Chessville
...by Chessplayers, for Chessplayers!
Today is


Site Map

If you have disabled Java for your browser, use the Site Map (linked in the header and footer).

Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.



From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

 

 

Chess Instruction

Tigerchess


GM Nigel Davies

Chess Mentoring Services

There is no quick fix to mastering chess so Nigel takes a long-term approach to mentoring, individually tailoring his guidance to each student's needs and available time. Several students have studied with Nigel for more than a decade, experiencing considerable growth in their game during this time.  "Chess improvement can be a time consuming job and prove especially difficult for those with lives outside the game.  For this reason my books, DVDs and mentoring services are aimed at enabling players to improve their results as much as possible in the least amount of time."

Study Your Games

"The problem I had to acknowledge was the stagnation of my development.  I was simply going nowhere.  It's not that I lacked experience - I was 28 years old then, and I had been playing chess for some 20 years up to that point - it was a rather sad realization that my game was not improving.  In search for inspiration I decided to follow the most common advice one can find in the works of Alekhine (my favorite player) and Botvinnik (one of my least favorite ones) which can be put into simple words - study your games.  Ever since, every game I played has been extensively annotated."
- Alex Yermolinsky (The Road To Chess Improvement, Gambit 1999)

Wise words from Yermolinsky who raised his game from being an also-ran to one of the strongest players in the world.  Yet despite this, and the fact that two of the greatest champions have recommended this form of study, how many people actually do it?  They persist in the belief that there is some short cut to success, such as buying a book or video on a particular opening.

Rather than procrastinate about the benefits of these studies, I feel I should do something myself to set an example.  I have not been analyzing my games much during the last few years, but I think it would be good to start doing so again.  So here are my games from the 2002 Chorley Open.

If you examine the notes carefully you may be surprised at how many mistakes I made; yet this is the ugly reality of most chess games when you look closely enough.

The previous week I had a disastrous tournament in the Blackpool Quickplay, probably because of rust more than anything else.  The following week I played quite a lot of blitz on the internet, but even at Chorley I started quite shakily.  How could I have played this game better?  The first step might be in playing an opening which is more ambitious and threatens to gain some space.  My poor attempt to avoid a draw later in the game could easily have resulted in disaster....

Peacock,M - Davies,N
Chorley Open, 2002 Rd 1

1.c4 e5 2.g3

I did not know anything about my opponent, but when he played this it occurred to me that he might want to play like Lund. The Preston school.....

2...c6 3.d4 Bb4+








Aiming for a kind of Old Indian set-up but without the dark-square bishop which is how Khenkin played against me some years ago.

The alternative is 3...exd4 which the books I've seen claim is slightly better for White after 4.Qxd4 d5 5.Bg2 Nf6 6.Nf3 Be7 7.cxd5 cxd5 8.0-0 0-0 9.Be3 Nc6 10.Qa4 etc.  It probably isn't that easy.

4.Bd2 Bxd2+ 5.Qxd2 d6 6.Nc3 Qe7 7.Bg2 Nf6








8.e3

Against Khenkin I played 8.e4.  The set up White adopts here was recommended in Kosten's "Dynamic English".

8...0-0 9.Nge2 Re8 10.0-0

In view of Black's reply, it may be slightly premature to castle.  Kosten recommended 10.h3 Nbd7 which transposes into Dorfman - Razuvaev, Burgas 1992.  The game continued 11.g4 Nb6 12.b3 a5 13.0-0 a4 14.Rae1 axb3 15.axb3 d5 16.c5 Nbd7 17.Ng3 Nf8 18.g5 N6d7 19.f4 e4 20.Nf5 Qd8 21.Nd6 with a crushing position.

10...e4 11.h3








And here the immediate 11.Rae1 is probably better in order to try and play f3 without first going h3.  In the game White's king is weak, a nagging factor in the subsequent play.

11...Nbd7 12.Rae1 Nf8 13.f3 exf3 14.Rxf3 Ne6 15.e4 h6 16.Nf4 Ng5 17.Rfe3








Reaching an 'ideal' position, the only problem with this ideal being that it cannot easily be improved.  Black meanwhile can do quite a lot.

17...Bd7 18.Kh2

Trying to improve his pieces, but they are already on the best squares.  He should play 18.e5 which looks fairly equal after 18...dxe5 19.Rxe5 Qb4 20.Rxe8+ Rxe8 21.Rxe8+ Nxe8 22.b3 etc.

18...Rad8 19.Qe2 Bc8 20.Nd3








White is unable to take the required central action and his 'ideal' pieces start to move back.  He should still play 20.e5 after which 20...dxe5 21.Rxe5 Qf8 is still fairly even.

20...Qc7 21.Nf2 Re7 22.Qd1 Rde8 23.h4 Ne6 24.Bh3 Qb6 25.d5 Nc5








I also considered 25...cxd5 and rejected it, but did not see that 26.Na4 Qb4 (or 26...Qd4) 27.exd5 pins the knight on e6 against the rook on e7.

26.Bxc8 Rxc8 27.dxc6 bxc6 28.b3

After 28.Qxd6?! there would follow 28...Rd7 29.Qf4 Qxb2 with White under serious pressure.

28...Re6 29.e5 dxe5 30.Rxe5 Rd8








I spent some time trying to make 30...Rxe5 31.Rxe5 Nxb3 work but after 32.Ng4 the best Black has is 32...Nxg4+ 33.Qxg4 Qf2+ with a draw by perpetual check.

31.Qc2 Red6 32.Nce4

32.Qf5 is a very reasonable alternative.

32...Ncxe4 33.Nxe4 Ng4+ 34.Kh3








34...Rg6??

This attempt to complicate matters could have ended in tears.  Objectively speaking Black should play 34...Nxe5 after which 35.Nxd6 Qd4 36.Qf5 Qxd6 37.Rxe5 is drawish.

35.Re7 Qb4

After 35...Qa5 White has 36.Ng5! as in the game, and the attempt to reinforce the knight on g4 with 35...f5 is powerfully answered by 36.c5 followed by Ne4-d6.

36.h5??

What I had missed in playing 34...Rg6 was that White could now go 36.Ng5! hxg5 37.Re8+ Rxe8 38.Rxe8+ Kh7 39.h5 winning the exchange.  Now the position becomes simplified but with White's king very weak.

36...Qxe7 37.hxg6








37...Ne5?

Another error.  Black can and should play the cold-blooded 37...f5! after which 38.Re2 (38.Qe2? Qxe4 39.Qxe4 Nf2+ wins a piece.) 38...fxe4 39.Kxg4 Qe6+ 40.Kh4 Rd3 is winning for Black.

38.gxf7+ Qxf7 39.Qe2 Qg6 40.Rf1 Re8 41.Rf4

41.Kg2 is probably better after which 41...Ng4 (41...Qe6 42.Re1) 42.Rf4 holds.

41...Kh8








42.Qd1??

Only after this is White actually losing. 42.Kg2 was correct with nothing special for Black.

42...Qe6+ 43.Kh2 g5!








Winning material.  At least I play the endgame reasonably well.

44.Nxg5 hxg5 45.Qh5+ Kg7 46.Qxg5+ Qg6 47.Qxg6+ Kxg6 48.c5 Rd8 49.Ra4 Rd7 50.Kg2 Kf5 51.Kf1 Ke6 52.Rh4 Kd5 53.b4 Rf7+ 54.Ke2 Rf3 55.a4 Rxg3 56.Rh7 Rg4 57.Rb7 a5 58.b5 Rxa4 59.bxc6 Nxc6 60.Kd2 Kxc5 61.Kc3 Ra3+ 62.Kb2 Rh3 63.Ka2 Nb4+ 0-1

After 64.Kb2 there follows 64...Kc4 65.Rc7+ Kb5 66.Rb7+ Ka4 67.Ra7 Rh2+ 68.Kb1 Kb3 etc.
 

Davies,N - Lin Chin Lee
Chorley Open, 2002 Rd 2

1.c4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.g3 Nf6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.0-0 0-0 6.d4 b6 7.cxd5 exd5 8.Nc3 Bb7 9.Qc2 Nbd7








9...Na6 is better in these positions.  The move played is rather passive.

10.Bf4 c6 11.Rad1 Re8 12.Ne5








Due to Black's passive treatment of the opening White is already threatening e2-e4.  He resolves to at least try and drive my knight from e5.

12...Nh5 13.Bc1 Bd6 14.f4








Played after a long think, but inconsequential.  The natural move is 14.e4! which took a lot of analysis to wrongly reject!  My fear was that after 14...Nxe5 15.dxe5 Rxe5 the position would tend towards drawish simplifications but in fact White maintains a powerful initiative after 16.exd5 cxd5 (16...Qd7 17.dxc6 Bxc6 18.Ne4 is very strong.) 17.Nxd5 Rc8 18.Qd3 (After 18.Qb3 Black has an important resource in 18...Ba6) 18...Rc5 19.Nxb6! Bxg2 20.Qxd6 Qxd6 21.Rxd6 Bc6 22.Nc8! a5 23.Rd8+ Be8 24.Be3 followed by 25.Nd6 with a winning endgame.

During my cogitations I was even considering 14.g4?! Nhf6 15.g5 Nh5 16.Nxf7 Kxf7 17.Qxh7 but noticed that this would open lines for Black's pieces after 17...Nhf6 (the post mortem revealed 17...Rh8! 18.Qf5+ Nhf6 which is much stronger) 18.gxf6 Nxf6 19.Qf5 Rh8 with Black taking the initiative.

14...Nhf6 15.Kh1?

This may look deep, but at this stage I was confusing myself already.  If White insists on playing this position slowly, the immediate 15.e3 looks better, but once again it seems that 15.e4! is strong.  I rejected this because of 15...dxe4 16.Nxe4 Nxe4 17.Bxe4 Nf6 18.Bxc6 Rc8 (18...Qc7 19.Ba4) missing the fact that 19.Nxf7! Kxf7 (or 19...Rxc6 20.Qb3) 20.Qb3+ wins back the piece with interest.

15...Rc8

There is nothing wrong with the immediate 15...c5, for example 16.dxc5 Nxc5 (16...Bxc5 17.Nxd5 Bxd5 18.Bxd5 Nxe5 19.fxe5 Nxd5 20.Qf5) 17.Nxd5 Bxe5 18.Nxf6+ Qxf6 19.Bxb7 Nxb7 20.fxe5 Qxe5 21.Rd7 Nc5 22.Rdxf7 Qd5+ followed by ...Qxa2 is fine for Black.

16.Qf5!?