 2700 guy and got rolled up in both games,
but I'm doing pretty well against the 2200-2300 crowd - a man's got to know
his limitations!
I've just really gotten into this. I love CC and it's much better
suited to my abilities. I'm too old & careless to play blitz or OTB well,
but with CC, I have the time to dig in and actually analyze enough to be
competent.”—Max Shepische.
But watch out!
If you post anything in that thread, the dread ‘Rob” might try to sign you
up for a CV team! Then there is “do you allow the Marshall Attack?”
another thread asks readers what they want to read in CV columns, and people
are still going on about the Pirc-Robatch.
4-5-2008
|
 |
Chess News
USA and Canada |
 |

Goodbye, Ruby
Tuesday!
We’re goinna miss
you...
I’m not sure if Chessville, in
collaboration with Susan Polgar and Paul Truong, pulled the biggest chess
April Fools spoof of all time
last Tuesday April 1. |
|
Where Was It?
Last Week's Where Was It: wasthe venerable old
Hastings. The traditional tournament there has been in need of
financial support for several years, reports Stewart Reubin, and
welcomes the financial support of the chess community. |
|
|
But 1,000 phone calls, messages and e-mails in 24
hours, including from the NY Times, made us all give up the joke early.
The song goes:
Sometimes you don’t know
what you got ‘til its gone.
Sung by Melanie and also
the Rolling Stones in the 60’s.
If Susan and Paul had needed to validate their work
in chess here in the USA, I would say from that massive and immediate
response that they just heard from everyone. That is, everyone who
actually cares for chess – and who does know ‘what they got’.
Congratulations America!
But there
is a bigger joke – some elements of the ‘message’ were true! But it
is not this Parrot’s place to announce them.
And
Goodbye Joel Channing.
Breaking news this weekend is that a USCF board member resigned April 4th,
over apparent disputes with board president Bill Goichberg. No
official communiqué has yet been uttered, and this news is via
‘deep-rook’, a spy at HQ.

O Canada! Chessville’s readership in Canada seems to have
doubled over the past year [as it has in India] – so what about proposing
yourself as a Canadian chess correspondent? Currently you are
outsourced to the lower 48! And you can’t leave it to Monroi to do
all the work. Its OK, we understand hockey terms down here. |
|
When Was It?
The first magazine devoted entirely to chess, founded
by La Bourdonnais in 1836 was published in Paris, where he
continued to edit LE PALAMÈDE
until 1839, and then ceased publication because of his death. Saint-Amant
and Joseph Méry revived it in 1841 and were joint editors until 1847, when
it ceased publication.
A magazine with a similar name, Le Palamède Français,
was published from 1864-65, edited by Paul Journoud, but had no connection
with its famous predecessor.
The invention of chess was ascribed to Palamedes
during the middle ages, which is presumably the reason behind the choice
of the name of the magazines.
This
extract from The Encyclopedia of Chess, Anne Sunnucks. 1970. |
|
| Chessville is also investigating correspondents
from India and China to represent the vast number of players
in those countries. |
|
Self
Esteem in Oregon
Here is an encouraging extract from:
http://www.thebeenews.com/:
“These chess clubs are important, because they bring together children
from all different backgrounds to play with one another. Beyond
that, when children learn how to play chess, they learn how to sit still,
concentrate, and think ahead.” And, kids also learn personal
responsibility, added Young. “They get the credit for their
successes. And, they can’t blame their losses on their family’s
situation — or even on what they had for breakfast. The ‘field is
level’ for every child. Winning at chess doesn’t take any special
physical or mental skill — it takes concentration, and a will to succeed.”
The program goes far beyond developing
young chess mavens, Young continued. “As soon as a child joins the
chess club, other students — and even some teachers — often think, ‘my
gosh, they’re brilliant’. It really increases their self-esteem when
they get good at playing chess. “Whether they achieve mastery of
chess or not, kids who learn to play tend to do better in school. As
they improve at the game, many of them start taking their studies more
seriously. “We’re not really interested in creating chess masters in
our after-school program. Our goal is to teach children skills that will
carry forward in life.”

Krush wins 1st North American Match Challenge
With a last round victory against IM Lilit Mkrtchian of Armenia. The first
three rounds ended with hard draws bringing the decision down to the final
round. The final match score is 2.5 - 1.5.
All games
can be replayed on the MonRoi World Databank of Chess at
www.monroi.com/wdc.

North American Chess Association Announces:
9th North American FIDE Invitational
RESULTS - Chicago, IL - March 22 - March 28, 2008
10 players from around North America come together in the ultimate
mental challenge with 7 of them in search of gaining their International
Master titles bestowed by the World Chess Federation, FIDE.
1st Place - 7.0 / 9.0
FM Mehmed Pasalic - IM norm scored
2nd Place - 6.5 / 9.0
NM Marc Arnold - IM norm scored
3rd Place - 5.5 / 9.0
IM Mesgen Amanov
4th - 5th Place - 5.0 / 9.0
FM Raja Panjwani
FM Teddy Coleman
6th - 7th Place - 4.0 / 9.0
IM Angelo Young
FM Igor Tsyganov
8th - 9th Place - 3.0 / 9.0
IM Arjun Vishnuvardhan
FM Gauri Shankar
10th Place - 2.0 / 9.0
FM Albert Chow
Chess News WORLDWIDE
Chessville
has attained its own correspondent to cover the biggest chess event of the
year, the 2008 Olympiad in Dresden this summer with its own match
reports, interviews, insider news, plus photo reports.
The
Dutch Championship is taking place 2nd - 13th April. The
participants are: Sergei Tiviakov
GM 2634, Daniel Stellwagen GM 2621, Erwin L'Ami GM 2600, Jan Smeets GM
2578, Sipke Ernst GM 2559, Friso Nijboer GM 2558, Dimitri Reinderman GM
2526, Ruud Janssen IM 2504, Yge Visser GM 2477, Jan-Willem De Jong IM
2474, Manuel Bosboom IM 2471, Daan Brandenburg IM 2435.
Nijboer is the early leader.

This is a category 12 event with average rating of
2536. [Cool logo is from a sponsor]
Official site.
Check out Chessville’s Forum
This
week Dan Heisman wants to know when its OK, in your opinion, to be
aggressive? I asked a Russian writer if he knows what the Sveshnikov is,
since that’s what Russians call the Pelikan. And I asked him the same
about the Petrov, which Russians call Russian Defence! Some people are
discussing the Najdorf and comparing it with the Taimanov & yet another
discussion relates contributions to opening theory by Tarrasch.
|
What to Play? When the KID was really
young, Continued from last week. Moves and commentary draw on The King
Hunt in Chess, W. H. Cozens. 1970. This
game continues with the puzzle posed last week, here is another snare
– would you capture en passant in this position? Black has just played 18.
…c5

Analysis: if 19.pxp ep
or dc then 19…Qxd4! 20.Qxd4 Nf3+ and Nxd4 netting a
whole piece.
19. Bxe5 Qxe5
20. Qb3 Rac8
21. Bb5 f5
22. Rae1 f4!
23. Qd7 Rbd8
24. gf Qxf4 White has no time to capture the e pawn since black
plays a few checks then takes over the e-file with Rde8.
25. Qe6+ Kh8
26 f3 Qg5+
27 Kh1 Rd6
28. Qh3 Covering the threatened sector, black’s task is to expel
the White Queen.
28. … Be5
29. Re2 Rdf6
30. Nd1 Rf4
31. Ne3 bringing the Knight within key range of key defensive squares
– see diagram]

I must remind viewers that in the very next year the
player of the white pieces, Alekhine, was to become World Champion – but
the middle game was the forte of Yates, and he shuffles the world’s best
around with magnificent economy.
31. … Rh4
32. Qe6 [ejected! But there is no option, if Qg2 then Rxh2.]
32. … Qh5 [threatening a mate in 4 after Rxh2+]
33. Ng4 [which holds everything! Doesn’t it?]

33. …Rxg4 [Cozens say this is an intuitive
sacrifice against no less than Alekhine, I wonder if he gives Yates enough
credit?]
34. fg Rxf1
35. Kg2 Qxh2+ [remember the title of Cozen’s book, which is not ‘win a
rook’ but ‘The King Hunt…’]
36. Kxf1 Qh1+
37. Kf2 Bd4+
38. Kg3 Qg1+
39. Kh3 Qf1+
40. Rg2 Qh1
41. Kg3 + [mate in 5 follows Rh2, can you see it after Qf3+]
41. …Qe8+
42. Kh3 [forced] g5!

43. Rc2 [making luft for the King, and the
only square available to the Rook, but which is undefended… allowing]
43. … Qf1+
44. Kh2 [if Rg2 mate in 4] Qg1+
45. Kh3 Qh1+
46. Kg3 [big shuffle, but what now?]

46. … Qd1!!
47. Rc3 Qg1+ [Yates doesn’t want the horrible rook! That Bishop is
beautiful, besides, this is a King Hunt!]
48. Kh3 Qf1+
49. Kg3 Bf2+
50. Kf3 Bg1+
51. Kg3 Qf2+
52. Kh3 Qf2++
Not bad for a KID. |
More Alekhine's Parrot Archives
|
The
Chessville
Chess Store
Advertisement

Reference
Center
The Chessville
Weekly
The Best Free
Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -
It's Free!!
The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives
Discussion
Forum
Chess Links
Chess Rules
Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store
|