Chessville
...by Chessplayers, for Chessplayers!
Today is


Site Map

Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints

 

 


 


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

 

 


News & Notes 3
By ICCF GM Yoav Dothan

This column contains five game from the GM tournament in Biel, and four correspondence games that I received with notes from the winners.  I add the invitation letter of the German Correspondence Chess Federation to the next ICCF World Cup.

I will be happy to get comments or analyzed games – you can mail them directly to yoavchess@gmail.com.


                    
 

Bruzon,L (2667) - Carlsen,M (2675) [A39]
GM Biel SUI (4), 27.07.2006

After 35 moves the game reached this position:








Carlsen could play 35...Nc3 36.Bxe8 Nxe4 37.Rxe4 Kxe8 and reach a position that wins a pawn and maybe the game, for example: 38.Re2 Qa1+ 39.Qg1 Qxg1+ 40.Kxg1 Rxg3+  White has a horrible pawn structure and he is minus one pawn.  Instead Carlsen chose 35...Rc8 36.Bc4 Qf5 37.Bb3 e6 38.Kg1 Rc3 39.Qh4 Nf6 40.R4e3 Rxe3 41.Rxe3 Ra8 42.Re2 Qb1+ 43.Kg2 Qd3 44.Rxe6 Nd5 45.Re1 Ne3+ 46.Rxe3 Qxe3 47.Qf6 Qe2+ 48.Kg1 Qe1+ 49.Kg2 Qe2+ ½–½
 

Radjabov,T (2728) - Pelletier,Y (2583) [B47]
GM Biel SUI (7), 31.07.2006

After 37 moves the game reached:








Black played 37...Rd6 and the game soon ended 38.f5 dxe6 39.Rxh6 Ke7 40.Rxe6+ Rxe6 41.fxe6 Kxe6 ½–½

Could he make the whole point by playing 37...d6 38.Rxh6 Ke7 39.Kb2 Rf5 40.Rh4 Kxe6?  I think that Black can win this ending.
 

Morozevich,A (2731) - Carlsen,M (2675) [B30]
GM Biel SUI (7), 31.07.2006

After 26 moves the game reached a position where Morozevich has a strong position:








Morozevich could play 27.b4 Bb6 28.Qe2 Bf7 29.c5 Bc7 30.Bg5 fxg5 31.Rxf7 and thus maintain a small advantage but instead chose 27.Bg7? and Carlsen did not miss his chance to turn the outcome of the game: 27...Bg4 28.b4 Be3 29.h3 Rd1 30.Rxd1 Rxd1+ 31.Kh2 Bf4+ 32.g3 Rd2+ 33.Qxd2 Bxd2 34.hxg4 Bxb4 35.Bxf6 a5 36.Kg2 Kd7 37.Kf3 Bd6 38.Ke4 Bxg3 39.Kd3 Ke6 40.Bd4 a6 41.Kc2 a4 42.Kb1 Be5 43.Bf2 Kd6 44.Ka2 Bc3 45.Ka3 Ke5 46.Kxa4 Kf4 47.Bb6 Kxg4 48.Ba5 Bxa5 49.Kxa5 Kf4 50.Kb6 a5 0–1
 

Morozevich,A (2731) - Radjabov,T (2728) [B30]
GM Biel SUI (4), 27.07.2006








After 34 moves White could play now Rg4 or Re7 and get a strong advantage for example:  35.Rg4 Nd3 36.Rxg5 Qxg5 37.Qxg5 hxg5 38.Re8 Bf5 39.Bd1 Bd7 40.Rd8 Nf4 41.Bc2+ g6 42.h4 and White is much better.

The game continued 35.f4 Rxd5 36.Qd8 Rd2 37.Qxc8 Rxc2 38.Re8 Qf5 39.Rh8+ Kg6 and the position is equal.








White could continue 40.Qc6 for example.

40.Qg8 Kh5 41.Qe8 Qd7 42.Qe3 Qf5 43.Qf3+ Kg6 44.Qc6








Within a few moves we see that Black's position is deteriorating.  What could he play?  Maybe 40...Nd3?  Also here 44...Nd3 seems better.

44...Ne6 45.Rd1 Rxb2 (relatively better is Re2) 46.Rxd6 Re7 (relatively better is 46...Re2)








Another possibility was to play: 47.Rd5 Rxg2+ 48.Kxg2 Qe4+ 49.Kg1 Qb1+ 50.Kf2 Qc2+ 51.Kf1 with a large advantage.

47.Re8 Kf7 48.Rxe7+ Kxe7








Here White could save himself a few hours and more then 40 moves, and win at once with 49.Rd5 Rxg2+ (or ...Qc2 50.Rd7+ Kf6 51.Bh4+ g5 52.fxg5+ hxg5 53.Qf3+ ) 50.Kxg2 Qe4+ 51.Kf2 Qc2+ 52.Kf3 Kf7 53.Rd7+

49.Qd7+ Kf6 50.Bh4+ g5 51.fxg5+ hxg5 52.Qd8+ Kg6 53.Qg8+ Kf6 54.Bxg5+ Ke5








Another chance to shorten the game comes again:

55.Qb8 Rxg2+ 56.Kxg2 Qxg5+ 57.Kh1 Qf5 58.Qxb5+ Kf6 59.Qxf5+ Kxf5 60.Rc6

55.Rd2 Rxd2 56.Bxd2 Qd3 57.Be1 Qe3 58.Bg3+ Kf6 59.Bh4+ Ke5 60.Qb8+ Ke4 61.Qxb5 Qxc3 62.Qc6+ Ke5 63.Qxa4 Nd4 64.Qe8+ Kd5 65.Qd7+ Ke4 66.Qh7+ Nf5 67.Qb7+ Ke5 68.Qb5+ Ke6








Another chance to shorten the game with a nice series of moves with the queen arrived in move 69:

69.Qe8+ Kd5 70.Qa8+ Kd6 71.Qf8+ Ke6 72.Qg8+ Kd6 73.Qg6+ Kc7 74.Qxf5

69.Qc6+ Nd6 70.Bg3 Qxa3 71.h4 Qd3 72.h5 Qd5 73.Qxd5+ Kxd5 74.Bf4 c3 75.g4 c2 76.Kg3 Ne4+ 77.Kf3 Nf6 78.Bd2 Ke6 79.Kf4 Nd5+ 80.Kg5 Nf6 81.Bc1 Kf7 82.Kf5 Nd5 83.g5 Ne7+ 84.Ke5 Nc6+ 85.Ke4 Ne7 86.Kf3 Ke6 87.Kg4 Kf7 88.Bb2 Ke6 89.g6 Ng8 90.Kg5 Nf6 91.h6 Ne4+ 92.Kh4 1–0
 

I next bring you three games sent to me by GM Turkov.  Most of the comments are his, I just added a few of my own.  The first game is a fine example of a win in the endgame stage:
 

Turkov,V (2457) - Ohtake,S (2596) [C43]
EM/GMN/004 ICCF Email, 25.06.2002

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 Nc6

A rare and rather dangerous move in Correspondence Chess.  The usual move is 4...d5.

5.Bxe4 d5 6.Nxe5 dxe4 7.Nxc6 bxc6 8.O-O Bd6 9.Nc3 f5 10.Qh5+ g6 11.Qh6 Bf8 12.Qe3 Bg7 13.Rd1 O-O








The opening phase leaves Black with a nice position.

14.Qg3 Rb8 15.Rb1 Rb4 16.Ne2 Ba6 17.Bd2 Rb7 18.Nf4








18...Bc4 19.b3 Bf7 would bring the bishop to a better position.  20.Ne2 Re8 21.Bf4 Qe7 22.h4 h6 23.Be5 Bxe5 24.dxe5 Qxe5 25.Qe3.

18...Qd6 19.b3 Re8 20.Be3 Rbb8 21.c4 Bb7 22.h4 Qe7 23.h5 g5 24.h6! Bxh6 25.Nh3 Qg7 26.Bxg5 Bxg5 27.Qxg5 Qxg5 28.Nxg5 Rbd8 29.Nh3 Rd6 30.Rb2








I think that Black should be able to draw the game, for example:  30...Kf7 31.Nf4 Rh6 32.g3 Rg8 33.d5 Ke7

30...c5 31.d5 c6 32.Nf4 Kf7 33.b4 cxb4 34.c5 (34.Rxb4 Rd7 35.d6 c5) 34...Rd7 35.d6 a5 36.a3 bxa3 37.Ra2








Maybe 37...Re5 38.Rc1 Bc8 39.Rxa3 Ra7 40.Kf1 a4 is best here.

37...Ra8 38. Rxa3 Bc8 39. f3 Kf6 40. Kf2 Rb7 41. Ke3 Ke5 42. Rd4 exf3 43. Nd3+ Kf6 44. gxf3 Bd7 45. Rda4 Rb5 46. Kd4 Be6 47. Ne5 Bb3 48. Nxc6 Bxa4 49. Rxa4 Ke6 50.Kc4 Rb1 51. Nd4+ Ke5 52. f4+ Ke4 53. Ne2 Re1 54.Nc3+ Kxf4 55. Kd5+ Kg3 56. c6 h5 57. d7 Ree8 58. c7 h4 59. Ne2+ Kf2 60. dxe8=Q Rxe8 61. Nf4 Rc8 62. Kd6 Kf3 63. Kd7 Rg8 64. c8=Q Rxc8 65. Kxc8 1-0
 

Turkov v (2487) - Aronov I. (2438) [B06]
RCCA-10 B, 2004

1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nf3 d6 4.Be2 c5 5.c3 Qc7 6.O-O Nf6 7.Re1 O-O 8.Nbd2 Nc6 9.d5 Ne5 10.Nxe5 dxe5 11.Qc2 e6 12.c4 b6 13.b3 Ne8 14.Bb2 Nd6 15.f4 exf4 16.Bxg7 Kxg7








White is creating a strong pawn on d6.

17.e5 Nf5 18.d6 Qd7 19.Ne4 Bb7 20.Nf6 Qc8 21.Qd3 Ne3 22.Rf1

22.Bf1 Rh8 23.Re2 Qc6

22...Nxf1

22...Nxg2 23.Qh3 h6 (I would play Rh8 -YD) 24.Rf2 Ne3 25.Rxf4 Nf5 26.Bd3

23.Rxf1 f3

23...Bc6 24.Rxf4

24.Bxf3 Bxf3 25.Qxf3 h6 26.h4 Qd8 27.Qg3 a6 28.Rf4








28...Rg8

Trying other moves here fails too – for example:

28...b5 fails to 29.Rg4 Qa5 30.h5 Kh8 31.hxg6 fxg6 32.Rxg6 Qd2 33.d7; or 28...Rh8 29.h5 g5 30.Rg4 Rh7 31.Qd3 Rh8 32.Qe3 Rh7 33.Qe4 Rh8 34.Qf4

29.Rg4 (29.Nxg8 Qxg8) Qf8 30.Qe3 Rb8 31.Rg3 a5 32.Qe4 Kh8 33.h5 1-0









 

Turkov,V - Eliseev,E [B22]
FKR-1/4, 1999

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.c3 Nf6 4.e5 Nd5 5.d4 cxd4 6.cxd4 d6 7.Nc3 dxe5 8.dxe5 Ndb4 9.a3 Qxd1+ 10.Kxd1 Na6 11.b4 Nc7 12.Nb5 Nd5 {better is ...Nxb5} 13.Bc4 Bg4








14.Bg5

When analyzing correspondence chess games there is always a problem: you know that (in this example) GM Turkov spent many hours of thought on this position, sometimes it can be even days.  Why did he not play 14.Bxd5?  Or 14.Ke2?  This is relatively a small matter, but in complex positions it is very difficult to understand as the outsider will never spend even a small fraction of the time that the players spent on the original game (at a pace of 60 days per 10 moves, or a "blitz" pace of 30 days for 10 moves!)

14...Nxe5

14...a6 15.Bxd5 axb5 16.Ke2 e6 17.Bxc6+ bxc6 is also an option.

14... Bxf3+ 15.gxf3 a6 16.Bxd5 axb5 17.Ke2 e6 18.Be4; or

14... O-O-O 15. Nd6+ exd6 16. Bxd8 Nf4 17. Bg5 Nxg2 18. Be2 dxe5 19.Rg1

15.Bxd5 O-O-O 16.Rc1+ Kb8 17.Kc2 Rxd5 18.Nxe5 Rxb5 19.Nxf7 Rg8 20.Bf4+ Ka8








White decides to exchange his rook VS the black bishop, maybe the most active black piece.

21.Rhd1 (21.h3) Bxd1+ 22.Rxd1 a5

22...b6 23.Rd8+ Kb7 24.Rd7+ Kc6 25.Rd3 Kb7 26.Nd8+ Kc8 27.Ne6 a5 28.Rd8+

23.Rd8+ Ka7 24.Ne5 axb4 25.a4 Rc5+ 26.Kb3 b6 27.Nd7 Ra5

27...Rf5 28.Be3 Kb7 29.g4 Rf7 30.Kxb4 e6+ 31.Kb5 or 29.Kc4 Rd6 30.Rb8+ Kc7 31.Rxf8 Rxf8 32.Nxf8 Rc6+ 33.Kxb4 h6

28.Be3 Kb7 29.Rb8+ Kc6 30.Nxf8 Kc7 31.Re8 Kc6 1-0








A possible continuation could be 32.Rd8 Kb7 33.Ne6 Rxd8 34.Nxd8+ Ka6 35.Nc6 Rh5 36.h3 Kb7 37.Nd4 Rd5 38.Kc4 b3 but Black decided to resign even though the win is still not trivial.
 

DOTHAN Yoav (ISR) - JÄDERHOLM Bo (FIN)
NPSF 60GM email 2005

Most of the comments were written by Mr. Jäderholm.

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6








6.Be3

  1. 6.Bc4 e6 7.Bb3 b5 8.0-0 =+ Ketola,V - Jäderholm,B, 4.email FIN-ch 2004.

  2. 6.Be2 e5 7.Nb3 Be7 8.0-0 Be6 9.f4 Qc7 10.Kh1 0-0 11.f5 Bd7 +=, Jäderholm,B - Arppi,H 4.email FIN-ch 2004.

  3. 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Be7 8.Qf3 Qc7 9.0-0-0 Nbd7 10.Bd3 b5 11.Rhe1 Bb7 12.Qg3 b4 13.Nd5 exd5 14.exd5 Kd8 15.Nc6+ Bxc6 16.dxc6 Nc5 17.Bh4 Kg8 18.Bxh7 (18.Bf5 Qxc6 19.Bxh7 Re8 20.Rxe7 Rxe7 21.Qxg7 Rxh7 22.Qxf7 Ra7 23.Qxh7 Qe4 24.Qxe4 Nxe4 25.Rd4 Kc8 26.Bxe7 Rxe7 (+- ?) (1/2-1/2 33 moves) Jäderholm,B-Sferle,M, ICCF XVII Ol.Prel. Sec 2, Board 4 2005) 18. - Rh8 19.Qxg7 Rxh7 20.Qxf6 Rxh4 21.Qxf7 Rh8 22.Re5 Rf8 23.Qg7 b3 24.axb3 Nxb3 25.cxb3 Qxc6+ 26.Kb1 =+ (1/2-1/2 82 moves) Atakisi,U - Jäderholn,B, 2.email Ol.turn.Sec.2.
    Board 4 , 2005.]

6...e5 7.Nb3 Be7 8.f3 Be6 9.Qd2 Nbd7 10.g4 0-0 11.0-0-0 Qc7 12.Kb1 b5 13.g5 Nh5 14.Nd5 Bxd5 15.exd5 Nb6 16.Rg1 Rac8

16...g6 17.h4 Rab8 18.f4 Nc4 =+ Kristol,Luba - Jäderholm,B, NPSF 60GM email 2005; 16...Rab8 17.N5 Nxd5 18.Qxd5 = Acs,P - Womacka,M, Pardubice Chech op 2005

17.Na5 g6

17...Nxd5 18.Qxd5 Qxa5 = Kraamnik,V - Vallejo Pons,F , Amber-rapid 2004

18.Bh3








18.h4 Nxd5 19.Qxd5 Qxa5 20.c4 Nf4 21.Bxf4 exf4 (position not quite clear but nearly =), Bologan,V - Vllejo Pons,F, Selfoss Milk Masters 2003.  I agree with Mr. Jäderholm's evaluation, the position is almost equal.

18...Rb8 19.Rg4

19.Bg4 Nc4 20.Nxc4 bxc4 21.c3 Rb5 22.Bxh5 gxh5 (position not quite clear but ½-½ in 32 moves) Quezada,Y - Qun Zhe, Wch U 20, Kochin 2004

19...Rbe8 20.Bf1 f5 21.Rg1 Rc8 22.Nc6 Rfe8 23.Rc1 Kh8 24.c4 bxc4 25.Bxc4 Nxc4 26.Rxc4 f4 =








YD – the other move I considered was 27.Bf2 Qd7 28.Qd3 Qh3 29.Rc2 Bf8 30.Qe2 Ng7 31.Rgc1

27.Qc3 Qd7 28.Bb6 Bf8

28.Qf5+ 29.Qc2 Ng7 (position not quite clear)

29.Qd3 Ng7 30.Rc3 Ra8 31.Qc2 Kg8 32.h4 Qh3 33.Bf2 Nf5 34.Qd1 Bg7 25.Rb3 a5 36.Qf1 Qxf1+ 37.Rxf1 e4 38.fxe4 Rxe4 39.Re1 Rae8 40Rxe4 Rxe4 41.Rb8+ Kf7 42.Nd8+ Ke7 42.Nc6+ Kf7 44.Ne8+ ½-½









The International Correspondence Chess Federation is delighted to announce that the German Correspondence Chess Federation will be the main organizer of the next ICCF World Cup Tournament:

The tournament will be played in three stages.  The Preliminary section will be played via postal and is expected to start on 15.12.2006.  Registration will begin upon receipt of this announcement and will close on 15.10.2006 to allow for pairings.  All chess players are warmly invited to participate to this event.  It will be possible for any player to apply for multiple entries during the preliminary stage.  The preliminary section via postal is expected to be finished no later than 15.06.2010.

Preliminary stage: Each section will consist of 7-11 players.  Every participant will play one game against each other player of his section (round robin tournament).  The winners of each section will qualify for the semi-final stage.  Other qualifications will depend upon the number of entries in the preliminary stage.  If two or more players share first place in the section, the qualification will be decided according to ICCF rules through the Sonneborn-Berger system.

Pairings for the semi-final and final stages will be announced later, depending upon the number of entries and the form of play selected by the applicants in the preliminaries.

Allocation of players in the preliminary and semi-final stages will be made as random as possible; however, geographical distribution as well as achievement of reasonable equality of the average rating will be taken into account.  In addition, those players who qualified for World Cup XIII and XIV finals will also be entitled to play in the semi-final stage of World Cup XV and the winner of WC XIV final will be eligible to participate in World Cup Final XV.

Although the number of preliminary groups for each player is unlimited, no player will be allowed to qualify for more than two semi-final sections or for more than one place in the final.

Winners of preliminary and semi-final stages will receive book prizes.  A cash prize of one thousand (1000) Swiss Francs will be awarded to the winner of World Cup XV, with a trophy and gold medal.  There will also be prizes of six hundred (600) Swiss Francs to the silver medalist and four hundred (400) Swiss Francs to the bronze medalist.  The above prize money is subject to the formal approval of the ICCF Congress 2006 in Dresden.

The following qualifications can be achieved in the final:

- The winner of the World Cup Final XV will qualify for the Final of the next World Cup Tournament (ICCF Tournament Rules, Article 3.6) and will gain the IM title (ICCF Tournament Rules, Article 8.6.c).

- All participants in the final will qualify for the semi-final of the next World Cup Tournament (ICCF Tournament Rules, Article 3.6)

- The top two finishers in the Final will qualify for the Candidates’ Tournament of the World CC Championship when the category of the final is VII or above (ICCF Tournament Rules, Article 1.3.1.e).

- All participants in the final who score at least 60% of the possible points and/or top two finishers (when the category of the final is XI or below) will qualify for the semi-final of the World Cup CC Championship (ICCF Tournament Rules, Article 1.2.2.e).

The German Correspondence Chess Federation has appointed:

Hartmut Höbel
Birkenstr. 3
29699 Bomlitz
Email: hoebel-bomlitz@t-online.de
Phone: 049 (0)5161-4642
Fax: 049 (0)5161-941594

Herr Höbel has been selected as Central Tournament Leader (CTL) of this tournament. He will be assisted by a team of Tournament Directors (TD). The appeal instances are the ICCF Appeals Commission (Playing Rules) for cases concerning the application of ICCF Playing Rules and the ICCF Appeals Commission (Other ICCF Rules) for cases concerning the application of Tournament Rules, Code of Conduct and any other rules matters not covered elsewhere.

Entries (including the ID-number from the ICCF rating system, name, e-mail address) should be submitted via National CC Federations.

Entry fee for National Federations is 20 CHF per player. The Direct Entry fee is calculated based on method of payment and currency used. The actual DE total will be presented to the player during his/her registration process.

Applications via National Correspondence Chess Federations must reach the CTL not later than 15.10.2006, preferably by e-mail. We ask that first applications be sent as soon as possible and thereafter on a weekly basis.

We wish all participants many interesting games and new links with CC friends in other countries based on the spirit of friendship and the ICCF motto:

AMICI SUMUS
Frank Geider
World Tournament Director
Valer-Eugen Demian
Non-Title Tournaments Commissioner
Hartmut Höbel
Central Tournament Leader
 


                    
 

News and Notes 1
News and Notes 2

 


The
Chessville
Chess Store

 

Reference
Center

 

The Chessville
 Weekly
The Best Free

Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives


Discussion
Forum


Chess Links


Chess Rules


Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.

Copyright 2002-2009 Chessville.com unless otherwise noted.