Chessville
...by Chessplayers, for Chessplayers!
Today is


Site Map

Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints

 

Already
Play the
Colle System?

Learn to Play it Better!

The Moment of Zuke:
Critical Positions and
Pivotal Decisions for
Colle System Players

by David Rudel
author of Zuke 'Em

7 modules written just for Colle System Players.  Over 150 practice problems accompany lessons written in Rudel's crystal-clear, inimitable style

Thematic Lessons
on game-changing
decisions Colle Players
frequently face

Two Free
Excerpts
Available


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.



From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

 

 

 

Alekhine's Parrot

TheParrot Says…Welcome to the archive of the weekly leader of chess events around the world.  Chessville welcomes your Feedback to TheParrot on this week’s news by writing to TheParrot@Chessville.com where selected letters will be featured.

6-28-2008

Oregon Over

The 10 player round robin event was held in June 2008 at the Portland Chess
Club in Portland, Oregon. Radu Roua (USCF 2209 FIDE 2240) won the event 7-2 to repeat his victory of 2007.  Landon Brownell (2249, 2277) and Nick Raptis (2305, 2259) tied for 2nd-3rd with 6.5-2.5, Full crosstable.  News courtesy Rusty Miller

Chess Media – Texas Tech announce
a Million for che$$

Last year, Texas Tech University generously agreed to host the Susan Polgar National Invitational for Girls, the most prestigious all-girls event in the United States, for the next 10 years and award a four-year academic scholarship for the winner each year to attend TTU.  That is nearly an $800,000 sponsorship package.

A new announcement June 23rd brings the total sponsorship for the Susan Polgar National Invitational for Girls for the next 10 years to over $1 million!  Special thanks to Provost Dr. Marcy, Vice-Provost Dr. Jim Brink, Peggy Flores, and everyone else who made this possible!

Good enough?  Not for everyone!

The same generous sponsorship offer was made for the Denker Tournament of HS Champions and the USCF, but USCF President Bill Goichberg and his supporters rejected the sponsorship offer by Texas Tech University.

Last week a misunderstanding arose at Chessville between this columnist and the publisher.  In the side-bar game a chess diagram illustrated the current position – in fact, readers may have been puzzled why the only diagrammed position for the entire game was the position on the board before the first move!

 

What to Play?  Getting off to a bad start with Bg5 on the Torre.

This side-bar features an on-going exploration of the history of opening developments.  I found a terrible first outing for the earliest Torre Attack, or the Trompowsky as it was to become better known in England.

Anyone know of an earlier game than this correspondence miniature?

[Event "corr."]
[Site "England"]
[Date "1855"]
[Round ""]
[White "Doherty A J"]
[Black "Ashby M"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Eco "A45"]

1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 c5 3.Bxf6 gxf6 4.d5 Qb6 5.Qc1 d6 6.e3 Nd7 7.Na3 a6 8.Ne2 Qa5+ 9.c3 b5 10.e4 Ne5 11.Qd1 f5 12.exf5 b4 13.Nb1 Bxf514.Ng3 Bxb1 0-1

On the other hand, here is a high-level game featuring 2. Bg5 against a Dutch set-up:

[Event "Herceg Novi blitz"]
[Site "Herceg Novi"]
[White "Petrosian, Tigran V"]
[Black "Bronstein, David I"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A80"]
[EventDate "1970.04.08"]
[EventType "tourn (blitz)"]
[EventRounds "22"]

1. d4 f5 2. Bg5 c6 3. Nd2 d5 4. e3 Qb6 5. Rb1 Nf6 6. Ngf3 Nbd7 7. c4 e6 8. a3 Be7 9. Be2 O-O 10. O-O a5 11. Qc2 a4 12. cxd5 cxd5 13. Rbc1 Bd6 14.Nb1 Ne4 15.Bf4 Bxf4 16. exf4 Nb8 17. Nc3 Bd7 18. Rfd1 Rc8 19. Ne5 Qd6 20. Qd3 Nc6 21. f3 Nf6 22. Rc2 Na5 23. Qe3 Nb3 24. g4 Be8 25. g5 Nh5 26. Bd3 Rab8 27. Ne2 b5 28. Rxc8 Rxc8 29. Bb1 b4 30. axb4 Qxb4 31. Nd3 Qd6 32. Ne5 g6 33. Ba2 Qb6 34. Nc3 1-0

   

Always innovative, we at Chessville believe this may be a first...

David Bronstein was famous for taking a long time to make his own first move, maybe 5 or even 15 minutes, even with the White pieces. When he was asked why he ‘tranced’ at move 1, Bronstein quipped, “it’s a very complicated position.”  [See for yourself!]

   

Chess Media
Problem’s, Problems!

Another item from last week was about Nabokov, problemist.  A fascinating article by Chessville’s Robert T. Tuohey, which should engage all you literate people out there, and also all you chess problemists.  If you missed it, well worth a look.  What particularly struck me is that it is unclear from the following extract if Nabokov is talking about composing chess or literary problems – or even if he is differentiating one from the other?

But whatever I can say about this matter of problem composing, I do not seem to convey sufficiently the ecstatic core of the process and its points of connection with various other, more overt and fruitful, operations of the creative mind, from the charting of dangerous seas to the writing of one of those incredible novels where the author, in a fit of lucid madness, has set himself certain unique rules that he observes, certain nightmare obstacles that he surmounts, with the zest of a deity building a live world from the most unlikely ingredients—rocks and carbon, and blind throbbings.

Chess Media
Parrot addresses USCF Board over Women’s Championship

Dear USCF Board, and interested parties,  I wish to raise official questions about the recently concluded US Women's Champion final, on an on the record basis.

It is the general opinion of the super-site Chessbase that what we recently witnessed was that Americans degraded and demeaned the game of chess by their conduct during the Women's championship final.

Even tournament directors in Europe do not recognize the final as other than a deviant form of chess, nor think blitz any sensible means of resolving tie-breaks for the serious game.

On behalf of Chessville, now very prominent on the US chess scene, in fact in terms of reader numbers, #1, I propose the USCF board the following questions which I will also publish, and continue to do so until it is understood:

1) Does any person on the board //disagree// that the means of resolving of the championship was degrading to chess and its players?

2) Who was responsible for choosing this way of resolving the championship?

3) Do the rules of Armageddon matches allow a player to move on the opponent's time?

4) While I understand that the TD is bound by the rules and no doubt has acted properly from that basis, did both players sufficiently understand the changed nature of the Armageddon rules to what went before?

I see from one player's reaction that this is not likely so, because of suggestions of open cheating, and thereby, what efforts were expended to inform the players of the actual rules under which they played some form of chess?

I will publish these questions next weekend as an open letter to the board. I will continue to keep the issue open until each item is both answered by people with authority to do so, and will receive any answer made to me by any party here as being in the public domain, and intended as permission to publish same.


THE sort of ANSWERS received…

Three individuals responded at generous essay-length: Frank K. Berry, Tom Braunlich, Don Shultz, with in total about 4,500 words.

Rather than repeat that correspondence in its entirety in this column, I understand that two of the questions above were answered, both to do with rules.

What are the RULES?

Question 3 asked – what do the rules say about if you can move on opponent’s time – and to paraphrase response: “yes”.
 

 

What to Play?
No Plan & Bad Plan
Bg5, slightly delayed

Kavalek - Browne
US Champ 1986

1 d4 Nf6
2 c3 g6
['the bishop bites on granite', but where else to put it?]

3 Bg5 Bg7
4 Nd2 d5
[otherwise on d6, e4 sooner or later]

5 Ngf3 0-0
6 e3 b6
7 b4
[the first non-standard move in the set-up, but indicated says Soltis to restrain the c pawn: eg 7 ...c5 8 bc! bc 9 Qa4 "after which White controls key Q-side diagonals"]

7... Bb7 [another, for now, 'bad bishop']

8 Be2 Nbd7
9 0-0 Ne4?
[a strong GM goes wrong before move 12. Black cannot quite figure out how to get free by either c5 or e5 pawn advances.

10 Nxe4! dxe4
11 Nd2 h6
12 Bh4

[player's assessment??: the usual result of playing through an opening is to ask yourself at somewhere between move 10 to 15, which side would you rather have? I think the challenge in this game is, if you think its equal, what plan to use as black?] Want a diagram? 

12. ... g5? [black goes wrong again but wait for the Marshall anecdote]

Did the players know the RULES?

Other items of substance came from the pen of Mr. Berry, who wrote about question 4:

“Krush said if she had realized this at the time she would have protested, and argued that due to this mad scramble the result was not a sporting one, and that a verdict of co-champions makes sense.”

And a fair paraphrase of that is ‘no’.  Certainly Irina Krush did not know them – The Parrot made a follow-up question to those who answered, asking if the rules were actually published somewhere, or how we now the players received or understood them?  There was no direct response to this question.

The Parrot pointed out that previous rules actually stated that the rules themselves should be published in the playing area, citing Maxwell’s book ‘Blitz Theory’, and which rules were varied from that?

At time of press it is also unclear if whatever rules in place were Fide-based, or merely what the respondents said was common practice in blitz – so I can’t report any clear answer despite all those words.

Did both players actually
proceed by the RULES?

Mr. Berry responded: “Even so, is it true that Anna was not playing fair?  As Anna and many others who watched the video have pointed out, Irina also made a questionable move or two during the time scramble when she knocked over a piece and didn’t set it back up before punching her clock as the rules require.”

A fair reading of that response which included the word “also” seems to indicate that neither player proceeded by the rules.

 

13 Bg3 f5

["a bad plan," said Frank, "is better than no plan at all." Soltis comments that black needs to activate his heavy pieces, Queen and rooks. Here the apparent pressure is achieving a double-edged situation, and Whites 'hidden resources' says Soltis, come into view]

14 f3! f4?

[question mark by Soltis - though I suppose it follows-on to with the previous plan with 12 ... f5? I suppose there may still be wiggle room for black here, if he at least delays the push]

15 Bf2 exf3
16 Bxf3 Bxf3
17 Nxf3 fxe3
18 Bxe3 e5

[and black escapes the opening having resolved all his problems, right?]

19 Qb3+! Kh8
20 Qe6! Qc8

[choosing that over Re8 since the resulting pressure on his King and weak pawns would 'crump' him]

21 Rae1 Re8
22 Qg6! e4
23 Nxg5! hxg5
24 Rf7
and /tilt!/ Black resigned

I think Andy Soltis suggested above the means to improve on as drastic a defeat as Walter ever suffered in a US Championship - the question remains, how to do that, and to when was black's plan clearly flawed?  Which side did the reader pick at move 12?

And so to the RULES themselves, clear as day, or as mud?

Mr. Berry continued to say:- “More importantly, what Anna did on these moves appears to be typical and not actually “illegal” despite what some players commonly believe.  Mike Atkins, an experienced blitz director who helped write the new USCF blitz rules, says, “If Player A has moved and is reaching for the clock, in blitz it is perfectly acceptable to be making your move in response.  As long as you allow the opponent to punch the clock first… This is not illegal.”

Does that mean you can or cannot move on opponent’s time?  Obviously if you allow the opponent to punch the clock first… First?  Before touching your pieces?  Although you can be ‘making your move in response’ which means exactly what?  preparing to move a piece, or actually completing a move with a piece?

Certainly someone, even of Krush’s experience, did not seem to understand what was ‘perfectly acceptable’ in blitz, which might been just coffee house chess, were also the rules for deciding a national championship.

As to question 1 above – Helluva Rules

No answer to that one from the board, and I think we can safely conclude that whether it was degrading or demeaning, remains an open question.  It would be fair to say that non-board members responded rather than answered the question – but the responses who in terms of denial that anyone should have said degrading or demeaning.

The politest public remark I can find is “It’s a helluva way to pick a champion,” said John Fedorowicz.

I suggest USCF change the name of US championship rules to just that: Helluva Rules.

Who is going to Beat Polgar?  Polgar?

Simul record attempt

The current world record is by GM Susan Polgar for 326 Simultaneous Games Played with a 96 percent win rate in Palm Beach, Florida on Aug. 1, 2005.  Her opponents ranged from 4-year-old Hannah Boshell, who lasted one more round than her older sister, Hunter, to 95-year-old Jona Lerman, who’s been playing the game for more than eight decades.

Honorable Gossip this week has it that there may be a new attempt at the record – perhaps by Susan Polgar herself.

Warning!  Don’t try this at home – I may have misheard the total distance Susan Polgar walked around that circle, but I thought I heard 12 miles.

Nakamura wins the Mainz960

John Henderson has been kind to send us these reports:  Second seed GM Hikaru Nakamura (Smallville) of the USA reasserted his authority as one of the top dogs on ICC on Sunday by winning the Mainz Chess Classic online Chess960 title.  After winning the first qualifier, Nakamura beat with ease Cassano (3-0), VerdeNotte (2.5-0.5) and Yarosavich (3-0) en route to the six-game final.

And in a more closely contested final, Nakamura beat the young Russian top seed Dmitry Andreikin, 4-2, to claim the $1090 (700 Euro) first prize, invitation to the FiNet and Ordix opens, hotel room and breakfast at the Hilton Mainz Hotel by the banks of the Rhine, just 1 block from the picturesque Old Town.

All of last week, qualifiers were held here on ICC for the coveted spots in the 16-player KO Mainz Chess Classic online Chess960 finals. The full list of finalists and results can be found at our dedicated Mainz Chess960 page.

The Sparkassen Chess-Meeting takes place in Dortmund 28th June - 6th July 2008. Participants: Kramnik Vladimir RUS 2788, Mamedyarov Shakhriyar AZE 2752, Leko Peter HUN 2741, Ivanchuk Vassily UKR 2740, Van Wely Loek NED 2676, Nepomniachtchi Ian RUS 2634, Naiditsch Arkadij GER 2623, Gustafsson Jan GER 2603.  Official site: www.sparkassen-chess-meeting.de

6-21-2008

Yerevan Chess Giants ~ Karen Asrian Memorial

Took place June 8th and 15th 2008. After the death of Armenian GM Karen Asrian, the event was renamed to the Karen Asrian Memorial. Time control 25' + 10' inc.

Round 12 standings
1 Leko - 7.5
2 Aronian - 7.0
3 Sargissian - 6.5
4-5 Morozevich, Bu Xiangzhi - 6.0
6-7 Adams, Gelfand - 5.5
8 Akopian - 4.0

Official website: http://www.chessgiants.am/


Very Big Attempt at Chess World Record in NJ

 After corresponding with a principal organizer this week, and then extensively with the entire organizing committee, Chessville has agreed to be a primary news outlet for an astounding attempt at a Guinness Book of Records event, in Chess!

Prevention First is a nonprofit agency dedicated to strengthening the foundations of children and families by empowering them to successfully handle difficult, everyday life situations and extraordinary challenges such as violence and substance abuse, and has been in existence for over 40years.

I was a pleasure to speak to you yesterday. As I mentioned, I am chairing Prevention First's Chessfest in Asbury Park for '08.  wrote John Szeliga, who as well as being a Verizon employee is also on the board of a national foundation for children:

Last years attendance by GM Maurice Ashley certainly was a big step forward and encouraged this years attempt:

I am chairing Chessfest 2008 in Asbury Park, NJ (through the nonprofit Prevention First - I am a board member.)  We are attempting to set a Guinness Book of World Records record. We will need to have 13,000+ participants on Sept 27.


Stay tuned for news of this major initiative in chess in the USA directly relating chess to social benefits for children.

Chess Media
‘Nother New Chess Novel

Susan Polgar wrote:  The Fire will be another fantastic book by a friend of mine who is the best-selling author Katherine Neville. I spoke to Katherine about what it is like to be a female in chess and some other similar issues. Here is some info about this book (published October 16th, Ed.):

Katherine Neville’s groundbreaking novel, The Eight, dazzled audiences more than twenty years ago and set the literary stage for the epic thriller. A quest for a mystical chess service that once belonged to Charlemagne, it spans two centuries and three continents, and intertwines historic and modern plots, archaeological treasure hunts, esoteric riddles, and puzzles encrypted with clues from the ancient past. Now the electrifying global adventure continues, in Neville’s long anticipated sequel:  THE FIRE

2003, Colorado: Alexandra Solarin is summoned home to her family’s ancestral Rocky Mountain hideaway for her mother’s birthday. Thirty years ago, her parents, Cat Velis and Alexander Solarin, believed that they had scattered the pieces of the Montglane Service around the world, burying with them the secrets of the power that comes with possessing it. But Alexandra arrives to find that her mother is missing and that a series of strategically placed clues, followed swiftly by the unexpected arrival of a mysterious assortment of houseguests, indicates that something sinister is afoot.

When she inadvertently discovers from her aunt, the chess grandmaster Lily Rad, that the most powerful piece of Charlemagne’s service has suddenly resurfaced and the Game has begun again, Alexandra is swept into a journey that takes her from Colorado to the Russian wilderness and at last into the heart of her own hometown: Washington D.C.

1822, Albania: Thirty years after the French Revolution, when the chess service was unearthed, all of Europe hovers on the brink of the War of Greek Independence. Ali Pasha, the most powerful ruler in the Ottoman Empire, has angered the sultan and is about to be attacked by Turkish forces. Now he sends the only person he can rely upon–his young daughter, Haidee–on a dangerous mission to smuggle a valuable relic out of Albania, through the mountains and over the sea, to the hands of the one man who might be able to save it.

Haidee’s journey from Albania to Morocco to Rome to Greece, and into the very heart of the Game, will result in revelations about the powerful chess set and its history that will lead at last to the spot where the service was first created more than one thousand years before: Baghdad.

Blending exquisite prose and captivating history with nonstop suspense, Neville again weaves an unforgettable story of peril, action, and intrigue.

http://www.katherineneville.com/

Chess Media
Alekhine on
BBC Radio

Reader Bob Holmstrom has pointed out a better recording of Alekhine’s BBC radio interview.  The offer still stands – if you can identify the interviewer tell us who you think it is, then we will amaze BBC who want to know.

US Junior Championship

[photo, below, right: Final photo from the US Junior.  From left to right:  organizer FM Tom Brownscombe, US Junior Champion Tyler Hughes, US Junior co-Champ Gregory Young, 3rd place Daniel Yeager, 4th place Edward Lu and Karpov School President Marck Cobb.

 

A few weeks ago the noted Petersburg GM remarked about ‘the Kasparov menace.’  Here he is annotating his own game.








1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.c4 c6 4.Nc3 dxc4 5.a4 Bf5  It seems a pleasant surprise, this variation I play both White and Black.  Many lines I looked by myself, at different time analyzed it together with such theorists as Elmar Magerramov, Alexander Khalifman, Vladimir Kramnik, prepared this variation for utilization on the World Championships...

6.e3  Lately I mostly play so, but in that situation I should admit this move as a  psychological mistake.  6.Ne5 leads to a more forced (thus simpler to play) game.  The more so the knowledge of this variation I have deeper than of the variation with 6.e3

6...e6 7.Bxc4 Bb4 8.0–0 Nbd7 9.Nh4  White is going to exchange Black's light colored Bishop.  Another variety of the variation is 9.Qe2 Further White proceeds e3-e4, capture space, but Black has a firm position without weaknesses.  Earlier Vasily Smyslov played this variation as black perfectly, now Evgeny Bareev.

9...Bg6  The other well-known in theory line is 9...0–0 10.Nxf5 exf5 11.Qc2 g6 12.f3 White strives to prepare the advance e3-e4, Black tries to prevent it.

10.h3  A move has been introduced in practice several years ago by Kasparov. It's dangerous to exchange on g6 at once since the opening of h-file, thus White expects Black's castling. More reliably 10.g3 in order to avoid the 'suspension' h4-Knight, which Black uses by the next move.

10...Bh5!  A risky continuation which turned out to be psychologically correct.

11.Qb3??  Certainly I knew that it is necessary to play 11.g4! Bg6 12.f4! whereupon begins a real slaughter.  Besides such play suits to position requirements.  Sitting up for about forty minutes I never could make up one's mind to a courageous assault of Black's position.  One moment I already thought to exchange bishops by way of 11.Be2 whereupon even Kasparov hardly would manage to find resources for a serious fight.  The position emasculates by itself quickly and a draw becomes inevitable.  However I considered that it is simply improperly to play so (I think the same now despite of a dismal result of the game).  One moment I simply twitched not estimating the position and not counting the lines (strictly speaking there is nothing to calculate), have made a terrible Queen move and after it White stands worse.

11...a5  Here I engrossed in thoughts for a long time again. It is true now it was to think about.  White with the last move deprived himself an opportunity both to finish normally the development and to set in motion his central pawns.

12.g4  In such interpretation this move is already not an attacking but a defensive one.  Probably nevertheless preferred was 12.Na2 whereupon Black has a pleasant choice between positional  12...Nd5 and attacking 12...Bd6.

12...Bg6  Black has only a perpetual check after  12...Nxg4 13.hxg4 Qxh4 14.gxh5

13.Ng2 0–0  Well also is 13...c5 , after for example: 14.Nf4 cxd4 15.exd4 0–0 Black has an advantage at the expense of a weakened white king.

14.Nf4 e5 15.dxe5?  White should not change the d4-pawn which took away important squares from black knights.  Better is 15.Nxg6 hxg6 16.Na2 (or 16.Rd1 exd4 17.exd4 Nb6 18.Bf1 whereupon Black has only minimum advantage.)

 
Despite a low-level turn out for this year’s event which USCF scheduled for final’s week in chess – quality and drama of the chess seemed very good according to Michael Aigner’s report, and also the official site.

2008 US Junior Closed
Final Standings

Tyler Hughes champion on tie-breaks

 

1.  Hughes, Tyler B............... CO 2267
          xx DW WD WD L- 5.5
2. Young, Gregory................ CA 2213
          DL xx WD WD W- 5.5
3. Yeager, Daniel A.............. PA 2363
          LD LD xx WD W- 4.5
4.  Lu, Edward J.................. VA 2213
          LD LD LD xx W- 3.5
5. Sawyer, Bradley J............. TX 2170
          W- L- L- L- xx 2.0

Chess Media:  CL GONZO?

After last week’s editorial here, Ex-editor of Chess Life Larry Parr writes about chess writing, to applaud Chessville’s efforts at ‘tending the flame.’  The Parrot replies with Chessville’s philosophy:

Dear Parrot: even in these rancorous times, you are considering benefits for everyone -- for the USCF, for the writers, for Chess Life readers, even as you take Chessville from height to height.  Yours, Larry Parr.

CLIMB EVERY MOUNTAIN?

In between them heights, Larry, are valleys.  In fact, some old Scots bloke with hams like oak-trees was pointing out a pretty winter ridge-line to me, a young Parrot, who was about to lead up a scarp about as steep as a stairs, but a stairs with no steps on it covered with ice, the top about 2,000 vertical feet above where we were standing

[Technically, the ice was good for climbing, crusty surface you could wang your ice-axe through, and with good grip for crampons, and no cornices above to tunnel through or fall on your head.  The challenge is that most body weight hangs on the toes, and you didn't want to cramp on the way up otherwise you simply freeze to death from exposure far above tree-line, with no help possible.]

But he said, nay laddie, its nae geeten oop thair!  Its geeten oop thair and back agin! - and continued to cackle, vastly amused - how ye going to cummon doon? he asked, carry 2,500 feet of rope?  A good point, I thought.

Anyway, he more seriously suggested two exit strategies from the top and made me estimate time and other aspects of a return, also appreciating that the easy route down would take too long, the sun being down at 3:15 and walking 4 miles in the dark by compass is a desperate measure in a whited-out unknown landscape.

[caption, an easy summer climb 4,000 feet above tree-line with the venerable naturalist Ian Campbell – Parrot in red shirt.]

 

15...Nxe5 16.Be2 Nfd7!  Black knight immediately goes on an apparent excellent  station on c5,  at the same time frees the way on h4 for the Queen.

17.Nxg6 Nxg6! [Not very well is 17...Nc5?! 18.Qc2 Nxg6 19.Na2!; Not so strong is also 17...hxg6 in view of 18.Ne4! taking away c5-square from the black knight.]

18.Rd1  In case of 18.Ne4 Qh4 19.Kg2 Qe7 20.Ng3 Nh4+ 21.Kh2 Rad8 Black has a strong initiative.

18...Nc5  Kasparov decides to pass the game into the endgame. I think not less strong was 18...Qe7

19.Rxd8  Bad was 19.Qc2 Qh4 20.Kg2 Rae8 , soon Black will provide f7-f5 or transfer the knight from c5 to g5 with a mate attack.

19...Nxb3 20.Rxa8 Rxa8 21.Rb1 Rd8 22.Bd1  Doesn't help  22.Ne4 Ne5 23.Kf1 Kf8 24.f4 Nd3 25.Bxd3 Rxd3 26.Ke2 Rd8, and White's pieces are paralyzed.

22...Nxc1 23.Rxc1 Ne5 24.Bb3? My last fault in this game.  An active play didn't go off 24.Ne4 Nd3 25.Rb1 Nxb2 26.Bb3 Ba3 (Weaker was 26...Nd3 27.Ng5 Ne5 28.f4 Bc5 29.fxe5 Bxe3+ 30.Kg2 Bxg5 31.Bc4 , and White has a counter-play.) 27.Ng5 Rf8 Black keeps an extra-pawn gradually dislodging white pieces from their active positions. ; Yet there were chances on a draw if White would play 24.Bc2! A) It is insufficient 24...Nc4 25.Rd1 Rb8 26.Rb1 followed by 27.Ne4 and 28.Bb3(It is interesting also 26.Rd7!? Nxb2 27.Ne4 b5 28.Bb3) ; B) 24...Bxc3 25.bxc3 Rd2 (Otherwise White activates the rook 25...Nc4 (or 25...Kf8 26.Rb1) 26.Rb1 Na3 27.Rb2!) 26.Rd1 The turned out to be bishop-knight endgame is a difficult one for White but it is not very simply to win it. Black's plan are: to place kingside's pawns on dark squares, to transfer the knight on c5, to bring the King closer to center and further to organize a passed a-pawn playing b7-b5. But even this is still not a win, in the offing was a long viscous play.

24...Rd2 25.Rc2 Bxc3 26.bxc3 Nf3+ 27.Kf1 Kf8!  I have not seen this simple move in time trouble. White couldn't even exchange the rooks.

28.Rc1 Ng5  White couldn't defense numerous weaknesses, further it is simple.

29.Rc2  Black easily wins also after  29.Ke1 Rb2 30.Bc2 Nxh3 31.f4 g5

29...Ne4 30.Ke1 Rxc2 31.Bxc2 Nxc3 32.Kd2 Nd5 33.Bb3 Ke7 34.Kd3 Kd6 35.Kd4 f6 36.h4 h6 37.h5 Nc7 38.f4 Ne6+ 39.Kc4 Nc5 40.Bc2 Nxa4  What can I say in conclusion?  One should play chess more actively: 'Fortune leads the one who strives and drags the one who fears...' Russian Proverb.  Result: 0–1

This is an extract from the player’s own account as sponsored by Chessville – in the “Lesson’s Learned” series.

LIFE & LETTERS

And there is analogy to USCF's recent lurches into the void – I see no sensible rehearsals of what to do on getting into trouble in exposed situations.  No viable exit plans - and only grim determination to brute force issues through, at the expense of engaging situations beyond any control, and with potential lethal effects.

Certainly it is the main view at Chessville that we wish to preserve and protect the game, and I think many players do the same - that's why they read us.  On the contrary, those who boost USCF seem far more content to boost the organization, which is to say, the fortunes of those who run that organization - and to continue my analogy above - have now pushed themselves as high as they can go in difficult conditions, but are faced with either an unrehearsed and very difficult descent, or to take the long easy route out - but risking survival itself in getting off the hill before the sun sets, forever!

That is some level of unwarranted risk, and willy-nilly people undertake the risk on their own behalf which is their own business, but what business do they have with what is entrusted to them as our National resources in chess?

That, my dear Larry, if I may subscribe the general editorial opinion of my Chessville colleagues, is a very pertinent question and our constant context.

Chess Media: Chessville Wants …

To thank those good individuals who responded to our appeal for infra-structural help.  There are a couple more jobs going, plus we are always looking for innovative columnists – one short-fall of our current offerings is a bit of chess history…

AEROSVIT-2008

The 3rd International Chess Tournament 'AEROSVIT-2008' takes place 7th-20th June 2008 in Foros, Crimea, Ukraine.

Round 5 standings were
1 Carlsen - 4.5
2-3 Karjakin, Volokitin - 3.0
4-8 Shirov, Ivanchuk, Eljanov, Svidler, Nisipeanu - 2.5
9-10 Alekseev, Jakovenko - 2.0
11-12 Onischuk, Van Wely - 1.5

One other interesting point so far is White v Black Scores. White has scored 14 wins, Black has 3 wins and there are 13 draws.

Could Carlsen handle the lead? Well, here are the Round 9 standings

1 Carlsen - 7.0
2 Eljanov - 5.5
3-4 Ivanchuk, Karjakin - 5.0
5-7 Alekseev, Svidler, Jakovenko - 4.5
8-9 Nisipeanu, Volokitin - 4.0
10-11 Shirov, Van Wely - 3.5
12 Onischuk - 3.0

Carlsen has an extraordinary performance rating of 2895, but is not in this round of the World Championship cycle – lets hope he stays around long enough for the next one, whenever that may be.

The scene was set for the last rounds; Susan Polgar commented on the GM play:

In spite of the nice leading edge when first place was almost guaranteed, Magnus Carlsen played for a win against Ukrainian Andrei Volokitin who owes him for a catastrophic 0-4 score in their earlier encounters. The long and tense battle finished in a draw after 80 moves, and after Eljanov drew with Karjakin, the first place at the 2008 Aerosvit Foros was secured for Carlsen. Vassily Ivanchuk once again "shocked" his opponent with an early Qf6, and this time it paid off as he forced Loek Van Wely to resignation practically right after the opening.

Final standings:

1. Carlsen, Magnus g NOR 2765 8
2. Ivanchuk, Vassily g UKR 2740 7
3-4. Karjakin, Sergey g UKR 2732 6
3-4. Eljanov, Pavel g UKR 2687 6
5-7. Volokitin, Andrei g UKR 2684 5½
5-7. Jakovenko, Dmitry g RUS 2711 5½
5-7. Shirov, Alexei g ESP 2740 5½
8-10. Alekseev, Evgeny g RUS 2711 5
8-10. Svidler, Peter g RUS 2746 5
8-10. Nisipeanu, Liviu-Dieter g ROU 2684 5
11. Van Wely, Loek g NED 2677 4
12. Onischuk, Alexander g USA 2664 3½

Official site: www.ukrchess.org.ua/aerosvit2008

6-14-2008

In Memoriam

Grandmaster, Armenian chess champion Asrian dies at 28
2008-06-09 18:32:34

YEREVAN, Armenia (AP) - Karen Asrian, an Armenian chess grandmaster who was the ex -Soviet nation's reigning champion and won the 2006 Chess Olympiad, died Monday after suddenly losing consciousness, the Armenian Chess Federation said.

Asrian was ranked 92nd by the World Chess Federation, or FIDE.  Apparently feeling ill, Asrian pulled his car into a court yard in the Armenian capital, Yerevan, early Monday and lost consciousness, the Armenian Chess Federation said.  An ambulance crew pronounced him dead at the scene, possibly of a heart attack, it said.

A moment of silence was held in his memory before the opening of a speed-chess tournament in Yerevan on Monday after his death was announced by Armenian player Smbat Lputian.

The Yerevan Chess Giants is taking place between June 8th and 15th 2008.  After the death of Armenian GM Karen Asrian, the event was renamed to the Karen Asrian Memorial.  Time control 25' + 10' inc.

Standings after 10 rounds:

1. Leko, Peter g HUN 2741 6½
2. Aronian, Levon g ARM 2763 6
3. Sargissian, Gabriel g ARM 2643 5½
4-5. Bu Xiangzhi g CHN 2708 5
4-5. Gelfand, Boris g ISR 2723 5
6. Morozevich, Alexander g RUS 2774 4½
7. Adams, Michael g ENG 2729 4
8. Akopian, Vladimir g ARM 2673 3½

Official website: http://www.chessgiants.am/

Big Report on Chess News USA and Canada

2008 Inter-Service Chess Championship, June 9-13

This year’s edition of chess rivalry between the armed services is already showing hints of historical proportions.  For the first time ever in the history of military chess, a lone Air Force tigress laid waste to a field of mesmerized men by defeating the top boards of both the Army and Navy teams.

Paired against LCDR Choate (USCF 2050), Elena Dulger (USCF 1828) humbled the Navy’s top player in the first round. She then vanquished 1LT Macaspac (USCF 1986) in the second round, this year’s Army champion and top seed. After two rounds, the leaders with perfect scores are: Bucholtz (Air Force), Carrelli (Marines), Dulger (Air Force), and Baniel (Army).

The winner of the team competition is determined by adding scores of the top four scorers for each team, and the team with the highest score earns the bragging rights as champion. Besides the team event, the top finisher of each team will take the first four team spots. The remaining two spots will go to the other top placers regardless of service.

In this scheme, any team can possibly (and only) take three spots in the US Armed Forces Chess Team. The upside to this arrangement is that each service will at least be represented. In addition, it also effectively removes the possibility for one service to exclusively comprise the team.

The downside is evident as it is possible for players to earn a berth on the US Armed Forces Team by simply becoming the top scorers of their respective services. These players may not necessarily be in the top ten on the wall chart. When this happens, the US Armed Forces Team essentially is not fielding its strongest team based on results.

The format of the tournament is 7-round Swiss but no player will be paired against his teammate. The six-player team will represent the US Armed Forces in this year’s edition of the NATO Chess Championship to be held in Brussels, Belgium. The dates are yet to be announced.

2008 INTER SERVICE CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP  PLAYER LIST

AIR FORCE  Rank Rating
1. Keough, Robert W TSGT 2073 [captioned below]
2. Bucholtz, Robert A TSGT 2013
3. Dulger, Elena V AC1 1828 [captioned top]
4. Pagtama, Lawrence B MSGT 1903
5. Ranario, Dan P MSGT 2024
6. Echaure, Samuel COL 2009

ARMY
1. Macaspac, Arthur M 1 LT 2086
2. Drake, Christopher A SGT 1964
3. Pitts, Chris L CPT 1915
4. Baniel, Jhonel B SPC 1932
5. West, Darryl L SGT 1730
6. King, Christopher S PFC 1381

NAVY
1. Choate, Paul L LCDR 2050
2. Nichols, Ryan G ATCS 1605
3. Pihl, Eric LCDR 1440
4. Smith, Victor E LCDR 1687
5. Recinos, Johnny Jeff MM2 1627
6. Dixon, Joseph K YN2 1592

MARINES
1. Adkins, James MSGT 1946
3. Carrelli, Donald Cpl 1704

BANIEL IS CHAMPION, DULGER MADE HISTORY!

Reports Chessville’s own correspondent, Andres D. Hortillosa
www.USMilitaryChess.org

Army Specialist Baniel succeeded in demolishing the Air Force surgeon  Dr. (Colonel) Echaure in the last round to secure top honors finishing with 5.5 points.  A weeklong stellar performance earned him a hallowed place in the tradition-rich annals of military chess.  His name is forever etched in the record books alongside world famous players like IM Emory Tate.

The sensation of the tournament, Elena Dulger of the Air Force finished in clear second.  The young airwoman’s impressive performance commences a new beginning in military chess.  For the first time ever, a woman player makes the roster of the US Armed Forces Chess Team for the NATO Chess Championship in Brussels, Belgium.

The noted IM Elizabeth Phatz represented Germany last year.

Other members of the team for the prestigious NATO event are: Tech Sgt. Robert A. Bucholtz (Air Force), Lt. Commander Paul L. Choate (Navy), and Corporal Carrelli (Marines).  The last spot is being determined this very moment by a playoff match between MSgt. Dan P. Ranario (Air Force) and Captain Christopher Pitts (Army).

The unique rules for determining the composition of the team call for a playoff match between the 5th and 6th finishers if not all services have a player in the top four.  The Marine qualifier finished 17th but because each service must be represented by its top scorer regardless of final standing, he makes the team.

This scheme puts players who finish in 4th, 5th and 6th places, respectively, in a playoff scenario.  If the team is chosen by the order of their respective standings, the members would be in this order: Baniel (Army), Dulger (Air Force), Bucholtz (Air Force), Ranario (Air Force), Pitts (Army) and Choate (Navy).  In this configuration, two are Army, three are Air Force and just one Navy will comprise the team.  The Marines will not be represented but the team yields the strongest field.

Decisive results in the last round changed the ranking order dramatically.  Pitts (Army) defeated Keough, the top seed for the Air Force.  Macaspac (Army) who normally makes the team lost to Ranario (Air Force).  Both Pitts and Ranario, with their decisive games in the last round, earned them a playoff and the winner the last spot on the team.

The Air Force bested the Army for the team championship by one point, Air Force totaled 26.5 points and the Army totaled 25.5 points.  Had West won his struggle against Adkins, the team event for this year would have been tied between the two perennial rivals at 26.5 points each.  The Navy finished in the distant third with 11.5 points.  The Marines with just two players finished with 6.5 points.

Top 5:
1 Jhonel B Baniel 1932 5.5
2 Elena V Dulger 1828 5
3 Robert A Bucholtz 2013 5
4 Dan P Ranario 2024 5
5 Chris L Pitts 1915 5

Team Final Standings
AIR FORCE 26.5
ARMY 25.5
NAVY  11.5
MARINES 6.5

Chess news from Susan Polgar

Stars out over Vegas - results

Many top tanked players didn’t take part in the US Championship this year, so there is a chance to see Nakamura and Kamsky at the Las Vegas Chess Festival June 5 to 8, 2008 at the Riviera Hotel. Players of note include:

Top finishers at the National Open:
1-6 GM Kamsky, Gata NY 2782 5.0
1-6 GM Fressinet, Laurent FRA 2706 5.0
1-6 GM Petrosian, Tigran L ARM 2666 5.0
1-6 GM Kolev, Atanas BGR 2620 5.0
1-6 IM Finegold, Ben MI 2594 5.0
1-6 GM Friedel, Josh NH 2504 5.0
7-9 GM Erenburg, Sergey ISR 2613 4.5
7-9 GM Khachiyan, Melikset CA 2566 4.5
7-9 IM Robson, Ray FL 2433 4.5

SP World Open for Boys and Girls:

Girls under 8 Co-Champions: Annie Wang, Nicole Zlotchevsky, Alisha Chawla, Queena Deng 4-1
Boys under 8 Champion: Winston Zen 5-0
Girls under 11 Champion: Leanne Hwa 5-0
Boys under 11 Champion:Tommy Polgar 5-0
Girls under 14 Champion: Sayaka Foley 5-0 (TTU $36,000 scholarship - Out of state tuition)
Boys under 14 Champion: Matthew Martinez 5-0
Girls under 19 Champion: Rebecca Lelko 4.5-.5 (TTU $36,000 scholarship - Out of state tuition)
Boys under 19 Champion: Randel Eng 5-0 (TTU $36,000 scholarship - Out of state tuition)

Official website: http://www.lvchessfestival.com/

Chess Media – Chess Life optional

USCF announced last week that the flagship print chess magazine Chess Life will become an optional purchase with USCF membership. USCF will also terminate its scholastic magazine Chess Life 4 Kids. The plan is the mind-child of President Goichberg and is receiving severe criticisms in the chess community.

Chess Media – More Trouble from ChessCafe

One upshot of these draconian measures is that the principal of Chesscafe who retails USCF’s book and equipment business has made several complaints including the mention of lawyers – Hanon Russell is himself a lawyer and is probably not kidding around.  He seems to have taken great offense at President Goichberg’s actions, not only cutting back the magazine but also by using other retailers without any due process, or notification to himself; behavior he says which hurts his business prospects representing USCF.

Interactions between Russell and board-member Bauer are in danger of becoming more than a little uncivil, and the confrontational tone can surely only end in tears.  Here is Bauer’s comment to Russell:

You and I have had this discussion about what actually happened at the US Amateur Team East, and you know for a fact it is true.  You are an attorney - put up or shut up.

Since these acrimonious interchanges are with USCF’s dedicated trading agent, it would surprise me to hear about any mediation services taking place before law-suits are engaged in earnest, and the inevitable ending in divorce.

Chess Media: Chess in Education

USCF Chess in Education workshop to be held in Dallas, August 7, 2008. Contact: Alexey Root alexey.root@gmail.com The United States Chess Federation (USCF) Chess in Education workshop is open for registration. USCF workshop: co-organizers Dr. Alexey Root and Dr. Tim Redman, sponsors USCF, U.S. Chess Trust, The University of Texas at Brownsville (UTB), Texas Tech University (TTU), and The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD)

Thursday, August 7, 2008: 1:00-1:30 USCF Chess in Education committee business meeting (John Buky and Joseph Eberhard, co-chairs).

1:30-2:00 Dr. Alexey Root, [captioned] author of Science, Math, Checkmate: 32 Chess Activities for Inquiry and Problem Solving, presents a classroom activity.

Looking to combine educational goals with chess? Dr. Root presents an activity from her most recent book that teaches the geometry of the board along with the particular way in which knights move, all wrapped up in a fun story. Come hear, and participate in, “Coco Can’t Wait.”

2:00-3:00 Keynote Speaker Russell Harwood, Chess Program Director UTB/TSC, presents, The Chess Boom in Brownsville, Texas, and Tips for Duplicating it Where You Live.

Scholastic chess is booming in Brownsville, Texas, and the surrounding communities.  Of the 50 schools in the Brownsville Independent School District, at least 35 have active chess programs.  Six different Brownsville ISD schools have won national chess championships, led by Dr. Americo Paredes Elementary’s seven national titles.  Two elementary school students have tied for individual national championships, and many others have finished in the top five.  The chess success of our local schools got the attention of Dr. Juliet Garcia, President of The University of Texas at Brownsville/Texas Southmost College, who formed a chess program at UTB/TSC so that area students would have the opportunity to earn scholarships and compete in chess at the university level.  The Brownsville Independent School District has gotten onboard, and now allocates about $400,000 per year to their chess program.  Chess has become a source of pride to BISD, UTB/TSC, and our community, and is now part of our identity.  How did all of this come about?  How can these results be duplicated elsewhere?  Are there other successful models in our area?  How does the future look?  These questions and more will be addressed during this informative presentation.

3:30-4:00 Jerry Nash, Scholastic and FIDE Director for USCF, presents Strategies to Introduce Chess as an Educational Tool: Coordinating the Five Communities.

Scholastic chess has seen a dramatic increase within the last twenty years.  In 1988, the United States Chess Federation’s youth and scholastic members totaled approximately 7000.  By 2002, the two age groups combined for over 53,000 members.  The state of chess in education may be characterized by its status as two types of programs: after-school and curriculum instruction.  By far the majority of scholastic chess programs fall within the after-school category.  The coordination of four communities – educational, civic, business, and political communities – along with the chess community is critical for the development of opportunities to demonstrate the value of chess for instruction.

4:00-4:30 Rosalyn B. Katz, author of The New Jersey Chess Bill; Chess in the Classroom; Start Playing Chess; and, Play Better Chess, presents Make it Legal – Chess Legislation and Application.

New Jersey’s Chess Bill was passed in 1993.  Fifteen years later, we examine such questions as: What good did it do?  How and why was it done?  How did we overcome obstacles and constraints?  Is similar activity a viable option for your state?  How can we go even further?  Those interested in expanding chess in their own states in a legalistic and practical way, will find an organized approach to success.  Booklets about the process will be provided for those in attendance by the NJ State Chess Federation.  Roz will offer individual consultation, at no additional charge, from August 6th through August 11th for promoters developing action plans for their own states.

4:30-5:00 Dr. Tim Redman, [2nd caption] editor of Chess and Education: Selected Essays from the  Koltanowski Conference, presents Chess and Syntax: Some practical applications for teachers.

In his talk for the Chess in the Schools and Communities Conference (CISCCON) , Professor Redman spoke on “Chess and Syntax: An Hypothesis.”  In that paper, he noted that among the counterintuitive results coming from valid research in chess and education was the effect that chess had on increasing reading scores among young chess players.  He offered as an hypothesis explaining this result that chess possesses a kind of syntax, and that learning this para-syntactic system indirectly but noticeably helps students.  In this paper, Dr. Redman furthers his work on that question.  Agreeing with his colleague Dr. Alexey Root that we must modify chess instruction to meet educational goals, he will explain some lesson plans that teach chess through emphasizing instruction that explains it in syntactic and rhetorical terms relevant to language arts instruction.

Address for participant registration:

For USCF workshop, send advance fees (made out to U.S. Chess Trust Chess in Education fund) to:Dr. Alexey Root, 500 Sunrise Cove, Denton, TX 76209, 940-484-2265, alexey.root@gmail.com

And now, the Armageddon Game Explanation

Anna Zatonskih tells Tom Braunlich what happened from her perspective at the termination of the US Championship:

TB: What is your response about the controversy stirred up by Irina in her Open Letter published on Chess Life Online a week after the tournament which protested the playoffs?

AZ:  Close to the end of the game Irina knocked her rook over and never put it back.  The USCF rules say: “If, during the course of a move, a player inadvertently knocks over one or more pieces, that player must not press the clock until the position has been reestablished.”

I remember my very fast thoughts at this point: If I will press ‘pause’ and claim win or extra-time based on illegal actions… I will lose on time!  The “Pause” button is a very small one on the front of the clock.  So I only had 2 seconds and I didn’t have a time to do it!  I know Irina didn’t do it on purpose but I had to move my rook as fast as I could.  I didn’t see any other choice for me.

Irina pointed out (in her Open Letter) that I started couple of my moves before she pressed her clock.  I’ve always liked to watch on YouTube how strong chess players play blitz.  I was amazed how they can make good decisions in just a fraction of a second.  During those games players with a 2600-2800 ratings and even world champions occasionally moved before their opponents pressed the clock.  This is a common thing in blitz games.

Here is the full interview: http://main.uschess.org/content/view/8500/463/

Chess Media: Want a Chess Toolbar?

I tried it and it works, get your own courtesy the innovative Chess Ratings Service, CXR at www.cxrchess.com.

I selected on of many options to add to the tool-bar including a direct Wikipedia button in case I ever want to find anything at Chessville.  [In-house joke].  The truth is Chessville is perhaps the most quoted source at Wiki, and there is so much stuff on this site – its hard to find, no?

Chess Media: Want a Survey on Chess Talent?

Chessville has agreed to publish significant results from a chess study by Dr. Robert Howard of the University of New South Wales, a psychologist working in education. The Parrot wrote back and forth with him this week:

I got interested in the natural talent idea from work on the Flynn effect, the continuing rise in IQ scores.  I have thought that the proliferation of prodigies in recent years might have something to do with the Flynn effect, but…”

But it seems the study is somewhat controversial with those who claim its all ‘just practice’. Soon we can make our own assessment.

Chess Media: Carlsen soon to be #1?

According to the LIVE ratings, Carlsen is #2 with a rating of 2792.

1 Anand 2798,1 -4,902
2 Carlsen 2792,2 +27,2
3 Kramnik 2788,0 0
4 Morozevich 2787,9 +13,9
5 Ivanchuk 2778,2 +38,2
6 Topalov 2777,0 +10
7 Radjabov 2744,1 -6,9
8 Mamedyarov 2742,1 -9,9
9 Leko 2741,0 0
10 Shirov 2738,9 -1,1

http://chess.liverating.org/

AEROSVIT-2008

The 3rd International Chess Tournament 'AEROSVIT-2008' takes place 7th-20th June 2008 in Foros, Crimea, Ukraine.

The usual very strong cast of participants is present: Carlsen Magnus g NOR 2765, Svidler Peter g RUS 2746, Ivanchuk Vassily g UKR 2740, Shirov Alexei g ESP 2740, Karjakin Sergey g UKR 2732, Jakovenko Dmitry g RUS 2711, Alekseev Evgeny g RUS 2711, Eljanov Pavel g UKR 2687, Volokitin Andrei g UKR 2684, Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter g ROU 2684, Van Wely Loek g NED 2676, Onischuk Alexander g USA 2664. Average rating 2711.7

Elsewhere there is a note about Carlsen now being #2 in the world, but look at this lead against high quality competition!

Round 5 standings
1 Carlsen - 4.5
2-3 Karjakin, Volokitin - 3.0
4-8 Shirov, Ivanchuk, Eljanov, Svidler, Nisipeanu - 2.5
9-10 Alekseev, Jakovenko - 2.0
11-12 Onischuk, Van Wely - 1.5

One other interesting point so far is White v Black Scores. White has scored 14 wins, Black has 3 wins and there are 13 draws.

Official site: www.ukrchess.org.ua/aerosvit2008

Bosna-2008 tournament - results

The annual tournament took place 22nd May - 2nd June in Saraevo. Format: double round robin.

Final standings
1 Morozevich - 7.5 [captioned]
2 Dominguez - 6.0
3 Movsesian - 5.0
4 Timofeev - 4.5
5 Predojevic - 4.0
6 Sokolov - 3.0

Official site: www.skbosna.ba

6-7-2008

Chess News USA and Canada

North American Chess Association

 The US G30 and G60 championship events will take place June 28-29, 2008. For full information on the events, click here.

Stars out over Vegas

Many top tanked players didn’t take part in the US Championship this year, so there is a chance to see Nakamura and Kamsky at the Las Vegas Chess Festival June 5 to 8, 2008 at the Riviera Hotel. Players of note include:

1 2782 GM 2726 Gata Kamsky
2 2747 GM 2686 Hikaru Nakamura
3 2706 GM 2656 Laurent Fressinet
4 2666 GM 2616 Tigran L Petrosian
5 2666 GM 2601 Varuzhan Akobian
6 2620 GM 2568 Atanas Kolev
7 2613 GM 2568 Sergey Erenburg
8 2594 IM 2539 Ben Finegold
9 2594 GM 2513 Dmitry Gurevich
10 2584 GM 2518 Alex Yermolinsky

The Susan Polgar Foundation and the Las Vegas International Chess Festival present an additional range of activities; the Susan Polgar World Open Chess Championship for Girls and Boys.

The Susan Polgar World Open Chess Championship for Girls June 7-8
The Susan Polgar World Open Chess Championship for Boys June 7-8
Scholarships to Texas Tech will be awarded based in part on performance in these events.
The Susan Polgar International Chess Camp (for all ages) June 5
The Susan Polgar World Open Chess Puzzle Solving Contest for Girls and Boys June 6
Free lecture by Susan Polgar for all players, as well as accompanying parents and coaches June 6. A Tandem Simul by Susan Polgar against up to 70 players June 6
The Susan Polgar World Open Blitz Chess Championship for Girls and Boys June 7
NEW! Parents and Coaches Tournament June 7-8
Breakfast with Susan June 7

Five-time U.S. Champion and syndicated columnist GM Larry Evans will be on hand to analyze player games. IM John Donaldson will give a series of free lectures on how to improve your game. You can also fill your time with Rule Book Tactics by NTD Tim Just, Bughouse Techniques, and more.

There will be live broadcast of games from the National Open, and possibly other events here and on the MonRoi web site.

First result already in: Final Standings of US Game 10 Championship – perhaps the result is no surprise, captioned is Nakamura looking over Gata’s shoulder, and the game board displays a Taimanov Sicilian.

1 GM HIKARU NAKAMURA 6.0
2-8 GM LAURENT FRESSINET 5.0
2-8 GM TIGRAN L PETROSIAN 5.0
2-8 GM SERGEY ERENBURG 5.0
2-8 GM ZVIAD IZORIA 5.0
2-8 GM ATANAS IVANOV KOLEV 5.0
2-8 GM MARK C PARAGUA 5.0
2-8 GM NIKOLA MITKOV 5.0

From a field of 99 players.  Official website.  Chess news from Susan Polgar.

Here is One of Many ‘Chess-Monkey’ Letters

Dear Parrot,

I idolize both Anna and Irina.  I viewed them as co-champions when I heard the results.  For me, Blitz is nonsense, and it didn't prove anything except that the organizers ought to re-think this approach.  All of these women are terrific and I hope they will all play head-on against the men next time.

I agree with Irina that using blitz games to decide an important championship event is, indeed, degrading.  It is not fair to the contestants, and it is not fair to the fans.  The clock-punching monkeys analogue is a good description of this circus stunt.  Many would argue that Blitz is not even chess; the outcome could be decided better by a match of Hopscotch.  I truly hope that players can come together and agree not to participate in any such monkey business.

Robyn Fielding
Sheepshead Bay, NY 11235


Video revelations …

After inviting many people to review the now infamous Armageddon game to resolve the Women’s title – here is a response from one reviewer, followed by a reply by the Parrot on what is known and unknown.

Regardless of whether or not any claim could be made at this late date, it is well that people are made aware of just who the cheaters are.  The video I watched (albeit in herky-jerky motion) revealed that one of these two contestants systematically cheated; such cheating ought to be "rewarded" by forfeit of the game in order to prevent the disease from spreading...

I think the penultimate move actually shows both players with hands on the clock at the same time - this means that Irina was about to punch the clock button after her move, but Anna had already moved and was pushing the button at the same time - as you note, the video framing makes it difficult to see if punching the button was before, after or simultaneous with Irina.

The video quality is also insufficient to read the clock data.  According to Irina Krush her last glance at the clock showed something like 6 seconds for herself and 2 seconds for Anna Zatonskih.

Unless Anna actually moved on Irina's time it is not credible from the video footage to think that it was Irina who timed-out.

What do you think?: here again is the URL.

I know Tom B, the TD, and am on good terms with him, and also understand that he has made an initial response to this issue, stating that he will present further rulings – and of course he can only act from the rules.

As far as I can see, there are several things wrong here - in fact by both players - an initial early offence is that Irina had not righted a rook before hitting the clock, but then there is 'hovering' over clock and board by both players, mostly Anna - and this at minimum obstructs the other players view of the board, and perhaps even opportunity to move your pieces or hit the clock without encountering the hand of the other player [again see for yourself, especially surrounding the situation when a piece is eliminated by Irina, and seems to fall over on Anna's side of the board - finally there is moving on opponents time, which obviously happened, and I must presume is permissible under Armageddon rules.

It both Fide and Blitz rules are varied, and it is allowable to move on opponent's time, then that aspect of things is eliminated.  Otherwise the rules state that releasing the piece constitutes 'a move' [in the sense that no other move may be made instead] they also say that a player should have opportunity to punch their clock. [I cited rule numbers previously, both for Official Blitz and Fide rulings.]

In terms of 'when a game is over' at least the Fide rule says that it an offense is registered, then the result of game is still open.  Unfortunately it does not say registered by whom - eg, if the TD sees an offence or cheating - is that sufficient reason to declare an inquiry?

What, according to Armageddon rules is the role of the TD here?

I suppose, as the video makes clear, a delay in making a complaint may also be justified - reviewing the video may only be possible after it is published, and perhaps the player had an intervening travel day as well?  Much seems to depend on these technical factors:

     # if you can move on the other person's time?

     # what constitutes a reasonable objection time in this specific circumstance?

     # the role of the TD to intercede?

I don't know answers to any of those questions yet.  Until they are answered then very reasonable doubts exist about the fairness of the result.  If there is determined to be no error, then let us never resolve any championship like this again!

Chess Media: Down Memory Lane

Here is a completely self-indulgent piece of nostalgia from my old county team [somewhat after I left it, and also missing its previous international star player P. H. Clarke – replaced here on the top board by a ‘goodish’ young player who continued his chess career to attain a top-ten world ranking [currently #13 in world] and play in a World Championship Final. Played at Plymouth, Devon on 15th March 1985: 

CORNWALL A

10½ - 5½

DEVON A

1

M. Adams

208

1 - 0

G. W. Wheeler

194

2

J. F. S. Menadue

189

0 - 1

J. F. Wheeler

183

3

D. A. J. Saqui

192

½ - ½

B. W. R. Hewson

183

4

H. G. Coleman

178

1 - 0

J. M. Hutchings

176

5

R. J. Grime

169

1 - 0

C. M. Hawthorne

181

6

S. J. Piper

167

1 - 0

T. J. Buckley

177

7

J. J. Nicholas

169

0 - 1

R. M. Gadd

172

8

D. Bly

145

0 - 1

R. H. Lingham

172

9

E. A. Horn

151

1 - 0

S. A. Wilks

156

10

A. Barkhuysen

148

1 - 0

B. J. Penaligon

149

11

M. S. Piper

142

½ - ½

R. M. Bruce

169

12

Default

 

0 - 1

Default

 

13

C. Peters

142

1 - 0

A. Osborne

152

14

A. D. Meakes

132

1 - 0

R. C. Luffman

152

15

D. Burleigh

142

½ - ½

K. J. Bloodworth

152

16

P. Bowden

120

1 - 0

Mrs R. M. Bruce

141

Even defaulting one game, the Cornish team score a massive result against the much more populated neighboring county, Devon.  The emerging young power-house first appeared in English county chess in the 1981/82 season. Here he is on board 15.

1

P. H. Clarke

208

½ - ½

S. Brown

205

15

M. Adams

127

½ - ½

C. Archer-Lock

161

                     

I am not sure of the current ‘conversion’ rate of English grades to American ones, but Clarke was considered to be a very strong master, perhaps IM level, and represented England in many Olympiads.  A result 12 November 1983 played at Exeter woke everyone up to the young player’s potential. Board 4  M. Adams  1 - 0  M. L. Newbury.  This was a significant result since Mr. Newbury was rated about 185, and Mickey Adams was still 11 years of age!

The top result showed something of the strength of the county’s chess teams at that time since Cornwall’s population is now about 500,000 whereas Devon’s is 1,000,000.

And [Laugh] I couldn’t resist this photograph, 1981/82 of the top club in Cornwall, Camborne – Redruth, there is a bearded Parrot in the back row! To his right is Ian George who wants to know if anyone can identify the lady and girl in the front row?

Chess Media: Drugs in the [Chinese] Rugs? Tastes Like Squirrel

I see that as well as the Olympics proper, the International Mind Games World Thing is also to be held in Beijing and that it includes chess, which will be drug tested by WADA, even though no one can actually think of a single reason to drug-test for chess.  Even Fide can’t say why – and USCF ‘urges’ Fide not to do it.  But Fide does.

As well as drugs, last night’s dinner should also be tested!

After all, maybe deep-friend squirrel would give one player an unfair advantage over the any opponent?  While this is a joke, testing chess-players for drugs is equally absurd.

What Chinese people actually understand of the world of “Engrish Food Notation” is maybe as best unquestioned as what Fide does.


The last picture is perhaps intended to attract chess nerds?

Have a rice day.


Want a Chess Toolbar?

A press announcement from Chess Express Ratings proclaims:- CHESS TOOLBAR

Chess Express Ratings, Inc. (“CXR”) is making available a free CHESS TOOLBAR for use with the Internet Explorer or Fire Fox browser.  We believe that this is the only chess-oriented toolbar available anywhere.  Features include:

  • connects to a chat room just for chess talk

  • includes chess news ticker

  • useful chess links (more to be added)

  • RSS Feed with chess news and puzzles

  • includes world news ticker

  • picks up radio stations around the globe

  • your local weather

  • includes Google Search

  • lots more cool stuff

  • no spyware!

CXR membership is NOT required to obtain the free toolbar.  The download can be obtained by clicking “free chess toolbar” from the CXR home page.

Chess Media: Chessville in the movies !!

Last weekend Chessville gave its permission to allow its home-page to appear in a forthcoming movie – as well as Convekta from Moscow, to allow their chess playing engine to appear in…'THE MESSENGER' COMES TO NYC THIS SPRING. THE MESSENGER is a moving story that follows the lives of those who are most personally affected by wars- the soldiers who fight in them, and the families who lose those they love to them.

Derek Montgomery (BEN FOSTER), Sergeant First Class, having just come back from serving in the war in Iraq, is battling his own post-war injuries, and his own emotional battles, as well- the love he left behind when he went off to fight has created a new life and a new love without him.

But little does Derek know that the biggest challenges he will face are yet to come with his new assignment to 'Casualty Notification' duty- a new role means he must be the man that gives the news that no family wants to hear- that their loved one is not returning home from war.

And even more difficult for Derek is the order that he must do the work alongside Captain Tony Stone (WOODY HARRELSON)- his superior with whom he immediately clashes. Tony has been around the block, is more experienced, and has an opinion on how Derek should do everything - inside and outside military life.

And the fine line between the two begins to blur as soon as Derek meets Olivia (SAMANTHA MORTON) when he arrives at her house to notify her that she has lost her husband in the war. What begins as an instant interest turns into a deeper fascination, and eventually, an unexpected longing… and complication.

As our main characters look to connect with each other and themselves after the profound experience of serving for their country, THE MESSENGER explores the bittersweet-ness of memory, loss, unlikely love, and the time it takes to heal.

This is the story of hope, redemption, and life after war- of the life that comes after death.

THE MESSENGER features Oscar-nominated actor WOODY HARRELSON ('The People Vs. Larry Flynt', 'Indecent Proposal', 'Cheers') as Tony, BEN FOSTER as Derek ('3:10 to Yuma', 'X-Men: The Last Stand'), and SAMANTHA MORTON as Olivia ('In America', 'Minority Report').

This beautiful script is written by OREN MOVERMAN, (writer of 'I'm Not There' and 'Married Life'), who also makes his directorial debut.

Executive Producer is MARK GORDON (Saving Private Ryan, The Patriot, Speed) who is producing along with Reason Pictures.

Filming starts May 20th in New York City.

AEROSVIT-2008

The 3rd International Chess Tournament 'AEROSVIT-2008' takes place 7th-20th June 2008 in Foros, Crimea, Ukraine.

The usual very strong cast of participants is present: Carlsen Magnus g NOR 2765, Svidler Peter g RUS 2746, Ivanchuk Vassily g UKR 2740, Shirov Alexei g ESP 2740, Karjakin Sergey g UKR 2732, Jakovenko Dmitry g RUS 2711, Alekseev Evgeny g RUS 2711, Eljanov Pavel g UKR 2687, Volokitin Andrei g UKR 2684, Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter g ROU 2684, Van Wely Loek g NED 2676, Onischuk Alexander g USA 2664. Average rating 2711.7

Time control: 90 minutes for the first 40 moves then 30 minutes to the end of the game with addition of 30 sec. after each move starting from the first move. International arbiter Oleg Tovchyga (Ukraine). The Shahcom Company provides live coverage of games in the playing hall and via internet on the official site and our site utilizing electronic boards "Shahcom".

GM Mikhail Golubev will annotate games live. The first playing day is 8th June.  Official site.

Result: The 4th PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP

...took place in Odessa, Ukraine 30th May - 2nd June2008.
Final standings:

1 Tregubov - 9.0 [captioned]
2 Drozdovskij - 9.0
3 Gelfand - 9.0
4 Ponomariov - 9.0
5 Karpov - 8.5
6 Korchnoi - 4.0
7 Beim - 4.0
8 Golubev - 3.5

Official site: worldcup.pivdenny.com

Now Playing…

The traditional Bosna-2008 tournament takes place 22nd May - 2nd June in Saraevo. Format: double round robin.

Round 6 standings:

1 Morozevich - 5.0
2 Dominguez - 3.5
3-5 Sokolov, Timofeev, Movsesian - 2.5
6 Predojevic - 2.0

Official site: www.skbosna.ba

Nakamura joins 2700 Club!

This is from the website: http://chess.liverating.org/

A number of players including Hikaru Nakamura, Dominguez, Milov, Gashimov, Wang Yue, Movsesian, and Eljanov broke the 2700 barrier!

1 Anand 2798,1 -4,9
2 Kramnik 2788,0 0
3 Morozevich 2786,5 +12,5
4 Ivanchuk 2780,5 +40,5
5 Topalov 2777,0 +10
6 Carlsen 2775,4 +10,4
7 Radjabov 2744,1 -6,9
8 Mamedyarov 2742,1 -9,9
9 Shirov 2741,4 +1,4
10 Leko 2741,0 0
11 Svidler 2738,0 -8
12 Aronian 2737,1 -25,9
13 Adams 2734,5 +5,5
14 Grischuk 2728,2 +12,2
15 Karjakin 2727,3 -4,7
16 Movsesian 2727,0 +32
17 Kamsky 2720,1 -5,9
18 Gelfand 2719,8 -3,2
19 Ponomariov 2717,6 -1,4
20 Eljanov 2715,8 +28,8
21 Gashimov 2712,4 +33,4
22 Polgar 2710,6 +1,6
23 Jakovenko 2709,4 -1,6
24 Wang Yue 2707,7 +18,7
25 Alekseev 2707,6 -3,4
26 Dominguez 2707,5 +12,5
27 Ni 2705,9 +1,9
28 Bu 2704,6 -3,4
29 Nakamura 2703,6 +17,6
30 Milov 2703,5 +13,5

Chess news from Susan Polgar

5-31-2008

Chess News USA and Canada

Mil-Chess

Now that Chessville has its own reporter on Military Chess, it will be interesting to note the report on the forthcoming tournament:

For the first time, there will be a woman competing as one of the six players from the Air Force in the upcoming Interservice Chess Championships which will feature the top 6 military players from the Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine Corps in Tucson AZ (June 8-14) at Davis Monthan Air Force Base.

Her name is Elena V. Dulger, from Hill AFB. This is the first time ever a woman has qualified from ANY service. During the qualifying rounds she achieved a 2000+ performance rating.

Source: Kris D'Alessandro, US Army CFSC.

 

Visuals reveal more information than simple rating numbers

Data Source: the recently concluded Frank K. berry US Championship reveals some interesting statistics for all players. The following graphic information is courtesy of CXR chess, and is a wealth of visual information [3 examples follow], even fuller statistics can be obtained here and here.

The first graphic illustrates performance by Irina Krush, the second by Anna Zatonskih. What an amazing difference becomes apparent in the relative black and white scores; relatively equal for Irina, and extraordinarily strong for Ana with the black bits. The URL’s above show not only these datum, but also the only published wall-charts of white and black performance against respective opponents.

As an additional comparison I chose the third graphic profiling performance of Batchimeg Tuvshintugs, who quite evidently vastly favors White pieces over Black.

Don’t degrade us…

A fascinating and important letter from Irina Krush, published as an open letter about her play-off experience in the US Championships – here are significant extracts from it with only minor cuts – material well justified publishing at length in this column since it almost certainly too long for print publications such as Chess Life:

Open Letter by Irina Krush
May 30, 2008

We then proceeded to the final Armageddon game, that was to be played without increment. As the defending champion, I was told by the organizers that I had to choose how the time would be divided, and Anna would choose the color she wanted to play.  I decided that White would be given 6 minutes, Black 4:30.  Anna chose to be Black with draw odds.

The relevant part of the game is not that I had the initiative throughout, and maintained a winning position until the end.  The relevant part is, of course, the clock, since I was deemed to have "lost" the title of US Women's Champion due to my time running out while Anna had 1 second left.

So, about the clock.  Tom Braunlich, one of the organizers of the event, wrote in his report "At one point Anna had 2 seconds left compared to about 20 for Irina."  This is a plainly incorrect appraisal of the time situation.  Then Tom, in an attempt to explain how my 20 seconds ran out before Anna’s 2, wrote that "Anna’s draw odds were a big advantage here – she could blitz out moves hardly thinking (just moving the piece nearest to the clock), while Irina actually had to do something with her moves since she had to win."  Unfortunately, this statement also has no basis in reality.  Despite having a winning position, I didn't need to "do something with my moves"- all I needed to do was move quickly and the person with much less time would flag first.  And, in fact, that's what I did.  I moved instantly, as can be seen very clearly in the video you've posted of that game.  I moved instantly, all the while having a significant time advantage until I got to 0 seconds while Anna had 1.  How could this have happened?

First of all, let’s establish what the true clock situation was.  Tom was certainly off in his estimate, but the essence of what he said was absolutely true: I had a large lead in time, let's say 8 seconds to 3 at one point, or as Anna herself says in her interview, “I realized that I had two seconds.  I was so shocked that I am going to lose right now.  She has six (seconds).  I played Rb8-e8 because it was so close to clock.”  So let's take 6 seconds to 2.  Watching the video, seeing me move instantly, how could 6 seconds lose against 2?

And that's the crux of the matter.  My opponent, seeing herself on the verge of losing on time, began playing moves before I had completed mine.  She made her moves before I hit my clock, and as soon as I pressed the clock, it was punched back at me.  That is how my lead in time was chipped away at, and this process began during the advance of Anna’s c-pawn, quite a few moves before the game ended.

Obviously, making moves before your opponent completes theirs is illegal.  Were it legal, White, having the “disadvantage” of the first move, would always lose on time to Black if the adversaries were to settle into the rhythm of Black using White’s time to move their pieces.

Editor’s Note

Modern e-boards can be set to avoid the situation Irina Krush describes; that of pressing the clock before a move has been played, by ensuring a move is recorded before allowing the clock to be punched.

Both the Shahcom and DGT companies produce boards that can be configured this way.

Indeed Shahcom have a clock  [Kasparov’s design] which even prevents the opponent from holding down the clock button so the other person can’t press their own.

The sad thing is, no one stepped in as this was happening.  No arbiter, no organizer, did anything to ensure that fair play was being observed in the final moments of the game.  It was a free-for-all, where the person with the worse blitz habits “won.”

People have pointed out that I should have registered my protest during the game, or immediately after.  Unfortunately, while I was certainly in disbelief as I watched my opponent complete 3 moves with her last remaining second and saw myself lose on time despite starting out with a large time lead, during the game and immediately after, I had no clear grasp of how she had accomplished this.  It happened too quickly for me to understand, but that doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen, and that it should be ignored.

An injustice that wasn’t brought to light at the moment it occurred is no less of an injustice.  Moreover, in our particular situation, it is not an injustice that is difficult to redress.  As no one in our tournament was in any way affected by our playoff, no games need to be replayed, no scores adjusted, no ratings recalculated- all that needs to be changed is the way the ending of this story is told.

It has been announced that Anna, by virtue of conserving 1 second on her clock, is the 2008 U.S. Women’s Champion.

I fervently dispute Anna's claim to the sole possession of this title.  I do not believe that a Champion emerges through one second they have managed to keep on their clock through illegal means.

In my view, a winner of a tournament is someone who at some point, perhaps in some minuscule and barely perceptible way, lifts themselves above their competitors.  I would be interested to hear any view that holds that Anna, through legal techniques, did anything to earn the title of Champion over me.

I’d also like to address my reaction at the end of this game, when I knocked a piece off to the side of the board before walking out of the room.  This may seem like poor behavior to some, but I believe that my reaction was nothing compared to the aggression leveled at me by my opponent during the end of this game.

Editor’s Note

If you missed it last week, watch the final moments yourself captured by U-Tube.

Knocking off a piece and storming away had no power or intention to take away anything my opponent had been working for during this tournament.  When my opponent moved on my time, however innocuous that may appear to be, I believe that she was committing one of the worst transgressions possible: depriving me, through unfair means, of the just rewards of my labor.  That is where the aggression lies in this situation, and not in my expression of frustration and anger over being wronged.

I want this point to be clear: my reaction at the end of the final game had nothing to do with “losing” and everything to do with the way it happened and my perception of something unfair having occurred.

I had hoped to resolve this matter in a friendly way, without being forced to voice my indignation in public.  Four days ago, I wrote a letter to Anna explaining my position, urging her to study the video of our final game, and if she agreed with my conclusions about what happened, to write a few sentences for uschess.org where she’d communicate her non-objection to sharing the title with me.  In any case, I told her, I looked forward to hearing what she had to say.  Unfortunately, I have not heard back from her, and since there is no guarantee that I ever will, I decided to go ahead and make my views known to the chess community.

What do I hope to accomplish through this letter?  First and foremost, I want the truth to finally be relayed to the American chess public.  As I’ve mentioned, the final tournament report that was offered to you was misleading, and I have yet to see a retraction of its false assertions.  Secondly, I believe that to continue into the future, unthinkingly parroting that Anna Zatonskih is the 2008 U.S. Women’s Champion with no regard for how she “won” this title, is a travesty of truth and justice.  I believe I have at least as much right to this title as she does, and I would like this right to be acknowledged.  To this end, I am asking for responses to this letter from Frank Berry and Bill Goichberg, the President of the USCF.  This event was held under their auspices, and I would like to know what they think of the results, given the evidence of what transpired.

To conclude, I will state that sharing the title would be an acceptable outcome for me, but I would certainly welcome any initiative to decide the title in over-the-board games, with real time controls that don’t degrade the participants into clock punching monkeys.

Sincerely,
Irina Krush

Chess Media: Big new Chess Movie

The upcoming feature film MATE  is psychological thriller of mystery and suspense in the vein of MEMENTO and THE USUAL SUSPECTS.

About MATE :

In a world of corruption and deceit, two former world chess champions cross paths and are unsuspectingly drawn into a deadly game of mystery and suspense.  Michael Foster and Kyle Kessler are long time archrivals in the highly competitive game of sixty-four squares.  Each has staked his claim to be the best grandmaster of his time.  Each has arguably been deemed the greatest chess champion to ever play the game.

Yet, beneath the surface of tactics and strategies, there is a truth that engulfs them beyond their calculated geniuses; a truth that suddenly turns their world upside down; a truth that unfolds and forces them on the run from a group of killers who have coerced them into a dangerous game of intrigue.

In the world of sixty-four squares, where lies intersect the truth, nothing is what it seems. Inside the mind of a chess king, reality is merely an illusion.

I have signed on as a co-producer and I will also have a featured appearance in the film. The press release for the full cast will be released very soon. I was a chess consultant for the off-Broadway show " Fit to Kill " back in 2005. It was a blast! I am very excited about this project and I am looking forward to being a part of this movie.  This article written by Susan Polgar

Chess Media: Fide Issue No News Farce

I forget exactly how many deadlines have now been over-run in respect of fixing up a match for the world title qualification between Kamsky and Topalov. Latest news is that Kamsky's manager announced that Lviv, Ukraine is offering 750.000 USD for the match. Danailov says 'We are ready to play in Lviv'. But… Fide has announced:-

“As of today, May 29, there is no money from Lviv in the bank account. The several days extension, given by FIDE to Mr. Chernenko, has expired last week. As stated in the official rules, if no other bid makes it by April 11, the match will take place in Bulgaria.”

Enter the Shirov Camp, who state:- 2. Mr. Gata Kamsky has declared that he does not wish to play in Bulgaria. According to the match regulations he should be replaced by me in this case.

So… someone had the bright idea of asking the Fide President what’s going on, and received this reply:

KI: I give my personal guarantees. The prize-winning fund will be such what has been specified in the application of the manager of the grandmaster Gata Kamski Alexander Chernenko: 935 000 dollars. The players will receive together 750 000. Besides I shall declare tomorrow the world championship among women. It will take place in Nalchik from August, 28th till September, 18th. The prize-winning fund will be 630 000 dollars.

Ernie beats Fisher, wins Championship [again]

A few years ago Ernie Johnson achieved a very creditable draw against a GM. Here is one of his games from the recently concluded Vassar-Chadwick Club Championships, which he went on to win, again, against a slightly weaker field than last year.

(3) Fisher, Craig (1800) - Johnson, Ernest (2009) [A02]
Dutchess County Championship (2), 10.03.2008


1.f4 e5 2.fxe5 d6 3.exd6 Bxd6 4.Nf3 g5 5.d4 g4 6.Ng5 f5 7.e4 Be7 8.Nh3 fxe4 9.Nf2 Nf6 10.Nc3 Bf5 11.Be3 Qd7 12.g3 Nc6 13.a3 0-0-0 14.Bb5 Nd5 15.Nxd5 Qxd5 16.c4 Qd6 17.Bxc6 Qxc6 18.Rc1 h5 19.b4 h4 20.b5 Qg6 21.d5 hxg3 22.hxg3 Rxh1+ 23.Nxh1 Bg5 24.Qd4 Bxe3 25.Qxe3 Qb6 26.Ke2 Rh8 27.Qf4 Bd7 28.a4 Qd4 29.Rd1 Qxc4+ 30.Ke3 Qc3+ 31.Ke2 Qf3+ 32.Qxf3 exf3+ 33.Ke3 Re8+ 34.Kf4 Re2 35.Rf1 Ra2 36.Nf2 Rxa4+ 37.Ke5 Ra2 38.Rh1 Rxf2 39.Rh8+ Be8 40.Rxe8+ Kd7 41.Rf8 Rc2 42.Rf7+ Kd8 43.Ke6 Re2+ 44.Kf5 0-1

Playing the From Gambit is unusual, so I sent Ernie back a game of my own played by correspondence about 6 months ago. White deviates at move 5 from Ernie’s game, but it you haven’t faced Black’s play, its worth playing though both variants to assess the worth and impact of each line.  Source.

1. f4 e5 2. fxe5 d6 3. exd6 Bxd6 4. Nf3 g5 5. g3 g4 6. Nh4 Ne7 7. d4 Ng6 8. Nxg6 hxg6 9. Qd3 Nc6 10.c3 Bf5 11.e4 Qe7 12.Bg2 O-O-O 13.Be3 Bd7 14.Kd1 f6 15.Nd2 Na5 16.b4 Ba4 17.Kc1 Nc6 18.Rb1 a6 19.Re1 Rxh2 20.Re2 Bxg3 21.Nf1 Ne5 22.Qd2 Rxg2 23.Rxg2 Be1 24.Qe2 Bb5 25.Qc2 Bxf1 26.Rg1 Bd3 27.Qd1 Bxb1 28.Kxb1 Bxc3 29.Qc2 Qxb4 30.Kc1 Bb2 31.Qxb2 Nd3 0-1

The Kasparov Menace

Here is a fascinating extract from a letter of one player’s experience.

Sakaev,K (2657) - Kasparov,G (2830)
EU Club Cup tt Rethymnon (4), 01.10.2003

The game with Kasparov is always an event for any chess player, especially when you meet with him for the first time.  I felt a huge emotion before the start the more so the game has been played for the team and I sensed an immense responsibility.  Perhaps at that moment it would be better for me to play with Black. I would be more calm.  If I lost nothing terrible, nevertheless black color, Kasparov...  But if I managed to hold out I would feel myself as a hero.  In contemporary chess on a top level white color is a big odds, so I perfectly understood that I am not at all obliged to lose and my team certainly has been intended to gain at last half a point on my board.  All night I spent in a preparation (time by time I tried to go to bed but all the same failed to sleep), even the most perspective and firm positions seemed to me as risky ones.  On the one hand I would like very much to play an interesting game, nevertheless I play with Kasparov not every day, on the other hand it would be better to play more reliably since I felt a big responsibility before the team.  Running a few steps forward I should say that turned out to be neither.  The game I have played unfortunately became the worst in quality from my side for many years since I began to play in  adult chess.  Really an energy which is radiated by Kasparov during the game along with a natural emotion disturbs to play very much.  For the first time in my life I have spent more than one hour for first twelve moves (from which I made only two my own, both very bad moves).  I don't understand what I thought about...I remember well as on the next day I watch a similar picture in the game Kasparov-Grischuk.  Alexander set stock-still,  couldn't make a move and only when he hadn't time for emotion (it remained twenty minutes for about 25 moves in a difficult position) and he has been forced to take quick decisions, Grischuk began offer the resistance.  Already after the game Boris Gelfand approached to me and said that it's an usual occurrence almost with everybody.  He, for example, only after about ten games managed to cultivate an immunity against Kasparov's magic beginning to play in an usual force. Legendary Victor Korchnoi, the member of my team, expressed similarly saying that formerly he also radiated energy which depressed and prevented to play in full force of many tried and tested avenues.

~

In a subsequent interview I asked Mark Taimanov about this ‘menace factor’ and he  replied, O Yes! Kasparov has it, Korchnoi has it, Fischer has it, and most of all, in his opinion, Mikhail Tal had it.

Perhaps I can repeat the game itself here in a subsequent column, together with Sakaev’s own comments.

Chess Media: Chessville too?

I am currently sworn to secrecy for a week, but seems like Chessville will also be in the movies! I know this message is a tease, but this is my way of saying nothing about something which seems quite real. Don’t shoot the messenger!

The 4th PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP will take place in Odessa, Ukraine 30th May - 2nd June2008. The prize fund is USD 35,000. As usual, some of the world's most famous chess players will compete in this rapid chess tournament. So this year Anatoly Karpov (Russia), Viktor Korchnoi (Switzerland), Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine) and Boris Gelfand (Israel) will take part. The number of contestants is reduced from 10 to 8, and the time control will be shortened (10 minutes on the game with an increment of 5 seconds for move), but in exchange, the grandmasters will play not one but two games against each other. The rest participants are Pavel Tregubov (Russia), Valery Beim (Austria) 2523, Yuri Drozdovskij (Ukraine) 2581, Mikhail Golubev (Ukraine) 2474. The winners of the three previous tournaments were: 2005 GM Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine), 2006 GM Joel Lautier (France), 2007 GM Vassily Ivanchuk (Ukraine). The main organiser of the tournament is Bank Pivdenny (en.bank.com.ua), which is the largest bank in the southern part of Ukraine. Pivdenny also organised the 2007 and 2008 ACP World Rapid Chess Cups, which were won by Peter Leko (Hungary) and Teimour Radjabov (Azerbaijan), respectively.

The Shahcom Company will provide live coverage of games in the playing hall and via internet on the official site and our site utilizing electronic boards "Shahcom" You are able to watch the games of "3rd PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP" from our Archive section.

Five rounds were played in the first day of Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup.

1-2. Drozdovskij, Yuri g UKR 2581 4
1-2. Ponomariov, Ruslan g UKR 2719 4
3. Gelfand, Boris g ISR 2723 3½
4. Tregubov, Pavel V g RUS 2629 3
5-7. Karpov, Anatoly g RUS 2655 1½
5-7. Beim, Valery g AUT 2523 1½
5-7. Korchnoi, Viktor g SUI 2598 1½

Official site: worldcup.pivdenny.com

Now Playing…

The traditional Bosna-2008 tournament takes place 22nd May - 2nd June in Saraevo. Format: double round robin.

Morozevich Alexander RUS 2774, Movsesian Sergei SVK 2695, Dominguez Perez Leinier 2695 CUB, Sokolov Ivan 2690 NED, Timofeev Artyom 2664 RUS, Predojevic Borki 2651 BIH.

Round 3 standings
   1 Morozevich - 2.5
   2 Dominguez - 2.0
   3-4 Sokolov, Timofeev - 1.5
   5 Movsesian - 1.0
   6 Predojevic - 0.5

Illustrated is the playing arena, with large electronic display boards in the background.

GM Susan Polgar had this to say about his Friday May 29th performance: When he is on, he is virtually unstoppable. At this pace, Morozevich is approaching 2800! After 6 games, he has 4 wins and 2 draws against opponents around 2680 average for a performance in the mid 2900!

GM Morozevich (2774) - GM Sokolov (2690) [C45]
29.05.2008 - Sarajevo - Round 6

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Bb4+ 5.c3 Bc5 6.Nxc6 bxc6 7.Bd3 Ne7 8.0–0 0–0 9.Bg5 f6 10.Bh4 d6 11.Nd2 Ng6 12.Bg3 f5 13.exf5 Bxf5 14.Bxf5 Rxf5 15.a4 a6 16.Qb3+ Kh8 17.Qb7 Rb8 18.Qxa6 Rxb2 19.Ne4 h5 20.h4 Rb6 21.Qc4 Qg8 22.Qe2 Rb8 23.Ng5 Nf8 24.Qxh5+ Nh7 25.Rae1 Bb6 26.Re7 Rbf8 27.Kh2 R5f6 28.a5 White wins 1–0
Official site:
www.skbosna.ba

5-24-2008

Chess News USA and Canada

Sooner or later the First part of the Parrot will have to be renamed, “Chess News of The Americas.”

This week the Parrot made some delightful connections with chess organizers in the Caribbean, and Chessville intends to report the chess scene there more frequently. A big and innovative tournament is taking place in Jamaica this summer – and there is also an annual youth chess event in Barbados – both deserving greater publicity, which Chessville is pleased to supply.

Of course, it would be good to have a regular reporter from Mexico too…

SPICE CUP GOING TO BE HUGE

Official announcements now confirm the quality the event – which last time I heard any news was a category 15, with average ratings 2600+ USCF. This update now exceeds 2600 FIDE.

As of this moment, the 2008 SPICE Cup (which will take place at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas from September 19-28, 2008) is a FIDE Category 15 event with an average rating of 2603 FIDE and 2675 USCF.

We will announce the next group of players shortly. We did not anticipate the amount of grandmasters requesting for invitations. With only three spots remaining, there are nearly 20 requests by GMs with ratings from 2570 to 2700. One of our goals is to be able to add a group B by next year.

Here are the confirmed players so far:

USA - GM Onischuk, Alexander 2728 USCF / 2663 FIDE
USA - GM Akobian, Varuzhan 2666 USCF / 2612 FIDE
USA - GM Kaidanov, Gregory 2697 USCF / 2611 FIDE
USA - GM Becerra, Julio 2644 USCF / 2601 FIDE
GER - GM Kritz, Leonid 2667 USCF / 2600 FIDE
POL - GM Miton, Kamil 2703 USCF / 2581 FIDE
USA - GM Perelshteyn, Eugene 2623 USCF / 2549 FIDE

Average USCF rating so far: 2675
Average FIDE rating so far: 2603

Source: Susan Polgar

Frank K Berry US Chess Championship

Anyway – like Ivanchuk’s recent performance, it is unsual to rip off 5 wins against your peers, but Anna [captioned] just went 6!  Here is her nice win with black in a French.

Abrahamyan, T (2239) - Zatonskih, A (2458) [C02]
Frank K Berry ch-USA w Tulsa USA (5), 17.05.2008

 

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3 Bd7 6.Be2 Rc8 7.a3 c4 8.0-0 Na5 9.Nbd2 Bc6 10.g3 Qd7 11.Nh4 Ba4 12.Qe1 Ne7 13.f4 h5 14.h3 Kd8 15.g4 hxg4 16.hxg4 Kc7 17.Qg3 Kb8 18.Ndf3 Ka8 19.Be3 Bc2 20.Rac1 Bh7 21.Ng5 Bg8 22.f5 exf5 23.gxf5 f6 24.e6 Qe8 25.Nh3 Bh7 26.Bg4 Rd8 27.Nf4 g5 28.fxg6 Bxg6 29.Rce1 Be4 30.Nfg2 Bg7 31.Bf3 Bxf3 32.Rxf3 Rg8 33.Bf4 Nac6 34.Bc7 Rc8 35.Bd6 Qh5 36.Qf2 Rh8 37.Rg3 Qh7 38.Qf4 Bh6 39.Qf3 Bg5 40.Rh3 Rcg8 41.Kh2 Bxh4 0-1

With one round to go these were the leader standings:

Men's leaders:

1 Shulman, Yury GM 2664 USA 6.5
2-3 Kudrin, Sergey GM 2610 USA 5.5
2-3 Onischuk, Alexander GM 2728 USA 5.5
4-6 Friedel, Josh IM 2511 USA 5.0
4-6 Perelshteyn, Eugene GM 2615 USA 5.0
4-6 Akobian, Varuzhan GM 2666 USA 5.0

Women's leaders:
[captioned is Irina Krush in her new red glasses]

1 Krush, Irina IM 2515 USA 7.0
2 Zatonskih, Anna IM 2490 USA 6.5
3 Abrahamyan, Tatev WFM 2280 USA 6.0
4 Rohonyan, Katerine WGM 2318 USA 5.5

Endgame: Final Results

In the men’s, GM Yury Shulman handily won the 2008 Frank K. Berry U.S. Championship with a score of 7 from 9 games and an undefeated 7-2 score, a half-point ahead of GM Alexander Onischuk.

The drama in the women’s competition was that Irina Krush drew her last round game which went 100 moves, but Anna Zatonskih won her game, giving both players 7.5 points to share first place. Then the women’s title was resolved the same day. It is interesting to read the following comments by GM Susan Polgar who was also awarding the ‘best fighting game’ award sponsored by goddess chess:

“The whole thing ended more than 9 hours after the last round started and many horrendous blunders were committed. I believe it is partly due to the fatigue factor.  Two most common questions are:

1. Should rapid / blitz chess be used to decide the national title in regular time control chess?

2. Should the 5-game playoff be held right after the last round or should it be held the morning after?”

There is a video of the action here:  http://youtube.com/watch?v=fNQjXHjRkNQ

Nothing at all against Anna who won the title, but personally I thought winning this way was disgusting; was no test of skill between the two players, especially after Irina had already played so long that day.  I think the viewer will attest for themselves that Irina’s attitude in the video clip is not just about losing, but perhaps something to do with having to play high speed ‘smack the clock’ skittles after already performing to what must be a level of exhaustion.

http://monroi.com/the-2008-fkb-us-chess-championship-results.html

Chess Media:
True Chess Stories

In the age of chess and other elective programs in school systems being shut down, despite No Child Left Behind programs, despite stories like the following one – a story which deserves repeating in full – chess seems very large in young people’s lives.  What follows is entirely uplifting and of good promise for the future.

Citywide Chess Championships at the Johns Hopkins University. (photo credit: Lloyd Fox)

Sam Macer was the kind of kid who, to put it kindly, didn't care to conform.

"I don't know how many middle schools he's been kicked out of," said Belinda Chance, the art teacher and chess coach at West Baltimore's Dickey Hill Elementary/Middle School, to which Sam, surly and argumentative, was admitted last year.  "He was very angry.  He yelled at teachers.  He's yelled at me before."

When Sam, now 13, asked to join Chance's chess club, she almost didn't let him in.  But she reconsidered.

"I thought, 'Maybe this will be the thing that will help,'" Chance said yesterday at the Citywide Chess Championships at the Johns Hopkins University, where Sam, his hands dancing across the checkered board, subjected one of his opponents to a 1 1/2-minute drubbing.

In Sam's case, chess made all the difference.

"It calmed me down," he said during a break between matches.  "It got better when I really started to know how to play.  I look at chess as life: There's different ways you can move in life.  Chess helps me decide, when a situation comes up, the move I want to make."

Yesterday, Sam shrugged off his losses in two other matches, a sign that, as even he acknowledged, he is maturing as both a player and a young man.

At the tournament, some 235 elementary and middle-school students - all from Baltimore public schools - battled for chess supremacy in Johns Hopkins University's Glass Pavilion, a space that went from a fitful silence during matches to an eruption of noise at the end of each round.

"It gives them a chance to work on their giftedness," said Bettie J. Williams, an instructional support teacher at Rosemont Elementary/Middle School, which entered five students - three of them first-graders - in the tournament for the first time.

What to Play?

Bad Dog!  Capa wrongs the Colle.

After last week’s demonstration of allowing White his ‘model development’, there was a cautionary note in Karlsbad 1929, Colle v Capablanca:

1. d4 Nf6
2. Nf3 b6
3. e3?! Bb7
4. Nbd2 e6
5. Bd3 c5
6. 0-0 Nc6!
7. c3 Be7

[and once again White achieves the ‘set-up’, but…]

8. e4 cxd4!

Colle sees a little too late that his model development cannot be played by rote. If he continues 9. cxd4 black replies Nb4! 10. Bb1 Ba6 then Rc8 [worse is 10. Be2? Nxe4.]

9. Nxd4 0-0
10. Qe2 Ne5!
11. Bc2 Qc8!

Which black followed with 12. … Ba6. White’s plan has failed to keep black pieces off c5 and e5 by maintaining a d4 pawn, and the fascinating consequence of this game was that the Colle started to disappear from grandmaster play.

Therefore, against the black set-up White must be prepared to play the Stonewall set-up with f4, or evolve into the Torre Formation, with the White Queen-bishop outside the pawn chain sitting on g5.

Notes for this column taken from White Opening System Combining Stonewall Attack, Colle System, Torre Attack. Andrew Soltis, Chess Digest 1992.

For many of the students, it was also the first time they had set foot on the university's Homewood campus, a grand and unsullied place far removed from the battered neighborhoods some of them call home.

"They were really amazed at how beautiful it was here," said David Utara, a fourth-grade teacher and the chess coach at Mary E. Rodman Elementary School. "They're learning that if you work really hard you can come to a place like this. They normally don't see much of the city - they rarely get off their block."

Bearing in mind that students this young sometimes need to be reminded about pesky things like decorum, the tournament's master of ceremonies, Steve Alpern, who directs the city schools' chess program, urged them before the first 35-minute round to display good sportsmanship, shake hands with opponents, and behave civilly in both victory and defeat. (Alpern said later that his position is being eliminated under a proposed restructuring of the school system's finances.)

Just before play began, Alpern said, "I want everybody to take a real big breath." The cavernous room hushed and, after a moment, the only sound heard was the soft clicking of chess pieces knocking each other off.

Bernard Thomas, a 10-year-old player from Pimlico Elementary/Middle School whose opponent unassailably protected his knight, was an early victim. "He beat me," Bernard said in a whisper, apparently a bit stunned at the speed of his fall.

His 12-year-old sister, Desire Thomas, did better. She finished off her adversary with a series of moves that prevented his king's escape from the back rank with deft positioning of two rooks.

"She's phenomenal," said Desire's coach, Lee Rutledge, who normally teaches sixth-grade English at Pimlico. The middle school team, he said, won the Maryland girls' championship this year and last with Desire's help, and last year she was the individual winner in that tournament's novice division.

"The kids who play chess get a lot of their identity from being good at something that's hard," Rutledge said. "It gives them a lot of confidence with other things they take on in the classroom."

Reporting Source: Nick Madigan of the Baltimore Sun

Chess Media:
True Chess Stories

Former World Chess Champion and Kremlin critic Garry Kasparov has been attacked by a radio-controlled phallic object during a meeting of opposition activists. Pro-Kremlin demonstrators decided to interrupt Kasparov’s address, designed to unite opposition political forces, by launching a rotor-assisted plastic phallus towards Mr. Kasparov.

The unconventional chopper managed to stay up for at least 20 seconds before stunned security guards swiped it out of the air. The prank was staged by "a couple of pro-Kremlin Young Russia activists" reports the Moscow Times. Mr. Kasparov was unharmed and laughed off the incident remarking that it was "below the belt", while also stating it was about the level one could expect from his opposition

Chess Media:
Goodbye Chess Life?

Pending a full report from Chessville on SPICE, next week, an official release has just announced:

“Texas Tech SPICE just received a cash donation of $320,000 for chess scholarships from an anonymous donor. Additional funding from the same donor was provided to build a chess park right outside of the Student Union building on campus.”

SPICE focuses on 3 very important areas: Chess Education, Chess Research, and Chess Outreach.

~

The benefits of chess seem to be progressively apparent to mainstream media in the C21st. We might all applaud SPICE for taking the lead in evolving the subject.

A majority of USCF board members are voting to terminate USCF’s magazine Chess Life as part of the subscription. This distinctly odd decision is led by board members Goichberg, Bauer and Hough, with the intent to make purchase of the magazine voluntary.

Since Chess Life is perhaps not the most valued chess publication in the United States, and each month for example, contains less chess than this column contains every two weeks – never-mind all Chessville’s columnists. In terms of quality of reporting Chessville is certainly not put in the shade by the anodyne 6 week old news vehicle which is Chess Life.

What on earth will Chess Life be like if circulation is reduced even more, and’ as it has been put, ‘market force’s are allowed to work? I would say they already are! Chessville seems to have twice as many monthly readers as USCF has adult members.

Chess Media: Goodbye Democracy?

Yet another report from the Chess Journalists of America [the CJA] mentions the matter of peculiarities in its election system, specifically that of the distribution of blank ballots, and otherwise even CJA members on USCF’s board never receiving any ballots. While editorially we have not yet received information from all sides of the issue in order to re-present it to you the chess public, [pending] I personally have read enough to resist signing up with the CJA for another 5 years.

Mtel –  Result


Final Scores and Crosstable
 

Rank

Name

IRtg

FED

1

2

3

4

5

6

Pts

1

Ivanchuk Vassily

2740

UKR

* *

1 ½

1 ½

1 1

1 ½

1 ½

8,0

2

Topalov Veselin

2767

BUL

0 ½

* *

½ ½

1 1

1 0

1 1

6,5

3

Radjabov Teimour

2751

AZE

0 ½

½ ½

* *

½ ½

½ 1

½ 1

5,5

4

Cheparinov Ivan

2695

BUL

0 0

0 0

½ ½

* *

1 1

½ ½

4,0

5

Bu Xiangzhi

2708

CHN

0 ½

0 1

½ 0

0 0

* *

½ ½

3,0

6

Aronian Levon

2763

ARM

0 ½

0 0

½ 0

½ ½

½ ½

* *

3,0

Official site: www.mtelmasters.com

Coming up: The Armenian Chess Federation ( www.armchess.am ) just announced a major rapid chess tournament with $262,000 prize funds. This event will take place from June 8 to 15, 2008 in Yerevan, Armenia.

Here is the list of players:

1. Morozevich Alexander Russia 2774
2. Aronian Levon Armenia 2763
3. Leko Peter Hungary 2741
4. Adams Michael England 2729
5. Gelfand Boris Israel 2723
6. Bu Xiangzhi China 2708
7. Akopian Vladimir Armenia 2673
8. Sargissian Gabriel Armenia 2643

Chess news from Susan Polgar

Capablanca Chess Tournament - Result

Havana, May 7 (Prensa Latina) The drawing of lots by elite chess players will focus the opening ceremony of the 43rd Capablanca Memorial International Chess Tournament, scheduled for Wednesday evening at the Neptuno-Triton hotel resort in Havana.

With a 3-way tie for first going into the last round. GM Dominguez was the only one among the 3 to score a decisive victory to win clear first.

Final round results:

Dominguez Perez, Lenier - Arencibia Rodriguez, Walter 1-0
Wojtaszek, Radoslaw - Bruzon Batista, Lazaro 1-0
Khenkin, Igor - Nogueiras Santiago, Jesus ½-½
Amonatov, Farrukh - Hernandez Carmenates, Holden ½-½
Tiviakov, Sergei - Quezada Perez, Yuniesky ½-½

Final standings:

1. Dominguez Perez, Lenier g CUB 2695 6
2. Amonatov, Farrukh g TJK 2649 5½
3. Khenkin, Igor g GER 2609 5½
4. Hernandez Carmenates, Holden g CUB 2568 5
5. Tiviakov, Sergei g NED 2635 4½
6. Wojtaszek, Radoslaw g POL 2625 4½
7. Nogueiras Santiago, Jesus g CUB 2559 4
8. Quezada Perez, Yuniesky g CUB 2567 3½
9. Arencibia Rodriguez, Walter g CUB 2534 3½
10. Bruzon Batista, Lazaro g CUB 2608 3

Official website: www.inder.cu/capablanca

World Championship Series

Kamsky versus… well, on Tuesday this week there was still no sign of the promised money, and no one, let alone Fide, was making any announcements. On Thursday which is 7 days past the latest deadline, there were still no announcements, confirmations, from anyone at all!

Somewhere out there $935,000 was supposed to have been transferred. Wouldn’t you think professional chess players deserve professional business management?

But that’s enough from me otherwise I will begin to sound like Topalov’s manager, Mr. Danilov – who could be said to be more than a tad skeptical of Fide’s (in)activities.

5-17-2008

Chess News USA and Canada

US Championship

Leaders after 4 rounds:

1 Kudrin, Sergey GM 2610 USA 3.5
2-5 Becerra, Julio GM 2637 USA 3.0
2-5 Shulman, Yury GM 2664 USA 3.0
2-5 Kaidanov, Gregory GM 2697 USA 3.0
2-5 Onischuk, Alexander GM 2728 USA 3.0

Women's leaders:

1-2 Zatonskih, Anna IM 2490 USA 4.0
1-2 Krush, Irina IM 2515 USA 4.0
3 Abrahamyan, Tatev WFM 2280 USA 3.0
4 Rohonyan, Katerine WGM 2318 USA 2.5

Official website

Another Polgar Game

I was going to write a sidebar this week on the Colle, Torre and Stonewall opening systems, then saw this recent illustrative game against the Stonewall.

2008 Elementary Nationals, Pittsburgh
White: Holecek, Zachary
Black: Polgar, Tom

1.d4 d5 2.e3 Nf6 3.Bd3 g6 4.Nd2 Bg7 5.f4 O-O 6.Ngf3 Nbd7 7.O-O c5 8.c3 b6 9.b3 Bb7 10.Qc2 Rc8 11.Bb2 Qc7 12.Ne5 Nxe5 13.fxe5 Nd7 14.Rac1 Qc6 15.Nf3 f6 16.exf6 exf6 17.Nd2 f5 18.Nf3 c4 19.bxc4 dxc4 20.Be2 Rfe8

Okay!  Black has clearly seized the initiative.

The game ended 0-1 at move 46.  Now, this was a well-contested game by both sides, and hardly illustrates all the possibilities of the Stonewall, but certainly shows how to compete with it.  In subsequent columns I think it is best to proceed with the more modest Colle, which observes all opening principles of developing each piece with only one move, and to keep Tarrasch happy, develop all the pieces too!  It risks little while negotiating the opening and retains mid-game prospects.  Tough luck with this one Mr. Holecek, many players would be puzzled to say specifically where you went wrong.

Tom’s mum plays the Colle-Zukertort, and I suppose is familiar with its family of openings, and her family with what to do against it.  And if world champions can do it…

Tightened circumstances?

First captioned is the improved space allowance at the US Championship.

Apparently Alex Onischuk mentioned the cramped condition to the TD and the TD, Frank Berry’s first reaction to Onischuk’s ‘threat’ was to ask him if he needed a ride to the airport!

So, some of the women were shuffled off to another room, where they felt isolated from the tournament … so back they came to be in the same place as the other players, [second caption].

The scenario reminds me of a recent Moscow tournament where the women had less space than the men, and the subject of the size of their handbags came up.  I guess that’s chess in 2008.

One good thing to report is that a Chessville columnist on behalf of www.goddess.chess has created a prize for best fighting chess in the competition, for the second year running.  The prize was boosted this year by an anonymous contribution ~ thank you, to whoever that was <grin> and I further understand that this year’s prize will be judged by Grandmaster Susan Polgar.

True Stories from Real Chess Fans and their Parents

This is an actually story that happened to me in Pittsburgh during the National Elementary Championship.  The tournament was held at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center.  I could not book a room at the closest hotel to the playing site.  So I had to stay at a nearby hotel along with many other chess parents.

Tommy and I usually walk about 8 - 10 minutes each way to go to and from the hotel and the Convention Center.  We decided to take the taxi from the Convention Center back to our hotel on night because Tommy was not feeling well and I wanted him to get extra rest.  When we got on the cab, our driver Nick recognized who I am.  He is a chess player and loves the game.  He asked if I am in Pittsburgh to do a speaking engagement or simul.  I told him that I was only there as a Chess Mom.  He also asked how my sisters are doing.

When we reached our hotel, he did not charge me for the cab fare which I was of course more than happy to pay.  It was very nice of him.  On top of that, Tommy forgot his score book inside the cab.  When Nick found it, he drove back to the hotel at midnight to drop it off for Tommy.  I think that this was a very nice gesture by him and I would like to thank him for it.  So Nick, if you happen to read this, thank you and good luck with your chess!

Susan Polgar

Chess News WORLDWIDE:

World Championship
Kamsky v. Topalov? Well…

4 extensions by FIDE, 4 nothings as result.  This thing is looking more like an election in Uganda.

Why has FIDE over-run 4 of its own deadlines in settling a match?  After over-running yet another deadline on May 15, things cleared up on the sixteenth with the announcement that the money was in, and the match was on:

Proposed prize fund : USD 750,000.00
The FIDE Contribution : USD 150,000.00
Expenses of FIDE : USD 35,000.00

Organiser's name : VAT ZTO Prodexport and Rondo Holdings S.A.  Organiser’s address : 03150 Ukraine, Kiev, Kovpaka str. 17, app. 131

But… as of May 17th none of the above is verified by the banking institutions handling the money.

 

What to Play?

I have been ‘mentoring’ another player for some 300 games of correspondence chess, and he still cannot strike on a system he likes.  Its easier for him to be black because he thinks [falsely] that that is simpler, since you only need respond.  As White, I suggest, consider this ‘bland’ opening which nevertheless completes all opening principles.

The Colle is not a dog!

Model Development of the white pieces.  Andy Soltis says ‘White’s pieces coordinate beautifully.  He controls all the central squares except d5.  He can expand e3-e4-e5.  The K-Rook can come to e1, the Q to c2, and the only remaining question is where to put the Q-Bishop and Q-Rook.”

It is worth looking at an illustrative game to discover if White can un-spring his position and where his prospects lay.  Too often ‘quiet’ development in the opening is judged by players to have little worth – but a look at the diagram reveals no White weaknesses therefore is White ready to “un-spring” and command the middle game?

Mtel – And just when you think it’s a fluke…

The tournament took off and immediately went vertical with Ivanchuk nonchalantly scoring 4-0 in the first 4 rounds.

Round 5 he had black against an even higher rated super-GM , and surely…

GM Aronian (2763) - GM Ivanchuk (2740)
[D12] Mtel - Round 5, 12.05.2008

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 Bf5 5.Nc3 e6 6.Nh4 Bg6 7.Nxg6 hxg6 8.a3 Nbd7 9.g3 Be7 10.b3 e5 11.cxd5 Nxd5 12.Nxd5 Qa5+ 13.Nc3 Qxc3+ 14.Bd2 Qb2 15.d5 cxd5 16.Bb5 a6 17.Bxd7+ Kxd7 18.0–0 e4 19.Bc3 Qxc3 20.Qxd5+ Ke8 21.Rac1 Qd3 22.Qxb7 Rd8 23.Rfd1 Qxd1+ 24.Rxd1 Rxd1+ 25.Kg2 a5 26.g4 Kf8 27.Qxe4 g5 28.Qf5 Bd8 29.Qc5+ Kg8 30.Qe5 g6 31.b4 axb4 32.axb4 Kh7 33.b5 Rf8 34.Qc5 Kg8 35.b6 Rb1 36.f4 Rb2+ 37.Kg3 gxf4+ 38.exf4 Bxb6 39.Qc3 Rb1 40.f5 Rg1+ 41.Kh3 Re8 42.Qf6 Bf2 43.Qg7+ Kxg7 44.f6+ Kf8 Black wins 0–1

Five rounds and 5 wins, but a draw in round 6 temporaily stalled Ivanchuk. In round 7 he had to face Topalov:

GM Ivanchuk (2740) - GM Topalov (2767)
[D43] 15.05.2008 / Mtel Round 7

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bxf6 Qxf6 7.e3 Nd7 8.Rc1 Bd6 9.Bd3 0–0 10.0–0 Qe7 11.Qc2 a6 12.c5 Bc7 13.e4 dxe4 14.Nxe4 Rd8 15.Rfe1 Nf8 16.Qc3 f6 17.Bb1 Kh8 18.a3 Bd7 19.Nfd2 f5 20.Ng3 Qf6 21.Nf3 Be8 22.Ba2 b6 23.Rc2 bxc5 24.Qxc5 Rab8 25.Rd2 a5 26.Qc3 Rd6 27.Rde2 Bb6 28.Re5 Bf7 29.Bb1 Qd8 30.Ba2 Rb7 31.Ne2 Ng6 32.Re3 a4 33.Qc2 Rc7 34.Qxa4 c5 35.dxc5 Rxc5 36.Rc3 Ne5 37.Ned4 Ng4 38.h3 Nxf2 39.Kxf2 Ra5 40.Qc2 Rxd4 41.Kf1 Qd7 42.Rc8+ Kh7 43.Qc6 Qd6 44.Qxd6 Rxd6 45.Rf8 Ra7 46.Ne5 Rd2 47.Re2 Rd1+ 48.Re1 Rd2 49.Re2 Draw agreed ½–½

One player has been performing way below his capability, and had to face the dynamo energy of Ivanchuk.  Its hard to accuse anyone of this calibre of weaknesses, but Bu has recently been struggling with endgames, very fortunate for Ivanchuk in this instance. This is what happened:

The chosen game was played in Ghent by Colle vs Delvaux in 1929.

1. d4 Nf6
2. Nf3 e6
3. e3 d5
4. Bd3 c5
[why not?]

5.c3 Nc6
6. Nbd2 Be7
7. 0-0 c4?
8. Bc2!

[maintaining the Bishop on the ‘mating diagonal’ says Soltis. Black has plenty of time to launch his Queen side pawns, right?]

8. … b5
9. e4! dxe4
[allowing e5 would seal off Black’s King from all aid!]
10. Nxe4 0-0
11. Qe2 Bb7

12. Nfg5 [its starting to look a lot like Christmas!]

12. …h6?  [One more side-bar complete the story.]

GM Bu Xiangzhi (2708) - GM Ivanchuk (2740)
[A05]
16.05.2008 - Mtel round 8

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 b6 3.g3 c5 4.Bg2 Bb7 5.0–0 e6 6.Nc3 Be7 7.d4 cxd4 8.Qxd4 d6 9.Rd1 a6 10.b3 Nbd7 11.e4 Qc8 12.Bb2 0–0 13.Qe3 Re8 14.Rac1 Qc7 15.h3 Rac8 16.Nh2 Qb8 17.Ng4 Ba8 18.Nxf6+ Bxf6 19.Na4 Be7 20.e5 Bxg2 21.exd6 Bxd6 22.Kxg2 Nc5 23.Nc3 Be5 24.b4 Nb7 25.Qxb6 Rxc4 26.Na4 Rxc1 27.Rxc1 Bxb2 28.Nxb2 Qa8 29.Qc6 Nd6 30.Qxa8 Rxa8 31.Rc6 Nf5 32.Rc7 h5 33.Nd3 h4 34.g4 Nd4 35.a4 f6 36.Nc5 e5 37.a5 Ne2 38.Ne6 Nf4+ 39.Nxf4 exf4 40.Rc6 Kf7 41.g5 Kg6 42.gxf6 gxf6 43.Kf3 Kg5 44.Rc5+ f5 45.Rc6 Rb8 46.Rb6 Ra8 47.Ke2 Re8+ 48.Kd3 Re4 49.Kc3 Re2 50.Rxa6 Rxf2 51.Rd6 f3 52.Rd1 Kf4 53.Kb3 Re2 54.a6 Re3+ 55.Kc4 f2 56.Rf1 Kg3 57.b5 Ra3 58.Kb4 Ra2 59.Kb3 Ra5 60.Kb4 Ra2 61.Kb3 Ra5 Game drawn ½–½

Round 7 standings
1 Ivanchuk - 6.0
2 Topalov - 5.0
3-4 Radjabov, Cheparinov - 3.5
5 Aronian - 2.0
6 Bu Xiangzhi - 1.0

This week’s drama is that Ivanchuk has slowed down, permitting draws after 5 straight wins, but Topalov took over the charge to become a very clear challenger in second place. I remember two years ago in Mexico Toppy was at the bottom of the chart, then switching to Linares, Spain, simply slaughtered everyone, to come out on top.  Official site

Coming up: The 3rd International Chess Tournament 'AEROSVIT-2008' will take place 7th-20th June 2008 in Foros, Crimea, Ukraine. Participants: Carlsen Magnus g NOR 2765, Svidler Peter g RUS 2746, Ivanchuk Vassily g UKR 2740, Shirov Alexei g ESP 2740, Karjakin Sergey g UKR 2732, Jakovenko Dmitry g RUS 2711, Alekseev Evgeny g RUS 2711, Eljanov Pavel g UKR 2687, Volokitin Andrei g UKR 2684, Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter g ROU 2684, Van Wely Loek g NED 2676, Onischuk Alexander g USA 2664. Average rating 2711.7 Time control: 90 minutes for the first 40 moves then 30 minutes to the end of the game with addition of 30 sec. after each move starting from the first move. The rest day - Saturday, June 14th. International arbiter Oleg Tovchyga (Ukraine).

The Shahcom Company will provide live coverage of games in the playing hall and via internet on the official site and our site utilizing electronic boards "Shahcom". GM Mikhail Golubev will annotate games live.  Shahcom site: www.ruschess.com.  Official site: www.ukrchess.org.ua/aerosvit2008.

Also coming up

Capablanca Chess Tournament

Havana, May 7 (Prensa Latina) The drawing of lots by elite chess players will focus the opening ceremony of the 43rd Capablanca Memorial International Chess Tournament, scheduled for Wednesday evening at the Neptuno-Triton hotel resort in Havana.

Standings with 1 round 1 go:

1. Dominguez Perez, Lenier g CUB 2695 5
2. Khenkin, Igor g GER 2609 5
3. Amonatov, Farrukh g TJK 2649 5
4. Hernandez Carmenates, Holden g CUB 2568 4½
5. Tiviakov, Sergei g NED 2635 4
6. Wojtaszek, Radoslaw g POL 2625 3½
7. Arencibia Rodriguez, Walter g CUB 2534 3½
8. Nogueiras Santiago, Jesus g CUB 2559 3½
9. Bruzon Batista, Lazaro g CUB 2608 3
10. Quezada Perez, Yuniesky g CUB 2567 3

Official website: www.inder.cu/capablanca

Dear Parrot:

ENCI Limburg Open chess tournament which is held this weekend in Maastricht (NL).  With almost 400 players the ENCI Limburg Open is one of the biggest chess tournaments in Europe.  With more than 25 titleholders the ENCI Limburg Open is a very attractive tournament which should definitely be covered on your website. For questions you can contact the organisation by e-mail.

Luther, the Russian GM Vladimir Epishin, and the Austrian women grandmaster Eva Moser.


 

What to Play? continued...

Black avoided at move 11 with Bb7 the White’s exchange on Nxf6, then Qe4 threatening mate, and also attacking the unsupported Q-Knight. But loses the thread here – 12. … g6 was essential]

13. Nxf6+ Bxf6
14. Qe4 g6
15. Nxe6 fxe6
16. Qxg6+ Bg7
17. Qh7+ Kf7

18. Bg6+ [stopping the flight of the King]
18. … Kf6
19. Bh5 Ne7
20. Bxh6 Rg8

21. h4! [threatening Bg5 mate]
21. … Bxh6
22. Qf7 mate.

Colle also played Alekhine in 1929 at Carlsbad.  He had some interesting ideas about how to treat this new White system which are worth a look – and which challenge White to change his ‘model development’!

A Press Release from GM Mikhail Golubev states

Karpov to face Korchnoi at the 4th Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup

The 4th Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup will take place in Odessa, Ukraine from 30 May - 2 June 2008. Eight grandmasters will play two rapid games each against other.

The participants are:
Boris Gelfand (2723, Israel)
Ruslan Ponomariov (2719, Ukraine)
Anatoly Karpov (2655, Russia)
Pavel Tregubov (2629, Russia)
Viktor Korchnoi (2598, Switzerland)
Yuri Drozdovskij (2581, Ukraine)
Valery Beim (2523, Austria)
Mikhail Golubev (2474, Ukraine)

The games between the veterans Karpov and Korchnoi will be of special interest. In 1978 they played the first of their world championship matches in Baguio, Philippines.

The winners of the three previous Pivdenny Bank Chess Cups were:
     2005 - Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine)
     2006 - Joel Lautier (France)
     2007 - Vassily Ivanchuk (Ukraine)

The official site will be at: http://worldcup.pivdenny.com

The main organiser of the tournament is Bank Pivdenny (http://en.bank.com.ua), which is the largest bank in the southern part of Ukraine. Pivdenny also organised the 2007 and 2008 ACP World Rapid Chess Cups, which were won by Peter Leko (Hungary) and Teimour Radjabov (Azerbaijan), respectively.  Source: Press Center of the 4th Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup.

5-10-2008

Chess News USA and Canada

And … the Caribbean

“Dear Parrot”

We, the Eight Rivers Chess Club located in Ocho Rios, Jamaica W.I. are trying to develop the game of chess on the Island and we would appreciate your support.  We are planning an open chess tournament in Jamaica next August 2nd & 3rd.  I was wondering if you or any of your club members would be interested in coming here to participate.  It is to be a Rated tournament over 6 rounds and 2 days.  The strength of player we are expecting is good club level.  We are expecting between 75 and 100 persons to participate from all over the Island of Jamaica.  The Jamaican Chess Federation will be officiating.

We are also planning an amateur Tournament to run simultaneously.  We are intending to give cash and other prizes to the winners, but no details are available on that yet!  The venue is located at Rooms On The Beach, a good hotel in Ocho Rios on the North Coast of the Island.  I know it is early, but I want to make as many chess players as possible aware, so that they can plan their visit.

If you are interested please call me at 1 876 974 7825 or 1 876 877 9288; I'll give you more
details then.  If you don't get me speak to Syd Abbass at 1-876-880-2925, or send me an email.  If you need any info regarding hotels etc, we'll try to help.  I hope to hear from you.  Kamran Abbas


US Championship; Participants Announced:

1 GM Alexander SHABALOV 2697 Current Champion
2 GM Alexander ONISCHUK 2728 Rating (2008 SPICE Cup)
3 GM Gregory KAIDANOV 2697 Rating (2008 SPICE Cup)
4 GM Varuzhan Akobian 2666 Rating (2008 SPICE Cup)
5 GM Yury Shulman 2664 Rating (2007 SPICE Cup Invitee)
6 GM Julio Becerra 2637 Rating (2007 SPICE Cup)
7 GM Boris GULKO 2623 U.S. Open Champion (2007 SPICE Cup)
8 GM Alexander Ivanov 2622 Rating
9 GM Eugene Perelshteyn 2615 Rating (2007 and 2008 SPICE Cup)
10 GM Sergey Kudrin 2610 Rating
11 IM Benjamin Finegold 2609 Rating (2007 SPICE Cup Invitee)
12 GM Dmitry Gurevich 2594 Rating
13 GM Alex YERMOLINSKY 2587 Qualifier
14 GM John FEDOROWICZ 2531 Qualifier
15 GM Jesse KRAAI 2569 Qualifier
16 IM Dean IPPOLITO 2499 Qualifier
17 IM David PRUESS 2497 Qualifier
18 FM Daniel LUDWIG 2429 Qualifier
19 NM Sam SHANKLAND 2296 Qualifier
20 IM Josh FRIEDEL 2511 Wild Card
21 FM Michael LANGER 2322 Wild Card
22 Sergey GALANT 2176 Wild Card
23 IM Larry Kaufman 2383 Senior Open Champion
24 IM David Vigorito 2439 WCL Tnmt of Champions winner

US Women's Championship:

1 IM Irina KRUSH 2515 Current Champion (2007 SPICE Cup)
2 IM Anna ZATONSKIH 2490 Rating (2007 SPICE Cup Invitee)
3 WGM Katerine ROHONYAN 2318 Rating
4 WIM Batchimeg TUVSHINTUGS 2289 Rating
5 WFM Tatev ABRAHAMYAN 2280 Rating
6 WIM Tsagaan BATTSETSEG 2251 Rating
7 WFM Iryna ZENYUK 2205 Qualifier
8 WIM Esther Epstein 2194 Rating
9 WFM Chouchanik AIRAPETIAN 2143 Wild Card
10 Courtney JAMISON 2064 Wild Card

Information courtesy Tom Braunlich for CLO.


Innovative Chess Indexed Announced

A press release for Chess Express Ratings (www.cxrchess.com), Forest Hills, NY, May 7th, also known as “CXR”, announced May 7th the creation of the "Tournament Significance Index” (TSI).  Up until now, when we heard of someone’s tournament victory, we had no way to compare the significance of the achievement with that of a rival’s success someplace else.  Except for the very well known events, we may not even have a correct idea of the strength of either the event or its winner.  Chess Express Ratings, best known for bringing literally dozens of performance metrics to the sport of Chess, has developed a mathematical formula which - without bias - calculates a “Section Significance Index” (SSI) for each section of a tournament.  The formula takes into account time control, number of rounds, effective number of players participating, and the game-weighted average rating of the contestants.

The minimum requirements for a section to qualify for an SSI are:

~ at least 4 players
~ minimum average rating of 400
~ at least 3 rounds

Instead of reporting more of this service, I though, “wait a minute! I’m a chess reporter, I’ll call them up and ask some questions!” And that is how it came about that the Parrot interviewed Russ Mollot, which you can read near the bottom of this column.


US Senior Open – RESULT

Stop-press: Susan Polgar reports; “Going into the final round, IM Kaufman and Foygel were both 4-0. IM Bradford and GM Gurevich were both 3.5 points. IM Kaufman defeated Foygel to win clear first.” I see from the above that Kaufman gains automatic entry into the US championship for this win.


Coming up later this Year – Strongest ever US Tournament.

September 19th to 28th sees a [so far] Category 15 tournament on US soil in the 10 player SPICE CUP. Seven of the 10 invitees have already signed up, and I understand average Elo is currently 2600. Chessville’s senior editor Kelly Atkins recently visited the SPICE campus at Lubbock and will make an extended report on its current and future activities.


Mtel gets going, early results:

Round 1

Aronian 0-1 Topalov [caption]
Cheparinov 1-0 Bu
Radjabov 0-1 Ivanchuk

Note the dark glass with media and spectators behind it. This anti-disturbance device is now common at high level Euro-tournaments.

Round 2:
Veselin Topalov - Vassily Ivanchuk
This was the 5,507 point match up, result 0-1
Levon Aronian - Ivan Cheparinov
5,458 points between them, result draw

What to Play? …continued

The critical 8. Rb1 in the Grunfeld Exchange, with 12. Qb3

Here is the tabiya position from last week:

White’s two main options at move11 are 11.d5 or 11. Qd3. Author Yelena Dembo says other options 11.Bd3 and 11. e5 seem insufficient tries by White. We continue with the most aggressive move, the pawn sac variation Black fears initiated by 11.d5.

11. d5 Bxc3 and now Qb3 or Bc4
12. Qb3 [Dangerous, but sufficiently promising?]
12. …Bg7
13. Bf4 Qc8!
14. Rfe1 Ba6
15. e5 Bxe2
16. Rxe2 e6

17 d6 Nd7 [Black is better, Avrukh] Let us look at the other White choice at 11. Bc4

 

Bu Xiangzhi - Teimour Radjabov
And with 5, 459 points here, result draw

An interesting early statistic is that White has scored 1 Win, and Black 3 wins.  Ivanchuk [cartoon] is the early leader.  Official site: www.mtelmasters.com.

Chess News WORLDWIDE:

Coming Up

The 4th PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP will take place in Odessa, Ukraine from 30 May - 2 June 2008. The prize fund is USD 35,000. As usual, some of the world's most famous chess players will compete in this rapid chess tournament. So far, Anatoly Karpov (Russia), Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine) and Boris Gelfand (Israel) have all confirmed their participation. This year, the number of contestants will be reduced from 10 to 8, and the time control will be somewhat shortened, but in exchange, the grandmasters will play not one but two games against each other. The winners of the three previous tournaments were: 2005 GM Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine), 2006 GM Joel Lautier (France), 2007 GM Vassily Ivanchuk (Ukraine).

Also coming up

Capablanca Chess Tournament

Havana, May 7 (Prensa Latina) The drawing of lots by elite chess players will focus the opening ceremony of the 43rd Capablanca Memorial International Chess Tournament, scheduled for Wednesday evening at the Neptuno-Triton hotel resort in Havana. [caption]

According to a report from the Cuban News Agency -AIN-, the order of the matches for the nine sessions of the competition will be defined after each of the ten Grand Masters (GM) randomly pick numbers that may mark their fate.

The elite group will be granted the 15th category of the International Chess Federation (FIDE) for having an average ELO of 2,602 points. Heading the group is Cuba’s Leinier Dominguez (2,695), who is in the 26th position in world ranking.

Before leaving Caracas, Eduardo Iturrizaga [caption], first Grand Master of Venezuela,  said he aspires to dominate at the José Raúl Capablanca In Memoriam, although he still has to obtain the 2,600 ELO, threshold to enter elite events.

Another favorite is Holland’s Sergei Tiviakov (2,634), 84th in the world, and holder of the European title. He is one of the four foreign players among the group of elite competitors. The others are Farruk Amonatov (2,625), from Tajikistan, Poland’s Radoslaw Wojtaszek (2,625) and German Igor Khenki (2,608).

Also among the top players is Cuban Lazaro Bruzon [caption] (2,608).

With ELOs below 2,600 are locals Holden Hernandez (2,568), national champion Yuniesky Quesada (2,567), Jesus Nogueiras (2,559) and Walter Arencibia (2,534). GM Neuris Delgado (2,530), and International Master (IM) Fidel Corrales (2,502), who is waiting for FIDE's confirmation to be named GM, will take part in the event.

Source: www.plenglish.com

Dear Parrot:

ENCI Limburg Open chess tournament which is held this weekend in Maastricht (NL). With almost 400 players the ENCI Limburg Open is one of the biggest chess tournaments in Europe. With more than 25 titleholders the ENCI Limburg Open is a very attractive tournament which should definitely be covered on your website. For questions you can contact the organisation by mail at info@limburgopen.nl.

The Press release states:  This weekend, the 2nd ENCI Limburg Open takes place in Maastricht.  More than 25 titled players are among the nearly 400 participants.  Favourites in the fight for the main price are the eightfold Greek Champion and number 1 of the Greek ranking list, GM Vassilios Kotronias (2611), and the number 1 of the Swedish ranking list, GM Emanuel Berg (2601). Moreover, GM Dimitri Reinderman, who ended up second in the last Dutch Championships, seems to have remarkable chances.  The Netherlands are furthermore represented in the battle for the main price by the well-known grandmaster Friso Nijboer.  The crowd of 9 grandmasters is completed by the Belgian GM Alexandre Dgebuadze (Belgian Champion 2007), the English GM Gawain Jones, the German GM Thomas Luther, the Russian GM Vladimir Epishin, and the Austrian women grandmaster Eva Moser.

Underdogs in the fight for the main prize are IMs like Sergy Klimov, Puchen Wang, Emory Tate and the young Dutch IMs Robin Swinkels and Chiel van Oosterom.  The current Limburg Champion IM Martin Dambacher (2470) and Maurice Peek (rating 2405 and 2 IM-norms) are dangerous underdogs.  They are also the two favourites to win the title Limburg Champion 2008.


Big Deal in Baku -RESULTS

How sad for Grischuk who led the whole way… but

Round 10 standings:
1 Grischuk - 6.5
2-3 Gashimov, Wang Yue - 6.0
4-6 Mamedyarov, Carlsen, Adams - 5.5
7-9 Bacrot, Kamsky, Radjabov - 5.0
10-12 Svidler, Karjakin, Cheparinov - 4.5
13 Inarkiev - 3.5
14 Navara - 3.0

But Svidler and Carlsen both scored a whole point in the last two rounds, 12 and 13, promoting Carlsen into equal first with Gashimov and the exciting Chinese player Wang Yue; and these players share first the prize of 72,500 Euros.

The critical 8. Rb1 in the Grunfeld Exchange, with 12. Bc4

11. d5 Bxc3 and now Qb3 or Bc4
12. Bc4 Bg7! [Prudent! disallowing any tempo-gaining moves by the white Queen.]
13. Qd3 [or 13. Qe2 Qc8! 14 Bg5 f6! – you will have to buy the book to review all options, and Play the Grunfeld is well illustrated.]
13. … Qc8
14. Bg5 Re8
15. e5

Worth another diagram since White has a big center for his pawn, but no obvious way to break through.  Black players intending to try out the Grunfeld should feel good about this position, but should also look at a host of sideline variations.  The good news for Black is that the variations illustrated seem to be White’s strongest options.  The game might continue: 15…Ba6 16.Rbd1 Bxc4 17.Qxc4 Qa6 18.Qh4 Qb7 19.Bh6! [now black must defend well] 19…Nd7 20.e6 fxe6 21.Ng5! Nf8! 22.dxe6 Bxh6 23.Qxh6 Red8 [Black retained his pawn, and staled the White attack in Haba-Banas, Austrian League 1997.]

Final standings:
1-3 Gashimov, Wang Yue, Carlsen - 8.0
4-5 Mamedyarov, Grischuk - 7.5
6-7 Adams, Svidler - 6.5
8-10 Radjabov, Kamsky, Karjakin - 6.0
11-12 Cheparinov, Navara - 5.5
13-14 Bacrot, Inarkiev - 5.0

Radjabov and Cheparinov immediately flew to Sofia, for the 2008 Mtel Masters on Thursday.

The Parrot notes that of the top 3 players Gashimov scored 3 times, all with White. Wang Yue twice with White and once with Black, and Carlsen twice with White and twice with Black. Interestingly, at the bottom of the chart Inarkiev scored twice.

5-3-2008

Wait a minute!  Before we get started with around-the-world reporting, I want to know why India is showing up as a massive source of readership at Chessville?  There are 2 possibilities; (a) the first being India has more spammers hitting our site than any other country whatever, and (b) that the subcontinent has discovered Chessville, and likes it.

What I would like to ask is that if you are a (b) type person, our editorial group at Chessville wants to talk with you about your own column, your own reporting on chess in the sub-continent. Interested?  Write to this Parrot!

Chess News USA and Canada

More Chess on TV with ABC

Paul Azzuro (President of http://www.chessondvd.com/) and Eileen (Avanti Visual Communications) are setting up the equipment at ABC TV studio for chess DVD filming.

 

So what does it look like?  Susan Polgar reports:- “This is the first ever DVD from the ChessonDVD.com series which is being shot using the latest High Definition Widescreen technology.  This 2-volume DVD series will cover the French Defense, the first opening I learned when I started playing chess. I actually used this opening exclusively until when I reached around the master level. I still use the French as one of my weapons today.

Its… Editor Atkins!

Susan Polgar’s Blog reported earlier this week:  "This is Mr. Kelly Atkins, one of the editors and forum host at chessville.com. He will be visiting SPICE and Texas Tech today to do an exclusive behind the scene college chess report. Many people hear about the incredible success of SPICE in a very short period of time. But how do we do it? After this visit, Kelly will report the behind the scene secret of success of SPICE and its plans in the future."

Look for Kelly’s special report on SPICE: [caption Jerry Perez, Dr. Hal Karlsson (one of the discoverers of water on Mars), GM Susan Polgar, Kelly Atkins.]  Photographer unknown.

US Senior Open – RESULT

Stop-press: Susan Polgar reports; “Going into the final round, IM Kaufman and Foygel were both 4-0. IM Bradford and GM Gurevich were both 3.5 points. IM Kaufman defeated Foygel to win clear first and earn a spot in the Frank K. Berry US Championship in Oklahoma.”

White: Kaufman, Lawrence 2383
Black: Foygel, Igor 2501

1.d4 d6 2.e4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.Be3 a6 5.f4 b5 6.Bd3 Nd7 7.e5 Bb7 8.Nf3 c5 9.Be4 Qb8 10.dxc5 Bxe4 11.Nxe4 Qb7 12.Nc3 dxc5 13.Qd5 Qxd5 14.Nxd5 Rc8 15.O-O-O f6 16.Rhe1 fxe5 17.fxe5 Nxe5 18.Nxe5 Bxe5 19.Bh6 Nxh6 20.Rxe5 Ng8 21.Rde1 Kf7 22.Nxe7 Rc7 23.Nd5 Rd7 24.Nf4 Nf6 25.Rxc5 Rhd8 26.Nd3 Kg7 27.Rc6 a5 28.Nc5 1-0

More Chess on TV, this time, Toppy

Its in Bulgarian, but that’s OK, chess humor must be international, and this one bank commercial featuring GM Topalov is short and its funny.  [Click here].

Even Brits do it.
But can we?

In fact, I have been writing for 3 months with the moving force of this project in England, to distribute free chess sets to schools, who has managed the complex logistics of moiving tons of chess sets around the country, and who now thinks we should do it in the USA too.  But, he says, we should use our own plastics company here.  The English company who sponsored this initiative, he told me, got 10 years of advertising from their annual marketing budget by doing so.  Here is a report from an English Newspaper which cites local politicians – of national politicians I think there are now a dozen members of parliament strongly enthusiastic of the program:-

SCHOOLS across Warwickshire are to be given new chess sets to try to get more youngsters interested in the game.

The Chess for Schools initiative is being backed by the government and the English Chess Federation and will involve the distribution of 250,000 chess sets nationwide.

What to Play?

An on-going exploration into critical opening positions or ‘tabiya’.

She* says ‘Critical’… so lets take a look at the Exchange Variation and that 8. Rb1 in the Grünfeld.

1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 g6
3. Nc3 d5
4. cxd5 Nxd5
5. e4 Nxc3
6. bxc3 Bg7
7. Nf3 c5

Fix that position in your mind as the basic tabiya, and now comes “one of the most critical tests in the entire Grünfeld.”

8. Rb1 0-0
9. Be2

And here is the big question… who wants to be Black?

White has a strong center, a lead in development, the possibility of creating a powerful central passed pawn, the lack of good squares available to Black’s minor pieces, and the exposed Queen.  Ready to resign yet?

The answer is Yelena Dembo*, from whose book “Play the Grünfeld”, I quote, and also Petr Svidler, Garry Kasparov, Bobby Fischer, Zoltan Ribli, Andras Adorjan, Peter Leko…

Encouraged? Let’s keep looking at this, the most critical variation.

Cllr John Burton, cabinet member for schools, said: "We are delighted to be involved in this scheme which will bring enjoyment and many educational advantages to pupils across Warwickshire.

Under the scheme, each school in the county is entitled to 10 chess sets - made by a plastics firm from raw material donated by chemical companies. As part of the initiative, the council's extended services team is to launch chess as one of its children's university modules.

The junior university scheme runs modules including story telling, break-dancing and Mandarin.  After distributing the chess sets, extended services is aiming to organise sessions with accredited chess coaches to help young people learn and improve at the game.


But Brits Split:

Following the April Council meeting on Saturday the following Directors have tendered their resignation effect 31 May 2008: Martin Regan (Chief Executive), Peter Sowray (International), Claire Summerscale (Junior Chess & Education; Women's Chess) and Mike Truran (Non-Executive Director).

Martin Regan had this to say about the issue:

However, in order for English Chess to achieve that of which it is capable, more fundamental changes are needed. This is what the board was elected to deliver.

We were under no illusion about the hurdles that would need to be overcome, nor were we even sure that the Federation itself would wish to embark on major change.

However, it was clear from the first that in order to progress this agenda two fundamental conditions were required: A unified board and a Council wishing to hear the debate with an open mind.

I regret to say that neither condition could be met, despite my best efforts.

Chess News WORLDWIDE

The IX European Individual Chess Championships take place in Plovdiv, Bulgaria 20th April - 4th May.

It was a bit of an effort to determine what actually happened from the offical web site, but the Parrot thinks that Tiviakov won the men’s, and Lahno the women’s.

9.…b6!

A move developed by the aptly named  David Avrukh, and adopted by Petr Svidler, David Navara and Pavel Eljanov

10. 0-0 Bb7

Take another snapshot of the position:

The author notes one worthwhile alternative in 10. …Qc7!? As an attempt to avoid the pawn sac line 11. d5, but we skip that analysis here to look at White’s two main options at move11:

11.d5 or 11. Qd3.

The idea of ‘What to Play’? is not to just remember move orders from the openings, but to try to understand the potentials of the position by looking at key points in it. If you want to play the Grunfeld, or understand what to play against it, each tabiya illustrates critical strategic or tactical points in the game that are essential to understand.

Next week we can continue this investigation with the most aggressive move, the pawn sac variation Black fears initiated by 11.d5.

After 10 minutes at the site I decided I couldn’t tell who was who from the pictures, so do not provide any, or any other information that is for sure, rather than a guess. Maybe you can do better, see the Official site.

A Russian site reports leader scores:

Men:
1 Tiviakov - 8.5
2-10 Volkov, Tregubov, Movsesian, L'Ami, Vachier-Lagrave, Grachev, Baklan, Kryvoruchko, Nyback - 8.0
11-34 Sutovsky, Laznicka, Pavasovic, Efimenko, Papaioannou, Khalifman, Najer, Mamedov, Akopian, Areshcenko, Fressinet, Smirin, Lululesku, Bologan, Khismatullin, Galkin, Gustafsson, Sargissian, Andreikin, Hracek, Roiz, Vajda, Markovski, Gurevich - 7.0

Women - Final leading standings:
1 Lahno - 8.5
2-7 Ushenina, Zhukova, Cmilyte, Mkrtchian, Skripchenko, Dembo - 8.0
8-16 Cramling, Pogonina, Muzychuk, Stefanova, Dzagnidze, Danielian, Lomineishvili, Demina, Socko - 7.5
17 Houska, Paehtz, Hoang Thanh Trang, Repkova, Rajlich, Zimina, Romanko, Atalik, Turova, Khukhashvili, Molchanova, Cosma - 7.0

Big Deal in Baku

When Sicilians go bad…
 

GM Adams (2729) - GM Svidler (2746) [B92]
30.04.2008

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be2 e5 7.Nb3 Be7 8.0–0 0–0 9.Be3 Be6 10.Qd2 Nbd7 11.a4 Qc7 12.Rfd1 Rac8 13.a5 Rfe8 14.h3 h6 15.Qe1 Qb8 16.Bf3 Rc4 17.Nd2 Rc6 18.Nf1 Rec8 19.Bd2 b6 20.Ne3 bxa5 21.Ncd5 Bxd5 22.exd5 Rc5 23.Bxa5 e4 24.Be2 Qxb2 25.Bxa6 Rb8 26.c3 Rxa5 27.Rxa5 Qb6 28.Rda1 Nc5 29.Bf1 Qd8 30.Rb5 Rc8 31.Ra7 Nfd7 32.Nf5 Bf8 33.Qe3 Qf6 34.Ng3 Qe5 35.Nxe4 Nxe4 36.Rxd7 Rxc3 37.Qe2 Qd4 38.Rd8 Rc1 39.Kh2 White wins 1–0
 

GM Radjabov (2751) - GM Kamsky (2726) [B41]
30.04.2008 (Baku Grand Prix - Round 9)

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.c4 Nf6 6.Nc3 Qc7 7.a3 b6 8.Be3 Bb7 9.f3 d6 10.Rc1 Nbd7 11.Be2 Be7 12.0–0 0–0 13.b4 Rac8 14.Nb3 Qb8 15.Kh1 Rfe8 16.Na4 Bd8 17.Bg1 h5 18.Bf2 Bc7 19.Nd4 Ne5 20.c5 dxc5 21.bxc5 b5 22.c6 Nxc6 23.Nxc6 Bxc6 24.Rxc6 bxa4 25.Bg1 Be5 26.Qxa4 Rxc6 27.Qxc6 Rc8 28.Qxa6 Rc2 29.Bd3 Rd2 30.Rc1 Qb2 31.Qc8+ Kh7 32.Rc2 Rxc2 33.Qxc2 Qxa3 34.f4 Bxf4 35.e5+ g6 36.exf6 Qd6 37.Qc5 Qxc5 38.Bxc5 Be5 39.Be7 h4 40.Bc4 g5 41.Bxe6 Kg6 42.Bc8 Bxf6 43.Bxf6 Kxf6 44.g4 hxg3 White wins 1–0
 

Round 10 standings:
1 Grischuk - 6.5
2-3 Gashimov, Wang Yue - 6.0
4-6 Mamedyarov, Carlsen, Adams - 5.5
7-9 Bacrot, Kamsky, Radjabov - 5.0
10-12 Svidler, Karjakin, Cheparinov - 4.5
13 Inarkiev - 3.5
14 Navara - 3.0

I have been trying to access the official site baku2008.fide.com all week, and you can too!  But it didn’t work for me.

4-26-2008

Chess News USA and Canada


This Week:

Big Focus on Chess USA

 

Master Nip on TV

Eight minutes of chess video via U-tube featuring young Master Nip aged 10, playing a 10 board simul – one of his opponents was the current armed forces champ from West Point – which was not enough to earn him a point!

Nicholas gave up one draw and won the other nine games.  See for yourself.

Samford Fellowship Awards, Krush and Bhat

International master (IM) Irina Krush is the reigning U.S. Women's Champion, with a USCF rating of 2515 and a FIDE rating of 2479.  Irina has represented the U.S. in numerous international competitions since the age of seven, receiving medals in both World Youth and World Junior Championships.  She became a master at age twelve, and an International Master at age sixteen.  She has been an integral part of the U.S. Women's Olympiad Team since the age of fourteen, helping the U.S. win a historic silver medal at the 2004 Olympiad in Mallorca, Spain.

At just fourteen, she won her first U.S. Women's title with the convincing score of 8.5/9.  At seventeen, she tied for first place with GM Igor Novikov in the NYC Mayor's Cup and earned her first grandmaster norm.  Irina is also active in the chess community as a writer, photographer, teacher, and manager of the U.S. Chess League team, the New York Knights.

Vinay Bhat learned how to play chess when he was six-and-a-half years old.  At the age of ten-and-a-half he set the then-current record for becoming the youngest national master, breaking Bobby Fischer's record by two years.  That record was since broken by Hikaru Nakamura, and most recently, by Nicholas Nip.  Vinay also played extensively internationally, representing the US in nine different World Youth competitions with top five finishes on five different occasions.Vinay completed his IM title in 2000.

From 2002 through 2006, he attended the University of California at Berkeley, graduating with degrees in Statistics and Political Economy, and then went on to work at Cornerstone Research in Menlo Park, California.  While working he has gotten back to playing chess and won his third and final GM norm in July 2007.  Later that year, FIDE granted him the GM title conditional on his FIDE rating crossing 2500.

North Carolina is one of the few states that holds an annual invitational for its top players.  Each year, six active players are invited to square off in a weekend round robin.  The highest-rated players in the state, who have been playing in local weekend tournaments, make up the field.  This year’s event is April 26-27 at UNC Charlotte.

In order to groom the next generation of masters and experts,
we need to keep our current crop of masters active in the state,

...said Randy Wheeless, president of the North Carolina Chess Association.  “This event serves as a ‘thanks’ to those players who are competing every weekend in local Saturday Swiss events and our top tournaments.  They make the chess environment in North Carolina much stronger.”

This year’s field includes: FM Andrey Chumachenko (defending champ), NM Maurice Dana, NM Neal Harris, NM Craig Jones, NM Chris Mabe and FM Ron Simpson.  Official Site.

Pictures are from an article on scholastic chess Of Kings and Kids in the Charlotte magazine.

10th North American FIDE Invitational - Chicago

April 19 - April 25, 2008. All games held at the Touch Move Chess Center at 5639 N. Ashland Ave Chicago, IL 60660.  The score with 3 rounds to go:

1st - 2nd (5.0/6.0)
WFM Melekhina [captioned] (WIM norm scored!  Will she get a GM norm too?)
IM Young
3rd place (4.0/6.0)
FM Pasalic
4th (3.5/6.0)
IM Amanov
5th - 6th (3.0/6.0)
FM Stamnov
FM Shankar
7th (2.0/6.0)
FM Chow
8th - 10th (1.5/6.0)
WFM Yuan
FM Monokroussos
IM Vishnuvardhan

IM Norm - 6.5/9; WGM Norm - 6/9; WIM norm - 4/9

For events specifics including round times visit - http://www.nachess.org/fide

MASSACHUSETTS WINS STATE CHAMPION OF CHAMPIONS TITLE

IM David Vigorito claims online U.S. Championship Qualifying Spot

World Chess Live - April 20, 2008 - The United States Chess Federation and World Chess Live are pleased to announce that, after a close competition, IM David Vigorito, representing Massachusetts, has won the fourth U.S. State Champion of Champions event and will now go forward to the 2008 Frank K. Berry U.S. Chess Championship, 13-21 May, in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Fifty state champions from Alaska through California to Hawaii, and from Maine through to New York and Florida battled their way through the Eastern and Western Conferences held on WCL (the new sister-site of the Internet Chess Club), with the top four contesting the Finals.

The four who battled their way through the Blitz Conference qualifiers to the Finals Weekend were: Western Conference: IM Vinay Bhat (Northern California) and IM Enrico Sevillano (Southern California). Eastern Conference: IM David Vigorito (Massachusetts) and IM-elect Ray Robson (Florida).

In the semifinals, both Vigoreto and Sevillano scored convincing 2-0 wins, respectively, against Robson and Bhat to set-up the final match-up of Southern California versus Massachusetts.  And in that final, it was David Vigorito, 36, from Andover, MA, who snatched the final U.S. Chess Championship qualifying spot by taking the title 1.5-0.5.

“It’s [the U.S. State Champion of Champions event] tough and demanding, yet at the same time innovative by being played online,” commented David Vigorito after winning the title.  “It was nice to be able to go to Tulsa having won through -- and doubly so by representing my home-state of Massachusetts.”

This unique event demonstrates that online chess and over-the-board chess can indeed be a perfect mix – even for one of the world’s most famous national championships.  First, each player in the tournament had to prove themselves OTB by winning (or scoring highly in) their relevant state championship to be invited, then they had to play online on WCL (both in an all-play-all Blitz for the conference qualifiers, and then the G\60 knockout finals, with independent proctors officiating at each venue to ensure fairness throughout), with the winner going forward to the U.S. Chess Championship.

Caption: Winner IM David Vigorito

For further information:
John Henderson, Director of Marketing & Chess Content
Tel: 847-347-9593. Email: jbhthescots@chessclub.com

The 5th Annual All-Girls Nationals, presented by the Dallas Chess Club and the Kasparov Chess Foundation (KCF) kicks off Friday April 25 with a simultaneous by Irina Krush.  The main event begins on Saturday, April 26 with four rounds, and two more on Sunday.  Some notable pre-registered players include 2008 U.S. Women's Championship wild card Courtney Jamison, World Youth silver-medalist Sarah Chiang and members of the many-time National Championship team I.S. 318 Darrian Robinson and Angelica Berrios, pictured to the left.  Other high-ranked entries include Anna Matlin, Medina Parilla, Sylvia Yang and Linda Diaz.

At stake in the Under 18 section is a Scholarship to the University of Texas at Dallas, valued at over $65,000 for an out-of-state student. KCF President Michael Khodarkovsky is happy that this year the tournament will include: "195 registered players and the strongest ever field of competitors so far."

The Susan Polgar Foundation and the Las Vegas International Chess Festival proudly present the Third Annual Susan Polgar World Open Championship for Girls (This is an OFFICIAL qualifier for the SP National Invitational for Girls) and Second Annual Susan Polgar World Chess Challenge for Boys.

Sections: Under 8, 11, 15, 19
June 6-8, 2008 - Las Vegas
G/45 - 5 Round Swiss

Over $100,000 in scholarships and cool chess prizes are available. Details: http://www.vegaschessfestival.com/polgar/

New Chess Blog

GM Boris Alterman has put up a new instructive chess blog:

“Nowadays I rarely play professional chess. Most of my time is dedicated to giving chess lectures, Simultaneous exhibitions, private lessons and training sessions.”

See http://chesslessons.wordpress.com:80/.


Good Interview Spotted:

Lilja Gretarsdottir - President of the Iceland Chess Federation spoke with journalists on her chess playing career and also the state of chess in Iceland.

“I cherish it personally more than competitively, in fact, and I enjoy the beauty in chess when others play well. Somehow for me it is also a personal connection to my grandmother, whom I adored. She was a person of an incredible independence and free spirit, both on the chessboard and in life. She always played the King’s Gambit and always went for the win no matter what. I loved her dearly and she gave me chess. I never had a trainer or anything like that, but I had my grandmother as an inspiration. (In spite of this fact Lilja has been eleven-time Icelandic women champion! D.B.)’

Read the whole thing here.

Chess News WORLDWIDE:

The IX European Individual Chess Championships take place in Plovdiv, Bulgaria 20th April - 4th May.

Top men participants: Movsesian Sergei 2695 SVK, Vallejo Pons Francisco 2684 ESP, Volokitin Andrei 2684 UKR, Almasi Zoltan 2674 HUN, Nikolic Predrag 2674 BIH, Akopian Vladimir 2673 ARM, Fedorchuk Sergey 2671 UKR, Motylev Alexander 2666 RUS, Bologan Viorel 2665 MDA, Georgiev Kiril 2665 BUL, Timofeev Artyom 2664 RUS, Efimenko Zahar 2660 UKR, Roiz Michael 2659 ISR, Tomashevsky Evgeny 2658 RUS, Fressinet Laurent 2656 FRA, Predojevic Borki 2651 BIH, Areshchenko Alexander 2650 UKR, Moiseenko Alexander 2650 UKR, Ivanisevic Ivan 2649 SRB, Sakaev Konstantin 2649 RUS

Round 4 leading standings
1-3 Grigoriants, Pantsulaia, Sutovsky - 4.0
4-14 Volkov, Stevic, Kovacevic, Tiviakov, Pavasovic, Efimenko, Mamedov, Werle, Movsesian, Kurnosov, Kriviruchko - 3.5

Top women participants: GM Cramling Pia 2539 SWE, GM Stefanova Antoaneta 2538 BUL, IM Socko Monika 2505 POL, IM Muzychuk Anna 2486 SLO, GM Lahno Kateryna 2479 UKR, IM Danielian Elina 2479 ARM, GM Hoang Thanh Trang 2477 HUN, IM Ushenina Anna 2474 UKR, WGM Pogonina Natalija 2470 RUS, IM Cmilyte Viktorija 2466 LTU, IM Javakhishvili Lela 2466 GEO, GM Peng Zhaoqin 2455 NED, IM Arakhamia-Grant Ketevan 2452 SCO, WGM Zhukova Natalia 2450 UKR, IM Paehtz Elisabeth 2449 GER. IM Dzagnidze Nana 2443 GEO, IM Skripchenko Almira 2443 FRA, IM Ovod Evgenija 2437 RUS.

Round 4 leading standings
1 Kovalevskaya - 4.0
2-8 Cmilyte, Kazimova, Stefanova, Peptan, Muzychuk A., Lahno, Dzagnidze - 3.5

Official site: http://www.eicc2008.com

Big Deal in Baku

Standings after 3 rounds:

1 Grischuk 2716 RUS 2.5
2-6 Carlsen 2765 NOR 2
Radjabov 2751 AZE 2
Karjakin 2732 UKR 2
Kamsky 2726 USA 2
Gashimov 2679 AZE 2
7-9 Adams 2729 ENG 1.5
Bacrot 2705 FRA 1.5
Yue 2689 CHN 1.5
10-13 Mamedyarov 2752 AZE 1
Svidler 2746 RUS 1
Inarkiev 2684 RUS 1
Navara 2672 CZE 1
14 Cheparinov 2695 BUL 0

Insider talk before the match was if Magnus Carlsen could handle the pressure of being the #1 rated player.  I personally thought so – but that is one very strong field of players!

That is what I wrote last week, but round 4 results went like this:

Round 4 results:
   Kamsky Gata 2726 1/2 Grischuk Alexander 2716
   Adams Michael 2729 1-0 Navara David 2672
   Bacrot Etienne 2705 1/2 Karjakin Sergey 2732
   Yue Wang 2689 1-0 Cheparinov Ivan 2695
   Svidler Peter 2746 1/2 Radjabov Teimour 2751
   Inarkiev Ernesto 2684 - Gashimov Vugar 2679
   Mamedyarov Shakhriyar 2752 1-0 Carlsen Magnus 2765
 

GM Mamedyarov (2752) - GM Carlsen (2765) [E17]
24.04.2008 - Round 4

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7  [Regular Parrot readers will recognize features of the English Defence and the Accelerated Queen’s Indian featured earlier this year.  A game Bilek-Schussler, Helsink 1978 went 1.c4 b6, 2. d4 Bb7, 3. Nf3 e6, 4.g3 Bxf3 – in other high level games this year Black has chosen Ba6].
5.Bg2 Be7 6.0–0 0–0 7.Re1 Na6 8.Ne5 Bxg2 9.Kxg2 c6 10.e4 Qc7 11.Nc3 Qb7 12.Nd3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.cxd5 cxd5 15.h4 Nb4 16.Bg5 Nxd3 17.Qxd3 Bb4 18.Rec1 a6 19.Ne2 Rfc8 20.h5 h6 21.a3 Bf8 22.Bd2 Rxc1 23.Rxc1 Rc8 24.Rf1 b5 25.f4 Qc6 26.Rc1 Qb7 27.Rf1 Qc6 28.Qf3 Qb6 29.f5 exf5 30.Bc3 a5 31.Bxa5 [Carlsen overlooked this shot] Qxa5 32.Qxf5 Qd2 33.Qxf7+ Kh8 34.Rf2 Rd8 35.Qxd5 Qa5 36.Nf4 Qa8 37.Ng6+ 1–0

Why Resign?  See the ‘Final Word’ at the bottom of the Page.

Olympiad Feed, Dresden:

Polgar defeats GM Uhlmann in demonstration games a couple of times at castle, before 1,200 guests.

Susan Polgar in her role of Ambassador of the Chess presented to the Chess Olympiad at Dresden, 2008, where 75 nations are registered to take part. [The following is from the German Press…]

The celebrated Hungarian-American chess genius Susan Polgar celebrated her birthday on April 19th, 2008 at the Dresden Residence Castle. The former chess world champion was, on her great day, the star visitor of this year’s Press Gala. The glamorous meeting of journalists, politicians and business representatives this year will be themed “Rochade in black and white” – on the occasion of the Chess Olympiad Dresden 2008 from 12 to 25 November.

Along with Susan Polgar, the grand masters Wolfgang Uhlmann and Lothar Schmid, Winfried Lehmann, president of the Organizing Committee, Chairman Dr. Dirk Jordan, director Jörn Verleger as well as the 26-year-old artist and ambassador of the Chess Olympiad Dresden 2008, Vaile, followed the invitation of the host and celebrated together with over 1,200 ball guests until early morning.

During the blitz match with commentary upon for visitors by Dr. Dirk Jordan, Susan Polgar twice defeated her ambassador colleague, the Dresden chess legend Wolfgang Uhlmann, in an uphill struggle. He took it calmly. For him, this weekend’s sportive highlight is the finale of the 2nd German Chess League. The male players of the USV TU Dresden are right before their ascension into the 1st league.

www.dresden2008.de or www.dresden2008.com

Karpov, Ponomariov and Gelfand to play in Odessa
by GM Mikhail Golubev

The 4th PIVDENNY BANK CHESS CUP will take place in Odessa, Ukraine from 30 May - 2 June 2008.  The prize fund is USD 35,000.  As usual, some of the world's most famous chess players will compete in this rapid chess tournament.  So far, Anatoly Karpov (Russia), Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine) and Boris Gelfand (Israel) have all confirmed their participation.

This year, the number of contestants will be reduced from 10 to 8, and the time control will be somewhat shortened, but in exchange, the grandmasters will play not one but two games against each other.

The winners of the three previous tournaments were:
     2005 GM Ruslan Ponomariov (Ukraine)
     2006 GM Joel Lautier (France)
     2007 GM Vassily Ivanchuk (Ukraine)

The main organiser of the tournament is Bank Pivdenny (en.bank.com.ua), which is the largest bank in the southern part of Ukraine. Pivdenny also organised the 2007 and 2008 ACP World Rapid Chess Cups, which were won by Peter Leko (Hungary) and Teimour Radjabov (Azerbaijan), respectively.

The 4th Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup will be covered at the Pivdenny chess site, worldcup.pivdenny.com.

4-19-2008

Fantasy Chess Island in Rare Chess Pictures vol. 3 is not Mont St Michel in France, and nobody guessed it from last week’s distance shot.

Here are closer views at low tide, and also at high tide. I have been trying to convince a certain someone that the site is worth review just in case they ever make a [slightly gothic?] chess movie.

Historical references are as early as 400bc, where, as an important trading port for the export of tin and copper to Europe. It is thought likely to be the island of Ictis, referred to in classical literature.

In fact, I have volunteered my services to be a native-speaking guide for whenever the Island is inhabited by either a group of Grandmasters, or Tom Hanks & crew.

If anything good happens I’ll send you all a postcard J

10th North American FIDE Invitational - Chicago

April 19 - April 25, 2008. All games held at the Touch Move Chess Center at 5639 N. Ashland Ave Chicago, IL 60660.


Participants include:

     IM Mesgen Amanov

     IM Angelo Young

     IM Arjun Vishnuvardhan

     FM Mehmed Pasalic

     FM Dennis Monokroussos

     FM Gauri Shankar

     FM Aleksander Stamnov

     FM Albert Chow

     WFM Alisa Melekhina

     WFM Yuanling Yuan

 

IM Norm - 6.5/9; WGM Norm - 6/9; WIM norm - 4/9.  For event specifics including round times visit - http://www.nachess.org/fide.

So Wins, Other Cheated at Dubai

Even so, let us not concentrate on yet another chess cheater on his cell-phone when the 14-year old youngest Philippine GM scores a great tournament championship victory in Dubai. Now rated 2540, but with a massive 2700 level performance rating, the young player scored 7 points to clinch the win and also $4500. Good show! Mr. So.

Susan Polgar is in Dresden for the Olympiad, and Chessville understands that she, and her husband will forward Chessville regular news on the Olympiad, as well as photography of the event.

Not everything in the April Fool’s joke was false!  In fact other parts of the Fool’s Day are also true – and the Parrot also wants to point out that the origin of the joke was from Susan herself.

Susan wrote, “The festivities in Dresden this weekend will be amazing. There will be tons of mainstream media, celebrities, important business people, politicians, etc.  I was told that there will only be two representatives from the chess community, grandmaster Wolfgang Uhlmann and myself.  I just gave a long interview to the biggest newspaper in Dresden.  They will be doing a 4-page chess special every single day during the Olympiad.  All the announcement will be officially made by this weekend. I will keep you posted.

Ural win Russian Team Championship – Result

It must feel good to have a team like this, and they certainly performed: Board 1: Radjabov, Board 2: Shirov, Board 3: Kamsky, Board 4: Grischuk, Board 5: Malakhov, Board 6: Akopian

1. Ural (Yekaterinburg) 16 (36½)
2. Economist-1 (Saratov) 13 (33½)
3. Finek (St Petersburg) 13 (32½)
4. TPS (Saransk) 12 (33½)
5. Spasio-Swiss (Moscow) 12 (32)
6. Shatar (Buryatia) 12 (31½)
7. '64' (Moscow) 11 (30)
8. SHSM (Moscow) 8 (29½)
9. Tomsk-400 (Tomsk) 8 (27)
10. Politekhnik (N. Tagil) 7 (27), etc.

Chess News WORLDWIDE

Grand Master Anatoly Karpov
to Play at Cuban Mass Match


Havana, April 15 (acn) Russian chess Grand Master and former world champion Anatoly Karpov will take part in a gigantic 4,000 chess board simultaneous match on April 21 at the University of Computer and Informatics Sciences (UCI) in Havana.
 

Karpov was welcomed upon his arrival Monday by Osvaldo Vento, an official from the Cuban Sports, Physical Education and Recreation Institute (INDER). Vento greeted the chess great on behalf of Jose Ramon Fernandez, president of the Cuban Olympic Committee and Christian Jimenez, who heads INDER.

Besides participating in the large gathering of chess enthusiasts at the UCI, Karpov will visit the International School of Sports and Physical Education and a local rehabilitation center for Ukrainian children affected by the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

The Russian chess grand master will also visit the pantheon containing the remains of mythical Cuban chess master Jose Raul Capablanca, world champion from 1921 to 1927, who Karpov considers a great inspiration. Source.

 

What to Play?

Several week’s ago I was showing off my ignorance of the King’s Gambit, and as a corrective action researched a few lines, Kieseritzky’s and Fischer’s particularly – thus armored with 45 minutes study I thought I’d try it in a correspondence game… but the game went like this…

1.e4 e5
2. f4 exf4
3. Nf3 Be7
4. Bc4

Ah!  I know Be2 is the Cunningham, but that was originally a gambit line combined with a subsequent g3, and I don't think it was very good, so played this Bc4 thing which I also don't know the name thereof.

4... Bh4 +

The question being, is that a good move, because now Black's king-N has trouble developing itself.

5. Kf1 c6

The guy I am playing is 2465 so requires respect, and I think that is an innovation – and I asked in a newsgroup if anyone had seen it before?  I had been expecting d6.  A reply stated there are some 15 year-old games in a database, but the line lacks a name.  Is there one?

 

Big Deal in Baku

The Chess Grand Prix will take place from April 20 to May 6 in Baku, Azerbaijan.

Here are the list of the players (by April 2008 rating order) in the Baku Grand Prix:

Magnus Carlsen (NOR 2765)
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (AZE 2752)
Teimour Radjabov (AZE 2751)
Peter Svidler (RUS 2746)
Sergey Karjakin (UKR 2732)
Michael Adams (ENG 2729)
Gata Kamsky (USA 2726)
Alexander Grischuk (RUS 2716)
Etienne Bacrot (FRA 2705)
Ivan Cheparinov (BUL 2695)
Wang Yue (CHN 2689)
Ernesto Inarkiev (RUS 2684)
Vugar Gashimov (AZE 2679)
David Navara (CZE 2672)

Insider talk is if Magnus Carlsen can handle the pressure of being #1. I personally think so – but that is one very strong field of players!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What’s this?!


PAPP Béla Memorial / Rapid

Adorján: Reversed Chess World premier!

Prize Found: 200.000,- HUF / Ft -
 2008. április 19-20. (½ 10 és 10 óra)
4+3 round / forduló, 2x30’ + lépésenként 20”/moves

Hungarian Chess Federation / Magyar Sakkszövetség (1055 Budapest, Falk Miksa u. 10.)

Prizes / Díjazás: 75-50-30-20-15-10 thousand HUF (over 60 players) Entry 3000,- HUF  (WGMs and GMs free)

Reversed Chess (Fordisakk) naturally is played according to traditional chess.  The only difference is that the two camps changing places in the beginning position.  BLACK is to start standing in the place of White, in return White that is playing in the place of BLACK replies. This mutation creates odd and comical pictures but not l’art pour l’art!

It is an experiment.  They say it is better to play with White.  If it is really so could only be because of the right (and duty) of the first move.  However almost all the associations connected with BLACK are negative.  I have collected just hundreds of such combination.

In short: the aim of the test tournament is to learn whether moving first or playing White in the whole game gives an advantage?

Naturally you cannot draw a firm conclusion of just one tournament.  But I, the ’innovator’ am sure that there’ll be interesting games and I’m eager to see the statistics of this tournament….

A. Adorjan, E-mail: aa_ok@interware.hu

4-12-2008

First of All:  Reply-to-Parrot Mail

Dear Louis, Fantasy Chess Island in Rare Chess Pictures vol 3 is not Mont St Michel in France, though you are not too far adrift!  You are right that Errol Flynn is playing Olivia DeHavilland who co-starred with him in "They Died With Their Boots On", which you date to 1940 or 1941.

This Could Be
The Last Time

Last week we reported the immanent demise of a board member – and his issue seems to now have become public news, and concerns legal liabilities of the USCF Forum, and disagreement about the need for insurance.

I note in passing that other board members Susan Polgar and Paul Truong have refused to have anything to do with the forum for over a year, and suggested shutting it down.

A visit to that forum records:

Who is online “Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest.” Which would be moi. The most visited item was “Notices of Disciplinary actions” which recorded a whopping 8,666 views [!] and another titled Complaints Department had recorded 1,616 views.

Any thread identifying chess itself as a topic was in the hundreds of view, and many of those seemed abandoned, with no 2008 entries at all.

In his offer to resign letter, Mr. Joel Channing opined with 2 rather significant comments:

Small Problem with
World Championship

On 25th of June 2007 on the presidential board meeting in Tallinn, FIDE decided that the semi final match of the world championship cycle (2008-2009) between Gata Kamsky and Veselin Topalov will take place in the second half of 2008 in Bulgaria.  The same decision was confirmed at the 78th FIDE congress in Antalya in November 2007.  The Bulgarian Chess Federation expressed it's readiness to provide the necessary prize fund of 150 000 USD and to cover all additional taxes and expenses around it's organization.  The contract for the match had to be signed in Singapore.  But that did not happen.

Instead of following the decisions taken at the 78th congress, the FIDE President Kirsan Ilymzhinov has extended the bidding period until April 23rd.

"If our actions or inactions were ever found by a jury to be the cause of significant damage to the image and career of a high profile personality, a jury award could easily be well into the millions."

"This would mean that the financial health of the Federation itself, as well as those of the directors, could be at risk."

While the USCF Forum is a contentious new element in the life of the Federation, it occupies massive amounts of board and staff time, and money to sustain it, it also seems to have detracted from a little problem to do with income, that is to say, about 200 thousand dollars adrift, and according to my calculations the impending financial crisis will hit home [that is, the homes of USCF's employees] at about Christmas time.

$200,000 adrift being about 7 salaried positions.  Though this is not the most dire prediction, which for next year is at the $300,000 level from a gross income of about $3.1 million.

 

This week voting on the future of the Forum went:

To cancel the internet insurance: Yes 4 (Bauer, Berry, Goichberg, Hough).  The motion passes.

To shut down the USCF Issues Forum: Yes 2 (Polgar, Truong).  The motion fails.

If a very slimmed down organization survives and retains the same name, then at least ratings services will continue as a core service to the chess public – though after a few more ‘little problems’ including last year’s resignation of a sitting board member for cheating with his own rating, plus the report in NY Times Chess Blog last week, by a player who wrote in to USCF for a masters title and a ratings floor, and was awarded them with no questions asked, no signature required… even though the sense of the letter was that the player achieved his results pre-1990, and USCF have ‘lost’ all rating data before that time…

Of course, if you can qualify as a master, that is some level of credibility in order to earn money by becoming a chess teacher…

But quality control systems seem entirely absent from ratings, and even after the demise of board member Tanner for rigging his own, the Parrot has not been able to understand from USCF officials if anything at all has happened in terms of the competency of the ratings department’s management of, what is after all, America’s official ratings service, and have received ‘replies’ rather than substantive answers.

A minimum response needs to state how no quality control measure was in place even for a Master title, and secondly, how many such instances are there? And of course, what has been done about what is known to be a problem.

With Dylan, I rather think ‘somebody better investigate soon’.


 

When Ratings were Gradings

Parrot Questioned on Ratings then and now: Has the FIDE rating system veered away from the original Elo theory as much as the USCF rating system has?  If the answer to this is no by a substantial margin then there is a valid point in making this distinction. Who knows the history of these subjects?

Answer: 'Ratings' is actually a new term. The older one is 'grading', and as early as 1880 people have been devising reports and schema to determine relative strength among chess players. [see, G. M. Brumfitt].

No ratings emerged to any general public until the end of WWII. But the Correspondance Chess League of America successfully introduced a system of their own devising in the 1930's.

OTB Ratings became more popular in England due to the work of J. Gilchrist and [to be Sir] R. W. B. Clarke. The first 'grading' list appeared March 1954 as result of their work.

In the 1950's USCF also implemented a [non-Elo] grading system - but this was problematic and was superceded by another devised by its own mathematical committee. At about the same time the Germans used yet another system, INGO.

The main differences between the contenders of these three systems was perhaps between the US systems and the English one. The US system related current results to all previous ones, whereas the English related current results to more recent results.

Until about 1970 there was nothing else to report - and then Don Shultz's introduction of Elo gained world wide attention, [to chess and also to horse racing!] especially among the increasing number of international players - and was some means for FIDE to also determine strength by an objective means as measured player-to-player, and from country to country.

US Championship 2008

Confirmed Roster - Women:

1 IM Irina KRUSH 2515 Current Champion
2 IM Anna ZATONSKIH 2490 Rating
3 WGM Rusudan GOLETIANI 2384 Rating
4 WGM Katerine ROHONYAN 2318 Rating
5 WIM Batchimeg TUVSHINTUGS 2289 Rating
6 WFM Tatev ABRAHAMYAN 2280 Rating
7 WIM Tsagaan BATTSETSEG 2251 Rating
8 WFM Iryna ZENYUK 2205 Qualifier
9 WFM Chouchanik AIRAPETIAN 2143 Wild Card
10 Courtney JAMISON 2064 Wild Card

Confirmed Roster for the 2008 US Championship:

1 GM Alexander SHABALOV 2697 Current Champion
2 GM Alexander ONISCHUK 2728 Rating
3 GM Gregory KAIDANOV 2697 Rating
4 GM Jaan EHLVEST 2687 Rating
5 GM Varuzhan AKOBIAN 2666 Rating
6 GM Yury SHULMAN 2664 Rating
7 GM Boris GULKO 2623 U.S. Open Champion
8 GM Julio BECERRA 2637 Rating
9 GM Alexander IVANOV 2622 Rating
10 GM Eugene PERELSHTEYN 2615 Rating
11 GM Sergey KUDRIN 2610 Rating
12 IM Benjamin FINEGOLD 2607 Rating
13 GM Alex YERMOLINSKY 2587 Qualifier
14 GM John FEDOROWICZ 2531 Qualifier
15 GM Jesse KRAAI 2569 Qualifier
16 IM Dean IPPOLITO 2499 Qualifier
17 IM David PRUESS 2497 Qualifier
18 FM Daniel LUDWIG 2429 Qualifier
19 NM Sam SHANKLAND 2296 Qualifier
20 IM Josh FRIEDEL 2511 Wild Card
21 FM Michael LANGER 2322 Wild Card
22 Sergey GALANT 2176 Wild Card

Source: Tom Braunlich

The New England Masters 2008 will take place at the Blackstone Chess Academy, 26 Main Street, Pawtucket (near Providence), Rhode Island, USA, from August 11-15, 2008. As usual, the event will be a 9 round FIDE rated Swiss with norm opportunities available to the participants.

Already confirmed to take part are GM Leonid Kritz (Germany), GM Timur Gareez (Uzbekistan), GM Sergey Erenburg (Israel), GM Eugene Perelshteyn (USA), GM Keith Arkell (ENG) and now two-time winner of Dos Hermanas, Jorge Sammour-Hasbun (PLE).

Free entries and reduced rate accommodation are offered to Grandmasters, non-USA International Masters and players rated FIDE 2500 or higher. To help attract foreign players to the event, which helps with norms, all entry fees are discounted by $100 for anyone participating who is not listed as USA.

Entry will be limited to players rated FIDE 2100 or higher although we are allowing 4 special participants rated under the minimum limit the chance to participate. Also, due to the size of the location, entry is limited to the first 50 confirmed entries received.

The event will also be part of the Blackstone Chess Festival that will also encompass the Blackstone Open on the weekend after the New England Masters, August 16-17, 2008.

For complete details and entry information please visit the tournament website.

Chess News Worldwide


Magistral Ruy López

One round to go and Mickey Adams is 1 point clear of the field.

Round 6 results:

1 Julio GRANDA (2609)  ½ ½ Gabriel SARGISSIAN (2643)
2 Michael ADAMS (2729)  1 0 Fabiano CARUANA (2620)
3 Humpy KONERU (2603)  1 0 Manuel Perez CANDELARIO (2537)
4 Hou YIFAN (2549)  0 1 Zhang PENGXIANG (2640)
 

 

No.

 

Nombre

Rtg

FED

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Pts.

Rk.

1

GM

Michael ADAMS

2729

ENG

*

1

1

½

1

1

 

½

5,0

1

2

GM

Koneru HUMPY

2603

IND

0

*

½

½

1

 

½

1

3,5

6

3

WGM

Hou YIFAN

2549

CHN

0

½

*

0

 

0

½

 

2,0

7

4

GM

Zhang PENGXIANG

2640

CHN

½

½

1

*

1

1

0

 

4,0

3

5

IM

Manuel P.CANDELARIO

2537

ESP

0

0

 

0

*

0

½

½

1,0

8

6

GM

Fabiano CARUANA

2620

ITA

0

 

1

0

1

*

0

½

2,5

4

7

GM

Gabriel SARGISSIAN

2643

ARM

 

½

½

1

½

1

*

½

4,0

2

8

GM

Julio GRANDA

2609

PER

½

0

0

 

½

½

½

*

2,0

5

 
The official site features some stunningly beautiful chess paintings in honor of the origins of the tournament.

Ruy López y su época : JUAN DE LUCENA: UNO DE LOS ANTECESORES DE RUY LOPEZ

Ruy López y su época : MADRID, 1575: EL PRIMER TORNEO INTERNACIONAL DE AJEDREZ por Loli Iglesias

website

The Dutch Championship is taking place 2nd - 13th April. The participants are:  Sergei Tiviakov GM 2634, Daniel Stellwagen GM 2621, Erwin L'Ami GM 2600, Jan Smeets GM 2578, Sipke Ernst GM 2559, Friso Nijboer GM 2558, Dimitri Reinderman GM 2526, Ruud Janssen IM 2504, Yge Visser GM 2477, Jan-Willem De Jong IM 2474, Manuel Bosboom IM 2471, Daan Brandenburg IM 2435.

Nijboer was the early leader, but with 3 rounds to go young stars GMs Daniël Stellwagen (2621) and Jan Smeets (2578) are tied for first at the 2008 Dutch Championship with the score of 5.5 points in 8 games.

GMs Erwin L'Ami (2600), Spike Ernst (2559) and Dimitri Reinderman (2526) are half a point behind with 5 points.

This is a category 12 event with average rating of 2536. [Cool logo is from a sponsor.]  Official site.

Check out Chessville's Forum:

This week we have “correspondance anyone?”  Here’s a pull quote:

“I've finally gotten it down to 14 current games, so I'm not so overwhelmed anymore. Never got to play Yelena. Rob tried to put me on the team, but it was full, so he started a second CV team and I've been playing on it (I think you're on both of them). Yelena was slaughtering everybody in sight, wasn't she? I played one 2700 guy and got rolled up in both games, but I'm doing pretty well against the 2200-2300 crowd - a man's got to know his limitations!

I've just really gotten into this. I love CC and it's much better suited to my abilities. I'm too old & careless to play blitz or OTB well, but with CC, I have the time to dig in and actually analyze enough to be competent.”—Max Shepische.

But watch out!  If you post anything in that thread, the dread ‘Rob” might try to sign you up for a CV team!  Then there is “do you allow the Marshall Attack?” another thread asks readers what they want to read in CV columns, and people are still going on about the Pirc-Robatch.

4-5-2008

Chess News
USA and Canada


Goodbye,
Ruby Tuesday!

We’re goinna miss you...

I’m not sure if Chessville, in collaboration with Susan Polgar and Paul Truong, pulled the biggest chess April Fools spoof of all time last Tuesday April 1.

Where Was It?

Last Week's Where Was It: wasthe venerable old Hastings.  The traditional tournament there has been in need of financial support for several years, reports Stewart Reubin, and welcomes the financial support of the chess community.

But 1,000 phone calls, messages and e-mails in 24 hours, including from the NY Times, made us all give up the joke early. The song goes:

Sometimes you don’t know
what you got ‘til its gone
.

Sung by Melanie and also the Rolling Stones in the 60’s.

If Susan and Paul had needed to validate their work in chess here in the USA, I would say from that massive and immediate response that they just heard from everyone.  That is, everyone who actually cares for chess – and who does know ‘what they got’.

Congratulations America!

But there is a bigger joke – some elements of the ‘message’ were true!  But it is not this Parrot’s place to announce them.

And Goodbye Joel Channing.  Breaking news this weekend is that a USCF board member resigned April 4th, over apparent disputes with board president Bill Goichberg.  No official communiqué has yet been uttered, and this news is via ‘deep-rook’, a spy at HQ.

O Canada!  Chessville’s readership in Canada seems to have doubled over the past year [as it has in India] – so what about proposing yourself as a Canadian chess correspondent?  Currently you are outsourced to the lower 48!  And you can’t leave it to Monroi to do all the work.  Its OK, we understand hockey terms down here.

When Was It?

The first magazine devoted entirely to chess, founded by La Bourdonnais in 1836 was published in Paris, where he continued to edit LE PALAMÈDE until 1839, and then ceased publication because of his death. Saint-Amant and Joseph Méry revived it in 1841 and were joint editors until 1847, when it ceased publication.

A magazine with a similar name, Le Palamède Français, was published from 1864-65, edited by Paul Journoud, but had no connection with its famous predecessor.

The invention of chess was ascribed to Palamedes during the middle ages, which is presumably the reason behind the choice of the name of the magazines.

This extract from The Encyclopedia of Chess, Anne Sunnucks. 1970.

Chessville is also investigating correspondents from India and China to represent the vast number of players in those countries.

Self Esteem in Oregon

Here is an encouraging extract from: http://www.thebeenews.com/:

“These chess clubs are important, because they bring together children from all different backgrounds to play with one another.  Beyond that, when children learn how to play chess, they learn how to sit still, concentrate, and think ahead.”  And, kids also learn personal responsibility, added Young.  “They get the credit for their successes.  And, they can’t blame their losses on their family’s situation — or even on what they had for breakfast.  The ‘field is level’ for every child.  Winning at chess doesn’t take any special physical or mental skill — it takes concentration, and a will to succeed.”

The program goes far beyond developing young chess mavens, Young continued.  “As soon as a child joins the chess club, other students — and even some teachers — often think, ‘my gosh, they’re brilliant’.  It really increases their self-esteem when they get good at playing chess.  “Whether they achieve mastery of chess or not, kids who learn to play tend to do better in school.  As they improve at the game, many of them start taking their studies more seriously.  “We’re not really interested in creating chess masters in our after-school program. Our goal is to teach children skills that will carry forward in life.”

Krush wins 1st North American Match Challenge

With a last round victory against IM Lilit Mkrtchian of Armenia. The first three rounds ended with hard draws bringing the decision down to the final round. The final match score is 2.5 - 1.5.  All games can be replayed on the MonRoi World Databank of Chess at www.monroi.com/wdc.

North American Chess Association Announces:
9th North American FIDE Invitational
RESULTS - Chicago, IL - March 22 - March 28, 2008

10 players from around North America come together in the ultimate mental challenge with 7 of them in search of gaining their International Master titles bestowed by the World Chess Federation, FIDE.

1st Place - 7.0 / 9.0
FM Mehmed Pasalic - IM norm scored

2nd Place - 6.5 / 9.0
NM Marc Arnold - IM norm scored

3rd Place - 5.5 / 9.0
IM Mesgen Amanov

4th - 5th Place - 5.0 / 9.0
FM Raja Panjwani
FM Teddy Coleman

6th - 7th Place - 4.0 / 9.0
IM Angelo Young
FM Igor Tsyganov

8th - 9th Place - 3.0 / 9.0
IM Arjun Vishnuvardhan
FM Gauri Shankar

10th Place - 2.0 / 9.0
FM Albert Chow

Chess News WORLDWIDE

Chessville has attained its own correspondent to cover the biggest chess event of the year, the 2008 Olympiad in Dresden this summer with its own match reports, interviews, insider news, plus photo reports.

The Dutch Championship is taking place 2nd - 13th April. The participants are:  Sergei Tiviakov GM 2634, Daniel Stellwagen GM 2621, Erwin L'Ami GM 2600, Jan Smeets GM 2578, Sipke Ernst GM 2559, Friso Nijboer GM 2558, Dimitri Reinderman GM 2526, Ruud Janssen IM 2504, Yge Visser GM 2477, Jan-Willem De Jong IM 2474, Manuel Bosboom IM 2471, Daan Brandenburg IM 2435.

Nijboer is the early leader.

This is a category 12 event with average rating of 2536. [Cool logo is from a sponsor]  Official site.

Check out Chessville’s Forum

This week Dan Heisman wants to know when its OK, in your opinion, to be aggressive? I asked a Russian writer if he knows what the Sveshnikov is, since that’s what Russians call the Pelikan. And I asked him the same about the Petrov, which Russians call Russian Defence! Some people are discussing the Najdorf and comparing it with the Taimanov & yet another discussion relates contributions to opening theory by Tarrasch.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

What to Play? When the KID was really young, Continued from last week. Moves and commentary draw on The King Hunt in Chess, W. H. Cozens. 1970. This game continues with the puzzle posed last week, here is another snare – would you capture en passant in this position? Black has just played 18. …c5

Analysis: if 19.pxp ep or dc then 19…Qxd4! 20.Qxd4 Nf3+ and Nxd4 netting a whole piece.

19. Bxe5 Qxe5
20. Qb3 Rac8
21. Bb5 f5
22. Rae1 f4!
23. Qd7 Rbd8
24. gf Qxf4 
White has no time to capture the e pawn since black plays a few checks then takes over the e-file with Rde8.

25. Qe6+ Kh8
26 f3 Qg5+
27 Kh1 Rd6
28. Qh3
  Covering the threatened sector, black’s task is to expel the White Queen.

28. … Be5
29. Re2 Rdf6
30. Nd1 Rf4
31. Ne3
bringing the Knight within key range of key defensive squares – see diagram]

I must remind viewers that in the very next year the player of the white pieces, Alekhine, was to become World Champion – but the middle game was the forte of Yates, and he shuffles the world’s best around with magnificent economy.

31. … Rh4
32. Qe6
[ejected! But there is no option, if Qg2 then Rxh2.]
32. … Qh5 [threatening a mate in 4 after Rxh2+]
33. Ng4 [which holds everything! Doesn’t it?]

33. …Rxg4 [Cozens say this is an intuitive sacrifice against no less than Alekhine, I wonder if he gives Yates enough credit?]
34. fg Rxf1
35. Kg2 Qxh2+
[remember the title of Cozen’s book, which is not ‘win a rook’ but ‘The King Hunt…’]
36. Kxf1 Qh1+
37. Kf2 Bd4+
38. Kg3 Qg1+
39. Kh3 Qf1+
40. Rg2 Qh1
41. Kg3 +
[mate in 5 follows Rh2, can you see it after Qf3+]
41. …Qe8+
42. Kh3
[forced] g5!

43. Rc2 [making luft for the King, and the only square available to the Rook, but which is undefended… allowing]
43. … Qf1+
44. Kh2
[if Rg2 mate in 4] Qg1+
45. Kh3 Qh1+
46. Kg3
[big shuffle, but what now?]

46. … Qd1!!
47. Rc3 Qg1+
[Yates doesn’t want the horrible rook! That Bishop is beautiful, besides, this is a King Hunt!]
48. Kh3 Qf1+
49. Kg3 Bf2+
50. Kf3 Bg1+
51. Kg3 Qf2+
52. Kh3 Qf2++

Not bad for a KID.


More Alekhine's Parrot Archives

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

 

 


The
Chessville
Chess Store

 

Advertisement


Reference
Center

 

The Chessville
 Weekly
The Best Free

Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives


Discussion
Forum


Chess Links


Chess Rules


Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.

Copyright 2002-2009 Chessville.com unless otherwise noted.